Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ijomev8n1 01 PDF
Ijomev8n1 01 PDF
Abstract
In this article, we will present an alternative proof of the Sine and Cosine series
using the Laplace Transform. Looking for different tests in Mathematics is very
motivating for students in Mathematics because it allows to use other ideas and
concepts, and sometimes can bring simpler solutions.
1. Introduction
Recently the Binomial Theorem was demonstrated using the Laplace Transform method-
ology (see [2]). In this work we will prove that the infinite Sine and Cosine series can
also be proved using the Laplace transform together with the integration by parts. To
arrive at this first we will present the analytical definitions of the Sine and Cosine func-
tion.
Proposition 1.1. The Sine function by the Taylor series around x = 0:
∞
x2n+1 x3 x5 x7
sin(x) = ∑ (−1)n (2n + 1)! = x − 3! + 5! − 7! + · · · ; ∀x ∈ R (1.1)
n=0
2 Julio Cesar Mohnsam and Ricardo Capiberibe Nunes
Proposition 1.2. The Cosine function is defined by the Taylor formula around x = 0:
∞
x2n x2 x4 x6
cos(x) = ∑ (−1)n (2n)!
= 1 − + − + · · · ; ∀x ∈ R
2! 4! 6!
(1.2)
n=0
2. Preliminaries
Now let us recall some important concepts for the deductions of said series.
Proposition 2.1. The Laplace Transformation of a function f (t), defined for all real
numbers t ≥ 0, is the function F(s), which is a unilateral transformation defined by
Z ∞
L [ f (t)](s) = f (t)e−st dt (2.3)
0
Lemma 2.3. (Integration by Parts). Let f and g be real functions which are contin-
uous on the closed interval [a, b]. Let f and g have primitives F and G respectively on
[a, b].
Then: Z b Z b
f (t)G(t)dt = [F(t)G(t)]ba − F(t)g(t)dt (2.5)
a a
u = cost, du = − sintdx;
−e−st
dv = e−st dt, v = .
s
−st ∞
−e 1 ∞ 1 1 ∞
Z Z
−st
L [cost](s) = cost − (sint)e dt = − (sint)e−st dt
s 0 s 0 s s 0
−st ∞
1 1 −e 1 ∞ 1 1 ∞
Z Z
−st
L [cost](s) = − sint + (cost)e dt = − 2 (cost)e−st dt
s s s 0 s 0 s s 0
..
.
∞
1 1 1 1 1
L [cost](s) = − 3
+ 5
− 7
+ · · · = ∑ (−1)k 2k+1
s s s s k=0 s
Now let’s apply the inverse Laplace transform
" #
∞
1
cost = L −1 {L [cost]}(t) = L −1 ∑ (−1)k s2k+1 (t)
k=0
t 2k
∞ ∞
−1 k 1
= ∑L (−1) 2k+1 (t) = ∑ (−1)k
k=0 s k=0 (2k)!
−e−st
u = sint, du = costdx; dv = e−st dt, v = .
s
−st ∞
−e 1 ∞ 1 1
Z
L [sint](s) = sint + (cost)e−st dt = 0 + L [cost](s) = L [cost](s)
s 0 s 0 s s
From the previous integration in the cosine part we have
1 1 1 1 1 1
L [sint](s) = L [cost](s) = − + − +···
s s s s3 s5 s7
∞
1 1 1 1 1
= 2 − 4 + 6 − 8 + · · · = ∑ (−1)k 2k+2
s s s s k=0 s
4 Julio Cesar Mohnsam and Ricardo Capiberibe Nunes
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the teachers of the Mathematics Coordination of the IF-SUL
Campus Pelotas for their comments.
References
[1] S. Lipschutz, Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables. Schaum’s Outline
Series, McGraw-Hill, 3rd ed, p. 183.
[2] K. Kataria, An Alternate Proof of the Binomial Theorem, The American Mathemat-
ical Monthly, Vol 123 - Month 11. 2016, p. 940.