Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case SummarySesinando Merida Vs
Case SummarySesinando Merida Vs
%onente&
Justice Antonio T. Carpio
'acts&
On 23 December 1998, Oscar Tansiongco learned that esinando !erida had cut a narra tree inhis
propert" in !a"od, #rg". $pil, !agdi%ang, &omblon. 'e reported it to $pil(s punong
baranga")lorencio &o"o, %ho summoned them to a baranga" meeting. !erida admitted during the
meeting thathe cut the *elled narra tree %ith permission o* one +icar Cali , %hom he
claimed to ha-e bought that propert" under a pacto de retro sale *rom Tansiongco in October
198/. 'e also sho%ed Cali (s %rittenauthori0ation. Tansiongco reported later the incident on
to D & *orester Thelmo . 'ernande0 inJ a n u a r " 1 9 9 9 . p o n
con*rontation b" 'ernande0, !erida reiterated his claim during the
e a r l i e r baranga" meeting. 'e then ordered !erida not to con-ert the *elled tree trun4 into lumber.On
25 Januar" 1999, 'ernande0 %as in*ormed b" Tansiongco that !erida did not *ollo% his
order.T h e r e * o r e , h e % e n t t o t h e ! a " o d p r o p e r t " a l o n g % i t h o t h e r D & e m p
lo"ees and en*orcemento**icers. The" sa% the
*elled narra tree there con-erted into si
s m a l l e r p i e c e s o * l u m b e r . T h e " subse6uentl" sei0ed the said lumber and deposited those *or
sa*e4eeping %ith &o"o.Tansiongco *iled in &omblon(s 7ro-incial 7rosecutor(s O**ice a complaint
charging !erida -iolation o* ection 58 o* the &e-ised )orestr" Code 7D / :;.$n the preliminar" in-
estigation, !erida submitted a counter a**ida-it reiterating his claim that he cutthe narra tree %ith
Cali <s permission. During the trial ho%e-er, he de*ended himsel* b" sa"ing that hehad no part in
cutting and con-erting the tree into lumber.On 2= o-ember 2 , esinando !erida %as *ound guilt" b"
&TC &omblon, &omblon, #ranch 81, o* -iolating section 58 o* the &e-ised )orestr" Code. $t sentenced
him to 1= "ears, 8 months and 1 da" to2 "ears o* reclusion temporal. $t also ordered the sei0ed
lumber be *or*eited in Tansiongco<s *a-or.On appeal at the Court o* Appeals CA;, !erida reiterated his
de*ense during the &TC trial. On 28 June2 2, the CA a**irmed the trial court<s ruling o* con-icting him
*or -iolating ection 58 o* the &e-ised)orestr" Code 7D / :, amended b" .O. 2//; but it ordered that
the sei0ed lumber be con*iscated inthe go-ernment<s *a-or. o, he sought that the CA
decision be reconsidered. 'o%e-er, his motion *or reconsideration %as denied because it %as
*iled late.
(ssues&
1; >hether !erida is liable *or -iolating section 58 o* the &e-ised )orestr" Code?
)egal %rovisions&
Section 68 of the Revised Forestry Code (PD 705):
“Cutting, Gathering and/or Collecting Timber, or Other Forest Products Without License. — An !erson
"ho shallcut, gather, collect, remo#e timber or other $orest !roducts $rom an $orest
land, or timber $rom alienable or dis!osable !ublic land, or $rom !ri#ate land, "ithout an
authorit , or !ossess timber or other $orest !roducts
Try Scribd FREE for 30 days to access over 125 million titles without ads or interruptions!