GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-PEOPLE

DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score Means of Verification/Remarks

per item
NO PARTLY YES
1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item, .083)
1.1. Has the The organization has Some members of Majority of the 0.83 If Yes, please provide details on the policy formalizing the
yet to identify key the GFPS occupy members of the
organization creation/reconstitution of the organization’s GAD Focal Point System
designated people in people to be members strategic positions in GFPS occupy
of its GFPS the organization strategic positions in
(GFPS) and attach a copy for validation.
strategic positions as
the organization
members of its GAD Refer to GFPS polocy
Focal Point System
(GFPS)? (possible If no, please explain why the organization has not identified people in
scores are 0, 0.41, and strategic positions who can be members of its GAD Focal Point System
0.83)
(GFPS)?

_________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

1.2. Has the GFPS members have GFPS members GFPS members 0.83 Please list down GAD trainings attended by GAD Focal Point System
not attended any of attended 1-2 basic attended all three
organization’s GAD members.
the basic GAD [Gender Sensitivity basic GAD trainings
Focal Point System trainings [Gender Trainings (GST), [Gender Sensitivity
Title of GAD Number Trainer/ Date
(GFPS) members Sensitivity Trainings Gender Analysis (GA) Trainings (GST),
Training and Profile Institutional
attended appropriate (GST), Gender and GA Tools and Gender Analysis (GA)
Analysis (GA) and GA GAD Planning and and GA Tools and of Provider
and relevant trainings Participant
Tools and GAD Budgeting] GAD Planning and
on GAD? (possible s
Planning and Budgeting
scores are 0, 0.41, and Budgeting]
0.83)

1_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
1.3. Has the Top management not Only selected All top management 0.41 Please list down top management official/s who attended Basic GAD
yet attended GAD members of the top officials attended
organization’s top Orientations/Gender Sensitivity Trainings (GSTs)
orientation or GST management/ Basic GAD
management attended attended Basic GAD Orientation or GST
Basic GAD Orientation Orientation or GST
Name Basic Institution Date
or Gender Sensitivity
of Top GAD al/Trainin
Training (GST)?
Manag Orientati g Provider
(possible scores are 0,
ement on/GST
0.41, and 0.83)
Official Attended

1.4. Has the Less than 50% of the 50-99% of the 100% of the 0 Please attach training profile of the organization’s staff members.
organization’s staff organization’s staff organization’s staff
organization’s staff
members attended GAD Orientation or members attended Provide list
members been Basic GAD Orientation GST GAD Orientation or
oriented on GAD? or GST GST
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)

1.5. Are the Top management and Some GFPS Some top 0.41 If yes, please explain how the top management and GFPS manifest
organization’s top GFPS are not yet members are aware management and all
awareness and consciousness of GAD related policies and mandates.
management and GAD aware and conscious and conscious of GFPS members are
Focal Point System of GAD-related GAD-related policies aware and conscious
_________________________________________________________
policies and mandates and mandates of GA- related
(GFPS) members _________________________________________________________
policies and
aware and conscious _________________________________________________________
mandates
of GAD-related policies
and mandates?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)

2_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
1.6. Does the Top management Top management Top management 0.83 GAD- Participants Organize Date
does not allow staff allows only the GFPS allows all key
organization’s top related r
members to participate to participate in GAD- officials, GFPS
management allow in GAD-related related activities members and staff Activity
staff members to activities members to
participate in GAD- participate in GAD-
related related activities
activities?(possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score 3.31

(Level 1 People)

2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)

2.1. Does the top Top management not Top management Top management 0.83 Please cite critical incidents showing top management directing the
supportive of GAD PB approves GAD PB approves GAD PB
management direct the implementation of the organization’s GAD Plan and Budget (GAD PB)?
implementation but not visible during and attends critical
implementation of the critical/significant /significant GAD
GAD Plan and Budget Please attach relevant documents indicating support of top management
GAD activities activities (e.g. setting
(GAD PB) of the of GAD agenda, to GAD (attendance sheet, copy of Opening/Closing Remarks during
organization? (possible strategic planning on GAD trainings, photos taken during GAD trainings, etc.)
GAD, etc.)
scores are 0, 0.41, and
Attach MOV –Admin Council, (picture, opening remarks)
0.83)

2.2. Are program Program implementers Only selected (some) All program 0.41 Please enumerate trainings on Gender Analysis (GA) and Gender
not yet trained on GA program implementers trained
implementers trained Analysis (GA) Tools attended by program implementers
and use of GA tools implementers trained on GA and use of GA
on gender analysis on GA and use of GA tools
(GA) and the use of Title of GA Participants Trainer/I Date
tools
gender analysis (GA) training nstitutio
tools? (possible scores nal

3_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) Provider

Please also attach training design and attendance sheets of trainings on

gender analysis (GA) and gender analysis (GA) tools attended by
program implementers.

2.3. Are concerned Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff 0.41 Please list down trainings conducted for concerned staff members on
members not yet members trained to members trained to
staff members trained the collection of sex-disaggregated data.
trained to collect SDD collect SDD collect and are
to collect sex- collecting SDD
disaggregated data Title of Participants Date Conducted
(SDD)? (possible Training
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

2.4. Are male Male employees do Male employees Male employees 0.41 Please provide list of the organization’s efforts initiated and/or
not yet participate in participate in the initiate and participate
employees involved participated by male employees:
the organization’s organization’s GAD in the organization’s
and appreciative of the GAD efforts efforts GAD efforts
organization’s GAD GAD Effort/s Type of Participants
efforts? (possible Involvement of
scores are 0, 0.41, and Male
0.83) Employees

4_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 *Type of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants, organizers and/or resource
persons in the conduct of the organization’s GAD efforts.

2.5. Are clients Clients are not Either internal or Both internal and 0.83 If yes, please identify the organization’s efforts to orient clients on the
oriented on the GAD external clients external clients
(internal and external) GAD efforts of the organization (e.g. PCW website, news, GAD corner in
efforts of the oriented on the GAD oriented on the GAD
oriented on the GAD organization efforts of the efforts of the
the organization, social media (FB, twitter); among others.
efforts of the organization organization
organization? (possible Activity Targeted Audience Date
scores are 0, 0.41, and Conducted
0.83)
SH Orientation

Please also attach results of assessment or surveys conducted to

measure awareness of clients (internal and external) on the GAD efforts
of the organization, if applicable.

2.6. Are the clients Clients (internal and Either internal or Both internal and 0.41 Please attach documentation of consultations/meetings (e.g. survey,
external) not able to external clients external clients
(internal and external) focus group discussions, key informant interviews) and list of issues
articulate gender articulate gender articulate gender
able to articulate their needs/issues in the issues/needs in the issues/needs in the
raised by clients (internal and external) during consultations, etc.
gender needs/issues in development of the development of the development of the
the development of the organization’s GAD organization’s GAD organization’s GAD Student – raising of GST, attach minutes of the mtg.
organization’s GAD efforts efforts efforts
efforts? (possible

5_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score 3.3

(Level 2 People)

3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)

3.1. Does the top No initial discussion With initial discussion Top management 0.41 Please attach directive/s issued by top management to integrate GAD in
among top among top issued directive/s to
management direct the organization’s program/activities/projects (PAPs) and performance
management officials management officials integrate GAD in the
integration of GAD in on the integration of regarding integration organization’s PAPs
indicators
the organization’s GAD in the of GAD in the and performance
program/activities/proje organization’s PAPs organization’s PAPs indicators
cts (PAPs) and and performance and performance
indicators indicators Issued directive on excursion or field trip (Dr. Gascon), reg Madlum
performance incident
indicators? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

3.2. Are the GFPS and GFPS and program Either GFPS or Both the GFPS and 0.41 Please enumerate organization program/activities/projects (PAPs) and
program implementers implementers not able program program
performance indicators integrated with GAD perspective by GFPS
able to integrate GAD to integrate GAD in the implementers able to implementers able to
development of the integrate GAD in the integrate GAD in the
members and program implementers.
in the development of
organization’s PAPs development of the development of the
the organization’s Responsible Organization GAD Remarks
organization’s PAPs organization’s PAPs
program/activities/pro Unit PAPs Perspective
jects (PAPs)? Integrated
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83) GFPS

Program
Implementer

6_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 s

NSTP –

Curriculum

3.3. Are concerned Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff 0 If yes, please explain how concerned staff members utilize sex-
members not yet able members utilized members utilized
staff members able to disaggregated data for gender analysis to enhance the organization’s
to utilize SDD for GA SDD for GA SDD for GA and
utilize sex- recommend ed
GAD efforts.
disaggregated data strategies to enhance
(SDD) for gender the organization’s _________________________________________________________
analysis (GA) to GAD efforts _________________________________________________________
enhance the _________________________________________________________
organization’s GAD
Type of SDD P/A/P where SDD GAD Efforts
efforts? (possible
was Applied Enhanced
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

3.4. Does the top Top management Top management Top management 0.41 Please attach documents issued by top management supporting the
management support support to qualified support to qualified support to qualified
appointment of qualified women staff members in leadership positions
the appointment of women staff members female staff members female staff members
inadequate limited to provision of includes issuance of
(e.g. department order or executive orders, trainings available and kinds
qualified women staff
relevant trainings relevant directives, of training etc.).
members to leadership
provision of relevant
positions? ID promotion, list of qualified staff
trainings, mentoring
(possible scores are 0,
and others
0.41, and 0.83)

7_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
3.5. Do women Women occupy less Women occupy less Women occupy 50% 0.41 Please identify the number of employees in the following position:
assume critical roles than 50% of the third than 50% of third or more of the third
and authority in the level, and middle level positions but level positions in the Position No. of No. of % of
organization? (possible management and comprise 50% or organization
Men Women Women
technical positions in more of the middle
scores are 0, 0.41, and
the organization management and
0.83)
technical positions in
Top Management
the organization

Middle
Management

Technical Staff

Data on Director and Deans- c/o HR

3.6. Are the clients No client (internal and Either internal or Both internal and 0.83 If yes, please describe how clients participate in the planning and
external) involvement external clients external clients
(internal and external), implementation of the organization’s GAD efforts.
in the planning and participate in the participate in the
able to participate in implementation of the planning and planning and
the planning and _________________________________________________________
organization’s GAD implementation of the implementation of the
implementation of the efforts organization’s GAD organization’s GAD _________________________________________________________
organization’s GAD efforts efforts _________________________________________________________
efforts? (possible
Please attach attendance sheets and documentation of meetings, as
scores are 0, 0.41, and
applicable.
0.83)

Please also attach documents external clients’ membership in the

technical working groups (TWGs) and project management offices

8_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 (TWGs).

Sub-total GMEF Score 2.47

(Level 3 People)

4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)

9_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
4.1. Are the GAD Focal GFPS members have Less than 50% of the 50% or more of the 0.41 Please attach list and profile of the GFPS members including the
Point System (GFPS) not yet served as GFPS members GFPS members
trainings conducted.
members able to serve resource persons on served as GAD served as GAD
as GAD resource GAD within the resource persons, resource persons
organization within the within the
persons within the Name of Title of Name of Date
organization, organization,
organization, including GFPS GAD Office/U Conducte
including its regional including its regional
its regional offices and member who Activities nit, d
offices and attached offices and attached
attached agencies? agencies agencies
(possible scores are 0, served as Conducte Regiona
0.41 and 0.83) GAD d l Office
Resource and/or
Person Attache
d
Agency

Mina
Ejay

4.2. Does top No initial discussion With initial discussion Top management 0.41 Please attach copies of directive/s issued by the top management
among top among top issued directive/s to
management direct the regarding the monitoring of the organization’s GAD efforts as well as
monitoring of the management officials management officials monitor the
on the monitoring of on the monitoring of organization’s GAD
monitoring reports, as applicable.
organization’s GAD
the organization’s the organization’s efforts
efforts? (possible
GAD efforts GAD efforts
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83) c/o Cecil –Chair TWg

4.3. Are concerned Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff 0.41 Please list down GAD efforts calibrated to address emerging gender
staff members able to members not able to members able to members able to
calibrate GAD efforts identify emerging calibrate GAD efforts issues
calibrate GAD efforts to to address emerging gender issues but not to address emerging
address emerging gender issues yet capable of gender issues Title of Emerging Gender Unit/Concern
gender issues? calibrating GAD Calibrated Issues Addressed ed Staff
(possible scores are 0, efforts to them

10_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
0.41 and 0.83) GAD Effort/s Responsible

Scholarship Increased dropout rate

of student

4.4. Do top No reflection of GAD GAD reflected in the GAD reflected in the 0 Please attach sample of Terms of Reference (TORs), Performance
in the performance performance performance
management and Contract, Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR)
contracts or TORs of contracts or TORs of contracts or TORs of
concerned staff top management and either top both top management
forms of staff members and Career Executive Service Performance
members reflect GAD concerned staff management or or concerned staff Evaluation System (CESPES) of top management officials of the
functions in their members concerned staff members organization
performance contracts members
or terms of reference
(TORs)? (possible
Planning to include in the SPMS and IPCR
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)

4.5.Are concerned staff No tools and/or KPs Developed tools and Developed tools and 0.83 Please provide details of tools and/or knowledge products (KPs) on
members able to on GAD developed KPs on GAD with KPs on GAD on their
GAD developed.
develop tools and/or assistance from own
knowledge products external GAD
GAD Tools Purpose Name and
experts/resource
(KPs) on and/or KPs Designation of GAD
persons
GAD?(possible scores
developed experts tapped for
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
assistance

brochure

newsletter

Jingle

11_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
4.6. Are clients No participation from Either internal and Both internal and 0.41 If yes, please describe the participation of internal and external clients in
clients in all levels of external clients external clients
(internal and external) the development planning cycle (planning management, implementation,
the development participate in 1-2 participate in 3 or
able to participate in 3 planning cycle of the levels of the more levels of the
monitoring and evaluation) of the organization’s GAD efforts.
or more levels of the organization’s GAD development development _________________________________________________________
development planning efforts planning cycle of the planning cycle of the _________________________________________________________
cycle (planning, organization’s GAD organization’s GAD
management,
efforts efforts ID
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation) of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score 2.47

(Level 4 People)

5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item: 1.67)

5.1. Does top Top management not Top management Top management 0 Please attach documentation of meetings and/or discussions where
yet able to raise GAD are able to raise able to raise and
management raise GAD concern/s was/were raised by the organization’s top management.
GAD concerns during concerns during high GAD concerns receive support on
high level meetings/ level meetings during high level GAD concerns from
Meeting/Discu GAD concerns Name of Top Name of
meetings colleagues during
discussions? (e.g. ssion discussed/ Management Person who
high level meetings
Cabinet cluster raised who Raised supported the
meeting, international GAD Concern GAD Concern
conferences) (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and
1.67)

12_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 Admin council mtg

5.2. Are the Staff members not yet Staff members Staff members 0.83 Please attach list and profiles of internal GAD experts.
organization’s staff tapped by other recognized as GAD recognized as GAD
members recognized organizations experts and tapped experts and tapped
as GAD experts by by 1-4 organizations by 5 or more
organizations Kindly enumerate seminars/conferences/trainings facilitated by internal
other organizations?
(possible scores are 0, GAD experts for other agencies and organizations
0.83 and 1.67)
Name of Title of Name Date
Internal GAD GAD of Conducte
Expert Activities Inviting d
Conducted Organiz
ations

NFA Basic GAD

5.3. Are external clients External clients not yet External clients External clients 0 Awards/Citations/Nomin Organization Date Conferred
recognized for their nominated, received awards for
of the organization ations Received Conferring the
gender mainstreaming shortlisted or cited in their gender
recognized as GAD efforts their respective mainstreaming efforts Award/Citation
champions by localities on their from reputable local,
reputable local, gender national and
national and mainstreaming international

13_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
international efforts organizations and
recognized in their
organizations?
respective localities
(possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)

Please also attach copies of news articles, other write-ups or

documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding recognized gender
mainstreaming efforts, if applicable.

*May not apply to agencies with no clear external clients (e.g. DND-Government
Arsenal)

Sub-total GMEF Score 0.83

(Level 5 People)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(People)

14_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
GUIDE FOR ANSWERING GMEF PEOPLE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Using the GMEF descriptor matrix or the “banig” as reference and the results of
the organizational assessment tool, mark the appropriate cell of the score sheet
where accomplishments of your agency are located.

2. Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) YES; (2) PARTLY YES;
and (3) “NO”. Indicate a score in the appropriate column to signify the degree to
which your organization has complied with the GAD element. Under the
MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verifications required or
provide explanation in support of your response.
3. Transfer the sub-total score per level to the GMEF Score Sheet. Add the scores
per level and indicate it in the shaded box to come up with the total score for the
People entry point.
4. To get the overall rating, add all the scores per entry point and indicate it in the
shaded box. Refer to the Legend of Scores for the corresponding equivalent
rating and stage.

15_PEOPLE

FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION