Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cornor David's Presentation 7 Nov 2010
Cornor David's Presentation 7 Nov 2010
This lady democracy supporter was holding up a picture of the Thai King, hoping it would
dissuade the military from an unprovoked assault. The Thai Constitutional court has
This female demonstrator was holding a picture of the Thai King. When pressed by the
CRES The Thai Civil Court did not enact a Court Order to evict the peaceful protest.
On the 10th April the military first fired massive waves of plastic bullets
and live bullets at the heads and upper bodies of the protestors.
Plastic bullets are deadly weapons
Strict military protocol dictates they must be fired by aimed single shots below the waist
The International Committee of the Red Cross has advocated banning use
against a demonstration, Geneva Conventions Protocol II (1977), unnecessary
wounding or risk of killing. Force more than necessary to deter threat.
Colonel Sansern, CRES Spokesman, initially officially
denied any live bullets were used
The Thai military has a long tradition of reciprocal training with the militaries
of the USA, Britain and Australia.
A democratic Thai government in 2003 (overthrown by coup in 2006) gained
Major Non-NATO Ally Status for Thailand.
In a public press conference the Thai government stated it would follow
generally accepted International/NATO Rules of Engagement.
You can only shoot at a person who has a potentially lethal weapon and
is visibly preparing to use it against you, or someone under your
protection.
This is a general rule, strictly enforced with coalition forces in Afghanistan
and Iraq, were the ‘threat force’ security forces have to deal with consists of
Taliban/al-Qaeda terrorists.
The Thai military ignored it unashamedly when dealing with democracy
demonstrators exercising their right to Freedom of Assembly.
These are the Facts
No property damage or deaths occurred in the area of the
protest until after the military assault.