CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200

Sub
Criterion Description Marks
No.
5.1 Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) 20

5.2 Faculty Cadre Proportion 25

5.3 Faculty Qualification 25

5.4 Faculty Retention 25

5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning 20

Faculty as participants in Faculty development/ training
5.6 15
activities/STTPs
5.7 Research and Development 30

5.7.1 Academic Research 10

5.7.2 Sponsored Research 5

5.7.3 Development activities 10

5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) 5

Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System
5.8 30
(FPADS)
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. 10

Total Marks 200

1
 Name of the Faculty Member

Degree (starting of
from highest
degree)
University Qualification

Year of Graduation
Current
Designation

All the Designations since joining the Institution

in above format in Annexure II.

Date of joining the Institution

1st Year

2
Serving 100% in programme
From other programme to this programme
UG
The faculty details are provided in the Annexure - II

From this programme to other programme

Distribution of
teaching load (%)

PG
Faculty receiving Ph.D during the assessment
year
5. FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS (200)(145)

Ph.D Guidance
Research Paper Publications
Research
Academic

Sponsored Research (Funded Research)

Consultancy and Product Development
Note: Please provide cumulative information for all the shifts for three assessment years

Specialization
Faculty Strength

Total
S. No Academic Year
Faculty
1 2018-19
2 2017-18
3 2016-17

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)

S:ratio=N/F; N=No.of students=3x where x is (approved intake+20% lateral entry

intake + separate division, if any)
F = No. of faculty = (a + b – c) for every assessment year
a: Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of this
program
b: Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty (considering fractional load)
serving this program from other Program(s)
c: Total number of full time equivalent regular Faculty (considering fractional load) of
this program serving other program(s)
Regular Facultymeans:
 Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of
not less than two years AND drawing consolidated salary not less than applicable
gross salary shall only be counted as a regular employee.
 Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/Central Government
and implementation as prescribed by the State Government. In case State
Government prescribes lesser consolidated salary for a particular cadre then same
will be considered as reference while counting faculty as a regular faculty.

Year X N F SFR=N/F
CAY(2018-19)
CAY m1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)

Average SFR for three assessment years

Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for

average SFR between 15:1 to 20:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1.

3
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required
tocomply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to
comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors

Year Required F1 Available Required Available Required Available
F1 F2 F2 F3 F3
2018-19
2017-18
2016-17
Average
RF1= AF1= RF2= AF2= RF3= AF3=
Numbers

𝐴𝐹1 𝐴𝐹2 𝐴𝐹3

Cadre Ratio Marks=[(
𝑅𝐹1
) + (𝑅𝐹2 ∗ 0.6) + (𝑅𝐹3 ∗ 0.4)] ∗ 12.5

5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)

FQ =2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where X is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular
faculty with M.Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student
ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)

Year X Y F FQ=2.5 x [(10X+6Y)/F)]

2018-19
2017-18
2016-17
AverageAssessment

5.4. Faculty Retention (25)

No. of regular faculty members in
CAYm2 2016-17 =
CAYm1 2017-18 =
CAY 2018-19 =

4
 Description 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Total No of Faculty
No of Faculty Retained
% of Faculty Retained

Item Marks
>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of
25
assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year
>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of
20
assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year
>=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of
15
assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year
>=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of
10
assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year
<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of
0
assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year

5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20)

 ICT usage
 Instruction Delivery
 Instructional Methods
 Assessment

S. Name of the Relevance of PO,

Subject Name Methodology Used
No Faculty PSO
A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

A.Y. 2016-17

5.6.Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)

A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation

 Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points

 Participation >5 days Faculty development program: 5 points

5
 Max.5 per Faculty
S.No Name of the Faculty CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
2018-19 2017-18 2016-17

Sum
RF= Number of Faculty required
to complywith 15:1 Student-
Faculty ratio as per 5.1
Assessment = (Sum/0.5RF)3
(Marks limited to 15)

Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15) =

The following are the details of traing programs attended by the faculty:

FDP/Training
S. Name of the No. of
Date Activity/STTPs/work Organized By Points
No Faculty Days
shops
A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

A.Y. 2016-17

5.7. Research and Development (30)

5.7.1. Academic Research (10)
Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty
receiving Ph.D. during the assessment period.
 Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book
Chapters etc.(6)
 Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the
institute(4)
All relevant details shall be mentioned.
The research papers considered are those (i) which can be located on the internet and/or are
included in hard-copy volumes/proceedings, published by reputed publishers, and (ii)
whether the faculty member’s affiliation, in the published papers/books, is of the current
institution.

6
 Include a list of all such publications and IPRs along with details of DOI, publisher,
month/year, etc.

Details of Papers Published:

2018-2019 2017-18 2016-17

Total
(CAY) (CAY m1) (CAY m2)
International Journals
National Journals
International Conferences
National Conferences

Name of the Journal/

S. Name of the Impact
Title Conferrence & Indexing
No Faculty Factor
Volume/Issue
A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

A.Y. 2016-17

Summary of publications:

S.No Name of the faculty 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17 Total

TOTAL

Details of Projects mentored for National/International Events:

S. No Name of the Faculty Name of the Project Name of the Event

A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

7
 A.Y. 2016-17

Details of Text Books Authored:

Year of
S.No Title Author’s Names Publisher
Publication

Details of Book Chapters Authored:

Year of
S.No Title Author’s Names Publisher
Publication

Details of Patents Applied:

Name of Application Agency/Cou

S.No Patent Title Status
Applicant(s) No. ntry

Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the
institute:

S. No Name of the Faculty Department Awarded/Submitted University

546+5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)

Funded research:
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)

Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):

Amount > 20 Lacs – 5 Marks
Amount >= 16 Lacs and <= 20 lacs – 4 Marks
Amount >= 12 Lacs and < 16 lacs – 3 Marks
Amount >= 8 Lacs and < 12 lacs – 2 Marks
Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 1 Mark
Amount < 4 Lacs – 0 Mark

8
 Principal
S. Title of the Investigator Funding Date of
Amount Status
No Project and co Agency Submission
Investigator

5.7.3. Development activities (10)

Provide details:
• Product Development
• Research laboratories
• Instructional materials
• Working models/charts etc

 Research laboratories:

 Instructional materials

Name of the Name of the Target

S. No Details
Faculty Instructional Material Audience
A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

A.Y. 2016-17

 Working Models/Charts etc

The following are the details of charts made available in the classroom/laboratories
developed by the faculty:

S. No Instructor Topic

A.Y. 2018-19

A.Y. 2017-18

A.Y. 2016-17

9
5.7.4.Consultancy (from Industry) (5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)

Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):

Amount > 10 Lacs – 5 Marks
Amount >= 8 Lacs and <= 10 lacs – 4 Marks
Amount >= 6 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 3 Marks
Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 6 lacs – 2 Marks
Amount >= 2 Lacs and < 4 lacs – 1 Mark
Amount < 2 Lacs – 0 Mark.

5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)

A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years:
 The entire faculty will submit their self appraisal forms for every semester.
 The self appraisal forms are given in 3 formats:
o Asst. Professor
 Teaching Process – 10%
 Regular Result Analysis – 20%
 Pass Percentage in 1st Supplementary Examination – 10%
 Feedback Analysis – 10%
 Personal Growth –25%
 Student Related Training – 10%
 Administrative Contribution – 15%

o Pursuing Ph. D/Assoc. Professor

 Teaching Process – 10%
 Regular Result Analysis – 20%
 Pass Percentage in 1st Supplementary Examination – 10%
 Feedback Analysis – 10%
 Research Contribution and Life Long Learning – 25%
 Student Related Training – 10%
 Administrative Contribution – 15%
o Having Ph. D
 Teaching Process – 10%
 Regular Result Analysis – 20%
 Pass Percentage in 1st Supplementary Examination – 10%
 Feedback Analysis – 10%
 Research Contribution and Life Long Learning – 25%
 Student Related Training – 10%
 Other – 15%
 The filled appraisal forms will be verified by the HOD and the marks are calculated
accordingly.

10
  Basing on the self appraisal performance appraisals are prepared by the HOD and
which are in turn reviewed by the Principal and salaries will be incremented
accordingly.
Its implementation and effectiveness:
Implementation:
 The faculty will be informed about his/her shortcomings in teaching a particular
subject.
 The End semester results are also assessed using the Result Analysis for every subject
handled by the faculty.
 Feedback from the students will be taken thrice in a semester.
Effectiveness:
 Salary increments are given according to their performance
 Incentives for paper publications, FDPs and achieving above 90% pass percentage in
their respective subjects will be given to the faculty.
 Cash awards are awarded for the faculty retended for 10 years and 15 years.

Incentive
S. No Name of the Faculty Details
Amount
A. Y. 2018-19
Research Publications

High Pass Percentage (Above 95%)

Professional Society Membership

Retention (More than 10 and 15 Years)

A. Y. 2017-18
Research Publications

High Pass Percentage (Above 95%)

Professional Society Membership

Retention (More than 10 and 15 Years)

11
 A. Y. 2016-17
Research Publications

High Pass Percentage (Above 95%)

Professional Society Membership

Retention (More than 10 and 15 Years)

Name Professional
Paper FDP / Pass Service Total
S.No of the Society
Publication Workshop Percentage Incentive Amount
Faculty Membership

5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)

Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation

and contributions in teaching and learning and /or research by
visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years:
 Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty(1)
 Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from
industry/retired professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3
marks x 3 years = 9 marks)
The department organizes various guest lectures, seminars from eminent persons from
industry and academia to enhance the teaching – learning process. The details of various
programmes organized in the department is given below.

Academic Name of the Hours of Relevance of

Topic
Year Speaker Interaction PO/PSO
CAY
(2018-19)
CAYm1
(2017-18)
CAYm2
(2016-17)

12