Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 40

GLOBE LTE – FDD SPARROW PROJECT

GOAF
4G ACCEPTANCE REPORT

Single Site Verification

SITE NAME GOAF

ENODEB ID 338434

AREA SLUZ

CITY / PROVINCE CAMARINES SUR

MME TURISMO POOL 1

DT PERFORMED BY Jhoemary Guevarra

DATE DT PERFORMED May 31, 2019

APPROVED BY:

HUAWEI RF MANAGER GLOBE TELECOM RgPM


[DATE] [DATE]

Allan Geronimo Erwin Roque

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 1 of 40 Version: 1.0
DOCUMENT HISTORY

REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION APPROVED CHECKED

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 2 of 40 Version: 1.0
4G SSV ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE

SITE GOAF

Site Configuration:
NE Name MME Name Site Type Site ID
GOAF TURISMO POOL 1 Outdoor Macro 338434

Huawei Technologies hereby certifies that the relevant parts of the Works referred to in this Conditional Acceptance Certificate
complies with the Network Rollout Procurement Agreement, in particular the Specifications and this has successfully passed the
SSV Acceptance Tests on the particular new site Basis.

The required Documentation is attached with this certificate.

Counter Signatures:

Huawei Technologies Representative Globe Telecom RF Representative

Name: Allan Geronimo Yin Xing Name: Macky Johnie Samonte Erwin Roque

Position: RF Manager RF Director Position: SLZ RF Engineer SLZ Regional Head

Date: Date:

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 3 of 40 Version: 1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This document records the performance test result of new site GOAF of the Globe LTE FDD network to verify if the newly build
site performance achieves the performance requirements. All KPIs are divided into several parts, including RRC Connection Suc-
cess Rate, ERAB Setup Success Rate, PS Call Drop Rate, Intra-Frequency Handover Success Rate, User DL/UL Peak Throughput,
Average DL/UL Throughput that are pre-defined in the LTE KPI Proposal for SSV acceptance.

The document is highly confidential and is strictly to be used only by Globe and Huawei. This SSV Acceptance Report is made
according to the agreement document describing the area and the applicable design rules and values. This document will be
submitted in Hardcopy and Softcopy included supporting data. Information contained in this document shall not be disclosed to
any other party unless it is expressly authorized by Globe and Huawei.

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 4 of 40 Version: 1.0
Remark:
- This page is left blank intentionally

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 5 of 40 Version: 1.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................8
2 TOOLS USED ..............................................................................................................................................9
3 DRIVE TEST METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................10
MOBILITY TEST 1 – LAPTOP 1 ........................................................................................................................10
MOBILITY TEST 2 – LAPTOP 1 ........................................................................................................................10
STATIONARY TEST – LAPTOP 1 ......................................................................................................................10
4 CELL INFORMATION and CROSS SECTOR VERIFICATION ........................................................................11
5 DRIVE TEST PLOTS ...................................................................................................................................12
5.1 Drive Test Pre-Define Route ....................................................................................................................12
5.2 Drive Test Plots and Graphs ....................................................................................................................13
5.3 Stationary Test Locations ........................................................................................................................22
5.4 Speed Test Screenshot Results ...............................................................................................................23
6 OSS REPORT .............................................................................................................................................29
6.1 NMS / OSS KPI Summary .........................................................................................................................29
7 DRIVE TEST STATISTIC..............................................................................................................................29
7.1 Drive Test Measurements .......................................................................................................................29
7.2 Mobility Handover Test ...........................................................................................................................29
7.3 Stationary Test Measurements ...............................................................................................................30
8 DRIVE TEST LOG FILES .............................................................................................................................30
8.1 Drive Test Log Files Round 1 Laptop 1 ....................................................................................................30
9 KPI OPTIMIZATION ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................30
10 CONCLUSION and SUMMARY .................................................................................................................31
11 ABBREVIATION ........................................................................................................................................32
12 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................33
12.1As-built Antenna Photo ...........................................................................................................................33
12.2Modulation Scheme ................................................................................................................................36
12.3OSS KPI Graph..........................................................................................................................................37

LIST OF TABLE
Table 1-A: Site Details....................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 2-A: List of Tools ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3-A: Mobility Test 1 Set-up Laptop 1 .................................................................................................... 10
Table 3-B: Mobility Test 2 Set-up Laptop 1 .................................................................................................... 10
Table 3-C: Stationary Test Set-up Laptop 1 .................................................................................................... 10
Table 4-A: Parameters and Cross Sector Checking ........................................................................................ 11
Table 4-B: Antenna Details ............................................................................................................................. 11
Table 6-A: OSS KPI Result ............................................................................................................................... 29
Table 7-A: Mobile Drive Test KPI Result ......................................................................................................... 29
Table 7-B: Mobile Drive Test Handover Result .............................................................................................. 29
Table 7-C: Stationary Test KPI Result ............................................................................................................. 30
Table 8-A: Drive Test Log Files Round 1 Laptop 1 .......................................................................................... 30
Table 9-A: Physical Changes Summary ........................................................................................................... 30
Table 9-B: Parameter Changes Summary....................................................................................................... 30

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 6 of 40 Version: 1.0
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 1-A: Site Map ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 5-A: Drive Test Predefined Route ....................................................................................................... 12
Figure 5-B: MS1 Serving PCI ........................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 5-C: MS1 RSRP (dBm) .......................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5-D: RSRP Graph .................................................................................................................................. 15
Figure 5-E: MS1 SINR (dB) .............................................................................................................................. 16
Figure 5-F: SINR Graph ................................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 5-G: MS1 Download Throughput (kbps) ............................................................................................. 18
Figure 5-H: Download Throughput Graph...................................................................................................... 19
Figure 5-I: Event Failures – Handover Success ............................................................................................... 20
Figure 5-J: Event Failures – CSFB Service Success .......................................................................................... 21
Figure 5-K: Stationary Test Points .................................................................................................................. 22
Figure 5-L: Test Loc1 of GOA-1/11 Speed Test Screenshot............................................................................ 23
Figure 5-M: Test Loc2 of GOA-2/12 Speed Test Screenshot .......................................................................... 24
Figure 5-N: Test Loc3 of GOA-3/13 Speed Test Screenshot ........................................................................... 25
Figure 12-A: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 1 ............................................................................................... 33
Figure 12-B: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 1 ................................................................................... 33
Figure 12-C: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 1 ....................................................................................... 33
Figure 12-D: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 2 ............................................................................................... 34
Figure 12-E: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 2 ................................................................................... 34
Figure 12-F: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 2 ....................................................................................... 34
Figure 12-G: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 3 ............................................................................................... 35
Figure 12-H: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 3 ................................................................................... 35
Figure 12-I: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 3 ........................................................................................ 35
Figure 12-J: DL Modulation Scheme............................................................................................................... 36
Figure 12-K: Site Availability Rate Graph........................................................................................................ 37
Figure 12-L: RRC Connection Success Rate (Service) (BH) Graph .................................................................. 37
Figure 12-M: E-RAB Setup Success Rate (BH) Graph...................................................................................... 38
Figure 12-N: PS Call Drop Rate (BH) Graph .................................................................................................... 38
Figure 12-O: Intra-frequency HO Success Rate (BH) Graph ........................................................................... 39
Figure 12-P: Total Traffic Volume (BH) Graph ................................................................................................ 39
Figure 12-Q: Average Throughput (BH) Graph............................................................................................... 40

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 7 of 40 Version: 1.0
1 INTRODUCTION

Site GOAF has finished integration on September 23, 2018. BFT test is conducted on September 23, 2018. Site GOAF
integration date is officially broadcast on September 23, 2018. While SSV drive testing is conducted on May 31, 2019.

ITEMS Site Information


Site Name GOAF
eNodeB ID 338434
Area SLUZ
City / Province CAMARINES SUR
MME TURISMO POOL 1
Frequency Band 3
Site Configuration 2+2+2
Longitude 123.478938
Latitude 33
Date SSV DT Performed May 31, 2019
Table 1-A: Site Details

Figure 1-A: Site Map

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 8 of 40 Version: 1.0
2 TOOLS USED

ITEMS Hardware/Software Version of Test Equipment


Dell Inspiron Intel® Core™ i3-2312M CPU @2.20
Laptop Computer GHz 2.20 GHz RAM 4GB (3.16 usable)
32-bit Operating System (Windows XP/Windows 7)
GPS Receiver G-STAR4 BU-393
GENEX Probe (V300R006)
Drive Test Tool Software
Speed Test
Huawei E5375
GENEX Software Dongle
Huawei P1 Mobile Phone
GENEX Assistant (V300R006)
Data Post Processing Tool
MapInfo 10.0
AC/DC Power Equipment DC-AC Power Inverter 500W
Table 2-A: List of Tools

Tools used to generate this report are:

 GENEX PROBE and Assistant (V300R006) or above


 Microsoft Office (Excel, Access, Word)
 Mapinfo 9.0 and above

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 9 of 40 Version: 1.0
3 DRIVE TEST METHODOLOGY

MOBILITY TEST 1 – LAPTOP 1


* In Mobility Test 1, 1 set of testing equipment will be used for data collection.
MS Equipment Test Type Duration KPI Measured Remarks
RSRP, SINR, Aver- From FTP
2GB download, 10s
MS1 Data Card FTP Download age DL Through- server
idle
put 10.188.173.139
30s call, wait until
Call Setup
MS2 P1 CSFB UE reselect back to To UMTS
Fallback (MO)
LTE
Table 3-A: Mobility Test 1 Set-up Laptop 1

MOBILITY TEST 2 – LAPTOP 1


* In Mobility Test 2, 1 set of testing equipment will be used for data collection. Scanner will serve as an optional testing equip-
ment setup.
MS Equipment Test Type Duration KPI Measured Remarks
RSRP, SINR, Aver-
2GB upload, 10s To FTP server
MS3 Data Card FTP Upload age UL Through-
idle 10.188.173.139
put
MS4 Scanner Idle Idle all the time RSRP, SINR **Optional
Table 3-B: Mobility Test 2 Set-up Laptop 1

STATIONARY TEST – LAPTOP 1


* In Stationary Test, 1 set of testing equipment will be used for data collection.
MS Equipment Test Type Duration KPI Measured Remarks
To Antipolo
Globe
SpeedTest
5 times SpeedTest at
Server (in case
each test location. Re- Average Ping
Average Ping
peat the test at 3 dif- RTT, User Peak
RTT in
MS5 Data Card SpeedTest ferent test locations DL Throughput,
SpeedTest fail,
evenly distributed in User Peak UL
will verify the
each sector; 1 test lo- Throughput
Average Ping
cation per sector.
RTT by perform-
ing Ping Test to
FTP Server)
Table 3-C: Stationary Test Set-up Laptop 1

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 10 of 40 Version: 1.0
4 CELL INFORMATION and CROSS SECTOR VERIFICATION

SECTOR-1 SECTOR-2 SECTOR-3


ITEM
GOAF-1/11 GOAF-101/111 GOAF-2/12 GOAF-102/112 GOAF-3/13 GOAF-103/113
eNodeB ID 338434 338434 338434 338434 338434 338434

Cell ID 1/11 101/111 2/12 102/112 3/13 103/113


TAC 3018 3018 3018 3018 3018 3018

Physical Cell ID 315 269 316 267 317 268

DL EARFCN 1650/1525 1650/1525 1650/1525 1650/1525 1650/1525 1650/1525

DL/UL Bandwidth 10/5 MHz 10/5 MHz 10/5 MHz 10/5 MHz 10/5 MHz 10/5 MHz

Root Sequence Index 740 740 336 336 368 368

CROSS SECTOR OK OK OK
Table 4-A: Parameters and Cross Sector Checking

SECTOR-1 SECTOR-2 SECTOR-3


ITEM
GOAF-1/11 GOAF-101/111 GOAF-2/12 GOAF-102/112 GOAF-3/13 GOAF-103/113
AZIMUTH(PHYSICAL) 60 160 280
AZIMUTH(LOGICAL) 35 85 135 185 255 305
M-TILT 2 2 2 2 2 2
E-TILT 10 6 4 6 5 6
ANTENNA HEIGHT 49 m 49 m 49 m
ANTENNA TYPE 4 ports 4 ports 4 ports 4 ports 4 ports 4 ports
Table 4-B: Antenna Details

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 11 of 40 Version: 1.0
5 DRIVE TEST PLOTS

5.1 Drive Test Pre-Define Route

Figure 5-A: Drive Test Predefined Route

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 12 of 40 Version: 1.0
5.2 Drive Test Plots and Graphs
* Based on the Best Serving Cell PCI plot, there is no swapped sector on site TIGWIM.

Figure 5-B: MS1 Serving PCI

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 13 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-C: MS1 RSRP (dBm)

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 14 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-D: RSRP Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 15 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-E: MS1 SINR (dB)

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 16 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-F: SINR Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 17 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-G: MS1 Download Throughput (kbps)

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 18 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-H: Download Throughput Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 19 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-I: Event Failures – Handover Success

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 20 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-J: Event Failures – CSFB Service Success

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 21 of 40 Version: 1.0
5.3 Stationary Test Locations

Test Loc Sec 2


Test Loc Sec 4

Test Loc Sec 6


Test Loc Sec 3

Test Loc Sec 1 Test Loc Sec 5

Figure 5-K: Stationary Test Points

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 22 of 40 Version: 1.0
5.4 Speed Test Screenshot Results

Figure 5-L: Test Loc1 of GOA-1/11 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 23 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-M: Test Loc2 of GOA-2/12 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 24 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-N: Test Loc3 of GOA-3/13 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 25 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-O: Test Loc4 of GOA-101/111 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 26 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-P: Test Loc5 of GOA-102/112 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 27 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 5-Q: Test Loc6 of GOA-103/113 Speed Test Screenshot

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 28 of 40 Version: 1.0
6 OSS REPORT

6.1 NMS / OSS KPI Summary


7 Days Monitoring
(Aug 08 – 14 2018)
OSS KPI Target KPI Unit Comment
(F1/F2)

Site Availability Rate 100% 100.00 % PASSED


DL Traffic Volume (BH)
(2000~2100)
Reference 29034.09 Mbyte
UL Traffic Volume (BH)
(2000~2100)
Reference 3219.70 Mbyte
RRC Connection Success Rate (Service) (BH)
(2000~2100)
98.50% 98.90 % PASSED
E-RAB Setup Success Rate (BH)
(2000~2100)
98.110% 99.22 % PASSED
PS Call Drop Rate (BH)
(2000~2100)
1.50% 0.82 % PASSED
Intra-frequency HO Success Rate (BH)
(2000~2100)
Reference 95.05 %
Service DL Average Throughput (BH)
(2000~2100)
Reference 8.61 Mbps
Service UL Average Throughput (BH)
(2000~2100)
Reference 0.71 Mbps
Table 6-A: OSS KPI Result

7 DRIVE TEST STATISTIC

7.1 Drive Test Measurements

Mobile Test
Target KPI DT Result Unit Comment
Key Performance Indicator
Call Setup Fallback (MO) Reference 100 %
Average DL Throughput 7.5Mbps 26.644 Mbps PASSED
SINR >= -3dB Reference 100 %
RSRP > -115dBm Reference 89 %
Table 7-A: Mobile Drive Test KPI Result

7.2 Mobility Handover Test

Handover Testing Test Result Comment

Sector1 => Sector2 OK OK


Sector1 => Sector3 OK OK
Sector2 => Sector3 OK OK
Sector2 => Sector1 OK OK
Sector3 => Sector1 OK OK
Sector3 => Sector2 OK OK
Table 7-B: Mobile Drive Test Handover Result

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 29 of 40 Version: 1.0
7.3 Stationary Test Measurements

User Peak User


PING Target DL Target Peak UL Target
Sam- RSRP SINR
Cell Name 32bytes KPI Result Through- KPI Result Through- KPI Result
ple (dB) (dB)
(ms) (ms) put (Mbps) put (Mbps)
(Mbps) (Mbps)

GOAF-1/11 Test Loc1 2 -75.5 27.00 26 40 PASSED 54.81 30.0 PASSED 18.18 5.0 PASSED

GOAF-2/12 Test Loc2 2 -84.38 27.00 27 40 PASSED 48.47 30.0 PASSED 19.59 5.0 PASSED

GOAF-3/13 Test Loc3 1 -81.75 29.00 23 40 PASSED 51.96 30.0 PASSED 19.53 5.0 PASSED
Table 7-C: Stationary Test KPI Result

8 DRIVE TEST LOG FILES

8.1 Drive Test Log Files Round 1 Laptop 1

#[Index] Log Files MS1 GPS


1 FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (1). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
2 FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (2). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
3 FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (3). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
4 FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (4). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
5 FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (5). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
… FDD_SSV_SLZ_TIGWIM_RD1L1_DL_ (24). gen P8 G-STAR4 BU-393
Table 8-A: Drive Test Log Files Round 1 Laptop 1

9 KPI OPTIMIZATION ACTIVITIES


Change Before After
No Improvement Area Cell Name Site Name Solution Remarks
Required Setting Setting
1 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-2/12 GOAF AZIMUTH REPAN 120 180 Improved
2 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-3/13 GOAF AZIMUTH REPAN 260 280 Improved
3 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-1/11 GOAF MTILT DOWNTILT 2 4 Improved
4 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-2/12 GOAF MTILT DOWNTILT 4 4 Improved
5 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-3/13 GOAF MTILT DOWNTILT 4 4 Improved
6 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-1/11 GOAF ETILT UPTILT 6 6 Improved
7 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-2/12 GOAF ETILT UPTILT 6 6 Improved
8 Site Coverage/Quality GOAF-3/13 GOAF ETILT UPTILT 6 6 Improved
Table 9-A: Physical Changes Summary

Current Proposed
No Site Name Source Cell Name Target Cell Name Parameter
Value Value
1
2
3
4
5
Table 9-B: Parameter Changes Summary

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 30 of 40 Version: 1.0
10 CONCLUSION and SUMMARY

Summary of the SSV for new site TIGWIM is:

1. No call setup failure detected.


2. No dropped call detected.
3. No sector swap detected.
4. No handover failure detected
5. Cell parameters are defined as planned.
6. Not all the KPIs have reached the target KPI.

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 31 of 40 Version: 1.0
11 ABBREVIATION

KPI Key Performance Indicator


OSS Operation Support Subsystem
RRC_SR RRC Connection Success Rate
ERAB_SR ERAB Setup Success Rate
CDR Hand Over Success Rate
HOSR Intra-Frequency Handover Success Rate
RSRP Reference Signal Received Power
SINR Signal Interference plus Noise Radio
PCI Physical Cell Identifier
TAC Tracking Area Code

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 32 of 40 Version: 1.0
12 APPENDIX

12.1 As-built Antenna Photo

Figure 12-A: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 1

Figure 12-B: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 1

Figure 12-C: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 1

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 33 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 12-D: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 2

Figure 12-E: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 2

Figure 12-F: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 2

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 34 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 12-G: As-built Antenna Photo Sector 3

Figure 12-H: Antenna Mechanical Tilt Photo Sector 3

Figure 12-I: Antenna Electrical Tilt Photo Sector 3

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 35 of 40 Version: 1.0
12.2 Modulation Scheme

Figure 12-J: DL Modulation Scheme

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 36 of 40 Version: 1.0
12.3 OSS KPI Graph

Figure 12-K: Site Availability Rate Graph

Figure 12-L: RRC Connection Success Rate (Service) (BH) Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 37 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 12-M: E-RAB Setup Success Rate (BH) Graph

Figure 12-N: PS Call Drop Rate (BH) Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 38 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 12-O: Intra-frequency HO Success Rate (BH) Graph

Figure 12-P: Total Traffic Volume (BH) Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 39 of 40 Version: 1.0
Figure 12-Q: Average Throughput (BH) Graph

Prepared Mark Razel Mendoza / INES SITE GOAF


Checked Kenneth Isaac Namit/ INES SSV Acceptance Report Last update: June 4, 2019
Page 40 of 40 Version: 1.0

You might also like