Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

OoOoOoO

Araullo University-Phinma
Cabanatuan City

Research
in
water resources
“Soil strength”

PREPARED BY: CARLO J. BINUYA


STUDENT

PREPARED TO: ENGR. CESAR FERRER


PROFESSOR

LABORATORY 1:
*INSTRUMENTS:
1. SCALE
2. SIEVE NO.4,NO.10,NO.40
3. OVEN
4. PULVERIZING APPARATUS

DATA RESULT

IN 200 g IN 180 g IN 150 g


W1 248.69 248.69 248.69
W2 448.69 428.69 398.09
W3 819.99 821.69 809.79
W4 751.2 738.89 738.49

COMPUTATION

*GS IF MSOIL=200 g

W 2−W 1 448. 6−248.6


GS= = =1.5221
( W 4−W 1 )−(W 3−W 2) ( 751.2−248. 6 )−(819. 9−4 48.)

*GS IF MSOIL=180 g

W 2−W 1 428. 6−248. 6


GS= = =1. 8501
( W 4−W 1 )−(W 3−W 2) ( 738.8−248. 6 )−(821 .6−428.6)

*GS IF MSOIL=180 g

W 2−W 1 398−248.6
GS= = =1.906
( W 4−W 1 )−(W 3−W 2) ( 738. 4−248.6 )−(209.7−398)

AVERAGE SPECIFIC GRAVITY =1.794

CONCLUSION:
THE MORE WEIGTH OF SOIL WE USE THE MORE SECIFIC GRAVITY WE GET.

LABORATORY 2:
TOTAL MASS OF SOIL SAMPLE = 500 g
MASS OF EQUIPMENT MASS AFTER SIEVE MASS OF RETAINED SOIL PERCENTAGE OF RETAINED
SIEVE NO. 4 =494.2 g 574.2 g 80 g 15.96%
SIEVE NO. 6 =499.5 g 556 g 66.6 g 13.29%
SIEVE NO. 16 =390.6 g 551.5 g 160.9 g 32.10%
SIEVE NO. 30 =370.1 g 427.6g 57.5 g 11.51%
SIEVE NO. 50 =345.4 g 386.3 g 40.9 g 8.16%
SIEVE NO. 100 =322.5 g 350 g 27.5 g 5.49%
SIEVE NO. 200=306.6 g 329.6 g 23 g 4.59%
PAN = 371 g 415.8 g 44.8 g 8.94%

COMPUTATION

FOR NO. 10
SIEVE ANALYSIS % FINER
70.75−38.65 0.6−0.3
SIEVE NO. 10 = 50.78% 70.79 3.35 = X =50.78
X−18.98 2−1.18
SIEVE NO. 40 = 22.38% X 2
38.65 1.18
SIEVE NO. 200 = 4.59%

CONCLUSION:
THEREFORE I CONCLUDE THAT BASE ON OUR LABORATORY OUR SOIL SAMPLE IS CONSIST OF 49.22%
GRAVEL AND BASED ON AASHTO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM OUR SOIL IS UNDER A-1-B(STONE FRAGMENTS
GRAVEL AND SAND).

You might also like