Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Election Law Synopsis
Election Law Synopsis
Election Law Synopsis
V. MRUDULA
12B154
2012-2017
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... iii
Review of Literature..................................................................................................................................................... iv
Objectives of the Study .................................................................................................................................................. v
Principle Aims of the Study ......................................................................................................................................... v
Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. v
Hypothesis ....................................................................................................................................................................... vi
Research Questions ...................................................................................................................................................... vi
Scope and Limitations ................................................................................................................................................. vi
Scheme of Chapters ..................................................................................................................................................... vii
Working Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................ vii
Shashank Shekhar ii
Electoral reforms through Judicial activism
Introduction
The Supreme Court’s ruling that legislators must cease to be members of the House if they are convicted
by a court for an offence where the punishment is more than two years, and its more recent judgment
with regard to the Right to Reject has raised, in some circles, the issue of judicial overreach. Are we seeing
a new pro-activism on the part of the highest judicial bench in the land on the question of electoral
reforms? If so, is this a positive development or a negative one?
The demand for electoral reforms has been there in vogue from quite some time.The Goswami
Committee on Electoral Reforms was set up 23 years ago in 1990.
Subsequently, there have been a host of other committees and reports, including the Vohra Committee
(1993), Indrajit Gupta Committee on State Funding of Elections (1998), Law Commission Report on the
Reform of Electoral Laws (1999), National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution
(2000), Election Commission of India Report on Proposed Electoral Reforms (2004) and the Second
Administrative Reforms Commission (2008). None of these have been able to bring about comprehensive
change and have remained confined to proposals, ideas and intentions.
Even, the comprehensive Electoral Reforms Bill has been pending before Parliament for the last two
decades.
Therefore it can be inferred that the Parliament and political parties have had enough time to act.
However,most of them have no overriding motivation to change the current system because they are its
biggest beneficiaries. This deliberate political drift has become one of the greatest impediments towards
achieving democratic reforms.
In this situation the question that need to be answered is, If Parliament, the supreme institution in a
democracy, refuses to act substantially on matters relating to the ethics and rectitude of its own
functioning, what recourse do public-spirited citizens have?
Given this reluctance of the political establishment to act, it has been seen in past few years that citizens,
through public interest litigations have knocked on the doors of judiciary to save the system from its
ultimate collapse. And in many cases judiciary have responded positively.
However this recourse to approach the judiciary for bringing out policy reforms has been criticized by
some as judicial overreach as in their opinion the judiciary should confine its job only to the
interpretationof law and its push the system towards reform.
In the light of the recent public agitation against corruption it is clear that the country is fed up with the
distortions in the functioning of our democracy and People want clean politics. They want electoral
reform, including in areas of financial transparency and the pernicious link of politics to black money. The
initiative taken by the Supreme Court has, therefore, considerable public support.
The research paper analyzes the landmark judgments of the higher judiciary of India on electoral process
and its impact on bringing a positive reform in the system.
Shashank Shekhar iii
Electoral reforms through Judicial activism
Review of Literature
Literature review covers the number of books available on the topic in our library. The author proposes
to secondarily rely on the articles and reports available on the Internet, related to this topic. For
international context primary sources would be the websites of their government.
The following books were referred for better understanding the crucial points involved in this present
dispute.
The objective of the study is to examine the impact of judgments delivered by higher judiciary on process
of bringing a positive change in election process in India.
1. Part I of this Article highlights the concept and necessity of electoral reforms. It gives a broad
outline of suggestions given by different committees on the subject.
2. The aim of Part II of the Article is to determine the impact of landmark judgments of High
Courts and Supreme Court in the bringing the reforms as suggested by different committees.
3. The aim of Part III of the study is analyze whether by this pro-activist nature the judiciary has
overreached its power as given in the constitution of India.
Research Methodology
Shashank Shekhar v
Electoral reforms through Judicial activism
The methodology the author has adopted in this study is the logical positivism method in which by logic
and resources from books and articles the author has tried to analyze the concept. The research was done
on the basis of Doctrinal Research by reading and deriving concepts from books, literature and online
journals and Judgments. Optimum use was made of all the available books and Internet that were found
resourceful. A major portion of the research shall be done on the Internet, as most of the theoretical data
is available only in the form of articles in legal and institutional databases.
Hypothesis
Formulating a hypothesis is of utmost importance in the doctrinal method of research and it is the crux of
any thesis.
Therefore the Final Hypothesis is: Judiciary working within the bounds of the constitution of India can
being about positive change in the electoral process in the country.
Research Questions
If Parliament, the supreme institution in a democracy, refuses to act on matters relating to the ethics and
rectitude of its own functioning, can judiciary step in and provide relief to the citizens?
This dissertation will deal with the very doctrinal aspect of electoral reforms through judicial activism.
Judicial pronouncements by different courts on the topic would be also dealt in detailed manner.
Thorough discussion would be on the application of constitutional morality in different cases and implied
limitations of constitution. A comprehensive account of election laws and reform suggested by successive
Law Commission of India and other committees would be discussed as well.Constitution and its
interpretations by judicial diktat and moral consequences would be discussed.
There has also been a great deal of substantive work on the topic of Electoral Reforms
undertaken by various civil society groups, which have contributed significantly to the public
discourse on the subject. While acknowledging the contribution of these groups, the paper limits
its discussion to those published by the committees mentioned above and the landmark
judgments of the Supreme Court of India on the relevant subject matter.
No empirical claim is made out.
Shashank Shekhar vi
Electoral reforms through Judicial activism
Scheme of Chapters
Working Bibliography
Books:
1. Rama, D. V., &Mendiratta, S. K. (2014). How India votes: Election laws, practice, and procedure. New
Delhi: Butterworths.
2. RathnaSwamy, P. (2014). Handbook on Election Law (1st ed.). Lexis NexisButtersworth.
3. Dabolia, T. S. (2013). Law of Elections & Election Petitions (4th ed.). Lexis NexisButtersworth.
4. Rathnaswamy, P. (2004). Electoral Reforms: Law and Institutions of India and World. Bookwell
Publishers.
5. Mendiratta, S. K. (2009). All you want to know about Indian elections. Gurgaon: LexisNexis
ButterworthsWadhwa.
6. Basu, Durga Das,(2002) Introduction to the Constitution of India, New Delhi: Wadhwa and
Company Law Publishers, 2002
7. Jain, M.P. Indian Constitutional Law Vol- 1, 2,(2003) -New Delhi: Wadhwa and Company Nagpur
Shashank Shekhar vii
Electoral reforms through Judicial activism
Web-links:
http://www.asianage.com/columnists/where-parliament-fails-judiciary-saves-115
http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/lc170.htm
http://adrindia.org/resources/recommendations-submissions
http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Electoral%20Reforms/Electoral%20Reforms
%20Code%20of%20Conduct.pdf
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/needed-urgent-electoral-
reforms/article4262865.ece
http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/PROPOSED_ELECTORAL_REFORMS.pdf