Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Piro query Ch. 27.

76
Query 1. Approved GAD from the irrigation department.

For this kindly ask the same from contractor.

Query 2. STADD file.

STADD file are attached in calculation report.

Query 3. Hydraulic calculation.

Hydraulic calculation are attached in calculation report.

Query 4. In drawing no.4 inner wall has not extended in full width of box while in other drawings it
has shown in full width.

As culvert intermediate wall are provided only up to total road width, only bottom slab i:e; raft
are extended up to full width at up to edge of straight wall which are along cannel direction in
both side, as shown in section E-E, drawing sheet no. 4.

Query 5. Top slab R/f has been provided in shorter direction while bottom slab R/f in skew direction.
However box has been analyzed in skew direction and R/f should be in skew direction.

In skew slab case, bottom reinforcement are main reinforcement and are applied in skew
direction, whereas top reinforcement are not the main reinforcement and are provided in
perpendicular to the slab. For more details, kindly refer research paper, Effective reinforcement
layout for skew slab, “27th conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURE”.

You might also like