Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research: Feeding Patterns and Stunting During Early Childhood in Rural Communities of Sidama, South Ethiopia
Research: Feeding Patterns and Stunting During Early Childhood in Rural Communities of Sidama, South Ethiopia
Research: Feeding Patterns and Stunting During Early Childhood in Rural Communities of Sidama, South Ethiopia
Research
Feeding patterns and stunting during early childhood in rural communities of Sidama,
South Ethiopia
1
Institute of Nutrition, Food Science and Technology, Department of Applied Human Nutrition, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia, 2College of
Public Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population and Fam. Health, Jimma, University, Jimma, Ethiopia, 3College of Pharmacy &
Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan 110 Science Place, Saskatoon SK CAN S7N 5C9, Canada.
&
Corresponding author: Tefera Belachew, College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population and Fam. Health, Jimma,
University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Key words: Feeding patterns, early childhood stunting, household, food security, southern Ethiopia
Abstract
Introduction: The period from birth to two years of age is a "critical window" of opportunity for the promotion of optimal growth, health and
behavioral development of children. Poor child feeding patterns combined with household food insecurity can lead to malnutrition which is a major
public health problem in developing countries like Ethiopia. Methods: A community based cross-sectional study that involved 575 participants
from rural Sidama was conducted from February to March 2011. A two-stage stratified sampling procedure was employed to select the required
households. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to compare stunting by feeding patterns and other characteristics. Results:
Only 14.4% of mothers fed their children optimally. Prevalence of stunting was higher for infants aged 6 to 8 months (43%) than for those in 0-5
months (26.6%) or 9-23 months (39%) category. Women who did not receive antenatal care(ANC) during pregnancy were 1.5 times more likely to
practice pre-lacteal feeding and 2.8 and 1.9 times more likely to feed their children below minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency,
respectively (P=0.01). Mothers older than 18 years during the birth of index child were 86% less likely to feed their child below minimum meal
frequency than their younger counterparts (P=0.01). Children who started complementary food either before or after the recommended 6 months
time, were more likely to be stunted (P=0.01). Conclusion: The feeding practices of most mothers did not meet WHO recommendations.
Behavior change communication about the importance of optimal complementary feeding and ANC attendance should be strengthened through
extensive use of the Health Extension Workers to reduce the level of child stunting in the study area.
© Masresha Tessema et al. The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
The prevalence of stunting was higher (43%) for children aged 6-8 Children whose fathers had gotten no formal education were 2.9
months than those 0 to 5 and 9 to 23 months, whereas the times more likely to go through early introduction of complementary
corresponding wasting was higher (9.6%) for 9 to 23 months old food than their counter part ((AOR=2.9; 95% CI: 1.3, 6.5).
children than those 0-5 and 6 to 8 months of age (Table 1). The Moreover, mother who practices bottle feeding were 3.1 times more
highest proportion of underweight (Weight-for-age < -2SD) was for likely to feed their child early complementary food than their
children in the category of 9 to 23 months (29%). counter parts (AOR=2.9; 95%CI: 1.3, 6.5). Whereas mothers that
fed their child pre-lacteal feed were 4.5 times more likely to conduct
The majority (93.6%) of the mothers reported initiating breast- early introduction of complementary food than their counter parts
feeding their children within 1 hour after birth. The overall rate of (AOR=4.5; 95%CI: 2, 9.6).
EBF for infants under 6 months was 62.4%; however, EBF rates
declined from 67.7% in the first month to 60.6% for age 4-5 Households whose land size was less than 0.25 hectare, fathers with
months. Bottle feeding (specifically bottles with nipples at their tips) no formal education, mothers who reported no increased food
is not recommended because improper sanitation associated with consumption during lactation and pregnancy were positively
bottle-feeding can introduce pathogens to the infant. The present associated with late introduction of complementary food. The
study found that total prevalence of bottle-feeding was 7.5% finding showed that with land size less than 0.25 hectare were 2
(2.8%, 7.6% and 8.8% for age groups 0-5, 6-8 and 9-23 months, times more likely to practice late introduction of complementary
respectively). Prevalence for timely introduction of complementary food than their counter parts (AOR=2; 95%CI: 1.1 - 3.3).
foods for 6-8 months old children was 57(72.2%). Compared to the Households with fathers having no formal education were 2 times
WHO recommendations for IYCF practices, only few (14.4%) of the more likely to practice late introduction of complementary food than
children were fed with complementary diet of minimum dietary those having formal education (AOR=2; 95%CI: 1.3 - 3.4). Whereas
diversity (≥4). mother that did e not practice the consumption of extra food during
pregnancy and lactation were 2 times more likely to start late
To meet energy requirements WHO [17] also recommends a complementary food than their counter part respectively.
minimum of two and three meals per day for breastfeeding IYC
between the age 6-8 and 9-23 months, respectively. With reference Approximately 86% of mothers in the study areas fed their child
to these recommendations, the results in the current study showed below the minimum dietary diversity recommended by WHO
that 30(38 %) of IYC in the age 6-8 months and 147(37 %) in the (recommended=4, study mean= 2). After adjustment for
age 9-23 months were reported to receive below the recommended explanatory variables by logistic regression, HOUSEHOLDs that did
minimum meal frequency. In addition, proportion of IYC who were not grow vegetables, mother who did not follow ANC and mother
fed with minimum acceptable diet (an indicator that combines who did not consume extra meal during pregnancy or lactation were
minimum meal frequency and minimum diet diversity) were positively associated with child fed below minimum dietary diversity
4(5.1%) for those in the age group 6-8 months and, 42(10.9%) for score. HOUSEHOLD land size greater than 0.25 hectare and later
those 9-24 months of age. birth order were negatively associated with child fed below
minimum dietary score (Table 3).
Based on the WHO IYCF practices indicators, majority (85.6%) of
the mothers sub-optimally fed their children, i.e, they did not follow It was found that those households that did not grow vegetables
at least one or more of the recommended practices for optimal were 2.8 times more likely to feed their child below minimum
feeding for their children from 0-24 months of age. And also 40.6% dietary diversity than their counterparts (AOR=2.8; 95%CI: 1.33 -
of the mothers reported practicing pre-lacteal feeding. 6.06). Whereas mothers who did not follow ANC during pregnancy
were 2.8 times more likely to fed their child below minimum dietary
On multivariable logistic regression after adjustment for other diversity than those who follow ANC (AOR=2.8; 95%CI: 1.25 -
explanatory variables, pre-lacteal feeding was positively associated 6.14). The study also showed that mother who did not consume
with child not fed with minimum meal frequency per day, mother extra food during lactation/pregnancy were 2.6 times more likely to
who did not receive advice about the complementary feeding and feed their child with low minimum dietary diversity than their
did not follow antenatal care (ANC) during pregnancy. Maternal age counterpart (AOR=2.6; 95%CI: 1.30 - 5.35). On the other hand,
during the first child birth > 18 years and mother who breastfed children in households with land size > 0.25 hectare and with 4th or
less than eight times per day were negatively associated with pre- above birth order were 73% and 69% less likely to be fed below
lacteal fed (Table 2).The birth order of index child was also find to minimum dietary diversity than their counterparts (AOR=0.265;
significantly predict EBF practice. Mothers were 5.5 times more 95%CI: 0.11 - 0.66) and AOR=0.31; 95%CI: 0.15 - 0.66
likely to practice EBF for their first child than for a child 4 th and respectively) (Table 3).
above birth order (AOR=5.5; 95% CI: 1.09 - 27.72, p< 0.05). The
study showed that mothers who did not receive advice about Mothers who did not follow ANC were 1.9 times more likely to feed
complementary feeding were 2.3 times more likely to practice pre- their child below minimum meal frequency than their counter parts
lacteal feeding (AOR=2.3; 95%CI: 1.29 - 4.16]) than those who did (AOR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.14 - 3.04). Mothers who forced their children
receive information. Mothers who fed their child below minimum to eat more than they take themselves during complementary
meal frequency were twice more likely to practice pre-lacteal fed feeding were 4.2 times more likely to fed below minimum meal
than their counterpart (AOR= 2.01; 95% CI:1.29 - 3.24); moreover frequency than those who simply encouraged the child to eat more
mothers who did not follow ANC during pregnancy were 1.5 times (AOR=4.2; 95% CI:1.5 - 11.89). This study also found that children
more likely to practice pre-lacteal feeding than those who did follow with birth interval less than two years were 2.7 times more likely to
ANC (AOR=1.5; 95% CI: 0.93 - 2.47). The study also showed that be feed below minimum meal frequency than those who were the
mothers whose age was greater than 18 year during the first child first born (AOR=2.7; 95%CI:1.15 - 6.17). Mothers > 18 years of
birth were 55% less likely to practice pre-lacteal feeding than their age during index child birth were 86% less likely to feed their
younger counterparts (AOR= 0.45; 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.70). Mothers
Diets that are diversified reflect higher dietary quality and greater Competing interests
possibility of meeting daily energy and nutrient requirements
[17,36]. Ensuring minimum dietary diversity is particularly critical for The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
vulnerable children because they need energy and nutrient dense
foods to grow and develop both physically and mentally and to live
We are highly indebted to Hawassa University, Institute of Nutrition, 8. WHO Working Group on Infant and Young Child Feeding
Food Science and Technology and Norwegian Agency for Indicators. Developing and validating simple indicators of
Development Cooperation (Norad) coordination office for financial dietary quality and energy intake of infants and young children
assistance. We would like to extend our appreciation to Sidama in developing countries: Additional analysis of 10 data sets.
Zonal and Boricha district Health Office for providing the necessary 2007. Report submitted to the Food and Nutrition Technical
information and facilitating conditions while carrying out this study. Assistance (FANTA) Project/Academy for Educational
We are also very grateful to extend our appreciation to the study Development (AED). Washington DC, USA. WHO. PubMed |
participants (mothers) who share their priceless time, supervisors Google Scholar
and the data collectors for their full commitment.
9. National Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. 2004.
Addis Abba Federal Ministry of Health, Family Health
Tables Department of Ethiopia.. Google Scholar
Table 2: A bivariate and multivariate logistic regression output showing the odds of giving Pre-lacteal feeding for infant and young
children in Boricha District, South Ethiopia, 2011
Pre-lacteal fed(n=575)
Variables Yes No Crude OR Adjusted
No. ( %) No. ( %) (95%CI) OR(95%CI)
Maternal age during first birth
15-18 77(13.8) 154(26.7) 1 1
>18 156(27) 188(32.6) 0.60(0.43,0.85)** 0.45(0.29,0.70) **
Delivery assisted
TBA 50(8.7) 79(13.7) 1 1
HEW 2(0.33) 9(1.6) 2.9(0.59,13.73) 6.2(0.62,62.57)
Nurse 1(0.17) 8(1.4) 5.1(0.62,41.71) 3.9(0.30,51.49)
Parents 180(31.3) 246(42.8) 0.87(0.58,1.29) 0.8(0.46,1.34)
Follow ANC
Yes 161(28) 207(36) 1 1
No 72(12.5) 135(23.5) 1.5(1.02,2.08) * 1.5(0.93,2.47) *
Receive advice on complementary feeding
Yes 147(25.6) 176(30.6) 1 1
No 86(14.9) 166(28.9) 1.6(1.15,2.27) ** 2.3(1.29,4.16) **
Minimum Meal frequency
Yes 144(25) 153(26.6) 1 1
No 89(15.5) 189(32.9) 2(1.42,2.81)** 2.01(1.29,3.24)**
Frequency of Breast feeding/day
> 8 times 182(31.9) 313(54.8) 1 1
< 8 times 51(8.9) 25(4.4) 0.29(0.17,0.48)* 0.2 (0.10,0.39)*
*Significant at <0.05; ** Significant at <0.01 OR= Odds Ratio; TBA = Traditional Birth Attendance; HEW= Health Extension Workers;
ANC= Antenatal Clinic
Delivery assisted
TBA 78(16.7) 25(5.4) 1 1
HEW 7(1.5) 1(0.2) 0.45(0.05,3.80) 0.54(0.05,6.43)
Nurse 4(0.9) 2(0.4) 1.5(0.27,9.03) 1.4(0.22,9.39)
Relatives 208(44.6) 142(30.5) 2.1(1.29,3.48)** 2.2(1.17,3.96)*
ANC follow
Yes 208(44.6) 98(21) 1 1
No 89(19.1) 71(15.2) 1.7(1.14,2.51)** 1.9(1.14,3.04)*
Feeding style
usually encouraged to eat more 202(43.4) 105(22.5) 1 1
usually not encouraged to eat more 85(18.2) 34(7.3) 0.8(0.48,1.22) 0.82(0.49,1.39)
usually forced to eat more 8(1.7) 14(3) 3.4(1.37,8.28)** 4.2(1.5,11.89)**
Mother take Vitamin A supplementation
Yes 100(21.5) 80(17.2) 1 1
No 197(42.3) 89(19.1) 0.57(0.38,0.83)** 0.47(0.29,0.76)**
Birth interval between index child
First birth 42(9) 21(4.5) 1 1
Less than 2 years 98(21) 70(15) 1.4(0.78,2.62) 2.7(1.15,6.17)*
Greater than or equal 2 years 157(33.7) 78(16.7) 0.9(0.55,1.79) 2.1(0.91,4.77)
Household food security status
Food Secure 49(10.5) 47(10.1) 1 1
Mildly Food Insecure 20(4.3) 9(1.9) 0.47(0.19,1.13) 0.27(0.09,0.82)*
Moderately Food Insecure 111(23.8) 55(11.8) 0.51(0.30,0.86)* 0.46(0.25,0.87)*
Severely Food Insecure 117(25.1) 58(21.5) 0.52(0.03,0.86)* 0.40(0.21,0.77)**
Mother age during index child birth
15-18years 4(0.8) 8(1.7) 1 1
>18years 293(63) 161(34.5) 0.28(0.08,0.93)* 0.14(0.03,0.62)*
*Significant at <0.05, ** Significant at <0.01
Variables Stunted(n=575)
Yes No Crude Adjusted
No. ( %) No. ( %) OR(95%CI) OR(95%CI)
Time complementary food started
Less than six months 21(3.7) 22(3.8) 2.9(1.41, 5.79)* 3.2(1.6, 6.6)**
greater than six months 43(7.5) 48(8.3) 2.3(1.31, 4.15)* 2.3(1.3, 4.05)**
At six month 117(20.3) 201(35) 1.6(1.003, 1.6(1.02,2.6)
2.51)*
Not started 33(5.7) 90(15.7) 1 1
Frequency of BF within 24 hours (n=571)
> 8 times 33(5.8) 43(7.5) 1
< 8 times 180(31.5) 315(55.2) 0.75(0.46,1.21)
Consumption of extra food during pregnancy/lactation
Yes 60(10.4) 132(23) 1 1
No 154(26.8) 229(39.8) 1.5(1.03,2.14)* 1.6(1.06,2.3)*
Feeding style (n=455)
usually encouraged to eat more 122(26.9) 185(40.9) 1 -
usually not encouraged to eat more 52(11.5) 70(15.5) 1.3(0.43,4.01)
usually forced to eat more 7(1.6) 16(3.6) 0.53(0.05,5.3)
Pre-lacteal feeding
Yes 92(16) 141(24.5) 1.2(0.84,1.66)
No 122(21.2) 220(38.3) 1
Bottle feeding
Yes 19(3.3) 24(4.2) 1
No 195(33.9) 337(58.6) 0.73(0.39,1.37)
Minimum Meal Frequency/day (n=466)
Yes 114 (24.5) 183(39.3) 1.2(0.79,1.71)
No 71 (15.2) 98(21) 1
Minimum Dietary Diversity (n=466)
Yes 28 (6) 39(8.4) 0.9(0.53,1.53)
No 157(33.7) 242(51.9) 1
Minimum acceptable diet (n=466)
Yes 20(4.3) 27(5.8) 0.88(0.48,1.62)
No 165(35.4) 254(54.5) 1
*Significant at <0.05; ** Significant at <0.01, OR = Odds Ratio; CI: confidence interval; BF = Breast feeding