Department of Education

Region V (Bicol)
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ALBAY
Ligñon Hill, Bogtong, Legazpi City
Telefax: (052) 481-5939 Website: www.depedalbay.com.ph

SLAC Session 2 (PPST Aligned)

I. Project Title: “Numelit … We Got It”

II. Proponent School/Department: San Fernando NHS/Filipino Department

III. Current State:

The survey shows that 14 out of 18 teaches are unable to use a range of innovative
teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills.

IV. Problem Analysis:

It was found out that teachers unable to use a range of innovative teaching strategies
that enhance achievement in literacy and numeracy skills due to their limited time of
preparation of their teaching areas due to ancillary services. Teachers are more focused
on one strategy which was considered their best practice due to effective students’ active
participation and interest.

V. Future State:
The teacher has utilized a range of innovative teaching strategies such as Small Group
Discussion (SGD), Focus Group Discussion (FGD), Pair and Share, Triad, Practical Work
Approach, Small Group Differentiated Work (SGDW), Deductive Approach, 5 E’s, and
Inquiry Based Approach.

VI. Implementation Plan:

a. What needs to happen?
Teachers were able to utilize range of innovative teaching strategies that enhance
learner achievement in literacy ang numeracy skills.

b. Who will do it?

School Head SLAC Team
PPST Implementing Team Demo Teacher
Faculty

c. When it will be completed?

November 23, 2018

d. What are the outcomes/expected results?

San Fernando NHS teachers were able to utilize a range of innovative teaching
strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills. In
addition, students become functionally literate, problem solver, and critical thinker.
VII. Test Results:
It was found out that teachers failed to apply knowledge of content within and across
curriculum teaching areas due to their limited knowledge and lack of interest towards the
other teaching areas. This failure in applying knowledge of content within and across
curriculum teaching areas causes students failure to recognize the interconnection/
interrelatedness of all the subjects.

VIII. Lessons Learned:

 NARRATIVE REPORT ON THE PROCESS OF SCHOOL LEARNING ACTION CELL
(SLAC) ALIGNED WITH THE PPST MODULE 1
(Apply knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas)

On the first stage of implementation of School Learning Action School (SLAC) aligned with
the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) Module 1 (Apply knowledge of content
within and across curriculum teaching areas), it was held last November 16, 2018. It was started by a
short program. Our principal, Mrs. Rosie G. Bolofer opened the program with her Opening Remarks.
Our principal stated that, “This is not a joke. This is not a game.” She also stated that through
cooperation and attentiveness, outstanding rate for teachers will be achieved.
The Demonstration Teaching by Mrs. Remy N. Balunso, an English teacher, started at 1:35 in
the afternoon and ended at 2:35. The Demo teacher managed the time well in her delivery of the lesson.
After the Demonstration Teaching, it was immediately followed by a Post Conference with the
Principal, Mrs. Rosie G. Bolofer, our Process Observer, Mrs. Salve B. Serrano, an English teacher and
Guidance Counselor designate of San Francisco National High School, teachers, and the demo teacher.
It was started by our principal that it is one of the Mode of Verification (MOV) of the teachers. She also
stated her observations and comments. According to Mam Rosie, “There was sequential priming of
activities that started with the motivational activity. The PPST Module 1 was evident on the activity
since the demo teacher took up different subject areas. PPST Module 4 (Manage a classroom structure
to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of physical learning environment) was also evident. There were group work
and board work for the students.” She also stated that, “the demo teaching was time bound. The session
met at the right time, so it was successful.”
Each department gave also their observations and comments. It was started by Mr. Michael A.
Dado, a Science teacher. He stated that, “The readiness of the team was evident. The demo teacher has
self-confidence.” He had few comments on the Daily Lesson Log. According to him, “The questions or
concepts on Finding practical Applications of concepts are not aligned on the competency.” “The demo
teacher should give reward after the students answered”, Mam Ailene O. Jesalva said. Sir Jerick
Zamudio, an AP teacher stated that, “The demo teacher managed the class very well but having a hard
time to solicit answers from the students due to the reason that they are afraid to answer because there
are observers.” The same comment was given by Mam Irene B. Bermillo and Ms. Suzette B. Vasquez.
The last person who gave her observation and comments was the Process Observer, Mrs. Salve
B. Serrano. She stated that the demo teaching was well-planned so no need to repeat. It was time-bound.
The objectives are evident on the process. The demo teacher was neat and well-groomed, has modulated
voice and has enthusiasm and interest in teaching. She gave comments on the content. “There was an
integration of AP by describing Dr. Jose Rizal, integration of MAPEH by using a picture of a pitcher
on the discussion. The demo teacher exposed the students by varied activities (individual and group
activity). She has also mastered the meaning of different concepts. The demo teacher used appropriate
teaching materials such as ICT and Manila Paper.
Our process observer gave some suggestions. First, the demo teacher should monitor closely
the group activity. Second, appreciate students’ answer by clapping or giving reward. Third, let the
students answer or solicit answers from the students by showing techniques in facilitating difficult
questions to be answered.
After the Post Conference, it was followed by Awarding of Certificate to the Process Observer,
Demo Teacher, facilitator, and participants.