Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Power of Legislature From Enacting, Repeal, and Create Laws A Change or Modification
Power of Legislature From Enacting, Repeal, and Create Laws A Change or Modification
A change or modification
Amendatory Act
Implied
1) Irreconcilable conflict- Part of first statute and a second statute embrace same subject. Second
act cant be enforced wo first act nullified. (repugnancy)
Ex. Second statute provides penalty as presc by RPC using same terms for classif and duration, not sp statute,
amendment
Fact that later enactment relate to same subject matter, not sufficient nor mere diff bet two.
Irr Conflict- exist when 2nd law nullif reason or purpose of 1st law,
Takes effect after 15 days f OG pub, deemed part of am law at time it took effect.
Construction
As a whole, as if the amended act is in its orig form. As if always been there.
Ex. Orig statute provides hall be in force for a period of 2 yrs from aproval. Ame- 4 yrs; 4 yrs counted from
orig date of enactment of orig statute.
Meaning changed
Prospective application
Subversion of judicial process to take cause fr court having jurisdiction before final decision is given
Applies to Lab arbiters w orig and exc juris over all cases involving employer employee rels, inc
money claims ag recruiter out of any law or contract of OFW
While pending claim, EO 797 eneacted, gave POEA the orig… exc jurisdiction. LA proceeded, in fav or OFW
Construction
Ex. Mecano v. COA:claim for reimb of govt official for med and hospitalization under Sec 699 of RAC 1917- auth
head of office to cause reimb or payment of med and hospital of emp if sick or injured or in perf of duties
COA denied claim. AC 1987 revised and pealed RAC Sec 699 daw. It was omitted in RAC.
SC rev grant claim. In AC, “all laws, dec, st inconsistent w this code shall be prealed or modf” RAC Sec 699 not inc
with AC. AC failed to id those intended to repeal.
No implied repeal also. AC governs aspect of govt on admin, org and procedure.
But alteration of modific not necessary mean alteration of construction, unless clear intent sa
language na ginamit at may material change na tlaga sa words
Codification
Continuation of existing laws is the presumption. Codifiers no intent to change the law as it formerly
existed.
Repeal
Deprive succeeding legislatures of crafting new laws appropariate to the ccircumstances. Cant bind
leg to part omde of repeal.
Total or Partial
Express or Implied
Implied repeal
1) Irreconcilable conflict- Part of first statute and a second statute embrace same subject. Second
act cant be enforced wo first act nullified. (repugnancy)
Ex. Second statute provides penalty as presc by RPC using same terms for classif and duration, not sp statute,
amendment
Fact that later enactment relate to same subject matter, not sufficient nor mere diff bet two.
Irr Conflict- exist when 2nd law nullif reason or purpose of 1st law,
3) Codification- the rev Code or statute by its framework and substance, cover whole subj to be a
complete perfect system in itself.
Those not repeated deemed impl repealed. Intent- nullify existing laws in subj, est uniform system
Sec 18, Rule 41 of pre 1997 Rules of Court- appeal in HC cases be taken win 48 hr fr notice of judg.
4)Reenactment
6) reenacting in general terms, then law on details, restrictions (later act, in negative)
“All laws, or part there of wc are not inconsistent with this act are hereby repealed or mod accdly”
Implied repeal.
Presumption against inconsistency. Harmonize first, check if may express then implied.
Special- leg makes prov. Details for all circ of part case.
Ex. LLDA v. CA
LLDA or towns municip exercise jurisd over Laguna Lake and environs in so far as issuance of permits for
fishery privileges?
LLDA statute- LLDA exclusive
Gen act prov all laws incons therwith repealed or modified accdly
Gen law says it shall apply regardless other law on same matter
Effects:
Neither repeal of law renders illegal what udner old is legal.or vice versa
Rights and obli existing on date of eff of new code not affected, governed by orig terms and conds of said
contract or law in force at time such rights vested.
Jurisdiction
Determined by law in force at the tiem action is filed. Neither repal of exp of laws deprve court or
admin tribunal od authority to act on pending action, and finally decide it.
Pending appeal
GR- repeal of statute defeats all actions and proceeding pati pending na mula sa statute.
CA- rule accdg to law prev at time of disposition not the law prev at time of rendition of appealed judg.
Pag may bagong law during pending, yun susundin ni CA so irereverse judg ng lower court.
On Vested rights
App to rights acq under contracts and rights of action to recover damages for torts.
Impairing by repeal vested rights and obli of contracts prohibited eccept in leg exercise of police power.
Contracts
Repeal not afftec terms of contract nor impair the right of parties. Even if contract w govt.
Not prevent from happ collection of taxes under old law, unless sinabi ng law.
Penal laws
Xpn-when repealing act reenacts statute and penalizes same act- cont na crime sya
Xpn- repealing act cont saving clause sabi pending actions hndi affected.
Municipal charter
Repealing statute dec unconsti, no effect of repealing yung luma. So walang repeal.