Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Based High

Sensitive Water Salinity Sensor For Oceanographic


Applications
Uma Kumari.C.R1, Dhanalakshmi Samiappan2 , T.Rama Rao3, Tata Sudhakar4

#1,#2,#3 Department of ECE, SRM University, Tamil Nadu, India


#4 Scientist & Head of Ocean Electronics Group, National Institute of Ocean Technology, Chennai, India
umakumari.cr@gmail.com ; dhanalakshmi.s@ktr.srmuniv.ac.in ; ramaraotr@gmail.com; tata@niot.res.in

Abstract— A high sensitive Mach-Zehnder Interferometer fiber optic sensors are used that can be used in Micro-Opto-
(MZI) based fiber optic sensor for the measurement of sea water Electro-Mechanical Systems (MOEMS). Optical
salinity has been demonstrated in this research. At first, interferometric sensors can withstand high temperature (up to
femtosecond laser is used as the source and its performance in 2000 oC) and corrosion. Apart from this, optical sensors are
sensing salinity of sea water is analyzed. Secondly, a Carbon
monoxide (CO) laser operating in the spectrum of 4.8 to 8.3 ȝm is
highly immune to Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) and
used to excite the arms of MZI. It has been observed that are capable of multiplexing various sensors in MOEMS
wavelength shifts related to attenuation dips are highly sensitive domain.
to salinity of sea water when CO laser is used as the source. Using
simple and robust schematic design, sensitivity of 0.01ȝm/ppt is Significant types of interferometric based optical
achieved for salinity range of 31 to 37 ppt at a constant sensors that have been reported in the literature are Fabry-
temperature of 27oC. The all-optical MZI salinity sensor Perot (FP) interferometers, Mach-Zehnder Interferometers
indicated here is easy to fabricate, low cost, highly sensitive and (MZI), Michelson Interferometers and Sagnac interferometers.
finds application in the field of oceanography. FP interferometers [3] make use of Polyimide (PI) diaphragm
Keywords— carbon monoxide laser; femtosecond laser; Mach-
that shrinks with respect to salinity of water. The PI
diaphragm constriction causes shift in the interference pattern
Zehnder Interferometer (MZI); oceanography; salinity sensor
thus enabling the measurement of salinity with a sensitivity of
I. INTRODUCTION 0.45nm/ (mol/L). Detection of beam deviation due to the
refractive index change allows remote monitoring of salinity
in sea water [2]. With theoretical description of the model, a
Salinity sensor plays a vital role in predicting the resolution of 0.012%o has been achieved for salinity range of
content of dissolved inorganic ions in sea water. Predicting 50 PSU (Practical Salinity Unit). An optical fiber laser salinity
salinity of sea water is very essential in modeling climatic sensor based on multimode interference effect has been
changes, aquatic life cycle and in underwater communication. proposed in [5]. Salinity of the liquid was measured from
Traditional methods are based on measuring salinity from wavelength shift of the transmission peak. Salinity sensitivity
conductivity of sea water [12]. These methods offer bulky and of 19.4 pm/% has been achieved and the measurement range is
expensive devices. A main challenge in electrical sensors is from 3.86% to 21.62%. Absolute salinity of sea water can be
that they are prone to Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) measured using Twin Prism Refractometer [4] technique that
which affects the sensitivity of the sensor. Recently, many provides output resolution proportional to the change in
fiber optics sensors [1] are being developed to sense refractive index of water. Mathematical modeling of optical
parameters like refractive index [7, 8], temperature [8], sensors [6] based on traditional refractometer provides user
pressure [4], strain and displacement. Techniques based on defined algorithms that can perform software analysis of
fiber Bragg grating [11, 13], photonic crystal fiber [14], high- sensor’s prototype.
birefringence elliptic fiber [16] and microfiber knot/coil
resonators [15] offer sensitivities in the range of 20-250pm/‰ Most recently, MZI based Refractive Index (RI)
and also have advantage of immunity to EMI. But the hitch in measurements have been studied and reported. RI sensors
the above mentioned optical sensors are that they are difficult using micro cavity based MZI sensors [9] have successfully
to fabricate. To overcome this obstacle, interferometric based

978-1-5090-3646-2/16/$31.00 ©2016 IEEE


reported a sensitivity of -17503.73 nm/RIU for a RI range of Depth Salinity
1.3371 to 1.3407. The challenge in this technique is creating a (m) (ppt)
smooth micro cavity that requires complicated fabrication 200 33.94
steps. By using tapered thin core fiber [10], RI sensitivity can 250 33.98
be enhanced in the range of 0.447nm for 1% change in typical
RI for a range of 1.333-1.3725. M. A. Mustapa designed 300 34.01
tapered Multimode Fiber Sensor for Salinity Detection [17] 400 34.07
and achieved sensitivity of 0.1705 RIU/M. Single mode 500 34.14
Tapered Optical Fiber [18] can also be used for salinity
600 34.02
sensing that achieves sensitivity of 2834.3 nm/RIU by varying
tapered area waist length. 700 34.26
800 34.31
To the best of our knowledge, no work has been 1000 34.41
reported in sensing salinity of sea water using MZI. Both the
arms of MZI are made of commercially available Single Mode
Fiber (SMF). MZI exhibits additional advantages of high
III. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM AND SELECTION OF LASER
sensitivity, low cost and ease of fabrication.
SOURCE
II. PROPERTIES OF SEA WATER
A. Schematic Design
Various parameters of sea water [20] are listed in Table I
corresponding to ocean depth range from 0 to 4500m. These
Salinity sensor using MZI is shown in fig (1).
properties are studied in order to select a perfect laser source,
specific interferometer as well as in selecting the type and
length of sensing fiber.

TABLE I. PROPERTIES OF SEA WATER

Parameter Range of values


Specific gravity 1.0233-1.0279
Density 920-1100kg/m3
Temperature 22oC-3oC Fig. 1. Schematic of proposed salinity sensor.
Salinity 31-37 ‰
Both the reference and sensing arms are made with equal
Refractive index 1.3382-1.3408 lengths (6mm) of CORNING SMF-28. SMF helps to prevent
any change in wavelength shift due to phase difference. This is
Thermal conductivity 0.56-0.68 W/m K done because wavelength shift corresponding to concentration
of salinity alone is required. The RI of core of SMF in both the
Salinity of sea water varies with depth of ocean as arms is 1.4324. A 3dB optical splitter splits the laser output
well as with temperature. Table II gives a clear insight equally to the reference and sensing arms. Surrounding
about distribution of salinity in ocean [19]. medium of reference arm is air whereas the sensing arm is
immersed in sea water sample. To view transmission spectrum
TABLE II. SALINITY OF WATER in real time, Optical Spectrum Analyzers (OSA) are connected
to the other end of both SMFs. Throughout this experiment,
Depth Salinity temperature of the sample (sea water) is maintained at 27oC to
(m) (ppt) avoid variation of output with respect to temperature.
0 31.22
B. Selection of Laser Source
10 31.40
20 31.56 In this paper, performance of proposed salinity sensor has
30 31.88 been evaluated using femtosecond laser and CO laser.
Femtosecond laser operates in the spectrum of 700nm to
50 32.40
1600nm. Agilent 86142B OSA operating in wavelength range
75 33.24 of 600-1700 nm with a resolution of 0.06 nm is used to
100 33.60 monitor the transmission spectra. In this case, it has been
150 33.88 observed that attenuation dips with sea water samples are not
clear and hence the corresponding wavelength shift could not varied. This change in RI can be viewed as wavelength shifts
predict effective refractive index of sea water. in the output spectrum. Thorlabs OSA 206 (Optical Spectrum
Analyzer) working in the range of 3.3 - 8.0 μm with a
When sea water samples are replaced with NaCl solutions resolution of 0.1 ppm and an accuracy of ±1 ppm is used to
with high salinity, wavelength shifts are clear and hence view the spectrum. The attenuation dips in wavelength around
prediction of salinity above 39 ppt is possible using 5.05 μm (order 110) is continuously noted down for various
femtosecond laser source. Variation of wavelength shift with samples and are denoted as Ȝm. From this value, effective RI
respect to effective refractive index using femtosecond laser is difference is calculated using Eq. (1)
shown in Table III. From the table, it is obvious that
femtosecond laser source cannot be used to excite arms of ǻneff = [(2m+1) Ȝm] / [2L] (1)
Mach-Zehnder interferometer for the proposed set-up.
Here, m is an integer and L is effective length of the
To make use of femtosecond laser for sea water salinity SMF that is used in the sensing arm (6mm). From ǻneff,
sensing, SMF with micro-cavity (chemical etched) should be effective RI of water sample can be predicted using Eq. (2)
employed.
n eff (water) =1.4324 - ǻneff (2)
TABLE III. CALCULATED SALINITY VALUES FROM WAVELENGTH SHIFT
WITH FEMTOSECOND LASER SOURCE
In Eq. (2), the constant 1.4324 indicates the effective
RI of core of SMF in the sensing arm. Finally, salinity is
Effective obtained [18] from the estimated RI of sea water.
Negative Effective RI of
wavelength RI water
shift difference sample Salinity V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
(nm) (ǻneff) (neff) (ppt)
Spectrum analyzer connected to reference arm shows
0 0.02855 1.4039 40 wavelength shifts corresponding to air medium. These values
9 0.02838 1.4040 41 are compared with spectrum from sensing arm to observe the
shifts with respect to salinity concentration of sea water.
20 0.02818 1.4042 42 Corresponding values are as tabulated in Table IV.
32 0.02796 1.4044 43
43 0.02775 1.4046 44 TABLE IV. CALCULATED SALINITY VALUES FROM WAVELENGTH SHIFT
WITH CO LASER SOURCE

52 0.02759 1.4048 44 Negative Effective Effective


60 0.02744 1.4050 45 wavelength RI RI of sea
shift difference water Salinity
(μm) (ǻneff) (neff) (ppt)
The experiment has been repeated with carbon monoxide 0 0.09372 1.3387 31
(CO) laser that emits light in the range of 4.8-8.3ȝm. Most 0.008 0.09358 1.3388 32
recently, coherent CO laser has been designed and
commercially available for material-processing applications 0.019 0.09337 1.3390 33
such as glass cutting, as well as medical, spectroscopic, and 0.029 0.09319 1.3392 34
research uses. The CO laser is more attractive because it has 0.039 0.09300 1.3394 35
the potential to be two times more efficient than traditional
CO2 lasers. Coherent CO lasers operate at high output powers 0.049 0.09282 1.3396 36
in the 5–6 ȝm range at high efficiencies at room temperature. 0.059 0.09264 1.3398 37
This specific feature of CO laser enables its application in the
field of sensing. In salinity sensing, temperature of water Sensitivity of MZI sensor has been calculated from
sample as well as the testing environment should be slope of the graph in fig. (2) as follows,
maintained constant. In the proposed work, temperature is
maintained at 27oC.

IV. SENSING PRINCIPLE

Due to the presence of NaCl ions in the surrounding


medium of sensing fiber, its effective RI difference gets
[4] M Le Menn, et al., “Advances in measuring ocean salinity with an
optical sensor”, Meas. Sci. Technol., no.22, 2011.
[5] QingqiangMeng, et al., “Optical Fiber Laser Salinity Sensor Based on
Multimode Interference Effect”, IEEE Sensors Journal, Volume: 14,
Issue: 6, pp: 1813 – 1816, 2014.
[6] S. Khotiaintsev , et al., “Modeling of the Fiber-Optical Water Salinity
Sensor”, IEEE International Workshop on Laser and Fiber-Optical
Networks Modeling, pp. 36 – 38, 2006
[7] A. W. Domanski, et al., “Compact optical fiber refractive index
differential sensor for salinity measurements”, IEEE Instrumentation
and Measurement Technology Conference, Volume: 2, pp: 953 – 956,
1997.
[8] Feifei Shi , et al., “Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and
Fig. 2. Sea water salinity vs wavelength shift temperature base on three-beam interferometric fiber-optic” IEEE
Optoelectronics Global Conference, pp:1 – 3, 2015.
[9] Xin-Ran Dong, Xiao-Yan Sun, Dong-Kai Chu, Kai Yin, et al.,
VI. SENSOR APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE WORK “Microcavity Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Sensors for Refractive
Index Sensing”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Volume: 28, Issue:
In oceanography, CTD (Conductivity, Temperature 20, pp: 2285 – 2288, 2016.
and Depth) sensors are widely used to predict and analyze [10] Jie Shi, et al., “Sensitivity-enhanced refractive index sensor by using
aquatic conditions and also for modeling climatic changes to tapered thin-core fiber based inline Mach-Zehnder interferometer”,
Proc. of SPIE-OSA-IEEE Asia Communications and Photonics, Vol.
retain a biologically balanced environment. MEMS based 8311, pp: 1-6, 2011
sensors are available for the same application. But, as [11] Farid Ahmed, Vahid Ahsani, Akram Saad and Martin B. G. Jun, “Bragg
discussed in the introduction section, electrical counterparts Grating Embedded in Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Refractive Index
are bulky and are prone to EMI as well as losses. Hence and Temperature Sensing”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters,
optical MEMS technique is employed in this paper. Apart Volume: 28, Issue: 18, pp:1968 – 1971, 2016.
from marine based applications, these sensors can also be [12] R.A.Cox, F.Culkin, and J. P. Riley, “The electrical conductivity/
chlorinity relationship in natural sea water,” Deep-Sea Res., vol. 14, no.
used in industrial functions for sensing temperature, specific 2, pp. 203–220, 1967
gravity and density of various samples. [13] L. Q. Men, P. Lu, and Q. Y. Chen, “A multiplexed fiber Bragg grating
sensor for simultaneous salinity and temperature measurement,” Journal
Apart from Mach-Zehnder based interferometer, of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 5, 2008.
salinity sensors based on refractive index method can also [14] C. Wu, B. O. Guan, C. Lu, and H.-Y. Tam, “Salinity sensor based on
polyimide-coated photonic crystal fiber,” Optical Society of America,
be performed using other two types (i) Michelson vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 20003–20008, 2011.
interferometer and (ii) Sagnac interferometer. [15] Y. P. Liao, J. Wang, H. J. Yang, X. Wang, and S. S. Wang,“Salinity
sensing based on microfiber knot resonator,” Sens. Actuators A, vol.
VII. CONCLUSION 233, pp. 22-25, 2015.
In this paper, a simple and high sensitive MZI based [16] X. Wang, H. J. Yang, S. S. Wang, Y. P. Liao, and J. Wang,“Seawater
sea water salinity sensor has been studied with femtosecond temperature measurement based on a high-birefringence elliptic fiber
Sagnac loop,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letter, vol. 27, no. 16, pp.
and CO laser sources. Among all the interferometric 1772–1775, 2015.
devices, MZI has been selected because it can be easily [17] M. A. Mustapa, M. H. Abu Bakar, A. S. Amir Hamzahy and M. A.
fabricated to get a compact MOEMS sensor. Results of both Mahdi, “Tapered Multimode Fiber Sensor for Salinity Detection,” IEEE
the cases were analyzed and noticed that exciting arms of 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP), pp. 227-229, 2014
MZI with CO laser provides a high sensitivity of 0.01 [18] Y. Mustapha Kamil, M. H. Abu Bakar, A. Syahiry, M. A. Mahdi,
“Determining Salinity Using a Single mode Tapered Optical Fiber,”
ȝm/‰ in the range of 31-37 parts per thousand (‰) at 27 IEEE 5th International Conference on Photonics (ICP), pp. 223-226,
oC . This range of salinity is explicitly applicable for sea 2014
water and hence CO laser can be the best choice for this [19] http://marinebio.org/oceans/temperature/
application related to naval platforms. Sensitivity of this [20] http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-12/rhf/
sensor can be further improved by varying the lengths of
fiber in sensing and reference arm.

REFERENCES
[1] Jose Rafael Guzman-Sepulveda, et al., “Fiber optic sensor for high-
sensitivity salinity measurement”, IEEE photonics technology letters,
vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 2323 – 2326, 2013.
[2] Yong Zhao, et al., “Monitoring technology of salinity in water with
optical fiber sensor”, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 21,
Issue: 5, pp: 1334 – 1338, 2003.
[3] Xinpu Zhang and Wei Peng, “Temperature-independent fiber salinity
sensor based on Fabry-Perot interference”, Optical Society of America,
Vol. 23, Issue 8, pp. 10353-10358, 2015.

You might also like