Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) For Teacher I - III

Name of Employee: ABEGAIL A. DELOS REYES Name of Rater: NOVA S. GASPAN


Position: SST - I Position: Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Tomaligues Integrated School / Calbayog City Date of Review: April 26, 2019
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
1. Content
Knowledge and Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of
Pedagogy (22.5%) content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration
No acceptable
Quality within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject
evidence was shown areas as shown in MOV 1
areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1
1. Applied knowledge with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 7
Basic
of content within and
Education
across curriculum
7.5% 5 5
Services
teaching areas. Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons using Submitted 2 lessons using Submitted at least 4 lessons
using MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by Submitted any 1 of the given No acceptable using MOV 1 and supported
Efficiency by any 1 of the other given any 1 of the other given any 1 of the other given MOV evidence was shown by any 1 of the other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different
teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that
promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing No acceptable promote reading, writing
Quality and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as evidence was shown and/or numeracy skills as
2. Used a range of shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a rating
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 of 7
teaching strategies
Basic
that enhance learner
Education
achievement in
7.5% 5 5
Services Submitted at least 4 learner- Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner-
literacy and numeracy Submitted 1 learner- Submitted at least 4 learner-
skills. centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidently
centered lesson as evidently No acceptable
Efficiency evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1
shown in any of the given
shown in MOV 1 and
evidence was shown supported by any 1 of the
and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of
MOV other MOV given
the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T

Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching
strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop Used different teaching
strategies that develop
critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking No acceptable
Quality and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as
critical and creative thinking
evidence was shown and/or other HOTS as shown
3. Applied a range of shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
teaching strategies to rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Basic
develop critical and
Education
creative thinking, as
7.5% 5 5
Services
well as other higher- Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as
Submitted 1 lesson as Submitted 4 lessons as
order thinking skills. as evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and No acceptable evidenced by MOV 1 and
Efficiency supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the
evidenced by any 1 of the
evidence was shown supported by any 1 of the
given MOV other given MOV
other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
2. Learning
Environment and 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Diversity of classroom structure to management strategies that management strategies that management strategies that management strategies that management strategies that
No acceptable
Learners (22.5%) engage learners, Quality engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
evidence was shown activities/tasks as shown in
individually or in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4 MOV 1 with a rating of 7
Basic groups, in meaningful
Education exploration, discovery 7.5% 5 5
Services and hands-on Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 4 lessons
activities within a supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and No acceptable supported by MOV 1 and any
range of physical Efficiency any 1 of the other acceptable any 1 of the other acceptable any 1 of the other acceptable
supported by any of the
evidence was shown 1 of the other acceptable
learning acceptable MOV MOV
MOV MOV MOV
environments.
Timeliness

Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher


management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of Applied teacher management
learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior
5. Managed learner No acceptable that promote positive and
Quality promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non-
behavior violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in
evidence was shown non-violent discipline as
shown in MOV submitted with
constructively by MOV submitted with a rating MOV submitted with a rating MOV submitted with a rating MOV submitted with a rating
Basic a rating of 7
applying positive and of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Education
non-violent discipline
7.5% 5 5
Services
to ensure learning-
focused Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted any 1 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the
No acceptable
environments. Efficiency given strategies as observed given strategies as observed given strategies as observed strategies as observed in given strategies as observed
evidence was shown in at least 4 lessons
in at least 4 lessons in 3 lessons in 2 lessons only 1 lesson

Timeliness
Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated
teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to
No acceptable
Quality address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as
evidence shown
address learner diversity as
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a rating
6. Used differentiated, of 7
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
developmentally
appropriate learning
Basic
experiences to Submitted at least 4
Education
address learners’
7.5% differentiated teaching
Submitted 3 differentiated Submitted 2 differentiated
Submitted any 1 Submitted 4 differentiated 5 5
Services teaching strategies in at teaching strategies in 2 teaching strategies in 2
gender, needs, strategies in at least 2 differentiated teaching
least 2 lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced by No acceptable lessons as evidenced by
strengths, interests Efficiency lessons as evidenced by
by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by
strategy in only 1 lesson as
evidence shown MOV 1 and supported by any
MOV 1 and supported by evidently shown in any 1 of 1 of the other acceptable
and experiences. any 1 of the other acceptable
any 1 of the other acceptable any 1 of the other acceptable
the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
3. Curriculum and
Planning (22.5%) Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented
7. Planned, managed developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced
No acceptable
Quality teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
and implemented process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1
evidence was shown process as shown in MOV 1
developmentally with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 7
sequenced teaching
Basic
and learning
Education
processes to meet
7.5% 5 5
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 4 developmentally
Services Submitted 3 developmentally Submitted 2 developmentally Submitted 1 developmentally
curriculum developmentally sequenced
sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and
sequenced teaching and
teaching and learning process No acceptable learning process as evidently
requirements and Efficiency as evidently shown in MOV 1
learning process as evidently learning process as evidently learning process as evidently
evidence was shown shown in MOV 1 and
varied teaching shown in MOV 1 and supported shown in MOV 1 and supported shown in any 1 of the given
and supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the
by any 1 of the other given MOV by any 1 of the other given MOV MOV
contexts. other given MOV other given MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T

Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in Consistently participated in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LAC/FGD/ meeting to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner No acceptable discuss teacher/learner
Quality feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich evidence was shown feedback to enrich instruction
8. Participated in
instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the as shown in the MOV
collegial discussions
Basic MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
that use teacher and
Education
learner feedback to
7.5% 5 5
Services
enrich teaching Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2
Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ Participated in at least 4
practice. LACs/FGDs/ meetings as LACs/FGDs/ meetings as LACs/FGDs/ meetings as No acceptable LACs/FGDs/ meetings as
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of
meeting as evidently shown
evidence was shown evidently shown in any 1 of
in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV

Timeliness

Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to No acceptable resources, including ICT, to
Quality address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as evidence was shown address learning goals as
9. Selected, shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a rating
developed, organized rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 of 7
Basic and used appropriate
Education teaching and learning 7.5% 5 5
Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied teaching Submitted 2 varied teaching Submitted at least 4 varied
Services resources, including teaching and learning and learning resources, and learning resources, Submitted any teaching and teaching and learning
ICT, to address resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently including ICT, as evidently learning resource, including No acceptable resources, including ICT, as
learning goals. Efficiency evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and ICT, as evidently shown in evidence was shown evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the any of the acceptable MOV and supported by any 1 of
the acceptable MOV
the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
4. Assessment and
Reporting (22.5%) Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used
diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and
10. Designed,
summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment No acceptable summative assessment
selected, organized Quality strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with evidence was shown strategies consistent with
and used diagnostic, curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
Basic formative and shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a rating
of 7
Education summative 7.5% rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 5 4
Services assessment
strategies consistent
Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted at least 3 varied
with curriculum assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as
Submitted 1 assessment tool
No acceptable assessment tools as
requirements. Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of
as evidently shown in any of
evidence was shown evidently shown in any 1 of
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T

Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress
No acceptable
Quality and achievement using and achievement using and achievement using and achievement using and achievement using
evidence was shown learner attainment data as
11. Monitored and learner attainment data as learner attainment data as learner attainment data as learner attainment data as
shown in the MOV submitted
evaluated learner shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
Basic
progress and
Education 7.5% 4 5 4
Services achievement using Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of
Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable
learner attainment Efficiency at least 4 of the acceptable
3 of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV MOV
at least 4 of the acceptable
evidence was shown MOV
data. MOV

Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV was completed No acceptable Submitted MOV were
Timeliness across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter evidence was shown distributed across 3 quarters
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T

Consistently showed prompt Frequently showed prompt Occasionally showed prompt Rarely showed prompt and Frequently showed prompt
and clear communication of and clear communication of and clear communication of clear communication of the and clear communication of
the learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress
No acceptable
12. Communicated Quality and achievement to key and achievement to key and achievement to key and achievement to key and achievement to key
evidence was shown stakeholders, including
stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
promptly and parents/ guardians as shown parents/ guardians as shown parents/ guardians as shown parents/ guardians as shown parents/ guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted
clearly the learners’ in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
Basic
needs, progress
Education 7.5% 4 4 4
and achievement to
Services
key stakeholders,
including Submitted a combination of
Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted any 1 of the given No acceptable Submitted a combination of 3
parents/guardians. Efficiency at least 4 of the acceptable
3 of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was shown of the acceptable MOV
MOV

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable Submitted MOV were
Timeliness distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters completed in only 1 quarter evidence was shown distributed across 3 quarters

Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed various Frequently performed various
various related various related various related related work/activities that related work/activities that
No acceptable
13. Performed various Quality work/activities that contribute work/activities that contribute work/activities that contribute contribute learning process contribute learning process
evidence was shown as shown in the MOV
related learning process as shown in learning process as shown in learning process as shown in as shown in the MOV
Basic the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted submitted
5. Plus Factor works/activities that
Education
(10%) contribute to the
10% 4 4
Services
teaching-learning
process.
Submitted at least 4 different Submitted 3 different kinds of Submitted 2 different kinds of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable Submitted at least 3 different
Efficiency kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence was shown kinds of acceptable MOV

Timeliness

OVERALL RATING FOR


Adjectival Rating Equivalences ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Adjectival Rating Range
Outstanding 4.500 - 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 - 4.499 ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
Satisfactory 2.500 - 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 - 2.499
Poor below 1.499
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight RATING
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET RESULTS
Objective (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T

NOVA S. GASPAN ABEGAIL A. DELOS REYES MA. TERESA S. SIMON


Principal II SST - I Public Schools District Supervisor
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
G EVALUATION

ING
SCORE
Ave.

5.000 0.375

5.000 0.375
ING
SCORE
Ave.

5.000 0.375
ING
SCORE
Ave.

5.000 0.375

5.000 0.375

5.000 0.375
ING
SCORE
Ave.

5.000 0.375
ING
SCORE
Ave.

5.000 0.375

5.000 0.375

4.500 0.338
ING
SCORE
Ave.

4.333 0.325
ING
SCORE
Ave.

4.000 0.300

4.00 0.400

4.738

OUTSTANDING
ING
SCORE
Ave.

ON
ervisor
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I - III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ABEGAIL A. DELOS REYES Name of Rater: NOVA S. GASPAN


Position: SST - I Position: Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Tomaligues Integrated School / Calbayog City Date of Review: April 26, 2019
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019

Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Score
Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 4 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 7 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.338
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 5 4 4.333 0.325
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000 0.400
Final Rating 4.738
Adjectival Rating OUTSTANDING

NOVA S. GASPAN ABEGAIL A. DELOS REYES MA. TERESA S. SIMON


Principal II SST - III Public Schools District Supervisor
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES


Teamwork
Self-Management
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes
organization.
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. 5 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 5
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
organization goals and objectives.

Professionalism and Ethics


Service Orientation
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her
concerns.
actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, 5 3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment. 4
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on
good grooming and communication.
DEPED strategies and directions.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve system
further enhance service delivery.
and help others improve their effectiveness.

Results Focus
Innovation
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas,
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational
processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
needs before personal needs.
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures
productivity to create higher value and results.
correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in terms of
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 4 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or 5
solutions.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
organization.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or improving
ability to succeed with minimal resources.
quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.

5 – Role model; 4 – Consistently demonstrates; 3 – Most of the time demonstrates; 2 – Sometimes demonstrate; 1 – Rarely demonstrate OVERALL
COMPETENCY 4.67
RATINGS
DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline
(Recommended Developmental
Intervention)

A. Functional Competencies

Curriculum and Planning Curriculum and Planning


Attend trainings on teaching and learning
Selected, developed, organized and used To select, develop, organize and appropriate
resources to be updated on new strategies Quarter 1, 2, & 3
appropriate teaching and learning resources, teaching and learning resources, to address
(ICT) – SLAC, Seminars, Workshops
including ICT, to address learning goals learning goals

Content Knowledge and Pedagogy Plus Factor


Attend trainings on teaching strategies and
Applied knowledge of content within and To perform various related works/activities that Quarter 1, 2, & 3
interventions – SLAC, Seminars
across curriculum teaching areas contribute to the teaching-learning process

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Professionalism and Ethics Innovation


Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility To be able
Attend trainings on new strategies to
to meet the organization’s needs, improve to demonstrate an ability to think ‘beyond the box’. Quarter 2 & 3
improve personal productivity
system and help others improve their Continuously focuses on improving personal
effectiveness. productivity to create higher value and results

Teamwork
Self-Management
Works constructively and collaboratively with
To prioritize Ask for coaching on time-management Quarter 1, 2, 3, & 4
others and across organizations to accomplish
work tasks and schedules to achieve goals
organization goals and objectives.

Feedback:

ABEGAIL A. DELOS REYES NOVA S. GASPAN MA. TERESA S. SIMON


SST - I Principal II Public Schools District Supervisor
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Resources Needed

Local fund, training


resource package

Local fund, training


resource package

Local fund, PPST


resource package

School Head

RESA S. SIMON
ols District Supervisor
oving Authority

You might also like