BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY

SESSION- 2018-19

BLBH 323: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

ASSIGNMENT

Topic: Third Party Intervention in Criminal

Litigation

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

PROF. R.K. MURALI BHANU PRAKASH
PANDEY
ROLL NO. 69
B.A.LL.B (Hons.) 6th
SEMESTER

FACULTY OF LAW
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
VARANASI, 221005
 BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY

SESSION- 2018-19

BLBH 323: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

ASSIGNMENT

Topic: Accused Right to Remain Silent: A case

comment on Nandini Sathpathy and Kathi Kalu.

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

PROF. R.K. MURALI PRACHI JAIN
ROLL NO. 39
B.A.LL.B (Hons.) 6th
SEMESTER

FACULTY OF LAW
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
VARANASI, 221005
 BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY

SESSION- 2018-19

BLBH 323: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

ASSIGNMENT

Topic: Power of Appellate Court under Cr.P.C.,

1973

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

PROF. R.K. MURALI JANHVI TRIPATHI
ROLL NO. 24
B.A.LL.B (Hons.) 6th
SEMESTER

FACULTY OF LAW
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
VARANASI, 221005
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The success and final outcome of this project required a lot of guidance and
assistance from many people and I am extremely privileged to have got this all
along the completion of my project. All that I have done is only due to such
supervision and assistance and I would not forget to thank them.

I respect and thank to Prof. R.K. Murali Sir, our subject teacher, for providing
me an opportunity to do the project work and giving us all support and
guidance which made me complete the project duly. I am extremely thankful to
his for providing such a nice support and guidance, although he had busy
schedule managing the daily affairs.

I owe my deep gratitude to my friends, who took keen interest on the project
work and guided me all along, till the completion of the project work by
providing all the necessary information for developing a good system. I would
not forget to them for their encouragement and more over for their timely
support and guidance till the completion of our project work.

I heartily thank my parents for facilitating me with all the requirements. I am

thankful to and fortunate enough to get constant encouragement, support and
guidance from library staff, faculty of law, which helped me in successfully
completing our project work.

PRACHI JAIN
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The success and final outcome of this project required a lot of guidance and
assistance from many people and I am extremely privileged to have got this all
along the completion of my project. All that I have done is only due to such
supervision and assistance and I would not forget to thank them.

I respect and thank to Prof. R.K. Murali Sir, our subject teacher, for providing
me an opportunity to do the project work and giving us all support and
guidance which made me complete the project duly. I am extremely thankful to
his for providing such a nice support and guidance, although he had busy
schedule managing the daily affairs.

I owe my deep gratitude to my friends, who took keen interest on the project
work and guided me all along, till the completion of the project work by
providing all the necessary information for developing a good system. I would
not forget to them for their encouragement and more over for their timely
support and guidance till the completion of our project work.

I heartily thank my parents for facilitating me with all the requirements. I am

thankful to and fortunate enough to get constant encouragement, support and
guidance from library staff, faculty of law, which helped me in successfully
completing our project work.

JANHVI TRIPATHI
PRACHI BIBLILOGRAPHY

1. Shivani Mittal, The Right Against Self-Incrimination

and State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad: A Critique,
2(1) NLUJ Law Review 75 (2013)
2 http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/180rpt.pdf

BOOKS:
• SC SARKAR, THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE (10th ed. LexisNexis, New Delhi 2012).
• ASHUTOSH KUMAR MISHRA, 50 LEADING
CASES OF SUPREME COURT IN INDIA (2014).
• BATUK LAL, COMMENTARY ON CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE, 1973 (5th ed. Orient Publishing
Company, Allahabad 2010).
• D.D. BASU, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973
(5th ed. LexisNexis, New Delhi 2014).
• K.N. PILLAI, R. V. KELKAR’S CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE (5th ed. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow
2008).
• S.R. ROY, B.B. MITRA ON CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE (20th ed. Kamal Law House, Calcutta
2003).
ARTICLES:
• Michael Macnair, The early development of the
privilege against self-incrimination, OXFORD
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES 66, 73 (1990).
• Kalpana Bhardwaj & Brijandra Panwar, Role of
Judiciary in Protection of Human Rights, 1
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 5 114, 115
(2010).
• Alfred Clapp, Privilege against self-incrimination, 10
RUTGERS LAW REV. 541 (1955).
• Akhil Amar & Renee Lettow, Fifth Amendment First
Principles: The Self-Incrimination
Clause, MICHIGAN LAW REV. 857, 901 (1995).
• David Dolinko, Is there a rationale for the privilege
against self-incrimination, 33 UCLA LAW
REV. 1063 (1985).
• Fred Inbau, Self-Incrimination: What Can an Accused
Person Be Compelled to Do?, JOURNAL
OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY 1329,
1337 (1999).
• J.K. Das, Investigation Technologies in Criminal Cases
and the Right to Health in India, 12
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND
LAW 56, 59 (2011).
• Ram Bhajan Rai, Relavance of Statements recorded by
the Police during Investigation, (2001)
5 SCC (Jour) 14.
CASES:
• Nandini Satpathy v. P. L. Dani, (1978) 2 SCC 424.
• State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad, AIR 1961 SC
1808.
• Hoffman v. United States, 341 US 479.
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
• Malloy v. Bogan, 12 L.Ed. 2d 653.
• Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 47.
• Mahabir Mandal v. State of Bihar, (1972) 1 SCC 748.
• Dina Nath Ganpat Rai, Re. AIR 1940 Nag 186, at 189.
• Arvind Khanna v. CBI, Criminal Rev. Pet. No.
443/2010.
• Selvi v. State of Karnataka, 2010 7 SCC 263.
• Abdul Rajak Mohammed v. Union of India, 1986 Cri LJ
2019 (Bom).
• Ram Lalwani v. State, 1981 Cri LJ 97.

BHANU BIBLIOGRAPHY