Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Errgq: Frqfurft
Errgq: Frqfurft
Errgq: Frqfurft
lfr*lftqrRq
Name of the Offi cer....,.,......,.,...
i.'cri ql €rEtq
Period of Report
t.efrrs'r+ sr rrc
gnmr we ffi)
Name of Officer (in full)
(in block letters) One box to be left blank between words
2 qqffi
Date of Birth
,TTl
dd
flmm rl_TTt
yyyy
3. qT. BrT. flr. +{r t rfr s'r +i
Year of Recruitment in L O. F. S
sorfu :
fsficEHtqT)
Qualifications (degree & diploma):
Other professional/Technical
recognitions
4. rqqr eraq 2 t Bffisd EFi/Bhqi + {E{ t e+q-* ofuq1 *r r{fem qkr t r nrs} 6} $H
e'ri n qk qI$ ertn E), a} B-d€'Ft / please state briefly the shortfalls with reference ro rhe
targets/objectives refered to in column 2. Please speci11, the constrains. ifany, in achieving the
targets.
e) 3r{qfud qrfr / 3E q{qrfr / aqrs + s.r+{ erl $ clc wa6R / Attitude towards Schedule Castes
i Schedule tribes / Weaker sections ofsociety.
gvefrwT lntegrity
' qm - IV/Part-IV
(6')
(A) Assesment of work output (.weightage to this section woirltl be 40yo)
(q)
(B) Assessment of personal attributes (weightage to this section would be 30%o)
asrd-ffiqa-o{eie
Inter-personal relationS
qf{f,rril trr q{ qrrr iG-t
Overall Grading on personal attributes
(Ir)
(c) Assessment of functional competence (weightage to this section ---=-l
would be 307o)
2. FTof-q-fi +wfl
zfrrqdr d
Strategic planning ability
3 frliqAi+1+rq-m
Decision making ability
*
figtJ qn Iv +'qu-s iF, E q.i rT i ftc.rs vnivr lweightagey *. e+run w
qqq ili+tq ifurrr
Overall numerical grading on the basis ofweightage given in Section A, B
and C of part fV of the report.
gFT:
ftqltjrr 3rftrsrft $T 6{fllr.R
Place :
Signature of the Reporting Authority
qe 3{sTtt{qlc'
Name in block letters
fraffi:
Date :
q({rqfis}J q-cfu+qhq
Designation During period of ieport
10
qFI - V/Part - V
{mHT srft{srfrdr 3il$fi
REMiARKS OF THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY
(Yq I qq 9 t EfltS rTq qifis+lq qrr si rrr+ * eIE qch{r qftranrfr ERT rfi qq) |
(To be filled by the Reviewing Authority alier filling up the numeric part as
mentioned at page No. 8 & 9)
fiHtJ * qrrr IV + EU-s s'q q,?i.r { flqq ,tq r+niu lwetghtagey * e+nrn w
qqq if+tq ikq /Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage
given in Section A, B and C of part IV of the report.
wq erq-iltiTc
Name in block letters
frqis:
Date :
qEarqfilqtJ srsRT+shT
Designation During period of report
kq s{nrorfr q,T cfu+fi keT qFr t, 3{l-iFT ;rrr
Name ofthe officer reported upon
Assessment Year:
lt
elFI - VI/Part-Vl
ffdurffie1srqGffi
REMARKS OF THE ACCEPTING AUTHORITY
<erqk errfir sfr'B stffi i+ d)
(i.e. next superior authority)
1. fidffir qffil{frq{r qffi 61ffi w ff qffi;12quft aqr ftr*ar qr
fu4quy 66pr16nts of the Accepting authority on the remarks of Reporting Authority / Reviewing
Authority & details ofdifference.
cB effifitilq
, Name in block letters
frqis':
Date :
qq{q'fiNE + <t{T{
si-qlsr
Designation During period of report
t2
g.*.q.e{R +t ffirqqfu tq qqq qRUfr qti fisH +1 si-qfu :t qr:i +} rqlw Etfr t r
Time Schedule for preparation/completion of APAR where the period of report ends on l3 March
of the year
( mfrrsd'- fficq{ I
(Reporting year - Financial Year)
frr€ ilntq a-6 "fft 6t amEo 5n f+q
qr+ t Grru orlwFr+ tq t !ilr+ *t nrftq
erc'r d ro'* t qR fi,qt', + agn rrtrfgrcr
lrsfus{+ 31 crd ql Er*q + ult61ff 5p1
tF.€o
frr* ffi rr.q rrfre oi qqre lPd6RTrr
t*-qrs-flq it&t)
Sl. No. Activity Dats b) $hich to be conrplEted. Date ol' actual
(1'he dates are to vary com p lct ion &
proportionatcly if the period of countcrsigncd by
report ends on adate othur than 31"' the concerned
ofMarch ol theyear ) omcer
2
ffiJ fuq qd erA arftr+n1 rrtr firqiiar 15 sT+{{
srfrr$rft s) E-{eqis-{ qtq-rT (q-dT dr[Ei)
Submission of sell'-appraisal to reporting officer by
officer to bo reported upon (wherc applicable)
15"'April
wg*vr I TNSTRUCTToNS
vflfrtsT + {Eiq t qi'mc Ei qt qri + {Tq Fqfufud ilffi *r eus{q +ffi srFs I
The following procedure should be followed in filling up the column relating to Integrity :
z Tr*. {H +e * r fi m-rs w ssfir ergvrur mur urft q r qtc s1 q-s !fr' (qi qfr e a$r+.r$ S qr€
; \r*-
"t +qr
qnr srF6s si T6 eTrr{R shT i*- e-{q-ff sffi
ytmatTi-r si qrq'ft I wi ssfrw si ccrfura
+ri qr .Je ria qr fi mr€ *-cqr {rrE +fi t dr ss fu ifr t fi c1€rr erRr+.fi +} w fr uqT qfr s k qo w
orfrrsrt++lrislqqiq{qqir*^ffiqq{q6{++'li{s?aH+filqqriqrssi sTftr+-n\*k{-€T-s,tr
qqrrfit, st fi€r{E} r
A Separate secret note should be iecorded and followed up. Acopy ofthe note should also be sent
together with the APAR to the next superior Oflicer who will ensure that integrity or to record the
secret note, the Reporting Officer should state either that he had not watched the offrcer's work for
sufficient time to form a definitejudgement or that he has heard nothing against the officer, as the case
may be.
q) qfr sr{qfiwH * wsssq {+r qr (vrq ws e} qrar t (t srftr*T{t 61 c-endr eqfr H + qT+
qri6q qd w-+1 Hfuk artqR Bs+ q.fl .c. sTR. i q} s1 sTql srfrs r
If,
as a result ofthe follow up action, the doubts or suspicions are cleared, the officer's integrity
should be certified and an entry made accordingly in the APAR.
q) qk {w qr {vrq s1 gfu 6} sTdt t n} ss srfifus-dr 6} q} ksri+ fuqr qT-{r qfrq qd ge-*1 g+qT su
srfrrsrftsi$Etqrqlqfrsr
Ifthe doubts or suspicions are confirmed, this fact should also be recorded and duly communicated
to the oflicer concemed.
columns inAPAR should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting adequate time'
rUtS
-
qwn*tqr<ttfl* r qr Z*",)Rlirr (e'& arcgeura*Onqrqqq+s)qkfdtqaqqlqqiqsq
t dfufl srfird q'd + tds frftTq eRilffidr ert{ 3st Tf6 s qr I 0 sl hRIq sr{ {qrqq + ddtl t
tCcIqtqrBkdEt'Tr l-2 qr 9-10sllsq-sgdqs-.{rE}R-s-frtfqssr siflq-flgtka+'r+ erqg+s
t I Eifi ffitc is te qqq fi dfu r slY{ {fi q{r 3{fr rsr+ u* o €qft rsrfr * er;6,iil src s{i srd q-S
r{srimrq+.rlqrde}'ft qi,+ qctreq'{ fuqrqnrqrBq r
It is expected that any grading of I or 2 (against work output or atfibutes or overall grade) would be
adequately j ustifiedin the pen-picture by way ofspecific failures and similarly, any grade of9 or 10
would b"j.r.tifr"d with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9- 10 are expected to
be rare ociurence and henie the need tojustiry them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting
. and reviewing authorities should rate the offrcer
against a larger population of his/her peers that
may be currently working under them.
m c.+.s. i{R t o eilr e t sq fri rri,}fti,r st'{6f, w6P *1 d"ft t rer qrs'n t
APAR graded between 6 hnd shortofS will be rated as 'very good'.