Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

PEOPLE VS.

MACEREN

Administrative regulations adopted under legislative authority by a particular department must


be in harmony with the provisions of the law, and should be for the sole purpose of carrying into
effect its general provisions. By such regulations, the law itself cannot be extended. An
administrative agency cannot amend an act of Congress.

FACTS:

The respondents were charged with violating Fisheries Administrative Order No. 84-1 which
penalizes electro fishing in fresh water fisheries. This was promulgated by the Secretary of
Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Commissioner of Fisheries under the old Fisheries
Law and the law creating the Fisheries Commission. The municipal court quashed the complaint
and held that the law does not clearly prohibit electro fishing, hence the executive and judicial
departments cannot consider the same. On appeal, the CFI affirmed the dismissal. Hence, this
appeal to the SC.

ISSUE: Whether the administrative order penalizing electro fishing is valid?

HELD:NO. The Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Commissioner of Fisheries
exceeded their authority in issuing the administrative order. The old Fisheries Law does not
expressly prohibit electro fishing. As electro fishing is not banned under that law, the Secretary
of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Commissioner of Fisheries are powerless to
penalize it. Had the lawmaking body intended to punish electro fishing, a penal provision to that
effect could have been easily embodied in the old Fisheries Law. The lawmaking body cannot
delegate to an executive official the power to declare what acts should constitute an offense. It
can authorize the issuance of regulations and the imposition of the penalty provided for in the
law itself. Where the legislature has delegated to executive or administrative officers and boards
authority to promulgate rules to carry out an express legislative purpose, the rules of
administrative officers and boards, which have the effect of extending, or which conflict with the
authority granting statute, do not represent a valid precise of the rule-making power.

You might also like