100

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

100.

In Re: Will of Tan Duico (1924)

Facts: Mamerta Base instituted an action for the probate of the will of Chinaman Tan Duico.
The court denied the probate of the will on the ground that said will was not signed by three (3)
instrumental witnesses. The document was signed by Simplicio Sala by order of the testator,
whose name is before the said signature, by reason of the latter’s incapacity on account of his
weakness and the trembling of his hand.

The testator also stated that he directed Simplicio Sala to sign it in his name and in the presence
of three (3) witnesses who also signed with him at the bottom of said document, and on the left
margin of each of its three (3) pages correlatively numbered in letter by Simplicio Sala in the
name of the testator Tan Duico and by the three (3) other witnesses.

Issue: Was the signing by the three (3) instrumental witnesses valid?

Ruling: In dealing with attestation, the law does not say that the instrumental witnesses must be
different from those who signed the attestation clause, for in the first part of said section, after
speaking of the signature of the testator or the person signing in his place, it adds and attested
and subscribed by three (3) or more credible witnesses in the presence of the testator and of each
other, from which it clearly follows that the same witnesses who signed on the left margin of
each page of the document presented by the testator to them as his will, must be the ones who
should sign the attestation clause, inasmuch as they alone can certify the facts to be stated in said
clause, for having taken a direct part therein, as they saw the testator sign the will, or the person
requested by him to sign all the sheets of the will and affirm that it was signed under his express
direction in the presence of said witnesses and that all the sheets thereof had also been signed by
them in the presence of said testator and of each of them.

For all of the foregoing, the document, Exhibit A, presented by the proponent as the last will and
testament of the deceased Tan Diuco is admitted to probate, without special finding as to costs of
both instances.

You might also like