Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuel Injector Holes: (Fabrication of Micro-Orifices For Fuel Injectors)
Fuel Injector Holes: (Fabrication of Micro-Orifices For Fuel Injectors)
George Fenske
Argonne National Laboratory
May 21st, 2009
Co-PIs
Nicholaos Demas
pm_03_fenske
This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information
Overview
Timeline Barriers
Project start date FY 04 Barriers addressed - FCVT/VT
Project end date FY 12 Materials Technologies (3.4.7 &
Percent complete 60% 3.4.8)
– Cost
– Manufacturability
– Performance
Budget Partners
Total Project Funding ~1.6M Imagineering Finishing
– DOE Share ~1.5M Technologies
– Collaborator Share ~0.1M Fuel system OEMs
Engine OEM
FY 08 350 K Small business - integration of EN
FY 09 350 K process into nozzle production
line
US EPA
2
Relevance of Research to DOE Barriers
This project addresses the development of fuel injector technology to
reduce diesel emissions by reducing in-cylinder production of diesel
particulates.
– Potential secondary benefits to improve fuel efficiency through improved
fuel atomization & combustion
Multiple paths being pursued by DOE & industry to reduce emissions
– Aftertreatment devices (NOx & PM traps)
– Alternative engine cycles (HCCI, LTC)
– Improved fuel injector designs – fuel atomization (in-cylinder
reduction of particulates)
DOE Workshop “RESEARCH NEEDS RELATED TO FUEL
INJECTION SYSTEMS IN CIDI AND SIDI ENGINES” identified specific
needs:
– Manufacturing technologies that would be used for cost-effectively
producing ultra-small holes and controlling dimensions with ultra precision.
– Materials and coatings to resist fatigue, wear, and corrosion; sensors and
controls; non-traditional fuel injection; modeling & simulation, …
3
Relevance/Purpose/Objective of Work
Combustion studies demonstrate that reducing the diameter of injector
orifice decreases the amount of particulates formed during combustion
Objective of research is to develop technologies to fabricate 50 µm
diameter (or less) micro-orifices for high-pressure diesel injectors
– Reduce in-cylinder production of particulates (lower emissions)
• with no fuel economy penalty
– Improve combustion of fuel (improved fuel efficiency)
125 to 200 µm
4
Approach Electrodischarge (current process), Plating
Identify potential micro-orifice fabrication (aqueous, CVD/PVD), Laser-processing,
techniques LIGA, …
– No technology exists to economically
produce robust 50 µm orifices Electroless Nickel
Downselect – 50 µm, maturity, cost, scale- – autocatalytic
up deposition of Ni
Demonstrate feasibility (lab) from aqueous
Identify and resolve technical barriers solution
– Uniformity, adhesion, deposit
formation, hardness, fatigue, reduced
flow …
Treat prototypic components (Tech USEPA
Transfer) NVFEL
Spray visualization studies (USEPA)
– Single-size orifices (50 µm)
50 µm Ø
Multi-Sized Orifices (e.g. 50 µm & 100 µm)
orifices on the same nozzle to maintain
overall fuel flow capability
100 µm Ø
– Detailed microstructural analysis
– Process re-optimization
55.8
Engine emission & efficiency studies 54.8 53.5 69.6 71.8
53.7 55.4 63.7 71.9 72.0
5
Milestones/Decisions
FY08 (completed)
– Preparation of EN coated nozzles to mitigate cavitation erosion
• Work with OEM to deposit EN on experimental nozzles to improve
cavitation performance at elevated pressures
– Characterization of NVD coated nozzles (coating uniformity, surface
finish, and adhesion
• Evaluate potential of alternative coating process (NVD - nickel
vapor deposition) process to deposit uniform coatings on nozzles
– Characterization of laser-fabricated micro-orifices.
• Perform preliminary assessment of uniformity of laser processed
orifices
FY09
– Preparation of multi-sized micro-orifices on commercial nozzles for
spray visualization studies at the US-EPA (in-progress)
– Establish collaborative agreement with nozzle OEM to accelerate
technology validation (in-progress)
• Negotiating level and type of effort between ANL and partner
Progress/Accomplishment: Ability Progress/Accomplishment:
to coat interior of injector orifices Developed and applied advanced
requires process optimization to analytical techniques to
remove hydrogen gas bubbles characterize coating uniformity
Autocatalytic EN process generates Metallography and phase-contrast X-Ray
hydrogen bubbles that adhere to surface imaging (NDE) of EN - coated nozzles
and prevents uniform coverage provide quantitative information on
Multiple mechanical techniques pursued to coating uniformity
mitigate adhesion of H2 successfully – Coating uniformity within 5%
achieved
Progress/Accomplishment: Progress/Accomplishment:
Addressed and resolved early Transferred concept/technology
issues related to coating adhesion to industrial plater/coater
Initial adhesion issues were
addressed and resolved with proper Lab-scale process transferred to
control of precleaning/etching, commercial size operation
control of solution chemistry, and
post-deposition annealing
Poor Adhesion
New set of nozzles procured for multi-sized orifice task. The new set of
nozzles were produced by the same OEM as those used in the spray-
visualization studies, however, they were fabricated from more current
(different) alloy.
– Information on alloy composition and heat treatment and how they
differed from original series of nozzles was unknown and proprietary
– Because of the unknown alloy composition and heat treatment, a
series of scoping runs were performed to determine deposition rate
and quality (coating uniformity, adhesion, hardness)
Initial EN deposition runs performed using original deposition protocols
developed for the spray-visualization nozzles indicated further
optimization was required.
– Presence of surface pits on outer surfaces
– Poor coating uniformity
Progress/Accomplishment:
Coating Uniformity & Surface
Pitting After First trial Run
1 out of 4 nozzles
experienced severe surface
pitting. Minor pitting
observed on remaining 3
nozzles
54.8 53.7 53.5 55.4 55.8 63.7 69.6 71.9 71.8 72.0
280 μm
CS
Progress/Accomplishment: Micro-Vickers indentation of
coatings on internal surfaces demonstrated excellent adhesion
of the coatings to the orifice (after 2nd trial run)
B S
A Micro-Vickers
hardness tester was
used to apply a load
at the interface
between the plated
region and the
substrate in order to CNN CS
test the plating nozzle
integrity
Good adhesion
Interface plating
between nozzle
(top) and EN
coating (bottom)
Forward 2 steps, back-1, sideways 1…. Pathforward
Summary - 2nd trial run with low-surface tension bath, degreasing of the orifices,
and aggressive agitation resolved issue of internal coating uniformity, however,
some external surface flaws appeared.
Visual examination of the surface flaws reveal they occurred at regions that
exhibited ‘staining’ under the coating - suggesting poor adhesion due to surface
contamination.
While the quality of the coatings produced using the protocols developed for the
2nd trial run should be sufficient to proceed to the next stage of research, a 3rd
trail run will be performed to eliminate surface flaws and assure uniform internal
coverage.
– Lower the level of surface tension modifier to mitigate internal coating
stresses while still maintaining good coverage
– Aggressive pre-cleaning and etching to assure surface cleanliness and
mitigate ‘staining’
Future Work - Pathway Forward
Near-Future (FY09)
– Re-fine coating protocols to assure defect-free, uniform coatings on
new nozzle alloys
– Deposition of coatings on new nozzles for US EPA flow studies
– Return nozzles to shop to EDM large (100 µm) in between 50 µm
orifices, slurry polish holes, regrind needle seat, and return to EPA
– EPA flow studies (FY 09/10)