Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Differences Between Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes: Eukaryotic Replication
The Differences Between Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes: Eukaryotic Replication
Replication is intimately linked to cell division in all organisms; both prokaryote and
eukaryote. Cell division in eukaryotes is carried out in the context of the cell cycle.
Unlike prokaryotes which can double under optimal conditions in as little as 20 min the
eukaryotic cell cycle takes some 18 to 24 h to complete.
G1, S and G2 are collectively referred to as interphase. If cells are no longer dividing,
such as with terminally differentiated cells, they are considered to be in G0. As the cell
passes through each phase of the cell cycle certain checks must be satisfied. At critical
stages the level of special cytoplasmic proteins known as cyclins rise then subside once
the cell has passed through the phase. There are also a group of enzymes known as cyclin
dependent kinases (cdks) which phosphorylate protein targets involved in the control of
the cell cycle. The catch is that, although the cdks are present at fairly steady
concentrations in the cell, independent of the cell cycle phase, they only become
activated when they bind the appropriate cyclin.
Certain key indicators are used at each checkpoint. A check for the completion of S phase
(replication) is the presence of Okazaki fragments. If replication is complete there should
be no Okazaki fragments. DNA damage is checked for at G1 before the cell enters S.
Spindles are checked before the cell actually divides (M phase)
PHAR 2811 Dale’s lecture 5 page 2
Coupled with these factors the DNA polymerases that are found in eukaryotes work
much slower NOT faster!! At the rate they work it would take 30 days to copy the human
genome if it was left to 2 replication forks! The average E. coli replication fork works
around the chromosome at a staggering 105 base per minute. Our eukaryotic counterpart
can only manage somewhere between 500 and 5 000 bases per minute.
The only way to get around such slack work habits is to employ more enzymes! There are
multiple initiation sites scattered some 30 to 300 kilobases apart. Drosophila, alias the
fruit fly, has ~ 5,000 such sites while mammalian cells have ~20,000. This initiation
event has to be tightly coordinated and with so many separate sites the logistics seems
massive. It is regulated but we don’t know how! Most of what we do know about
eukaryotic replication has been gained from studying yeast and SV-40 DNA replication.
Drosophila and toads have also been studied as have human cell cultures.
As with prokaryotes each origin of replication begins with the binding of a large protein
complex; in the case of eukaryotes it is imaginatively named the Origin Recognition
Complex (ORC). This complex will remain on the DNA throughout replication. Other
protein factors then join the ORC (a whole party in fact!) and recruit proteins which coat
the DNA. The next complex to associate is the MCM complex. This complex contains a
helicase amongst other enzymes. This will be required to unravel the DNA. To facilitate
the binding of the MCM complex, a helicase loader must also bind. You can see this party
is getting complicated very quickly. Let’s simplify the story by appreciating that a
number of protein complexes bind in a coordinated fashion and once this has been
completed we have a pre-replication complex. These accessory proteins or licensing
factors accumulate during G1 of the cell cycle. The initiation complex is now described
as licensed to begin replication. These licensing factors also prevent re-initiation. You
PHAR 2811 Dale’s lecture 5 page 3
can’t have eager proteins trying to re-initiate replication during one round of replication.
It is essential that only ONE faithful copy of the DNA is made at replication!!
Then we have pol ε. It can polymerase DNA and sticks to the job very well but may have
a regulatory role rather than a serious catalytic one. DNA pol γ is restricted to the
mitochondrion and is thus thought to be responsible the replication of its genome. The
chloroplast also has DNA pol γ. On top of the pols α, δ and ε eukaryotes have lots of
repair enzymes: pols β, η, ι, κ and ζ.
Not only do we have different enzymes but eukaryotic cells have more copies of these
enzymes than do prokaryotes. Our typical animal cell has between 20,000 and 60,000
molecules of pol α whereas our regular bacterium, E. coli has 10 to 20 molecules of
DNA pol III.
Once the DNA has replicated in eukaryotes it must be packaged. This happens rapidly
after replication. The cell must synthesise the required histones as replication proceeds (it
doesn’t have enough stored histones to do the packing).
Prokaryotic/
Protein Activity/role
eukaryotic
5’ to 3’ polymerase, 3’ to 5’ exonuclease,
DNA Polymerase I Prokaryotic
5’ to 3’ exonuclease
DNA Polymerase III Prokaryotic 5’ to 3’ polymerase, 3’ to 5’ exonuclease,
5’ to 3’ polymerase, complexes with
primase then begins DNA synthesis from
DNA Polymerase α Eukaryotic
RNA primers, low processivity (~100 nt),
no exonuclease activity
5’ to 3’ polymerase, 3’ to 5’ exonuclease
DNA Polymerase δ Eukaryotic (proof reading), high processivity when
complexed with PCNA
5’ to 3’ polymerase, high processivity,
DNA Polymerase ε Eukaryotic
probable regulatory role
DNA Polymerase γ Eukaryotic Mitochondrial DNA polymerase (5’ to 3’)
Primase Both RNA polymerase (5’ to 3’) makes primers
DNA helicase Both Untwists DNA
Single stranded Binding Coats DNA to prevent strands re-
Both
Protein (SSBP) annealing
Topoisomerases (type I and Relieves stress of supercoiling (type I) and
Both
II) introduces negative supercoiling (type II)
DNA gyrase Prokaryotic Type II topoisomerase
Seals breaks in the DNA backbone
DNA ligase Both between 3’OH and 5’ PO4 requires energy
source
Initiator proteins Both Bind at the origin of replication
Reverse transcriptase activity (5’ to 3”)
Telomerase Eukaryotic
using an endogenous RNA template
The ends of the DNA are known as telomeres. As each chromosome is one continuous
double stranded length of DNA it has 2 telomeres (not rocket science!). Replicating the
ends and what to do with the ends are problems. There is a particular problem with the
lagging strand. The 3’ to 5’ parent strand is copied no trouble as the leading strand. The
lagging strand (parent 5’ to 3’) has small primers made every so often and filled in. There
is no template at the end to bind to so when the primers are removed there is an overhang.
This can’t be filled in by normal lagging strand mechanisms because a 3’ Oh is required
and there is none at the end. This is not good!! It exposes the DNA to digestion which
would eventually eat into the genes at the end (gene erosion). The other problem is that
with each round of cell division the DNA would become shorter. This is known as the
“end-replication” problem.
PHAR 2811 Dale’s lecture 5 page 5
This problem was solved by the discovery of a group of reverse transcriptases known as
telomerases. (This discovery was made by an Australian scientist Elizabeth
Blackburn).The end DNA, the telomeres, have an unusual sequence; several thousand
copies of a tandem repeat which is species specific, but is G rich. The vertebrate version
is TTAGGG. This repeating sequence is added onto the 3’ end by telomerases and is
sometimes tucked in to the end forming a cap. Capping proteins associate to prevent
nuclease erosion of the ends.
The really interesting thing about telomerases is not so much their existence as their lack
of activity in certain cells, most somatic cells to be exact. While germ-line cells and some
highly proliferative stem cells have telomerase activity and thus the zygote will have full
length telomeres, the telomeres of somatic cells shorten with each mitotic cell division.
Eventually they become too short and the cell stops dividing. It is this phenomenon that
explains the observation that normal cells in culture only survive ~30 cell divisions
before they die out.
In contrast, immortal cell lines, which are derived from cancers can be kept in culture
indefinitely. The most famous cell line is the HeLa cell. HeLa cells are derived from
Henrietta Lacks who died in 1951 of cervical cancer:
Here is the extract from the following website with a brief history of these famous cells:
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may97/860431113.Cb.r.html
“In 1951 a physician removed cells from the cervix of Henrietta Lacks, a 31 year
old black woman from Baltimore, and sent the cells to a lab to determine if they
were malignant. The cells were malignant and Henrietta Lacks died eight months
later from cervical cancer. Henrietta Lacks' physician provided George and
Margaret Gey of Johns Hopkins University with a sample of these cervical cancer
cells. The sample of Henrietta Lacks' cells was code-named HeLa, for the first
two letters of her first and last name. The HeLa cell cultures survived and
multiplied so well in culture, that they were soon being shipped to research labs
around the world for study.
PHAR 2811 Dale’s lecture 5 page 6
Over the past 45 years, research on HeLa cells has provided scientists with an
enormous amount of basic knowledge about the physiology and genetics of cells.
However, HeLa cells have been responsible for generating a great deal of bogus
scientific data as well. It turns out that HeLa cells grow very aggressively in
culture and can easily invade other cell cultures during routine lab transfer
procedures, when proper precautions are not taken. As a result, numerous
research papers have been published on the biology of a variety of cultured cell
types which have subsequently been shown to be HeLa cells.”
Immortal cells i.e. cancer cells, have active telomerases (90%) or other mutated strategies
to keep their telomeres long (the other 10%). This is not the reason they have become
malignant BUT cancer cells with active telomerases are selected out as the malignancy
establishes itself. If they were not the malingnancy would soon die as the cells divide so
rapidly they would very quickly reach the damage control point and the cells would die.
http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/genetics/accelerated-aging-progeria-gen-01.html
“Cellular data, particularly regarding structures called telomeres, suggests that
some of the cells from Hutchinson-Gilford patients are prone to early cell
senescence. Telomeres are special DNA structures at the tips of the
chromosomes. These telomeres gradually shorten over time, and this shortening
is associated with some aspects of cellular aging. Skin fibroblasts from
Hutchinson-Gilford patients have shorter than normal telomeres and
consequently undergo early cell senescence. At birth, the mean telomere length
of these children is equivalent to that of a normal eighty-five-year-old.
PHAR 2811 Dale’s lecture 5 page 7