Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sriram Project
Sriram Project
A
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
ARUN KUMAR .S (70805101004)
of
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
IN
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
I hereby declare that the entire work embodied in this dissertation has been
carried out by us and no part of it has been submitted for any degree or diploma of
Place: Coimbatore
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
During the process of actual manufacture, which took up nearly two months the interactions
between Mr. S. Devananthan and ourselves dispelled all our initial doubts, because of the efforts put in by
him. Mr. S. Devananthan helped us to the maximum in every possible way and we are deeply moved by
his kindness, despite the odds that confronted us.
Our sincere and heartfelt thanks are due to him in helping us to give shape to our design and to
achieve our target.
We also express our profound gratitude to Prof. Arun Kumar Adak, Head of the Department,
Mr. D. Viswanathan, Associate Professor and our guide Mr. C. Parthasarathy and all the teaching and
non-teaching staffs of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering of our college for their suggestions
and encouragement.
i
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
Finally we express our sincere thanks to all who have helped us throughout the project.
ii
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
Abstract
Satellites play a vital role in the development of a country. Depending upon the dimensions and
weight of a satellite the launch vehicle and hence the engine has to be properly designed. Engines have to
be designed in such a way that they should give maximum power so as to lift off from the surface. But
lifting off from the surface doesn’t make it all; it has to reach the cosmos and must be able to inject the
satellite into the orbit with exact orbital velocity. Conventional launchers and engines are complicated
involving huge expenses and efforts, and can inject huge satellites into orbit. But incase if a small satellite
is designed and has to be tested, it is not practical to launch it immediately into the orbit with the existing
huge satellite launch vehicles because of the high cost. Also in case of failures huge amount of money and
precious time will be lost. In this situation a small satellite launch vehicle (SSLV) with a compatible
engine will nearly rectify all these drawbacks. So we as a group wanted to develop a technology suitable
for launching a payload of about 50 Kg into a Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Our work here is to design,
manufacture and to test a 500 Kgf thrust producing liquid propellant rocket engine. This will be our
indigenous model since all the works have been done using the materials which are locally available. We
believe depending upon the success it will help our nation to develop in this field.
iii
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i
ABSTRACT ii
LIST OF TABLES vi
LIST OF FIGURES vi
Chapter I – INTRODUCTION 2
1.1 Introduction to liquid rocket engines 2
1.2 Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion 4
1.3 Some standards for amateur rocket designers 5
1.4 Design Section – Calculation of Mass flow rates 6
iv
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
Chapter IV – SUB-SYSTEMS
4.1 Cooling system 42
4.2 Ignition system 44
4.2.1 Pyrotechnic Ignition System 44
4.2.2 Hypergolic Ignition System 44
4.2.3 Spark Igniters and Augmented Spark Igniters 45
4.3 Control and Measuring Systems 45
4.3.1 Gaseous Nitrogen Regulator 45
4.3.2 Gaseous Oxygen Regulator 46
4.3.3 Propellant Control Valves 46
4.3.4 Check Valves 46
4.3.5 Pressure Gauges 46
4.3.6 Temperature Indicator 46
4.3.7 Thrust Indicator 47
4.4 Design section – Design of cooling system 47
4.5 Design section – Sketch of the assembly 49
Chapter V – MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY
5.1 A Brief Description of Machine Tools 55
5.2 Machining process 56
5.2.1 Combustion Chamber 56
5.2.2 The Nozzle 59
5.2.3 The Injector 61
5.2.4 Engine Mount and Test Stand 62
5.3 Electroplating 63
5.4 Assembly 64
5.4.1 Engine 64
5.4.2 Engine mount and Screw rod 66
5.4.2 Measuring systems 66
Chapter VI – TESTING
CONCLUSION 70
v
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
vi
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid propellant Rocket engine 2009
viii
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Chapter I - INTRODUCTION
1
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
INTRODUCTION
The power plant is the most essential part of any mechanical devices or instruments or systems.
The prime goal of any power plant is to provide enough energy to drive that system. All it does is it
converts energy from one form to another form. Power plants can be classified into many sub categories.
There is no constant rule for classification of power plants, depending upon the requirements,
manufacturability, type of energy being converted, etc., these can be sub divided into many categories.
Rocket engines are a kind of power plants which converts chemical energy into kinetic energy.
Combustible chemicals are combusted in the combustion chamber of a rocket engine and are allowed to
expand through the nozzle. These chemical rocket engines can be further classified into three types’ viz.,
Solid rocket motor, Liquid rocket engine and Hybrid rocket motor. In Solid rocket motor the propellant is
a mixture of fuel and oxidizer and is stored in the solid state. Liquid rocket engines have fuel and oxidizer
both stored in liquid or gaseous form in separate tanks. The disadvantage of the solid rocket motor is that
if it was ignited it will stop only when the entire propellant gone empty until that it will burn
continuously. Hence these were used at places where high thrust is required. Examples include boosters in
rockets, missiles, etc. In liquid rocket engines the case is different the reaction can be controlled by
controlling the flow of propellants in to the combustion chamber. The disadvantage is the storage of
liquid propellants is difficult than the solid propellants and the mechanism required for the operation is
complicated. Examples include many of the rocket engines which are currently in use. The disadvantages
of these two engines have been overcome by the hybrid rocket motor. It consists of the stored fuel in solid
state and oxidizer in liquid or gaseous state which is required for the combustion. The hybrid rocket motor
have some advantages over the two of its competitors, however it is not widely used. Liquid Rocket
engines were the prime thrust producers in many of the rockets which involve satellite injection, missions
to other celestial bodies and even some of the ICBMs. In this text we will study about the design of such
engine.
2
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The pressure in the balloon is greater than that of the atmospheric pressure. Because of high
pressure, the air inside the balloon will tend to squeeze towards where the pressure is low. When the air
inside the balloon is allowed to come out from the mouth of the balloon it will come with some velocity
because of the above said pressure difference and the velocity is said as exit velocity this causes the
balloon to move forward. As the air squeezes out through the throat, a force is produced and that force
moves the balloon in the opposite direction. This force is called Thrust. This is what exactly happens in a
LPR engine (on all other chemical rockets also). According to SI system the thrust is measured in Newton
(N). One Newton is the force required to move one kilogram of an object with velocity one meter/second
in one second.
3
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The schematic of a LPR engine is shown in Fig. 1.1-2. The fuel and oxidizer are stored in their
storage tanks and are ducted to the injector. The purpose of the injector is to mix the fuel and oxidizer and
to spray them into the combustion chamber as minute droplets. The droplets are atomized in order to
make the fuel and oxidizer mix properly and also to make the combustion complete. The oxidizer and fuel
mixture is then ignited by using an igniter. Upon ignition combustion takes place and the pressure and
temperature builds up tremendously. The pressurized gases will then starts to flow towards the low
pressure area through the throat where it is accelerated to sonic velocity and then it is expanded through
the diverging nozzle to increase the velocity at the exit. The nozzle is designed in such a way that the
nozzle exit pressure matches with the ambient pressure to obtain high burnout velocities and also to avoid
the formation of shock waves while flowing at high velocities.
=
Where , the force is produced, is the mass and is the acceleration. Now we know that
acceleration is change in velocity with respect to time. Substituting for acceleration,
=
The product of mass and velocity is called the momentum and this equation is referred to as the
momentum equation. When this equation is applied in rocket engines the values of mass and velocity can
be either the mass or velocity of the rocket or the exit gases’. Now the above equation can be re-written
as,
=
Where ṁ is the mass flow rate and ve is the effective exit velocity of the gas. This is the
generalized equation for the thrust of any rocket engine. The above equation holds good if the exit
pressure (Pe) of the gases equals the ambient pressure (P∞). If the exit pressure is not the same as ambient
pressure then the thrust equation is given by
=
+ (
−
∞ )
From the basic sciences we know that the product of mass and velocity is momentum, so the first
term is the momentum thrust and the second term is the pressure thrust. The pressure thrust depends on
the expansion of the nozzle. If the expansion is too high then the exit pressure will be less than the
ambient pressure and this will cause negative pressure thrust. So a rocket nozzle has to carefully designed,
total burning time is termed as Impulse(). Mathematically it can be expressed as = , where is the
so that the exit pressure should be slightly greater than the ambient pressure. The product of thrust and the
4
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
total thrust force over a period of time and is the burning time. Specific impulse (Isp) is the impulse per
unit weight of the propellant. Specific Impulse is one of the important factor for the selection of the
propellants and is mathematically represented as
= =
The unit of Specific Impulse is seconds (s). Here W is the mass flow rate ( ) and this mass flow
rate is the total mass flow rate including the fuel and oxidizer. Here we introduce another variable r,
which is the oxidizer fuel ratio.
=
=
And
= = +
From this we can find the oxidizer and fuel flow rates for a given propellant combination for the
required mass flow rate. The oxidizer/fuel ratio ‘r’ depends upon each propellant choice and some of the
widely used propellant combination and their properties are given in table 1.1[1].
Mass Adiabatic
Combustion
Sl. mixture Flame Isp
Oxidizer Fuel Pressure
No. ratio Temperature (S)
(psi)
(r) (F)
1 Liquid Oxygen Gasoline 2.5 5470 242 300
2 Gaseous Oxygen Gasoline 2.5 5880 281 500
3 Liquid Oxygen JP-4 2.2 5880 255 500
4 Liquid Oxygen Methyl Alcohol 1.25 5180 238 300
5 Gaseous Oxygen Methyl Alcohol 1.2 5220 248 300
6 Liquid Oxygen Liquid Hydrogen 3.5 4500 363 500
7 Red fuming Nitric acid JP-4 4.1 5150 238 500
8 Fluorine Liquid Hydrogen 4.54 5084 389 500
Note: All these values are obtained from the pre recorded tests and these values may slightly vary from text to text. All the above
values hold good with expansion to 14.7 psi.
5
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Hydrocarbon fuels are the most readily available fuels in the market and they can be handled
easily unlike any other fuels. The best choice of oxidizer for an amateur rocket builder is the gaseous
oxygen and it is the best oxidizer for most of the combustible matters. Although Liquid oxygen is the best
oxidizer for any rocket it cannot be handled by an amateur rocket builder. Regardless of the pressure
oxygen will be in its liquid form if and only if the temperature is -183˚C. Liquid oxygen is pale blue in
color and its storage is very difficult. Since it is a cryogenic liquid it requires double wall vessel to be
stored. So, Gaseous oxygen would be the best choice for an amateur rocket builder.
The objective of this design section is to showcase the calculations involved in the design of a
Liquid propellant rocket engine. Sample calculations corresponding to each chapter will be given at
the end of the respective chapters. The design section deals with the design of a Liquid propellant
rocket engine which is capable of producing 500Kgf thrust at sea level.
Calculate the mass flow rates for a rocket engine capable of producing 500Kgf thrust at sea
level with GOX and Gasoline as propellants
=
The required thrust is 500kgf. If we choose the propellant combination as gaseous oxygen and
gasoline then the specific impulse will be 281s. Substituting the values we will get,
=
500
= =
281 !
This is the required mass flow rate for the engine for the selected propellants. Now we know the
mixture ratio for the selected propellants and by this,
=
"#
= +
"$
And
= (1 + )
6
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
=
"
(-./)
1.78 /!
=
(1 + 2.5)
7
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
8
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
30(4) + 40(3) = 0
÷ by ρAV
04 0 03
+ + =0
4 3
9
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
09
90 − =9 + 0!? 0 − 300! cos Ѳ = 300! C
>!
0 > 0! >
= = +
0 >! 0 >
=0
:D
:E
For a steady flow the acceleration is zero,i.e the rate of change of velocity is zero. So
D;D
;
>9 >
cos Ѳ 0
3>! >!
10
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
This equation is the Euler’s equation of motion. Bernoulli’s equation is obtained by integrating
this equation and by assuming
>9
G G 0H G 0 IJK!K
3
9 L
H IJK!K
3 2
11
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Now consider the first law of thermodynamics. 0M 0N 0O. Second law states that 0N 0!.
So 0M 0! 0O. 0O is the work done by the system, and it can also be denoted as – 90. From this
we get 0M 0! − 90.
0ℎ 0M 90 09
0! 0ℎ − 09
0 09
0! R −
By perfect gas law, 9 S
0 09
0! R −S
9
L 9L
!L − !- R +K − S+K
- 9-
9L R L
+K +K
9- S -
VW
9L L
YX
T U
9- -
VW
Z
X Z[-
We know that
9L L Z⁄Z[-
T U
9- -
In the same way, Substitute 0M RD 0 in 0M 0! − 90 and proceed, we will get
L L [-⁄Z[- 3-
T U
- - 3L
3L L -⁄Z[-
T U
3- -
12
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Z
9 3 Z Z[-
T U=T U =T U
9- 3- -
]- L ]L
ℎ- =ℎ+
2 2
State 1 corresponds to combustion chamber. So the velocity at this state will be zero.
]L
ℎ- = ℎ +
2
We know that ℎ = R
]L
R - = R +
2
÷ ,^ R
- ]L
=1+
2R
ZX
But R = Z[-
- ]L
=1+
2_S/(_ − 1)
= `_S
- ]L (_ − 1)
=1+
2L
]L
aL =
L
- _−1 L _ − 1 L [-
=1+ a J = T1 + a U
2 - 2
13
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
- _−1 L _ 1 L [-
1 a J T1 a U
2 - 2
From this
[Z
9 _ 1 L Z[-
T1 a U
9- 2
[-
3 _ 1 L Z[-
T1 a U
3- 2
14
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Consider figure 2.3-2. The mass flow across any section has to be same. So
3∗ ]∗ ∗ 3]
3∗ ∗ 3∗ 3- ∗
∗ 3] 3- 3 ]
1 d
= 81 + 2 a < = 8 <
31 _−1 2 _−1 cd (Z.-) efd
3 c∗ L
But and (since M=1)
L 3∗ L 3- L ∗ L
T ∗U = T U T U T U
3- 3 ]
h 2
g L _−1 2 _−1 i ∗ L
81 + a < 8j<
L
8g∗ < = 8Z.-<
efd
2
By Definition,
_+1 L
] L a
8 ∗< = a =
∗L 2
_−1 L
1+ a
2
Substituting and simplifying we get
Z.-
L 1 2 _ − 1 L Z[-
T ∗ U = L oT U T1 + a Up
a _+1 2
With the help of above equations we can easily calculate all the major parameters of a nozzle
corresponding to the local Mach number. The pressure, density and temperature ratio relations help us in
finding out the local values of the respective relations. The suffixed variable represents the known value,
i.e. the chamber conditions. The Area ratio relation finally gives the profile of the nozzle with respect to
the Mach number. While designing a nozzle the nozzle design Mach number is chosen and is fed up in the
formula to find the exit area. The throat area can be found out by choking the nozzle. The condition at
which the nozzle will be choked is given by
S ∗
∗ = T ∗ U kl n
9 _m
15
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
• Convergent nozzle
• De-Laval Nozzle (Convergent – divergent nozzle)
• Minimal length nozzle
• Plug or Aerospike
CONVERGENT NOZZLE: - A convergent nozzle is a kind of nozzle which is generally used for
increasing the velocity of the gases in the subsonic region. The principle behind this nozzle is the
continuity equation which we will be discussing later. The simple form of continuity equation is given
below. A schematic of a convergent nozzle is shown in the Fig. 2.1-1.
3- - 4- 3L L 4L
When the flow is incompressible, i.e., When the density is constant the equation changes to
qr sr q t st
CONVERGENT- DIVERGENT NOZZLE: - This nozzle is mainly used for accelerating the flows to
supersonic speeds. Supersonic flow can be achieved only by a C-D Nozzle or De-Lavel nozzle. The
convergent section of nozzle accelerates the flow up to transonic speeds and finally sonic speed will be
achieved at the throat when the nozzle is choked. Throat is the part where the cross-sectional area will be
at its minimum. Nozzle can be choked by further increasing the pressure ratio. Behind the throat region
the divergent section begins. Here, the pressure drops and the flow begins to accelerate. The acceleration
of the flow depends upon the expansion of the gases. The divergent section of most of the nozzles will be
16
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
simply conical which does not yield the perfect expansion of the gases. Perfect expansion is possible only
with the bell nozzle where the contour will be parabolic. Design of such bell nozzles depends on the
method of characteristics and Ѳ-β-M relationship. The design itself is a separate science and it involves in
the solution of higher order differential equations. Many software packages are available to solve this
criterion and software based solution will be discussed here.
MINIMAL LENGTH NOZZLE: - This is very similar to a De-Lavel nozzle except the length of the
total nozzle will be reduced by increasing the divergent angle and also by reducing the size of the
convergent section. This reduction will be done in such a way that it should not affect the performance of
rocket engine. Most of the modern rockets have this kind of nozzle (except some experimental rockets).
Here in this text we will be designing this kind of nozzle in our example calculations.
PLUG OR AEROSPIKE: - The aerospike engine is a type of rocket engine that maintains its
aerodynamic efficiency across a wide range of altitudes through the use of an aerospike nozzle. It is a
member of the class of altitude compensating nozzle engines. A vehicle with an aerospike engine uses
25–30% less fuel at low altitudes, where most missions have the greatest need for thrust. Aerospike
engines have been studied for a number of years and are the baseline engines for many single-stage-to-
orbit (SSTO) designs and were also a strong contender for the Space Shuttle main engine. However, no
engine is in commercial production. The best large-scale aerospikes are still only in testing phases. The
design of this kind of nozzle can be done with the help of software packages however we will not be
discussing about this type of nozzle.
17
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Find out the throat area required for the accounted rocket engine and hence plot the
contour of the rocket engine’s nozzle. Choose a design Mach number of 3.
Combustion Chamber
Design Mach
pressure
No.
psi bar
100 6.894 1.95
200 13.789 2.33
300 20.684 2.55
400 27.579 2.73
500 34.473 2.83
Table 2.5-1 Design Mach Numbers corresponding to various chamber pressures
The throat area can be found out by choking the nozzle and the relation is given by
S ∗
∗ T ∗ U kl n
9 _m
18
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
b 2.7808 C 10[x L
y b 59.5
For the ease of manufacture and to ensure proper choking, round this value to 59mm. So
y b 59
To find the contour we need to solve higher order differential equations which are very difficult
to solve manually. As already explained there are many software packages available to solve the higher
order differential equations in order to get the parabolic contour of the nozzles. We have chosen
AEROSPIKE 2.6 given by aerorocket.com. The following screen shots will best explain the datas to be
fed into the software and the output given by it.
19
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The above image is the main window of the software. As indicated in the above figure feed the
pressure ratio as 34.01 in the provided area. Select the propellant combination as shown in the following
figure. The fuel we are using is gasoline, but this option is not available in this software. So select RP-1
(Rocket Propellant 1) and then change the value of γ as 1.23.
After this, click on the button over Minimum Length Nozzle. A new window will appear and in
that window change the value of γ to 1.23, design Mach No. to 3 and Throat diameter to 0.059 m as
shown in the following fig.
20
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
By clicking the plot button various distributions over the nozzle can be figured out.
21
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Now click on the “Send MLN data to printer” button and get the coordinates as shown below.
22
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
So here we have found out the throat area and hence the contour of the nozzle has been generated.
All the obtained values can be checked for consistency by manual calculations. For the ease of
manufacture the nozzle and combustion chamber can be hypothetically divided into two sections. These
two sections can be brought together and fixed up by flanges which are fitted on them. The thickness is
the next problem which we will be discussing in the subsequent sections.
23
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
24
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The first one is the high pressure container i.e., the combustion chamber. Combustion chamber
volume is the major parameter in the design and is obtained by assuming a characteristic length which is
required for complete combustion. Generally the characteristic length (L*) is assumed to be 20 inches
(0.508 m). Then the volume is calculated by using the following relation. The convergent section volume
is also included in this.
4mz ∗ × {∗
The radius of the combustion chamber is generally taken 2-3 times the radius of the throat. With
this radius the chamber cross sectional area (Ach) is found out and the actual length of the combustion
chamber (Lch) is found out by the following method. The decimal 1.15 in the denominator is to neglect the
length of the convergent section. This means 10% of the total volume is allotted for the convergent
section.
For most of the engines the volume of the convergent section is generally 15Y100 ℎ of the total
volume. So,
4mz
{mz =
1.15 C mz
Here we have found the length and cross sectional area of the combustion chamber, and now the
length of the convergent section is found out by volume of the truncated cone (frustum) formula.
4m}
{m} = ~
Y3 Smz + S ∗ + Smz S ∗
L L
Where, Vcon is the convergent section volume. (15% of the total volume)
25
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
With these datas we can easily plot the combustion chamber. Now since this is a cylinder we can
easily calculate the thickness required by thin shell formula,
m 0m
2
Here
m is the pressure inside the cylinder, is the working stress and 0m is the diameter of the
cylinder or the combustion chamber. Knowing all these values the thickness of the chamber can be
easily calculated. For calculating the thickness we need to know the working stress of the material.
Although material selection lies in the manufacturing phase, it is must here for estimation of thickness of
the components and so to plot the contour of the components. Modern rocket engines are fully made of
composite materials, since composites have extremely high strength/weight ratio and high strength than
any other materials. But machining the composites is extremely hard and cannot be machined in a similar
way that we machine the metals. Composite materials are set of laminates binded together by a resin or
any other similar adhesive material. Each laminate consists of several laminas. Every lamina is formed by
fibers and matrix. A fiber is simply a synthetic thread which is laid down in a net like pattern and a matrix
is formed by separate process. So if we need to manufacture a whole engine in composite we need to lay
down the laminas exactly to the engine’s profile and then the whole of the engine has to be developed in a
similar process. The description of this technique lies beyond the scope of this text and hence machinable
materials will be chosen and will be discussed here.
Depending upon the cost available and manufacturing facility available the materials has to be
chosen. Most of the high temperature materials used in Aerospace industry costs more and so an amateur
designer may not be able to spare. Some of the high temperature materials are Hastalloy series, Nickel
alloys, Chromium alloys, Molybdenum alloys, titanium alloys, Ni-Cr alloys, Graphite, Vanadium steel,
Silicon added alloys. It should be noted that not all these may be readily available in market and the most
easily available metals are Stainless steel, copper and mild steel only.
Design a thruster for the accounted rocket engine, provided with mild steel EN8. Hence
estimate the thickness of the combustion chamber and assume it as the uniform thickness
throughout the nozzle. Plot the contour of the combustion chamber and the nozzle.
Now the radius of the combustion chamber is taken as 2 times the radius of throat. Therefore Smz = 2 C
29.5 C 10[x ≃ 0.059 . So the area is ~ C 0.059L = 0.0109358 L .
26
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
limit can be made up to ± 5 (!^ 5) and the diameter of the combustion chamber can be
This is the total length of the combustion chamber. For the ease of manufacture the tolerance
round up to 0.06. Now the length of the convergent section is found out by the following relation. The
value of 4m} is 15% of the total volume i.e. 1.41 C 10[3 C 0.15 = 2.1 C 10[4 3
X (mm) Y (mm)
0 0
0 120
85.6 120
117 89.5
117 30.5
85.6 0
Table 3.2-1 Combustion chamber coordinates
Now we need to calculate the thickness of the combustion chamber. Since the material to be
chosen is EN8 (Emergency Number 8), the yield strength of EN8 is 250Mpa. Considering a factor of
L
= 125 a
. So by thin shell formula,
L
safety as 2, the working stress (σ) can be calculated as
m 0m 3.447379 a
C 120
= = ≅ 2
2 2 C 125 a
Now for safety purposes make this thickness to 5mm for the actual engine. For the hypothetical
implementation of cooling system (which we will be discussing later) fix the thickness as 10 mm and
make it uniform throughout the engine.
It should be noted that the flanges has to be designed in such a way that it should be capable of
holding the bolts and nuts. Though the diameter of the hole for fastening is assumed as 10 mm the total
diameter of the head and the nut will be more. So care should be taken while designing the flanges. The
following figures best explains the design of combustion chamber and nozzle.
27
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 3.2-1 2D view of the designed engine (All dimensions are in mm)
Fig. 3.2-2 & 3 3D view of the designed combustion chamber (left) and Nozzle
28
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
There are generally two types of injectors. One is impinging type and the other is spray type.
Spray type injectors are the ones which are normally used in automobiles. Impinging type injector is the
one which is specifically used in rocket engines. However if the engine is a small one, spray type injector
can also be used. But for big engines impinging type has to be used. The schematic of both the injectors
were shown in the following fig. The impinging stream type injector is very difficult to manufacture but
the design can slightly be altered for the ease of manufacture.
29
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The design of such impinging injector plate itself is a separate science and hence a basic injector
which is capable of inducing the ignition will be explained here in this text.
The feeding system is the major system which is involved in the design of injector plate, since the
injector design mainly depends upon the mass flow rates of the fuel and oxidizer. There are four different
types of feeding system which are currently in use. They are pressure fed system, expander cycle, gas
generator cycle and staged combustion cycle. In these systems staged combustion system is a
combination of expander system and gas generator system.
If the engine designed is a small one, then the mass flow rates will also be less. If the mass flow
rates were small then the fuel flow can be made possible by a reservoir fitted at an elevated area. Through
a small orifice (say 1 inch dia) the fuel can be ducted to the injector and the velocity of the flow at the end
of the duct can be found by the formula 4 `2. Where H is the total height of water level from the
lower end of the duct where the injector is connected. The total discharge can be found out by =
R: 4. Where R: is the discharge coefficient and is approximately equal to 0.6. If the mass flow rates are
higher, then a separate pump has to be used or the reservoir has to be pressurized. Pressurizing the
reservoir is one of the complicated methods both for manufacturing and handling. However if one needs a
pressurized fuel container for the required mass flow rate, then the required pressure can be found out by
the relation,
30
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
9 (/L ) 4 (/!)L
()
3 (w/x ) × (/! L ) 2 (/! L )
Here the cross sectional area of the container can be anything. is the velocity of the flow at the
orifice at the bottom of the container, considered the orifice is at the bottom. H is the total height of the
level from the centre of the orifice. 3 is the density of the fuel and g is acceleration due to gravity. 9 is the
water level from the bottom. If the orifice is not at the bottom, then H should be taken as height of water
After finding the velocity the discharge can be calculated by = R: 4. Where is the cross
sectional area of the orifice. With these relations proper Height of fuel and the required pressure in order
to deliver the required mass flow rate can be calculated. The following figure simply explains a pressure
fed system.
This method holds good if one doesn’t want to take care of pumps, etc. The alternate method is to
use pumps driven by external source or any other three different systems which will be briefed in the
subsequent section. This method is very suitable for any amateur rocket builder and doesn’t involve any
complex design calculations and experiments. The implementation of this system will be explained here
in the subsequent design section and it can be easily understood there.
31
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
EXPANDER CYCLE
Heat in the cooling jacket of the main combustion chamber serves to vaporize the fuel. The fuel
vapor is then passed through the turbine and injected into the main chamber to burn with the oxidizer.
This cycle works with fuels such as hydrogen or methane, which have a low boiling point and can be
vaporized easily. As with the staged combustion cycle, all of the propellants are burned at the optimal
mixture ratio in the main chamber, and typically no flow is dumped overboard; however, the heat transfer
to the fuel limits the power available to the turbine, making this cycle appropriate for small to midsize
engines. A variation of the system is the open, or bleed, expander cycle, which uses only a portion of the
fuel to drive the turbine. In this variation, the turbine exhaust is dumped overboard to ambient pressure to
increase the turbine pressure ratio and power output. This can achieve higher chamber pressures than the
closed expander cycle although at lower efficiency because of the overboard flow.
The gas-generator cycle, also called open cycle, taps off a small amount of fuel and oxidizer from
the main flow (typically 3 to 7 percent) to feed a burner called a gas generator. The hot gas from this
generator passes through a turbine to generate power for the pumps that send propellants to the
combustion chamber. The hot gas is then either dumped overboard or sent into the main nozzle
downstream. Increasing the flow of propellants into the gas generator increases the speed of the turbine,
which increases the flow of propellants into the main combustion chamber, and hence, the amount of
thrust produced. The gas generator must burn propellants at a less-than-optimal mixture ratio to keep the
temperature low for the turbine blades. Thus, the cycle is appropriate for moderate power requirements
but not high-power systems, which would have to divert a large portion of the main flow to the less
efficient gas-generator flow.
In a staged combustion cycle, also called closed cycle, the propellants are burned in stages. Like
the gas-generator cycle, this cycle also has a burner, called a pre-burner, to generate gas for a turbine. The
pre-burner taps off, and burns a small amount of one propellant and a large amount of the other,
producing an oxidizer-rich or fuel-rich hot gas mixture that is mostly unburned vaporized propellant. This
hot gas is then passed through the turbine, injected into the main chamber, and burned again with the
remaining propellants. The advantage over the gas-generator cycle is that all of the propellants are burned
at the optimal mixture ratio in the main chamber and no flow is dumped overboard. The staged
combustion cycle is often used for high-power applications. The higher the chamber pressure, the smaller
and lighter the engine can be to produce the same thrust. Development cost for this cycle is higher
because the high pressures complicate the development process. Further disadvantages are harsh turbine
32
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
conditions, high temperature piping required to carry hot gases and a very complicated feedback and
control design.
These three methods uses extreme technology and it cannot be easily employed in the first design
itself. So the best choice for amateur rocket developers is to run the pump through external power source.
Fig. 3.4.2-1, 2 & 3 Schematic of expander, gas generator and staged combustion feeding systems
Oxidizer flow is another important thing which is to be accounted. If the oxidizer is in liquid form
then the above mentioned method (i.e. for fuel) can be used. Note that if the oxidizer is cryogenic (E.g.
Liquid oxygen) then normal pumps cannot be used to pump this. Cryogenic pumps are available and
those pumps must be used for pumping LOX. Pressurization system can also be used but the technology
exists beyond the knowledge of amateur rocket developers. Any other oxidizers which are in liquid form
under STP can be handled easily and pressurization system can be used.
For amateur rocket developers commercially available gaseous oxygen which is available in
portable cylinders will help the most and gaseous oxygen based example will be discussed in our design
section. Even the outlet dia of any portable cylinder is 1 inch (25.4 mm,) the throat dia is only 3mm. This
is the major value while taking into account. The pressure inside a portable gaseous oxygen cylinder is
150 Kg/cm2.
33
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The fuel we have chosen in gasoline. The density of gasoline is 44.5 lb/ft3. The total mass flow
of fuel is 1.12 lb/s. We know that 3 /4.Volume flow i.e. 0.0251 x /! = 2565 +9ℎ. So
-.-L
.
this flow can be made possible by a commercially available pump with discharge of approximately 3000
LPH. In case if someone needs to pressurize his container then the above mentioned method can be used.
The diameter of the outlet of the pump (probably 0.5 HP) will be 1 inch (25.4 mm). With a collar
or reducer, reduce the diameter to 0.75 inch, so that the duct will have a uniform diameter of 0.75 inch.
When the injector plate is reached the diameter will increase to spread the fuel over large number of tiny
holes. In this case the total cross sectional area for the fuel flow is taken as the area of a half inch duct
(126.676 mm2) so as to increase the velocity at the end. No.60 drill (Dia 1.016mm) is chosen and the area
of each drill is given by 0.8107 mm2. So the number of holes will 126.676/0.81 = 156 ℎJ+M!.Out of
these 40 holes can be made with Pitch Center Diameter (PCD) of 38mm and 52 holes can be made with a
PCD of 58 mm and 64 holes can be made with a PCD of 78 mm. The following figure best explains the
criteria.
34
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Now we need to design a housing assembly to cover this plate and so as to allow the injector plate
to get connected to pipe lines. This can be done in a simple way as shown in the following figure.
Fig. 3.5-3 & 4 2D and 3D views of fuel injector housing (All dimensions are in mm)
35
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
So here we have designed the perforated plate and its connection assembly to pump. Now we
need to design the injector plate for the oxidizer which should impinge on the fuel flow to make the
perfect mixture.
Density of gaseous oxygen at STP is 0.08165 lb/ft3 (1.308 Kg/m3). But the gas is stored at 150
Kg/cm (1.471×107 N/m2) in portable oxygen cylinders which are commercially available. So its density
2
9 1.471 C 10
3 = 177.845 w/x = 11.1025 +,/ x
S 287 C 288
The required oxidizer mass flow rate is 1.272 Kg/s (2.804 lb/s). If we open the oxidizer cylinder
the density varies with respect to the pressure. So let us use a pressure regulator to regulate the overall
pressure to 100Kg/cm2. At this pressure the density of oxygen will be 118.64 Kg/m3 (7.406 lb/ft3). Now
we need to calculate the velocity of the flow from this pressure (100 Kg/cm2 or 1422.334 psi) to the
combustion chamber pressure (35.153 Kg/cm2 or 500 psi). For this we need the density of oxygen at 500
psi and is found to be 41.707 Kg/m3 or 2.603 lb/ft3.
1 1
9- + 3- - L = 9L + 3L L L
2 2
Now we need to choose the diameter of the ducts, Let us choose a flexible hose of diameter 0.5
inch (12.7 mm). The total mass flow rate which can be made possible by a single cylinder is given
by = 34 . Near the injector plate the density is 41.707 Kg/m3. The cross sectional area is C
(12.7 C 10[x )L = 1.2667 C 10[ L and the velocity is 176.3 m/s. Therefore the mass flow rate is
0.9314Kg/s. For 2 cylinders 1.8628 Kg/s
But we need a total mass flow rate of 1.272 Kg/s. For 1 cylinder the required mass flow is 0.636
Kg/s. ρ and A will not change. So the velocity has to be reduced to satisfy the required conditions. For
this mass flow rate, the required velocity is
0.636 w/!
4= = = 120.38 /!
3 41.707 w/x C 1.2667 C 10[ L
36
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
After calculating the velocity, apply the Bernoulli’s principle in the reverse way to calculate the required
pressure.
29- 351530 w/L
120.38 /! l
41.707 w/x
9- 65.3725 w/IL
So even if we use a 100Kg/cm2 regulator we need to regulate the pressure to only 66 Kg/cm2 in
both the cylinders to achieve the required mass flow rate.
Since we will be using 2 cylinders there will be 2 × 0.5 inch hoses for ducting the pressurized
oxygen to the injector. Two inlets on the oxidizer injector plate will do the job, but let us make it as four
for proper distribution. This increase in area will be later reduced to compensate the pressure loss. After
that section we have to distribute the oxidizer over a large area for injecting them through the inclined
perforated ring. This large area will reduce the pressure for a little amount and then the pressure get builds
up before the injection into the combustion chamber if we reduce the flow area. Now the flow area over
the inclined ring is calculated as follows. The flow area around the housing of the oxygen inlet is given
by 117L 100L 3000 L . Now let us reduce this area to half of this value to increase the
velocity and pressure of the injection. So the area over the inclined ring for the injection is 1500 mm2.
This area has to be equally divided on the inclined ring as holes. For manufacturing feasibility let us
choose the number of holes as 30 and these yields the dia of each hole as 30.
It should be noted that the injector which is designed here is based on the convenience of the
authors. The objective is to distribute the flow into the combustion chamber through perforated discs or
rings without any loss. The injector which is designed here may be complex to understand and any new
kind of design can be adopted depending on the manufacturing feasibility and the flow distributions. For
convenience the 2D and 3D views of the designed injector is shown in the upcoming figures.
37
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 3.5-7 2D view of the oxidizer injector (All dimensions are in mm)
Now as similar to the fuel housing the following figure shows the oxidizer housing and this
completes the design of the fuel injector.
38
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 3.5-8 2D view of the oxidizer housing (All dimensions are in mm)
39
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
As stated earlier the injector can be designed in any way so that it should deliver the total mass
flow rates of the fuel and oxidizer to the combustion chamber in a well mixed manner. If the injector
doesn’t mixes the fuel and oxidizer in a good way then combustion instability will occur which may result
in disaster. The assembled view of the designed injector is shown below.
40
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Chapter IV – SUB-SYSTEMS
41
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Because of high combustion temperatures and high heat transfer rates from the hot gases to the
combustion chamber wall thrust chamber cooling becomes a major consideration. For short duration un-
cooled chamber walls can be used. In this case the heat has to be absorbed by the sufficiently heavy
combustion chamber which acts as the heat sink. For most long duration applications a steady state
cooling system has to be employed. Some of the cooling systems used in rocket engines are as follows.
1. Regenerative cooling
2. Dump cooling
3. Film cooling
4. Transpiration cooling
5. Radiation cooling
6. Ablative cooling
REGENERATIVE COOLING: is the most widely used method of cooling a thrust chamber and is
accomplished by flowing high-velocity coolant over the back side of the chamber hot gas wall to
convectively cool the hot gas liner. The coolant with the heat input from cooling the liner is then
discharged into the injector and utilized as a propellant. For the fuel/oxidizer to flow around the
combustion chamber/nozzle, the path has to be formed. The path can be formed either longitudinally or
spirally. Spiral path has many advantages than longitudinal paths. For these either double walled
combustion chamber or single wall with tubular winding can be done over it. Most of the engines with
regenerative cooling system were employed with spiral tubular winding type of ducts for the cooling
purposes. Since it involves lots of thermodynamic calculations these systems cannot be easily designed in
the first design itself.
DUMP COOLING: It is similar to regenerative cooling because the coolant flows through small
passages over the sides of the thrust chamber wall. The difference is that after cooling the thrust chamber,
the coolant is discharged overboard through openings at the aft end of the divergent nozzle. Here we will
be using such kind of cooling system in our design section. As similar to the flow passages around the
combustion chamber/nozzle in the regenerative cooling system, the passage has to be made similar to that
and is shown in the following figure.
42
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 4.1-1 Double wall dump cooling system (longitudinal and spiral)
The heat transfer from the hot combustion chamber gases to the chamber wall is by convection.
The amount of heat transfer through conduction is very small and the radiation heat transfer will be
usually less than 25% of the total heat transfer. Now the amount of heat which can be transferred to the
coolant is given by
N R ( − )
43
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
FILM COOLING: It provides protection from excessive heat by introducing a thin film of coolant or
propellant through orifices around the injector periphery or through manifold orifices in the chamber wall
near the injector or chamber throat region. This method is typically used in high heat flux regions and in
combination with regenerative cooling.
TRANSPIRATION COOLING provides coolant (either gaseous or liquid propellant) through a porous
chamber wall at a rate sufficient to maintain the chamber hot gas wall to the desired temperature. The
technique is really a special case of film cooling.
RADIATION COOLING: In this process heat is radiated away from the surface of the outer combustion
chamber wall, when the chamber is red hot. This requires high temperature wall material (possibly
refractory material).
ABLATIVE COOLING: In this process a sacrifice of combustion chamber gas side wall material is
made by melting and subsequently vaporizing it to dissipate heat. As a result relatively cool gases flow
over the wall surface thus creating a cooler boundary layer assisting the cooling process. An ablative
material is a fiber-reinforced resin that pyrolyzes endothermally within the chamber wall releasing a cool
gas over the inner surface of the combustion chamber. The best ablative coating which is especially used
in rocket engines is Dow Corning DC 93-104. If this is not available commercially then MOLYKOTE P-
37 Anti-seize paste will nearly be a good substitute for DC 93-104.
44
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
the American engines used hypergolic propellants for the main combustion, since it doesn’t require a
separate ignition system. Also the possibility of hard start is zero when hypergolic fuels were used. Now
as igniter a small impinging is nozzle is designed and a little amount of these hypergolic propellants were
fed through small pipelines. The flow of these hypergolic propellants can be turned on whenever ignition
is required. This system is mainly suitable for large engines and the storage of the hypergolic propellants
is a challenging task.
45
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
46
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
With water as coolant design a dump type cooling system for the combustion chamber alone
and hence estimate the mass flow rate of the coolant.
N R ( − )
Where, is the total heat transferred from the combustion chamber to the coolant. Now, the total heat
transferred is calculated as
N × 11.3 /L w C
Fig. 4.4-1 Cooling system passage for combustion chamber (All dimensions are in mm)
47
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
This is very similar to a thread of pitch 20mm. The outer radius of combustion chamber is 70mm.
Then the helical path is formed over a depth of 5mm. So when considered as a circle the radius is 65mm.
Now consider the following figure to find the length in 1 turn.
Helical circumference
Pitch = 20mm
θ
48
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
20
tan[- T U = 2.805°
408.2
Therefore the length of the helical circumference is found out by
20 20
SMN0 {MKℎ = = = 408.689
sin 2.805° 0.04893
This is the arc length in 1 turn. The total no. of turns is 3.5. So the total arc length is 1430.4 mm.
Now the depth of the path is 5 mm and its width is 10mm. So the total surface area (A) is (1430.4*10) +
(1430*5*2) =28608 mm2. So
0.323 /w = C R ( − )
Now 0.323 W/K is the possible heat transfer from the combustion chamber to water with the
available surface area. If water is used as coolant then, Cp for water is 4.178 KJ/Kg K, and the water inlet
temperature (Ti) will be 293K. It should be noted that the boiling point of water is 373K. So let us choose
the outlet temperature (T) as 323K and so the required mass flow can be found as,
Now to cool the heat transferred through the combustion chamber material along the passage
which we have formed we need only 7 LPH for cooling the chamber of outside temperature 700°C. Now
this is due to the poor conductivity of the material chosen and will melt the inner surface of the
combustion chamber. So this kind of design is a poor design, so to rectify this we can increase the mass
flow of water to a maximum level so as to maintain the chamber wall temperature lower. But this will
divide the combustion chamber wall into two regions, the hotter inner region and the cooled outer region
which may result in the deformation of the combustion chamber. Anyhow for amateur rocket designers
this will not affect the performance in a big way and the design can be implemented.
Choose a suitable ignition system for the accounted rocket engine and hence show a sketch
of the measurement systems and hypothetical assembly.
Although ignition must be produced when the rich mixture comes in contact with a spark, it is
safer for any amateur rocket builder to choose continuous flame as a source of ignition. Portable LPG
cylinders were available and a small LPG welding torch can be fitted into the combustion chamber by
welding. If an amateur feels that this will be difficult, then pyrotechnic igniters can be used. The
disadvantage is that we need to replace the pyrotechnic igniter whenever we restart the engine. For
pyrotechnic igniter one can simply buy a slow burning fire cracker and simply fix it from the bottom in
such a way that the flame should be in the combustion chamber.
49
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Performance measuring systems include temperature transducers, pressure transducers and the
thrust transducer. Temperature has to be measured at three places namely at the combustion chamber,
throat and at the nozzle. Temperature can be measured in many ways; out of those ways using a
thermocouple is the best and convenient method for an amateur rocket designer. The thermocouple that
we have chosen is 4.5 inches (114 mm) long and the outer ceramic sealing is 13 mm in diameter.
Provisions for inserting a steel tube of dia 15mm has been made in the combustion chamber. The holes
were not opened so as to avoid the pressure loss. A blind hole of depth 8mm for measuring the chamber
temperature and a hole for measuring the temperature at the throat can be made on the 10 mm thickness
combustion chamber as shown in the figure.
Fig. 4.5-1 Thermocouple provisions in the combustion chamber (All dimension are in mm)
50
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
The next performance parameter which is to be measured is pressure. This requires a hole in the
combustion chamber, and through the hole, the pressure has to be tapped up and with a suitable pressure
gauge the pressure can be measured. It should be noted that the temperature of the combusted gases will
be high. Most of the pressure gauges will not withstand such temperatures. So a suitable high temperature
pressure gauge has to be chosen for this purpose, Else the gases has to be cooled down. Since most of the
high temperature pressure gauges and digital pressure transducers are of high cost and involve more
complexity in the assembly and calibration we had not made any attempt in measuring the pressure,
though the concept can be understood from the following figure.
The most important measuring device is the thrust indicator. Thrust is the output given by the
rocket engine. Since this is a force this can be measured by a force sensor. The commonly available force
sensor is the load cell. Nowadays most of the truck weigh bridges use this kind of load cells. A small
range load cell used for that purpose will help us in figuring out the thrust. The following figure shows
the load cell and the assembly can be seen in fig. 4.5-5.
51
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
52
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
So, with this the design of a Liquid Propellant Rocket Engine with bell contour, choosing
Gasoline and Gaseous oxygen as propellants to produce an overall thrust of 500Kgf is over and the
subsequent sections will discuss about the manufacturing, assembly and testing.
53
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
54
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
INTRODUCTION
This chapter explains about the entire manufacturing processes which are involved in giving
shape to the designed engine. Since the material we have chosen is EN8 which is comparatively a good
grade mild when compared to any other mild steel grades. Generally many kinds of thoughts may arise
for manufacturing the engine. Out of those the most feasible are the casting and machining.
Casting is a process of producing solid objects by pouring molten material into a shaped mold and
allowing it to cool. Casting is used to shape such materials as glass and plastics, as well as metals and
alloys. The traditional method of casting metal is sand casting. Using a model of the object to be
produced, a hollow mold is made in a damp sand and clay mix. Molten metal is then poured into the
mold, taking its shape when it cools and solidifies. The sand mold is broken to release the casting.
Permanent metal molds called dies are also used for casting, in particular, small items in mass-production
processes where molten metal is injected under pressure into cooled dies. Nowadays the mold is also
made in wood and seafoam (Thermocoal). Die casting is a similar process in which the mould is made up
of steel and the molten metal is pressure fed into the mould. This kind of process gives good surface
finish than sand casting and precision parts can also be made. In this method the material required is
exactly the same as in the designed shape. There will be no loss of material when we manufacture in this
process.
Although there will be huge material loss, machining will be the convenient process for this kind
of rocket engine manufacturing. Since it involves complex parabolic contour in the nozzle the shape of
the mould cannot be easily produced. But by computer aided manufacturing (CAM) the required contour
can be more precisely produced. The whole of combustion chamber and nozzle can be easily
manufactured by turning operation itself.
MILLING MACHINE, In a milling machine, a work piece is fed against a circular device with a series
of cutting edges on its circumference. The work piece is held on a table that controls the feed against the
cutter. The table conventionally has three possible movements: longitudinal, horizontal, and vertical; in
some cases it can also rotate. Milling machines are the most versatile of all machine tools. Flat or
contoured surfaces may be machined with excellent finish and accuracy. Angles, slots, gear teeth, and
recess cuts can be made by using various cutters. One of the convenient and best milling machine is
M1TR.
55
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 5.2.1-1 & 2 Raw material for combustion chamber and nozzle
56
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Since the components are axis symmetric pre-machining can be done by turning itself. Now the
turned material has to be shaped for the given dimensions. Since it is convenient and cheaper to remove
most of the material using the lathe, a uniform stock of 5mm is left on all sides of the combustion
chamber and the rest of the material has been removed using lathe. Then the combustion chamber is fed
to the Vertical Turning CNC Lathe (VTL), thereby to remove the 5mm stock and to give the finishing
touch. A view of combustion chamber in the VTL is shown in the following figure.
57
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Now the completed combustion chamber is again fed in conventional lathe for making the coolant
passage. As designed the helical groove can be formed by a process similar to threading in the lathe. The
helical groove has a pitch of 20mm and an overall neutral fiber height of 66mm. The starting point of the
neutral fiber point is 25mm from the throat surface. The groove is simply a square thread of depth 5mm
and breadth 10mm. After the groove has been made the combustion chamber, milling operations were
done for the thermocouple provisions. Then a stainless steel sheet of 1 mm thickness is wound over the
combustion chamber with provisions for coolant to pass in and out. These operations were done by TIG
welding. Welding should be done in such a way that there should not be any leak to prevent the spillage
of coolant. To mount the thermocouples steel tubes were also welded with the combustion chamber as we
have designed. The following figure best explains the criteria.
58
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 5.2.1-7 Finished combustion chamber with provisions for cooling system and thermocouples
59
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
So with this the manufacture of nozzle has been completed. As similar to combustion chamber,
blind holes to a depth of 8 mm is made near the exit of the combustion chamber and a stainless steel tube
is welded into it for inserting the thermocouple. The following figure shows the actual manufactured
nozzle.
60
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
61
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
62
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Fig. 5.2.4-2 & 3 Test stand (left) and engine mount with screw rod
The test stand for this 500 Kgf engine has been made in Galvanized Iron (GI) pipe of diameter
2.5 inch. 6.75 feet rod of the aforementioned dimension is bought and is cut into 6 feet and 0.75 feet. The
o.75 feet rod is welded perpendicularly to the 6 feet rod by electrical arc welding. Then tow cross beams
of length approximately 1 foot is welded at the base for poling it on the ground. A provision for fixing the
load cell has also been made in the test stand itself, and the completed test stand is shown in the following
figure.
5.3 ELECTROPLATING
Since EN8 is easily attacked by oxygen, it will begin to corrode. The corrosion will look odd and
at a stage the strength of the engine will become less and this may result in a disaster. So to prevent the
corrosion Ni-Cr electroplating is done for the combustion chamber, nozzle and the injector. Engine mount
is zinc plated and screw rod is plated with hot chromium. Although electroplating creates a center of
attention of the engine, it indirectly prevents the corrosion, and the electroplated components are shown in
the following figure.
63
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
5.4 ASSEMBLY
As all the components been manufactured, these have to be assembled in a proper way to begin
the testing. Assembly requires lots of care, because if the assembly is not proper there may be a pressure
loss, or improper temperature/pressure distribution, improper combustion may take place. To prevent
these cares should be taken during the assembly operation.
5.4.1 Engine
The engine consists of three parts namely Injector, Combustion chamber and the Nozzle. At first
the throat in the nozzle and the combustion chamber must exactly match. To ensure this 2×10 mm dowel
holes were made by reamers on both the nozzle flange and the throat side combustion chamber flange
with a PCD (Pitch Center Dia) of 165mm. Then 6×10.5mm holes were made on the same flanges for M10
bolts with same PCD as shown in the following figure.
64
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
10 mm dowel hole
Now we need to assemble the combustion chamber and the nozzle. To prevent any pressure loss
we need to use any flexible rubber type washers between the chamber and the nozzle. This is made
possible by a Teflon washer, since they withstand high temperatures. Holes were made on the washer, and
finally the combustion chamber and the nozzle were aligned by 2 dowel pins and then they are fastened
by 6×M10 Align key type TVS bolts of length 35mm.
The next part is to assemble the chamber and the injector. Since the injector mates into the
combustion chamber there is no need for the dowel pins, and the chamber and the injector can be fastened
by 8×M10 Align Key type TVS bolts of length 35mm with a similar Teflon washer between them.
65
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
On top of the engine mount a 0.5 inch hole is made and is for the screw rod. In the screw rod a
male thread over 0.5 inch dia rod is made and the threaded rod is inserted into the hole on top of the
engine mount and can be fastened by suitable nuts. The other side of the screw rod is threaded with a fine
thread over 10.9 mm dia rod. This fine thread is used to run through the female thread in the load cell.
The following figures best explains the criteria. Refer Fig. 5.2.4-1 & 2 for the assembled views
As the load cell fixture has been already seen above there is no need to explain it further. The
output bus from the load cell is connected to the YH-T3 indicator and the battery is switched ON. It
should be noted that since the thrust force will be acting on the upward direction the arrow mark on the
load cell must face upwards. When the engine is suspended the indicator should indicate the dry weight of
the engine with a minus sign. When thrust is produced the negative load will decrease and the upward
thrust will be indicated on the display. This concludes the manufacturing and assembly phase.
66
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
Chapter VI – TESTING
67
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
68
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
As soon as the desired output has been achieved the amateur rocket builder may consider for
building a bigger rocket with more and more complex feedback mechanism provided with good safety
systems involved.
69
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
CONCLUSION
The engine has been tested for more than 5 times and the thrust produced by the engine is slightly
lower than the expected value. All the tests have been recorded and can be shown upon enquiry. The
decrease in thrust is mainly due to the lack of availabilities of components and their high cost. The thrust
indicated by the indicator is around 150 Kgf and this reduced value is mainly due to the improper mass
flow rate into the engine. The fuel mass flow is very difficult to control and measure, since we have not
used any flow meters. The available flow meter is the Rotameter which is made up of acrylic glass. Since
gasoline reacts with acrylic glass, it cannot be used. So digital flow meters have to be used. Digital flow
meters are not currently available and have to be imported. Because of time constraint and money we
couldn’t extract the maximum possible output from the engine. With the available facilities we have come
up to this, but we will continue the test until we reach the desired output.
70
Design, Development & Testing of Liquid Propellant Rocket engine 2009
REFERENCES
1. Rocket Propulsion Elements, by George P. Sutton
2. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, by J.D. Anderson
3. Rocket Propulsion and Spaceflight Dynamics, by J.W.Cornelisse, H.F.R. Schöyer, K.F. Wakker
4. Modern Compressible Flow, by J.D. Anderson
5. Introduction to Flight, by J.D. Anderson
6. Strength of Materials, by R.K. Bansal
7. Strength of Materials, R.S. Khurmi
8. Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machines, R.K. Bansal
9. Many references from Internet
71