Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transverse Analysis and Design 32m Curved Span P18-P19
Transverse Analysis and Design 32m Curved Span P18-P19
Transverse Analysis and Design 32m Curved Span P18-P19
Project Name : CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED
SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Title : TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Design Note No. : DN/P-123/006
Rev. No : R0
Date : 20-Jun-19
Discipline : BRIDGE
Calculation by : ASD
Checked by : PK
Page - i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.4.5.4 CHECK FOR MAXIMUM LIMITS FOR TOTAL REINFORCEMENT 30
1.4.6 SLS STRESS CHECK OF DECK SLAB FOR SLS RARE COMBINATION 31
1.4.6.1 SLS STRESS CHECK UNDER RARE COMBINATION AT BRIDGE OPENING 31
1.4.6.2 CRACKED SECTION STRESS CHECK AT END OF SERVICE LIFE (70 YRS) 32
1.4.7 SLS CRACK WIDTH OF DECK SLAB FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION 33
1.4.7.1 MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT FOR CRACK CONTROL (IRC:112 CLAUSE 12.3.3) 33
1.4.7.2 CRACK WIDTH CHECK UNDER QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATION 33
2 DESIGN OF END CROSS GIRDER 35
2.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL 35
2.1.1 EFFECTIVE WIDTH OF CROSS GIRDER 35
2.2 ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CONDITION 36
2.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR CROSS GIRDER 36
2.2.2 LOADS (NORMAL CASE WITH LIVE LOADS) 36
2.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) 36
2.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 36
2.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 37
2.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 37
2.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A TRAIN 37
2.2.2.4.2 CLASS-70R TRAIN 38
2.2.2.4.3 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD 38
2.2.2.4.4 70R TRACKED 39
2.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION) 40
2.2.3 ANALYSIS RESULT NORMAL CASE 40
2.2.3.1 ULS MOMENT FROM GRILLAGE ANALYSIS (MAX OF BASIC OR SEISMIC COMBINATION) 40
2.2.3.2 GOVERNONG MOMENT FROM ABOVE TWO ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CASE 40
2.3 ANALYSIS FOR JACKUP CONDITION 40
2.3.1 LOADS (JACKUP CASE WITHOUT LIVE LOADS) 40
2.3.3 ANALYSIS RESULT JACKUP CASE 41
2.4 DESIGN METHOD TO BE ADOPTED 41
2.5 DESIGN FORCES AND MOMENT 41
2.6 CALCULATION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR SAGGING MOMENT 42
2.7 CALCULATION OF NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR HOGGING MOMENT 42
2.8 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 43
2.9 CALCULATION OF HANGING VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 44
3 DESIGN OF MID CROSS GIRDER 45
3.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL 45
3.1.1 EFFECTIVE WIDTH OF CROSS GIRDER 45
3.2 ANALYSIS 46
3.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR CROSS GIRDER 46
3.2.2 LOADS 46
3.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) 46
3.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 46
3.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 47
3.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 47
3.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A TRAIN 47
3.2.2.4.2 CLASS-70R TRAIN 48
3.2.2.4.3 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD 48
3.2.2.4.4 70R TRACKED 49
3.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION) 50
3.2.3 ANALYSIS RESULT 50
3.2.3.1 ULS MOMENT FROM GRILLAGE ANALYSIS (MAX OF BASIC OR SEISMIC COMBINATION) 50
3.2.3.2 GOVERNONG MOMENT FROM ABOVE TWO ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CASE 50
3.4 DESIGN METHOD TO BE ADOPTED 50
3.4 DESIGN FORCES AND MOMENT 51
3.5 CALCULATION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR SAGGING MOMENT 51
3.6 CALCULATION OF NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR HOGGING MOMENT 52
3.7 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 53
Page - ii
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Continuous Beam Model for Transverse Analysis (Spring Support Indicate Position of Main Girder)
1.1.2 LOADS
Page - 1
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
X
1 2 3 4 5
2.8984 2.100 2.100 2.100 0.5016
Page - 2
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Load on Wheel-1 = 57 kN
Load on Wheel-2 = 57 kN
Contact width across span = 250 mm
Contact width along span = 500 mm
Distance between two vehicle c/c of wheels (Traffic Direction) = 1.200 m
Distance between two Wheels C/C (Transverse direction) = 1.800 m
Minimum edge distance upto c/l of wheel = 0.400 m
b1 = 0.400 m
initial position of first wheel = 0.900 m
Final position of first wheel = 7.000 m
Number of load generation = 61 Nos
Transverse increament of Wheels = 0.1 m
Impact factor = 1.6
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
1 0.900 2.00 2.80 2.00 44.36 2.70 0.20 0.64 0.64 139.0
2 1.000 1.90 2.68 1.94 45.73 2.80 0.10 0.52 0.52 171.2
3 1.100 1.80 2.56 1.88 47.19 2.90 0.00 0.40 0.40 219.3
4 1.200 1.70 2.44 1.82 48.74 3.00 0.10 0.65 0.65 136.1
5 1.300 1.60 2.32 1.76 50.41 3.10 0.20 0.87 0.87 101.5
6 1.400 1.50 2.20 1.70 52.19 3.20 0.30 1.07 1.07 82.7
7 1.500 1.40 2.08 1.64 54.10 3.30 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.5
Page - 3
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
8 1.600 1.30 1.96 1.58 56.15 3.40 0.50 1.39 1.30 68.4
9 1.700 1.20 1.84 1.52 58.37 3.50 0.60 1.52 1.36 65.3
10 1.800 1.10 1.72 1.46 60.77 3.60 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.0
11 1.900 1.00 1.60 1.40 63.38 3.70 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
12 2.000 0.90 1.48 1.34 66.22 3.80 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
13 2.100 0.80 1.36 1.28 69.32 3.90 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
14 2.200 0.70 1.24 1.22 72.74 4.00 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
15 2.300 0.60 1.12 1.12 79.31 4.10 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
16 2.400 0.50 1.00 1.00 88.84 4.20 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
17 2.500 0.40 0.88 0.88 100.98 4.30 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.1
18 2.600 0.30 0.76 0.76 116.97 4.40 0.60 1.51 1.36 65.4
19 2.700 0.20 0.64 0.64 138.97 4.50 0.50 1.39 1.29 68.5
20 2.800 0.10 0.52 0.52 171.16 4.60 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.7
21 2.900 0.00 0.40 0.40 219.34 4.70 0.30 1.07 1.07 83.2
22 3.000 0.10 0.65 0.65 136.10 4.80 0.20 0.87 0.87 102.3
23 3.100 0.20 0.87 0.87 101.46 4.90 0.10 0.64 0.64 137.7
24 3.200 0.30 1.07 1.07 82.74 5.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 219.3
25 3.300 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.54 5.10 0.10 0.65 0.65 136.1
26 3.400 0.50 1.39 1.30 68.40 5.20 0.20 0.87 0.87 101.5
27 3.500 0.60 1.52 1.36 65.29 5.30 0.30 1.07 1.07 82.7
28 3.600 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.00 5.40 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.5
29 3.700 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.39 5.50 0.50 1.39 1.30 68.4
30 3.800 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.36 5.60 0.60 1.52 1.36 65.3
Page - 4
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
31 3.900 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.87 5.70 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.0
32 4.000 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.88 5.80 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
33 4.100 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.39 5.90 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
34 4.200 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.43 6.00 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
35 4.300 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.07 6.10 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
36 4.400 0.60 1.51 1.36 65.38 6.20 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
37 4.500 0.50 1.39 1.29 68.51 6.30 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
38 4.600 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.70 6.40 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.1
39 4.700 0.30 1.07 1.07 83.21 6.50 0.60 1.51 1.36 65.4
40 4.800 0.20 0.87 0.87 102.26 6.60 0.50 1.39 1.29 68.5
41 4.900 0.10 0.64 0.64 137.73 6.70 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.7
42 5.000 0.00 0.40 0.40 219.34 6.80 0.30 1.07 1.07 83.2
43 5.100 0.10 0.65 0.65 136.10 6.90 0.20 0.87 0.87 102.3
44 5.200 0.20 0.87 0.87 101.46 7.00 0.10 0.64 0.64 137.7
45 5.300 0.30 1.07 1.07 82.74 7.10 0.00 0.40 0.40 219.3
46 5.400 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.54 7.20 0.10 0.65 0.65 136.1
47 5.500 0.50 1.39 1.30 68.40 7.30 0.20 0.87 0.87 101.5
48 5.600 0.60 1.52 1.36 65.29 7.40 0.30 1.07 1.07 82.7
49 5.700 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.00 7.50 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.5
50 5.800 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.39 7.60 0.50 1.39 1.30 68.4
51 5.900 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.36 7.70 0.60 1.52 1.36 65.3
52 6.000 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.87 7.80 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.0
53 6.100 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.88 7.90 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
Page - 5
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
54 6.200 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.39 8.00 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
55 6.300 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.43 8.10 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
56 6.400 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.07 8.20 1.00 1.76 1.48 59.9
57 6.500 0.60 1.51 1.36 65.38 8.30 0.90 1.74 1.47 60.4
58 6.600 0.50 1.39 1.29 68.51 8.40 0.80 1.69 1.44 61.4
59 6.700 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.70 8.50 0.70 1.61 1.41 63.1
60 6.800 0.30 1.07 1.07 83.21 8.60 0.60 1.51 1.36 65.4
61 6.900 0.20 0.87 0.87 102.26 8.70 0.50 1.39 1.29 68.5
62 7.000 0.10 0.64 0.64 137.73 8.80 0.40 1.24 1.22 72.7
1.1.2.4.1 2 LANE CLASS - A
Two lane class-A is analysed by using combination of above load cases for 1 lane only in software
1.1.2.4.2 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (L-TYPE)
Load on Wheel-1 = 100 kN Load on Wheel-2 = 100 kN
Max. load on a wheel = 100 kN Wheel Base width = 860 mm Wheel Gap = 50 mm
Max. tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm2 Contact area = 1896.5 cm2 Vehcle width = 2.79 m
Contact width along span = 810 mm Contact width across span = 234.1 mm
Distance between two loads across span = 1.22 m b1 = 0.384 m
Distances between C/C of wheel Across the traffic = 1.93 m
Impact factor = 1.25
Edge Distance = 1.2 m
Initial position of first wheel = 2.13 m
Final Position of first wheel = 5.640 m
Transverse increament = 0.0702 m
Page - 6
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 7
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 8
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 9
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 10
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 11
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 12
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 13
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 14
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 15
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 16
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 17
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 18
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 19
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Hogging moment) for ULS Basic Combination BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Sagging moment) for ULS Basic Combination
Shear Envelope result is not required because as per IRC:112 the slab designed by effective width method donot require shear check.
Page - 20
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Hogging moment) for SLS Rare Combination BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Sagging moment) for SLS Rare Combination
1.1.3.3 BM ENVELOPE FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION
BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Hogging moment) for SLS QP Combination BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Sagging moment) for SLS QP Combination
1.2 ANALYSIS OF OVERHANG SLAB AT EXPANSION JOINT
1.2.1 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR
Over hang slab behaves as cantilever coming out of end cross girder
Width of slab considered 1m
Length 1.075 m
T\hickness 0.35 m
1.2.2 LOADS
Page - 21
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 22
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 23
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 24
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.3.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 45 deg CL Long Gird
2
Area Of Crossection 0m
Weight per m 0 kN/m
Moment 0 KN-m per m width
Page - 25
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.25
Page - 26
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Page - 27
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.4 RCC DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Width (m) 1 1 1 1 1
Avj Thk (mm) 300.000 300.000 300.000 400.000 300.000
R0
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
MaxM(KN-m) 274.950 128.500 92.760 107.231 116.734
MaxM per m (KN-m/m) 274.950 128.500 92.760 107.231 116.734
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Max MRC (KN-m) 190.020 86.910 62.500 72.752 78.360
Max MRC per m (KN-m/m) 190.020 86.910 62.500 72.752 78.360
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Max Mqp (KN-m) 74.060 44.800 28.520 13.579 6.641
Max Mqp per m (KN-m/m) 74.060 44.800 28.520 13.579 6.641
Page - 28
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.4.4 MATERIAL DATA
1.4.4.1 CONCRETE
Partial safety factor for Material (Basic and seismic) γm = 1.5 IRC:112-Cl 6.4.2.8
1.4.4.2 STEEL
Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk = 500 Mpa IRC:112 Table 18.1
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es 200000 Mpa IRC:112 Cl 6.2.2
= 200 Gpa
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs = 1.150 IRC-112 Fig 6.3 (Note)
Clear Cover = 40.0 mm
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Design Moment (M) per m Width (KN-m/m) 274.950 128.500 92.760 107.231 116.734
Width of comp. zone-b / width of Tens. Zone bt (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Effective Depth d (mm) 254.000 252.000 254.000 352.000 252.000
Kav = M / (bd2f av) 0.2385 0.1133 0.0805 0.0484 0.1029
x= (1-sqrt(1-4βKav)/(2*β))*d (mm) 67.8327 29.9656 21.1442 17.39426 27.0921
x/d 0.26706 0.11891 0.08324 0.049416 0.10751
x/d lim = 1/( f yk / (γsEsεcu3)+1) 0.61686 0.61686 0.61686 0.616858 0.61686
Page - 29
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
AS.min1=0.26 (f ctm / f yk) bt d (mm^2) 462 459 462 641 459 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
AS.min2=0.0013 bt d (mm^2) 330 328 330 458 328 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
AS.min = max(AS.min1, AS.min2) (mm^2) 462 459 462 641 459 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
Cross-sectional Area of Concrete Ac (mm^2) 300000 300000 300000 400000 300000
As max tension rein =0.025 Ac (mm^2) 7500 7500 7500 10000 7500 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (2)
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 3585 2011 1131 2011 2011
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
As required.Trans =20% of As Provided.Long (mm^2) 717.069 402.124 226.195 402.1239 402.124 IRC:112-CL 16.6.1.1 (3)
dia of Bar (mm) 16 12 16 12 12
Spacing (mm) 200 200 200 200 200
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 1005 565 1005 565 565
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
cover 40 40 40 40 40
Act.ext 40000 40000 40000 40000 40000
As.sur =0.01*Act.ext 400 400 400 400 400 IRC:112-CL 16.5.4 (4)
dia of Bar (mm) 16 12 12 12 12
Spacing (mm) 200 200 200 200 200
As Provided 1005 565 565 565 565
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
As max Long rein =0.04 Ac (mm^2) 12000 12000 12000 16000 12000 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (2)
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 5596 3142 3142 3142 4021
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
Page - 30
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.4.6 SLS STRESS CHECK OF DECK SLAB FOR SLS RARE COMBINATION
SLS Stress check has to be carried out for service life as per IRC:112 clause 12.1(1).
Hence stress is checked at bridge opening as well as 70yrs when all of creep has taken place
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Design Moment (MRC) per m Width (KN-m/m) 190.020 86.910 62.500 72.752 78.360
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
D 300.000 300.000 300.000 400.000 300.000
Uncracked I = (bD^3) / 12 (mm^4) 2E+09 2.3E+09 2E+09 5.3E+09 2.3E+09
Y=Ytop = Ybot = D/2 150.000 150.000 150.000 200.000 150.000
σtop = σbot = MRC *Y/I 12.668 5.794 4.167 2.728 5.224
Mean Flexural tensile Strength f ctm.fl
4.550 4.550 4.550 4.200 4.550 IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.3 (3) Eq 6.6
= max( (1.6-h/1000)f ctm , f ctm )
if σbot > f ctm.fl then "Cracked" else "Uncracked" Cracked Cracked Uncracke UncrackedCracked IRC:112-CL 12.1(2)
Allowable Compressive Stress = 0.48 f ck 24.0000 24.0000 24.0000 24.0000 24.0000 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of concrete Ec,eff =
35000 35000 35000 35000 35000
short term Modulu s= Ecm (Mpa)
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es (Mpa) 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Area of Steel As (mm^2) 3585 2011 1131 2011 2011
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
d 254.000 252.000 254.000 352.000 252.000
Depth of Concrete in Compression(mm)
84 65 51 79 65
dc=(-AsEs+Sqr((AsEs)^2 +2bAsEsEc,effd))/(bEc,eff)
Page - 31
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
1.4.6.2 CRACKED SECTION STRESS CHECK AT END OF SERVICE LIFE (70 YRS)
1. Check whether Linear Creep or Non-linear Creep is applicable for Quasi-Permanent load
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Design Moment MQP 74.060 44.800 28.520 13.579 6.641
Stress in conc σc = (MQP / zc)*(Ec,eff / Es) 7.838 5.946 4.702 1.053 0.881
Stress limit for considering linear creep = 0.36 f ck 18.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
Creep Model: if σc <=0.36 fck then "Linear" else
Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear
"Non-Linear"
2. Find Creep Coeff Φ(70 Yrs) considering RH -80% and Age at loading as 28 days
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
D 300.000 300.000 300.000 400.000 300.000
Ac 300000 300000 300000 400000 300000
u=2b for P2 To P13 and 2b+D for P1 2300 2000 2000 2000 2000
Notional Size 130 150 150 200 150
Φ(70 Yrs) 1.709 1.700 1.700 1.678 1.700 Interpolation from
IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.7(2) Table 6.9
3. Calculation for Ec,eff for combination of Short Term and Long Term Effects
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Short term Modulus Ecm 35000 35000 35000 35000 35000
Long term Modulus Ecm/(1+Φ) 12921 12963 12963 13071 12963 IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.5(4)(iii)
Total Moment MRC 190.020 86.910 62.500 72.752 78.360
Moment Due to Quasi-Permanent Loads MQP 74.060 44.800 28.520 13.579 6.641
Moment Due to Transient (short term) Loads
115.960 42.110 33.980 59.173 71.719
MST=MRC-MQP
Effective Modulus Ec,eff = (
21009 18654 19710 26654 30593
MQP + MST ) Ecm / ( MST + (1+Φ)MQP )
Page - 32
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Stress in Steel σs = (MEd / zs) 240.868 193.225 238.108 112.264 170.263 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
Allowable Tensile Stress = 0.8 f yk 400.000 400.000 400.000 400.000 400.000 IRC:112-CL 12.2.2
Check on Steel Stress OK OK OK OK OK
1.4.7 SLS CRACK WIDTH OF DECK SLAB FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION
Allowable Crack width wk 0.3 mm
For moderate exposure condition and Reinforced Concrete members from IRC:112 Clause 12.3.2(1)
Table 12.1
1.4.7.1 MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT FOR CRACK CONTROL (IRC:112 CLAUSE 12.3.3)
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
h=D 300.000 300.000 300.000 400.000 300.000
Depth of section in tension before crack forms h/2 150.000 150.000 150.000 200.000 150.000
Area of concrete in tension just before crack formation
150000 150000 150000 200000 150000
Act =b*h/2
f ct,eff = max( f ctm , 2.9) 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500
Axial Forces in Quasi perm. Combination NEd 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
mean stress of concrete σc = NEd / (bh) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
h* = h for h<1000 else h* =1000 300.000 300.000 300.000 400.000 300.000
Coeff for considering effect of Axial force Ned on stress
distribution k1 = 1.5 for compressive and (2h*) / (3h) for 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Tensile
Coeff to take into account stress distribution just prior to
cracking and change of Lever Arm kc = 0.4 ( 1 - 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400
σc / ( k1( h / h* ) f ct,eff ) ) <= 1
bar dia 12 16 12 16 16
Spacing 100 200 200 200 200
Permited σs from bar dia 280 240 280 240 240 Interpolated From IRC:112 Table 12.2
Permited σs from bar spacing 320 240 240 240 240 Interpolated From IRC:112 Table 12.3
Permited σs = min of above 2 values 280 240 240 240 240
As.min = kckf ct,effAct / σs 750 875 875 1085 875
Provided steel 3585 2011 1131 2011 2011
Chk on Proovided Steel for Crack Control OK OK OK OK OK
1.4.7.2 CRACK WIDTH CHECK UNDER QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATION
1. Analysis of section for Quasi-Permanent loads at 70 Years
Design Case C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of concrete Ec,eff = as
21009 18654 19710 26654 30593
calculated above
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es (Mpa) 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Area of Steel As (mm^2) 3585 2011 1131 2011 2011
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
d 254 252 254 352 252
Depth of Concrete in Compression(mm)
102 85 66 89 69
dc=(-AsEs+Sqr((AsEs)^2 +2bAsEsEc,effd))/(bEc,eff)
Page - 33
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR
Project
CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title
SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19) Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Stress in conc σc = (MEd / zc)*(Ec,eff / Es) 6.606 4.719 3.739 0.946 0.837
Stress in Steel σs = (MEd / zs) 93.878 99.603 108.654 20.953 14.429 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
Coeff for Bond Properties k1 (0.8 for deformed bars) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Coeff for strain dist k2 (0.5 for bending) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Clear Cover to Long Reinf c (mm) 40 40 40 40 40
Dai of Bar Φ 12 16 12 16 16
Spacing of Reinf. Sp 100 200 200 200 200
5(c+Φ/2) 230 240 230 240 240
Max crack Spacing For Sp <=5(c+Φ/2)
Sr.max= 3.4c + 0.425 k1k2Φ / ρp,eff and For
173.572 233.004 276.852 276.21 240.03 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.8/12.12
Sp <=5(c+Φ/2) Sr.max = 1.3*( h-x
)
Factor dependent on duration of loading kt
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
(taken as 0.5)
Stress in tension Reinforcement σsc 94 100 109 21 14
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es (Mpa) 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Short term Modulus Ecm 35000 35000 35000 35000 35000
αe = Es/Ecm 5.714 5.714 5.714 5.714 5.714
f ct,eff = max( f ctm , 2.9) 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500
( εsm - εsm ) is >= 0.6 σsc / Es 0.00028 0.00030 0.00033 0.00006 0.00004 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.6
εsm - εsm = ( σsc - ( k1fct,eff / ρp,eff )( 1- αeρp,eff ) )/Es 0.00026 0.00014 -0.0001 -0.0004 -0.0003 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.7
εsm - εsm = max of above two values 0.00028 0.00030 0.00033 0.00006 0.00004 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.8
Calculated Crack width wk = Sr,max( εsm - εsm ) 0.049 0.070 0.090 0.017 0.010 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.5
Allowable Crack Width (mm) 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
Chk on allowable Crack Width OK OK OK OK OK
Page - 34
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2 DESIGN OF END CROSS GIRDER
Figures Below shows the structural Model for Normal and Jackup Case. Crossection based on effective width is used in the structural model to define properties
Continuous Beam Model for Normal Case (Spring Support Indicate Position of Main Girder) Continuous Beam Model for Jackup Case (Spring Support Indicate Position of Jacks)
Page - 35
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.2 ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CONDITION CL of ECG
1075 11000
2.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR CROSS GIRDER
45 deg CL Long Gird
For Overhang Cantilever slab portion Total flange contribute to loading
For Other side load within the 45 degree triangle shall contribute.
However coservatively any load upto a distance of span /2 shall be ` 2176.95 1088.4725
assumed to be taken by cross girder
Page - 36
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS)
Thickness 75 mm
width 2163.47 mm
Weight per unit length 4.05651 kN/m eccn 6.73625
It is assummed conservatively that for the axle load configuration of different types of load as per IRC:6 only heviest load that can be applied within the Loading Zone width of girder will be considetred
2.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A TRAIN Long Direction
1200
250 250
Page - 37
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.2.2.4.2 CLASS-70R TRAIN
Long Direction
1370
610 610
Since Two axle of 170 KN from Class-A train and Two Axle of 200 KN from Bogie load is effective it is sufficient to consider Bogie Load of 400KN for various Configurations of One Lane 70 R loading. Hence For Bogie load Following Trains
Configuration are thus run along Cross Girder Model to get the effect of two lane 70R
Page - 38
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
70 R Bogie Load Configuration L Type
Distance 450 1480 450
Load (KN) 100 100 100 100
Following Train is thus run along Cross Girder Model to get the effect of Two Lane Class 70R tracked Loading Zone width= 2163.47
Distance 2060
Load (KN) 165.69 165.69
Page - 39
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION)
LC SW SD SDS LL
Factor Fav 1 1 1 1.5
Factor Unfav 1.35 1.35 1.75 1.5
2.2.3.1 ULS MOMENT FROM GRILLAGE ANALYSIS (MAX OF BASIC OR SEISMIC COMBINATION)
Maximum Saging Moment 970 kNm Impact Factor for Transverse Analysis as above used.
Maximum Hogging Moment 964 kNm Impact Factor for Transverse Analysis as avobe used.
2.2.3.2 GOVERNONG MOMENT FROM ABOVE TWO ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CASE
Maximum Saging Moment 970 kNm
Maximum Hogging Moment 964 kNm
Bear No Reactions
SW Fact SD Fact SDS Fact Factored Reaction applied Node No.
1 929.581 1.35 249.302 1.35 108.876 1.75 1782.025 102
2 808.454 1.35 4.08 1.35 83.762 1.75 1243.504 106
3 769.789 1.35 0.226 1.35 79.227 1.75 1178.168 110
4 645.701 1.35 146.933 1.35 61.248 1.75 1177.240 114
Page - 40
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.3.3 ANALYSIS RESULT JACKUP CASE
Maximum Saging Moment 65.15 kNm
Maximum Hogging Moment 1158.32 kNm
2.4 DESIGN METHOD TO BE ADOPTED
Span c/c of support 2176.95 mm
Long Girder width 661 mm
Clear Span 1515.95 mm
Effective Span of Cross Girder L 1743.34 mm IS 457 Clause 29.2 effective span taken as minimum of Span c/c of support or 1.15 times the clear Span
Depth D (avg) 1700 mm
L/D 1.02549
As per IS 456 clause 29.1 a) if L/D Ratio is less then 2.5 for continuous Beam it is designd as Deep Beam Else Normal Beam
Design Method Design as Deep Beam
As per IS:456 clause 29.2 The Lever arm for continuous Beam Is
z=0.2 ( L + 1.5D) when 1 <= L/D <= 2.5
or z=0.5 L when L/D < 1
z = 858.667 mm
2.5 DESIGN FORCES AND MOMENT
A Normal Condition with Live Load (ULS Basic Combination)
Hog Sag
Design Bending Moment (kN-m) 964 970
B Jack Up Condition without Live Load (ULS Basic Combination)
Hog Sag
Design Bending Moment (kN-m) 1158.32 65.15
C Governing ULS Moment
Hog Sag
Governing Design Bending Moment (kN-m) 1158.32 970
Page - 41
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2.6 CALCULATION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR SAGGING MOMENT
Page - 42
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2
Steel to be provided shall ve max of Asmin and As req 3102.64 mm
Distribution of Tensile Reinforcement IS:456 Clause 29.3.1 b)
Clear span/overall depth (L/D) 0.89173
Zone -I
Depth of zone I from Top 0.8D For L/D<1 else 0.2D 1360 mm
2
Ammount of Reinf in Zone II For L/D<1, As,req else 0.5( L/D - 0.5) As,req 3102.64 mm
Provide 8 no 20 Dia + 8 no 20 Dia + 8 no 20 Dia distributed in 1360 from Top
2
Steel Provided in Zone I As,prov 7539.82 mm OK
Zone - II
Depth of zone II on either side of mid depth 0 For L/D<1 else 0.3D 0 mm on both side of mid depth
2
Ammount of Reinf in Zone II For L/D<1,0 else As,req - 0.5( L/D - 0.5) As,req 0 mm on Both Face
0 mm^2 On each Face
Side Face Reinf Requrement in horizontal direction as per IRC:112 Clause 16.9(4) for Deep beam shall be maximum of following
2
0.15 % of the area on each face 1402.5 mm
or 150 mm2 per m on each Face 255 mm
2
2
Requiered side Face Reinforcement in Horizontal Direction on each 1402.5 mm
2
Tota Reinforcement required on each face = max(side face Reinf or Zone II reinf) 1402.5 mm Distributed in depth of 0 mm in central portion of Beam
Page - 43
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Provide 12 dia stirrup @ 100 c/c with one leg contributing to reinf on each Face
2
Steel Provided on Each Faces As,prov 1130.97 mm OK
Page - 44
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
3 DESIGN OF MID CROSS GIRDER
12000 12000
3.1.1 EFFECTIVE WIDTH OF CROSS GIRDER
Span 2100 mm Effecticve width is min of following
lo 1470 mm 0.2*b1 + 0.1*lo 2547 mm 300 300
bw 550 mm 0.2*lo 294 mm
b1 12000 mm
Spacing b1 12000 mm beff 294 mm
Figures Below shows the structural Model for Normal and Jackup Case. Crossection based on effective width is used in the structural model to define properties
Continuous Beam Model for Normal Case (Spring Support Indicate Position of Main Girder)
Page - 45
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
3.2 ANALYSIS CL of ECG
12000 12000
3.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR CROSS GIRDER
45 deg 45 deg CL Long Gird
3.2.2 LOADS
3.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW)
Self weight of girder within effective width is automatically applied in software
Additional width to the left 481 mm
Thk 300 mm
Additional self weight to the left 3.608 KN/m
Eccn from centre 0.810 mm'
Page - 46
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
Max 4300
Distance 1800 Min 1700 1800
Load (KN) 114 114 114 114
Page - 47
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
3.2.2.4.2 CLASS-70R TRAIN
Long Direction
1370
610 610
Since Two axle of 170 KN from Class-A train and Two Axle of 200 KN from Bogie load is effective it is sufficient to consider Bogie Load of 400KN for various Configurations of One Lane 70 R loading. Hence For Bogie load Following Trains
Configuration are thus run along Cross Girder Model to get the effect of two lane 70R
Page - 48
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
70 R Max Single Axle Configuration L Type
Distance 450 1480 450
Load (KN) 100 100 100 100
Following Train is thus run along Cross Girder in Grillage Model to get the effect of Two Lane Class 70R tracked
2060
160.83 160.83
Page - 49
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
3.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION)
LC SW SD SDS LL
Factor Fav 1 1 1 1.5
Factor Unfav 1.35 1.35 1.75 1.5
3.2.3.1 ULS MOMENT FROM GRILLAGE ANALYSIS (MAX OF BASIC OR SEISMIC COMBINATION)
Maximum Saging Moment 417 kNm Impact Factor for Transverse Analysis as above used.
Maximum Hogging Moment 1617.6 kNm Impact Factor for Transverse Analysis as avobe used.
3.2.3.2 GOVERNONG MOMENT FROM ABOVE TWO ANALYSIS FOR NORMAL CASE
Page - 50
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
As per IS:456 The Lever arm for continuous Beam Is
z=0.2 ( L + 1.5D) when 1 <= L/D <= 2.5
or z=0.5 L when L/D < 1
z = 866.5 mm
Page - 51
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
3.6 CALCULATION OF NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR HOGGING MOMENT
Tensile Force Ft=M / z 1866.82 KN
Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk 500 Mpa
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs 1.15
clear Cover c 40 mm IS:456 Clause 29.3.1 c)
Effective Depth d 1660 mm
Mean tensile strength of concrete fctm 3.5 Mpa
Minimum Resinforcement as per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC 112 maximum of
2
As,min=0.26(fctm/fyk)*bd 1661.66 mm
3
As,min=0.0013*bd 1186.9 mm
4
As,min=max of above 2 1661.66 mm
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req = Ft γs / fyk) 4293.69 mm
2
Steel to be provided shall ve max of Asmin and As req 4293.69 mm
Distribution of Tensile Reinforcement IS:456 Clause 29.3.1 b)
Clear span/overall depth (L/D) 0.91176
Zone -I
Depth of zone I from Top 0.8D For L/D<1 else 0.2D 1360 mm
2
Ammount of Reinf in Zone I For L/D<1, As,req else 0.5( L/D - 0.5) As,req 4293.69 mm
Provide 8 no 20 Dia + 8 no 20 Dia + 8 no 20 Dia distributed in 1360 from Top
2
Steel Provided in Zone I As,prov 7539.82 mm OK
Zone - II
Depth of zone II on either side of mid depth 0 For L/D<1 else 0.3D 0 mm on both side of mid depth
2
Ammount of Reinf in Zone II For L/D<1,0 else As,req - 0.5( L/D - 0.5) As,req 0 mm on Both Face
2
0 mm On each Face
Side Face Reinf Requrement in horizontal direction as per IRC:112 Clause 16.9(4) for Deep beam shall be maximum of following
2
0.15 % of the area on each face 1402.5 mm
or 150 mm2 per m on each Face 510 mm
2
2
Requiered side Face Reinforcement in Horizontal Direction 1402.5 mm
Page - 52
Project CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR DETAILED DESIGN & DRAWING FOR CURVED SUPER STRUCTURE SPAN OF ROB-504 IN AGRA
Consultant: INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES
UP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED
Client
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION UNIT - 1, AGRA Discipline BRIDGE Design Note No. DN/P-123/006
Calc by ASD Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 32m SPAN CURVED SUPERSTRUCTURE (PIER P18-P19)
Checked by PK Date 20-Jun-19
2
Tota Reinforcement required on each face = max(side face Reinf or Zone II reinf) 1402.5 mm Distributed in depth of 0 mm in central portion of Beam
Side Face Reinf Requrement in Vertical direction per m as per IRC:112 Clause 16.9(4) for Deep beam shall be maximum of following
2
0.15 % of the area 825 mm per m distributed on Each Faces
or 150 mm2 per m on each Face 150 mm2 per m distributed on Each Faces
Requiered side Face Reinforcement in Vertical Direction 825 mm2 per m distributed on Each Faces
Provide 12 dia stirrup @ 120 c/c with one leg contributing to reinf on each Face
2
Steel Provided on Both Faces As,prov 904.779 mm OK
Page - 53