Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Death Penalty Should Not Be Accepted
Death Penalty Should Not Be Accepted
Universidad de Córdoba
DEATH PENALTHY SHOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED 2
Abstract
Death penalty is usually understood as a process in which the government causes death to a
common person as a result of having committed a serious crime, such as: terrorism, murder, and
so on. Many people agree with implementing this penalty, claiming that it is a good way to
prevent horrible crimes and the delinquency of a country, however there are others who disagree
with this affirmation. This paper seeks to give the readers some arguments that make them think
about if it is really effectiveness the application of the death penalty in the society, exploring
some arguments against this practice; for instance, the suffering of the people involved in this
situation, the type of trial that is given to the condemn, and so forth.
3
DEATH PENALTHY SHOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED
Nowadays, it is very common to watch on the news, read in the newspapers, listen on the
radio or read on the social networks about many types of crimes, and it is not surprising to listen
to people to wish the victimizers´ death and ask the government the implementation of the death
penalty for those bad people. However, the application of this penalty has some negatives
First, death penalty is a practice that violates two fundamental rights which are: the right
to life and the right not to suffer torture. Death penalty is about killing someone and do not give
him the opportunity to get reformed and incorporated to the society again, because it is an
irreversible situation. Killing a prisoner in order for that person not to commit a crime again, it is
similar to say that the doctor has to kill his patient, so that person not becomes sick again.
Furthermore, the condemned are exposed to be beheaded, hanged, electrocuted, shot in the neck
by firing squad and they are applied the lethal injection, without taking into account that they
sometimes do not die on the first try, so they have to be torture the amount of times necessaries
until they die, producing them suffering, and not only to them, but their families as well, because
they are aware of the procedure their condemned relatives are subjected.
Moreover, this type of penalty has not showed effectiveness. There are many countries
which state that death penalty is a way to dissuade the delinquency; however, it has not been
proved that this is a helpful strategy against the delinquency. A research carried out by The
National Academy of Sciences of the United States, explained that it is not known if the death
penalty reduces homicides, and even if it increases them, because it has been almost impossible
to find the opposite, in fact, in the United States, the average murder rate for states that use the
Besides, in some cases this practice is not fair. There are no fair trials. Defendants are
rarely allowed to be represented by lawyers, and in many cases they are not informed of the
progress of legal proceedings against them. Death sentences usually are based on confessions
obtained through torture or non-reliable testimonies, and people are killed although there is not
enough evidence to deserve the death penalty; for instance, the cases of Larry Griffin in 1995,
Carlos de Luna in 1989, Gary Graham in 2000. Additionally, countries such as China, Iran and
Saudi Arabia, use this penalty as a politic tool to minimize their political opponents or with other
To conclude, before accepting the use of the death penalty or not in a country, the issues
concerning this practice must be taken into consideration, such as the fundamental rights that can
be violate, the suffering of people directly and indirectly affected with the application of this