Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fe-Ni Phase Diagram: BY J. 1. Goldstein R. E. Ogilvie
Fe-Ni Phase Diagram: BY J. 1. Goldstein R. E. Ogilvie
BY
J. 1. GOLDSTEIN
R. E. OGILVIE
.
n-
I .
GPO PRICE $
\
CFSTI PRICE(S) $
i
.. -., ,,..
-., -- .
I -
~~
'
. ~ Hard copy (HC)
- Microfiche (MF)
1
, ff 653 July 65
MARCH 1965
'
b
t m
0 v
1 '
Fe-Ni Phase Diagram
T
u.
-
I.
r
Guidstein
and
R. E. Ogilvie
ABSTRACT
0
0
w a s redetermined.
~ODWCTION
I .
enough temperatures the y phase breaks down i n t o a supersaturated bcc
- 2 -
4
a 5$ Ni alloy.
Owen and Liu4 used the technique just described to form the equilibrium
PROCEDURE
The two methods used to determine the Fe-Ni diagram are the diffusion
techniqGe used for miking the diffusion couples has been described in a
previous paper o8 After the diffusion treatment a discontinuity in the
resultant concentration versus distance profile was measured. The Ni
corieentrations in the n agd y phases at the interface of the discontinuity
are the solubility limits of the CY and y phases in the phase diagram at
by the probe, then the phase diagram can be determined.g In the Fe-Ni
than lQ-? am Hg. The other diffusion couples a s well as the quenched
3 0 %w
~i i i i ti spzcL-mxi e n r e n t between ,035 and .O5 microamps. Both the
b ' e
-4-
6
For the Fe-Ni system a t 3Okv and f o r a take-off angle, 8 = 52.5O; Aab = 1.158
several other a l l o y s both before and ai'tcr each run. The conversion of . a
The whole conversion process w a s programmed and run on the IBM-7094 computer.
pasuL'1's
i'rm the diffusion couple technique and t h e quench and anneal technique
~ g r p e ~ nf
~ cthp
t m l . i ~ . ~nf
s CCY' /C(;Y . The data obtained from both techniques
a r e summrized i n Table I11 along with the measured values of the Fe-Ni
diagram by Owen and Liu4 .
The new phase diagram proposed from t h e r e s u l t s of t h i s work i s
w i l l be discussed l a t e r .
D ISCLTSSION
and anneal technique a r e much smaller than those of the X-ray technique
- 6 -
betwden the alloys. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the new diagram and
except a t 700Oc.
The diagram below 500°C was not determined i n t h i s study because the
01P ard Y below 500°@. Theoretical calculations have been made by Jones
sild P u ~ ~ p h r eand
y ~ Kaufman and Cohen7. Jones and Pumphrey calculated the ...
.I/-* boundary by assuming [If'-y ( bhe difrerence between the heats of
"I'iicy Yound t h a t the a/c/+v boundary had a m a x i m u m N i content a t 4000C and bent
back t o s ~ ~ a l l amounts
cr or ITi coilLent a t lower temperatures. This
equilibrium i n bulk a l l o y s .
boundary l i e s between 5.8 and 6.9 At$ N i a t 35OoC and between 4.8 and 7.5
it was rcasoiiable t o suggest, as did Owen and Sully15, that the w/or+v
CONCLUSIONS
Acaim-m
The authors wish to thank the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
the M.I.T. Computation Center for time 011 the I B M 7094 computer. The
authors would also like t o thank Dr. L. Kaufman f o r his comments and
suggestions,
- 10 -
REFERENCES
V O ~ . 158, p . 749.
2Jj I e Goldstein: "Electron Microbeam Probe Studies of Metallic
p. 132.
V O ~ 166, p. 121.
'Le Kaufman and M. Cohen, Trans. AIME: 1956, v o l . 206, p . 1393.
'J- I . Goldstein, R . E . Hanneman, and R . E . Ogilvie - t o be published
p. 322.
c omun-i?ation.
v o l . 11, p. 323.
5.2
4.8 5x106
700
TABU I1
* iG $2
-
N
PPm -
H
PPm
-
Fe
I1
2 5 . 1 8 ~05 0.006 0.02 4 <LO
Remaining 0.001 .006 3 5 5PPm
I
2,aWwe C Techriique C
Q Y
(hen + Liu) (Owen + Liu
D.C. , 1.25 D. C. 3.8
&+A 2.246 Q+A 8.2
. .
II
.,,
Figure Captions
590X, Etchant - 2$ N i t a l .
0
d
x In
PI)
In
IN
0
N
0 0 0
0 0 0
(D m d
FIGURE 1
* -
P
1 I I I I 1 1I I l-r
.-
- I
c5
a
0
t
.-
2
-0- ---.I w
0
z
-PCT
0
v)
e-
z
s
if
---7
e-
0
6,
U
in I
R 8
t
3
U
0
Yc\
X
x
1
c
c\I
\. x
+
U
0
4