Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Meconium during delivery: A sign of

compensated fetal distress

H. ABRAMOVICI, M.D.
J. M. BRANDES, M.D.
K. FUCHS, M.D.
I. TIMOR-TRITSCH, M.D.
Haifa, Israel

The fetal scalp pH was examined in 80 parturients in whom meconium


appeared during the first stage of labor. These were matched with 80 control
patturients in whom the amniotic fluid was clear. No significant differences
were found between the two groups in fetal outcome, Apgar score,
or number of interventions during delivery. The meconium group was subdivided
into two groups: (1) thin and watery and (2) thick and solid. No differences
were found between the two subd~oisions in fetal scalp pH, fetal outcome,
Apgar score, or the number of interventions during delivery. Our data support
the assumption that the passage of meconium during delivery could be a
state of compensatory fetal distress.

T H E A P P E A R A N c E of meconium dur- there is no connection between the appear-


ing any stage of labor has long been con- ance of meconium during labor and the fetal
sidered a clinical sign of fetal distress. Ac- outcome. On the other hand, there are many
cording to the classical conception, this is cases of evident fetal distress, even of fetal
an indirect sign representing the response death, without evidence of meconium. In
of the fetal gastrointestinal tract to hypoxic this respect the series of Wood and Pinker-
conditions: Any decrease in the oxygen con- ton2 and Leslie 3 clearly show that there is no
centration in the fetal blood induces hyper- difference in the fetal outcome when cases
peristalsis of the fetal gut and relaxation of in which meconium appeared during de-
the anal sphincter. As a result, the fetus livery are compared to cases in which the
passes meconium into the amniotic fluid. 1 amniotic fluid remains clear. There is am-
Lately, the appearance of meconium as a bivalence concerning the appearance of me-
sign of fetal distress has been questioned. conium during delivery as being an ominous
Clinical experience shows that in many cases sign.
During the last few years, the relatively
new biochemical and electronic methods of
From the Department of Obstetrics direct fetal monitoring during labor have
and Gynecology, Rambam Government
Hospital, The Aba Khoushy Medical allowed a more accurate analysis of the fetal
School. condition and a re-evaluation of the old
Received for publication March 26, classical indirect signs of fetal distress (me-
1973.
Revised june 13, 1973.
conium, fetal heart rate changes, etc.) . How-
Accepted july 6, 1973.
ever, at the time of this study only bio-
Reprint requests: Dr. H. Abramovici,
chemical monitoring was available to us. The
Department of Obstetrics and purposes of this article are: ( 1) to establish
Gynecology, Rambam Government the correlation between the appearance of
Hospital, Aba Khoushy Medical School..
Haifa, Israel. meconium alone during labor and fetal
251
January 15, 1974
252 Abramovici et al.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.

Table I. The one-minute Apgar scores in the and 45 were multiparas. In 50 cases the me-
meconium group as compared to the conium was thin, watery, and green or yel-
control group low. In 30 cases the meconium was thick,
firm, and sometimes included pieces of solid
Apgar I Meconium Control
meconium.
score group group Total
One minute after delivery the condition
0- 3 1 1 2
4- 6 5 6 11 of the fetus was evaluated by Apgar's scor-
7-10 74 73 147 ing method.
Total so 80 160 To each parturient in our series, a control
subject was matched by stage of labor, age,
and parity, and in whom the amniotic fluid
Table II. The pH values and Apgar scores was clear. In this control group the new-
in the 80 babies who passed meconium born infant's condition was evaluated by the
during delivery Apgar score.

Apgar Results
score I pH< 7.20 I pH > 7.20 1 Total
The 80 parturients with evidence of me·
0- 3 1 0 1
4- 6 2 3 5 conium were delivered of live-hom babies.
7-10 0 74 74- Out of these 80, 76 (95%) were delivered
- -
Total 3 77 80 spontaneously and four were delivered by
operative procedures (two cesarean sections,
one forceps, and one vacuum extractor). All
acidemia, ( 2) to determine whether the ap- the babies were mature, weighing over 2,500
pearance of meconium during labor can be grams (more than 36 weeks from last men-
used as a clinical prognostic sign for fetal strual period). Table I, shows the one-minute
outcome, and ( 3) to check if there is any Apgar scores at delivery for the 80 babies
connection between the type of meconium who passed meconium during delivery as
(thin and watery or thick and solid) , fetal compared to the 80 control babies in whom
acidemia, and fetal outcome. the amniotic fluid was clear.
The 74 babies who passed meconium and
Material and methods 73 babies with clear amniotic fluid (control
In 80 parturients who were in a progres- group) were vigorous at delivery and had
sive first stage of labor and in whom me- Apgar scores of 7 or more. Only six babies
conium appeared after the rupture of the in the meconium group and seven babies
membranes (surgical or spontaneous) , the in the control group were depressed at de-
fetal scalp pH was examined. livery (Apgar scores below 7) and required
The mean cervical dilatation when the resuscitation (0 2 ; suction) . As this table
meconium was diagnosed was three fingers shows, there were no significant differences
and from this stage the mean duration of in the Apgar scores between the two groups.
labor was three hours and 20 minutes. The Table II shows the pH values and Apgar
fetal scalp sampling was performed immedi- scores for the 80 babies who passed mecon-
ately after the membranes ruptured and me- ium during delivery. In 77 out of these 80
conium was diagnosed. The acid-base bal- the fetal pH values during delivery were
ance was examined according to Saling's4 normal (pH above 7.20) and acidemia was
method; pH values above 7.20 were con- found only in three (pH values below 7.20).
sidered normal and values below 7.20 were The Apgar scores in the 77 babies with
considered as pathologic, showing fetal normal pH values were 7 or above in 74
acidemia. All the cases were vertex presen- and low (between 4 and 6) only in three,
tations and the fetal heart beats were normal. but the babies recovered well after resuscita-
Of the 80 parturients, 35 were nulliparas tion (0~: suction) . The three babies in whom
Volume 118 Meconium during delivery 253
Number 2

acidemia was found (pH less than 7.20) had Table III. The fetal outcomes, mean Apgar
low Apgar scores (below 7). scores, and number of interventions in the
Table III shows a comparison between meconium group as compared to the
the fetal outcomes, mean pH values, mean control group
Apgar scores, and number of interventions
during delivery of the 50 patients with
I
Meconium Control I
.! group . group . Total
watery (yellow or green) meconium and No. of ca.ses 80 80 160
the 30 with thick meconium. In the group Live-born infants 80 80* 160
with watery meconium (50 babies) the mean No. of interventions
during delivery 4 4 8
pH value was 7.30 (range, 7.18 to 7.43). In 8.58 8.57 8.58
Mean Apgar score
this group the mean Apgar score was 8.66 *One baby in this group died immediately after delivery
(range, 6 to 10). In 48 out of 50 patients of as a result of severe congenital malformations.
this group (96 per cent) the pH values were
above 7.20 and only in two were pH values Table IV. The fetal outcomes, mean pH
of 7.18 found. One of these two mothers values, mean Apgar scores, and number of
was delivered by vacuum extractor and the interventions during delivery in the infants
second gave birth spontaneously while prep- with thin and watery meconium as
arations for forceps delivery were being compared to those with thick and solid
made. One cesarean section was performed meconium
in this group in a case of posterior asynclitism Thick,
without clinical evidence of fetal distress. firm,
In the group with thick meconium during Thin solid
watery me co-
delivery ( 30 babies), the fetal pH values meconium nium Total
were normal (above 7.20) in 29 (96.6 per
No. of cases 50 30 80
cent); in only one the pH was 7.19 and the Live-born infants 50 30 80
patient was delivered by forceps. The mean pH> 7.20 48 29 77
pH value in this group was 7.31 (range, pH< 7.20 2 1 3
Mean pH 7.30 7.31 7.30
7.19 to 7.40) and the mean Apgar score was Mean Apgar score 8.66 8.56 8.58
8.56 (range, 3 to 10) . One cesarean section No. of interventions
was performed in this group in a case of ce- during delivery 2 2 4
phalopelvic disproportion which was diag-
nosed early in labor and no evidence of fetal thick meconium (Table IV) no difference
distress was found. As Table IV shows, when was found concerning the fetal outcomes,
the two groups with thick solid and thin fetal pH values and Apgar scores.
watery meconium are compared, no signif- We assume that the type of meconium de-
icant differences can be found between the pends on the water absorption capacity of
two groups concerning the mean Apgar the fetal gut. When the fetal gut absorbs
scores, mean pH values, fetal outcomes, and more water from its contents, the meconium
the number of interventions during delivery. passed by the fetus will be firm or solid; if
the fetal gut absorbs less water, the me-
Comments conium passed by the fetus will be loose and
The traditional VIew concerning the dif- watery.
ferent types of meconium is that the green Since in a mature baby the gallbladder
or yellow watery meconium means an old and the biliary tract are anatomically and
meconium which was passed by the fetus functionally well developed, it is logical to
and became mixed with the amniotic fluid. assume that the color of the meconium will
In contrast, the thick solid meconium means depend on the bile pigments it contains. 5
a fresh meconium, indicating a recent pas- We therefore feel that the physical properties
sage due to actual fetal distress. When we of the meconium do not have a definite value
compared the two groups with watery and in the estimation of fetal distress.
254 Abramovici et al. January 15, 1974
Am. J. Obst•t. Gynecol.

Schwartz 6 was the first to show (in 1858) The vasoconstriction followed by hypoxia of
that the appearance of meconium during the fetal gut induces hyperperistalsis and
labor meant impending fetal death. Walker's 7 sphincter relaxation and as a result the fetus
basic assumption, according to which the passes meconium. What Saling's explanation
fetus passes meconium when the oxygen con- really shows is that a mature fetus has the
centration in the umbilical cord blood falls, capacity of adaptive mechanism against hy-
has not been confirmed by any other author. poxia (peripheral vasoconstriction) in order
On the contrary, there are experiments dem- to supply oxygenated blood to the vital
onstrating that there is no connection be- organs. It is our opinion, therefore that the
tween the fetal oxygen concentration and fetuses who have passed meconium during
the fetal peristalsis. Speert8 demonstrated labor are in a state of temporary compen-
that induced hypoxia and/or oxygen admin- sated fetal distress (well-oxygenated vital
istration to pregnant monkeys does not affect organs and peripheral hypoxia) . The fetal
the fetal peristalsis. Clinical experience clear- blood pH at this stage will show no aci-
ly shows that newborn infants with hypoxia demia; if the fetus is delivered within a
due to respiratory or cardiac insufficiency do reasonable period of time the Apgar score
not pass meconium in greater amounts or will be good. Our results confirm this pre-
more frequently than normally oxygenated sumption: in only three of our 80 cases of
babies. These observations seem to indicate meconium during labor was there a slight
that during labor other influences besides fetal acidemia; the great majority of the
hypoxia can cause the passage of meconium. babies had good Apgar scores.
According to Fenton and Steer9 the passage Saling12 found slight acidemia in only
of meconium represents a normal physiologic three out of 176 cases of meconium and the
intra-amniotic defecation; certain fetuses be- same low percentage of acidemia in cases
gin this function just before instead of just of meconium during delivery was found by
after birth. The fetus in utero swallows Coltar and associates 13 and Garud and as-
amniotic fluid, vernix caseosa, and desqua- sociates.14
mative cells-substances which form the Our results confirm these observations and
meconium. These substances begin to ac- we feel that during progressive labor the
cumulate in the fetal gastrointestinal tract appearance of meconium with normal fetal
in the fourth month of pregnancy and, close heart beats and nonnal pH may be a tem-
to delivery date, when the gastrointestinal porary compensated state of fetal distress
tract is functionally mature, the fetus de- because in our cases the appearance of me-
fecates the meconium into the amniotic fluid conium did not change the prognosis of the
as a normal physiologic process. fetuses and the Apgar scores of the me-
Another explanation for the appearance conium group and the control group were
of meconium was given by Hon, 10 who sug- comparable. We could assume that for short
gested that the passage of meconium is due periods the state of compensation would
to a vagal reflex more frequent in postmature persist. Perhaps a change in the fetal heart
cases (vagal dominance) . beats or a fall in the fetal scalp pH would
According to Saling, 11 the vital organs of suggest the end of the compensatory equilib-
the fetus receive normal blood supply during rium and a state of decompensated fetal
hypoxia while the rest of the fetal nonvital distress in which intervention should be per-
organs (skin, gut, etc.) do not receive oxy- formed. Continuous fetal monitoring is es-
genated blood as a result of vasoconstriction. sential in these cases.

REFERENCES 2. Wood, C., and Pinkerton, J. H. M.: J. Obstet.


1. Barham, A. K.: J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 68: 427, 1961.
Commonw. 76: 412, 1969. 3. Leslie, D. W.: Br. Med. J. 2: 612, 1959.
Volume 118 Meconium during delivery 255
Number 2

4. Saling, E.: Arch. Gynaecol. 197: 108, 1962. 10. Hon, E. H.: Modern Trends in Human
5. Hellman, L. A., editor: Williams' Obstetrics, Reproductive Physiology. London, 1963, But-
Ed. 14, New York, 1971, Appleton-Century- terworth & Co., Ltd.
Crofts, p. 221. 11. Saling, E.: Foetal and Neonatal Hypoxia in
6. Schwartz, H.: Cited by Abramson, H.: Relation to Clinical Obstetrics Practice,
Resuscitation of the Newborn Infant, St. London, 1968, Edward Arnold, Ltd., p. 117.
Louis, 1960, The C. V. Mosby Company, p. 12. Saling, E.: Perinatal Medicine, 1st Europ.
114. Congr., Berlin, New York, and London, 1969,
7. Walker, J.: J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Com- Academic Press, Inc., p. 17.
monw. 61: 162, 1954. 13. Coltar, T. M., Trickey, H. R. A., and Beard,
8. Speert, H.: AM. J. 0BSTET. GYNECOL. 45: W. R.: Br. Med. J. 1: 342, 1969.
69, 1943. 14. Garud, A. M., Davis, P. L. M., Stanley, C.,
9. Fenton, A., and Steer, C.: AM. J. 0BSTET. et a!.: Br. Med. J. 1: 346, 1969.
GYNECOL. 83: 354, 1962.

You might also like