Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Why are GM Foods Not Labeled? http://www.grassrootsnetroots.org/articles/article_17240.

cfm

G r a s s r o o t s Ne t r o o t s Al l i a n c e - C a mp a i g n i n g & L o b b y i n g f o r He a l t h , Ju s t i c e , Su s t a i n a b i l i t y , Pe a c e , a n d D e mo c r a c y

HOME SIGN UP T AKE ACTION GNA SURVEY GET LOCAL FORUM DONAT E CONT ACT

GNA STATE PAGES Why are GM Foods Not Labeled?


Find the Politicians' My Green Choices, South Africa, March 2008
Answers Here: Straight to the Source

Choose Your State


Genetically modified food, also known as GM food or genetically engineered food,
SEARCH GNA:
entered the food supply in the 1990s. GM foods contain small pieces of foreign
GO DNA (from other organisms and often from another species) however SA
companies are not required to label foods that use GM ingredients. The foreign
GNA NEWS & ALERTS: DNA in GM foods is engineered into the food in hopes of producing desirable traits
like resistance to herbicides and pesticides, or resistance to specific pests. Insect-
War and Peace
resistant maize, for example, is modified by inserting a bacterium gene that
produces toxins and acts as an insecticide. Others have a gene that makes them
Environment & indestructible when sprayed with certain herbicides.
Sustainability
The pro-GM faction - mainly GM seed producers such as Monsanto, Du Pont,
Food, Farming, Organics
Dow, Bayer and Syngenta - say GM increases crop yields, reduces farming costs
and increases food security for developing countries.
Health In regards to GM potatoes, the seed developers claim that they are better for our
health & the environment because they reduce pesticide spraying. However GM
Politics and Democracy potatoes are engineered with an inbuilt pesticide to control the tuber moth. The
pesticide is now inside the plant and farmers will still use a toxic cocktail of
Civil Rights chemicals to combat all the other 99 pests, as well as viral, fungal & bacterial
diseases, and weeds that plague potato farming in South Africa. Furthermore the
Constitutional Liberties
toxin is accumulating in the environment and throughout the food chain. The tuber
moth will also quickly develop resistance to the toxin, so this is a short-term and
short-sighted solution to this problem.
Economics & Trade
Environmental bodies worldwide are strongly against GM food growth, agreeing
that this is a dangerous experiment with health and could have a disastrous effect
on the environment. They say it violates a natural organism's intrinsic value; that
modified genes are being spread through pollination; and that it allows a few giant
corporations to control food production worldwide, forcing farmers to buy new,
expensive, patented seed from them year after year.
Many countries, including most of Europe, most Australian states, Angola, Sudan,
Venezuela and Zambia, have declared themselves GM-free zones, refusing to
grow GM crops. So strong is the anti-GM lobby in the UK that the industry has
abandoned all attempts to get GM seeds approved for growing in that country.
South Africa, on the other hand, has adopted the crops wholeheartedly. Since
1997, South Africa has grown GM crops - including maize, soya beans and cotton -
commercially. The Government does not require GM crops to be separated from
non-GM crops during production, processing and distribution, which means there's
no way of tracking GM food from farm to plate; if one strain caused adverse
effects in humans or animals, it would be virtually impossible to trace the offending
variety.
So here, in South Africa, we have no real way of telling which of our foods contain
GM ingredients. 'The Regulations Relating to the Labelling of Foodstuffs Obtained
Through Certain Techniques of Genetic Modification', do not require GM foods
currently imported, marketed or sold in South Africa to indicate the presence of GM
ingredients on the label. Andries Pretorius, of the department of health comments
that, "labelling in South Africa applies only to GM foods that are 'substantially
different' from non-GM foods or contain animal or human genes, currently SA GM
foodstuffs on the shelves only contain inserted bacterial genes and proteins and

1 of 2 3/17/2009 7:08 PM
Why are GM Foods Not Labeled? http://www.grassrootsnetroots.org/articles/article_17240.cfm

these foodstuffs are considered substantially equivalent to their non-GM


counterparts and therefore do not require to be labelled.
An article in the Sunday Times a few months ago reported that many South
Africans are unknowingly eating genetically modified maize. The article listed the
following products as testing positive for GM maize: "ProNutro original flavour
(52.7 %), ProNutro Toddlers Instant apple and banana flavour (97.5%), Iwisa
Maize Meal (27.2%), Tiger Brands Ace samp (53.7%) and Purity cream of maize
baby soft porridge (24.9%)."
Pick n Pay No Name Brand cornflakes and Kellogg's cornflakes were reported to
be GM free.
Personally, I'd like to be able to choose whether or not my family eats GM food.
Why can't products with GM ingredients be labeled, regardless of whether they
have bacterial, protein or animal genes. They are in the EU.

TH E G N A IS A P R O J E C T O F T H E O R G AN IC C O N S U ME R S FU N D

HOME SIGN UP TAKE ACTION FIND CANDIDATES FIND OFFICIALS DONATE ABOUT
PEACE ENVIRONMENT FOOD HEALTH DEMOCRACY CIVIL RIGHTS CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES ECONOMICS
F ai r Use Noti c e: The mate r i al on thi s si te i s pr o vi ded f or educ a ti ona l an d i nf or mati onal pur poses. I t may c on tai n
c o py r i ghted mater i a l the u se o f whi c h ha s no t alway s been spec i f i c ally autho r i zed by the c op y r i g ht own er . I t i s
be i ng made ava i la ble i n an ef f or t to advan c e the un der sta ndi ng o f sc i e nti f i c , envi r on men tal, e c onomi c , soc i a l justi c e
an d human r i ghts i ssues etc . I t i s beli eved that thi s c on sti tute s a ' f a i r use' of a ny su c h c op y r i g hted mate r i al as
pr ovi de d f o r i n sec ti on 107 o f th e US C o py r i ght Law. I n a c c or danc e wi th Ti tle 17 U. S . C . S ec ti o n 107, the mate r i al
on thi s si te i s di str i buted wi thout p r of i t to those who h ave an i n ter e st i n u si ng the i n c lu ded i n f o r mati o n f o r r esear c h
an d educ a ti on al pu r poses. I f y ou wi sh to use c opy r i g hted mater i al f r om thi s si te f or pur poses of y our own tha t go
be y ond ' f ai r use' , y ou must obtai n per mi ssi on f r om the c opy r i ght o wner . The i nf or ma ti on o n thi s si te does not
c o nsti tute lega l or tec hn i c al advi c e.

2 of 2 3/17/2009 7:08 PM

You might also like