Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BTH 5991-9030EN Cannabis AppNote
BTH 5991-9030EN Cannabis AppNote
Authors Abstract
Lilly Asanuma1, Dan Miller1,
Eight U.S. states have approved the recreational sale of cannabis, with an additional
Rick Jordan1, Melissa Churley2,
35 states allowing some degree of medical use, or use of cannabidiol‑containing
and Anthony Macherone2,3
products for limited medicinal purposes. Every state that has legalized use in
1
Pacific Agricultural some form has testing requirements for pesticide residues in cannabis flower and
Laboratory, cannabis products before retail sale. Each state has its own testing requirements
Sherwood, OR 97140 regarding the specific pesticides to be evaluated, and the action levels that the
2
Agilent Technologies, Inc. tested pesticides must not exceed. Pacific Agricultural Laboratory has validated
Santa Clara, CA 95051 workflows using LC/MS/MS and GC/MS/MS to cover these different requirements
across a range of products. This Application Note describes a comprehensive
3
Johns Hopkins University
pesticide screening and quantitation approach for up to 214 pesticide residues
School of Medicine
in cannabis flower. The methodology uses a single extraction and combined
analyses using the Agilent 7010 Tandem Quadrupole and Agilent 6470 Tandem
Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer systems. For GC/MS/MS, limits of quantitation
(LOQs) were determined to be 0.1 mg/kg for 94 % of the comprehensive target
list. For LC/MS/MS, LOQs were determined to be 0.1 mg/kg for 89 % of the
comprehensive target list. Analyte recoveries were between 70–120 % for 212 of the
214 compounds.
Introduction The protocol was based on the sample Source. This efficiency permits high
preparation procedure used to determine sample dilution factors that minimize
Quantifying pesticide residues in pesticides in dried hops1 with an matrix effects while still achieving the
cannabis flower is a complex problem. additional dilution step before analysis. required limits of quantitation (LOQs),
The challenge is partially due to the The dilute eluate is then passed to both determined to be 0.1 mg/kg for 94 % of
concentration level disparities between GC/MS/MS and LC/MS/MS workflows, the comprehensive target list.
naturally occurring cannabinoids, as described below, for comprehensive To achieve the necessary separations,
incurred pesticide residues, and other pesticide residue analysis. More than the LC/MS/MS system used an
endogenous compounds such as 200 known pesticides were tested, going Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120
terpenes, which typically are found at far beyond the often-referenced Oregon Phenyl‑Hexyl column (2.1 × 100 mm,
concentrations of 1 to 2 % by weight of list of approved pesticides for cannabis. 2.7 μm, p/n 695775-912). An online
the flower. The typical extraction process To help minimize matrix effects and multisampler pretreatment procedure
has the potential for low pesticide provide acceptable recoveries for each was used to improve the peak shape of
recoveries and deleterious effects on target list, dispersive SPE cleanup (dSPE) early eluting compounds. This procedure
the analytical instrumentation caused techniques were developed for each entails sandwiching the sample between
by co-extracted material. Our approach platform. HPLC grade water using the sandwiched
to sample preparation exploits the
The GC/MS/MS system was equipped injection features of the autosampler.
benefits of highly sensitive instruments,
with two columns of differing polarities, The sensitivity of the Agilent 6470
allowing for significant sample dilution to
and used midcolumn backflush with MS/MS system allows for high dilution
decrease these matrix effects.
the Agilent Purged Ultimate Union. The factors that minimize matrix effects,
An acetonitrile extraction of the cannabis Agilent 7010 GC/MS/MS includes a High and achieve the required LOQs. For
extract was used, followed by passing Efficiency Source (HES), which results in the comprehensive target list, 89 % of
the extract through a SPE cartridge. the creation of up to 20-times more ions the compounds achieved an LOQ of
compared to the Standard Agilent Inert 0.1 mg/kg.
2
Experimental Weigh 1.0 g of sample into a 50-mL centrifuge tube.
3
Results and discussion Table 1. GC/MS/MS Conditions.
GC Conditions
Sample preparation GC Agilent 7890B
Using a simple extraction and SPE Column 1 Agilent HP-35MS, 15 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm (p/n 122-3812)
cleanup of the cannabis flower matrix Column 2 Agilent HP-5, 15 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm (p/n 19091J-431)
substantially reduces the issues Inlet Multimode (MMI)
associated with QuEChERS extraction, Inlet liner
Splitless, 4 mm single taper w/ deactivated fused silica wool
Recommend: Agilent Ultra Inert (p/n 5190-2293)
which include spiking pH and exothermic
Column 1 flow 1.2 mL/min
conditions that can degrade sensitive
Column 2 flow 1.25 mL/min
pesticides. In our approach, we eliminate
Inlet temperature 180 °C
the hydration step necessary with
Inlet temperature program 180 to 280 °C at 400 °C/min
QuEChERS, thus increasing the recovery
Injection volume 2 µL
of the more polar pesticides.
70 °C (1 minute)
For GC/MS/MS analysis, a cleanup Oven temperature program
35° C/min to 180 °C (0 minutes)
10 °C/min to 200 °C (0 minutes)
step was performed for each sample 8 °C/min to 300 (4.5 minutes)
extract before analysis using the Run time 23.14 minutes
Agilent Universal dispersive-SPE kit Column backflush Agilent Purged Ultimate Union (p/n G3186)
(p/n 5982-0028). In this procedure, Intra-run, when deltamethrin elution passes the Ultimate Union
100 μL of the collected extract was Post run, 2.4 minutes at 4.0 mL/min
added to 900 µL of hexane:acetone MS Conditions
(1:1, v/v) in the 2-mL cleanup tube. The Spectrometer Agilent 7010 triple quadrupole GC/MS with high efficiency source (HES)
slurry was vortexed and centrifuged, and Mode Electron ionization (EI)
300 µL of the supernatant was added Transfer line temperature 300 °C
to 300 µL of hexane:acetone (1:1, v/v) Source temperature 230 °C (280 °C recommended)
resulting in an overall 500-fold dilution Quadrupole temperature 150 °C
before analysis.
For LC/MS/MS analysis, 50 µL of the Table 2. LC/MS/MS Conditions.
collected extract was transferred to HPLC Conditions
an autosampler vial containing 950 µL HPLC Agilent 1260 Infinity multisampler
of acetonitrile, resulting in a 500-fold Column Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 Phenyl-Hexyl, 2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7 µm (p/n 695775-912)
dilution. Column temperature 45 °C
If additional sample cleanup is Injection volume 2 µL
necessary due to the complexity of Mobile phase A 5 mM Ammonium formate + 0.1 % formic acid in 95:5 (v/v) water:methanol
the coextracted matrix (see note in Mobile phase B 5 mM Ammonium formate + 0.1 % formic acid in 95:5 (v/v) methanol:water
Figure 1), a third cleanup procedure Flow rate 0.4 mL/min
can be followed using the Agilent MS Conditions
dispersive‑SPE kit (p/n 5982‑5122). In Gas temperature 250 °C
this tertiary procedure, 1 mL of collected Gas flow 9 L/min
sample extract is added to a 2‑mL Nebulizer 35 psi
dSPE cartridge, vortexed, centrifuged, Sheath gas heater 300 °C (200 °C recommended)
and diluted to a final factor of 500-fold Sheath gas flow 12 L/min
before analysis. Please note, under Capillary 4,000 (+) 3,500 (–)
these conditions, Daminozide, Spinosad,
Spirotetramat, and Spiroxamine Table 3. Mobile phase gradient.
4
GC/MS/MS performed using the external standard was improved. This procedure greatly
Matrix-matched calibrators were technique (absolute response versus reduced matrix effects/interferences,
prepared over a range of 0.2 ng/mL concentration). and allowed for improved instrument
to 20 ng/mL. Regression curves were The HES of the 7010 GC/MS/MS up-time by preventing frequent inlet
constructed with a minimum of five system makes high sample dilution maintenance and column replacement.
levels for linear models and a minimum possible for injection of analytes at Using the defined sample preparation
of six levels for quadratic models. Using sub‑ppb levels as part of a routine techniques and dilution factors, LOQs of
a 1/X weighting factor, and excluding workflow. By diluting the cannabis 0.1 mg/kg for 94 % of the target list of
the origin, all correlation coefficients flower samples as much as 500-fold, over 70 compounds were determined.
were >0.990. All quantitation was overall robustness of the analyses
×102 ×106
Bifenthrin Dichlobenil
7
y = 33381.350105*x – 6070.899500 1.6 y = 84437.569125*x + 9941.891764
6 R2 = 0.9979 R2 = 0.9998
1.4
5 1.2
Response
Response
4 1.0
0.8
3
0.6
2
0.4
1 0.2
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
×106 ×105
2.0 Ethoxyquin Dichlorvos
1.8 y = 95126.837174*x + 10287.886151 2.1 y = 11366.326711*x + 269.182058
1.6 R = 0.9996 R2 = 0.9997
2
1.8
1.4
1.5
Response
Response
1.2
1.0 1.2
0.8 0.9
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.2 0.3
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
×105 ×105
Myclobutanil Pendimethalin
5 y = 25029.713155*x + 4155.220045 1.2 y = 50.406618*x2 + 5324.540767x + 1215.023552
R2 = 0.9984 R2 = 0.9997
4 1.0
Response
Response
0.8
3
0.6
2
0.4
1
0.2
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
Figure 2. Select GC/MS/MS calibration curves (red triangles represent injected QCs).
5
Figure 3. Select GC/MS/MS MRM chromatograms.
6
Table 5. GC/MS/MS recoveries and % RSD (n = 5 replicates). Table 6. Compounds with LOQs
different from those in Table 4.
Compound % Recovery %RSD Compound % Recovery %RSD
GC-MS/MS
α-BHC 93 2.27 Fenarimol 90 4.74
Compound LOQ (mg/kg)
Aldrin 100 3.14 Fenvalerate 112 6.19
Captan 0.5
β-BHC 93 2.14 Fipronil 107 10.68 Deltamethrin 0.5
All compounds listed in Table 4 had LOQs of 0.1 mg/kg, except for those given in Table 5.
7
LC/MS/MS The sensitivity of the Agilent 6470 Multisampler Pretreatment option that
Matrix-matched calibrators were MS/MS system allows for dilution sandwiches the sample between LC/MS/MS
prepared over a range of 0.2 ng/mL to factors up to 500-fold, which helps grade water, allows for improvement of
10 or 20 ng/mL. Regression curves were minimize matrix effects and reduces peak shape for early eluting compounds.
constructed with a minimum of five MS/MS source maintenance. The use This option is helpful when analyzing
levels for linear models and a minimum of Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell column a large list of compounds with a
of six levels for quadratic models. Using technology allows for UHPLC separation wide range of polarities. Using these
a 1/X weighting factor and excluding the and run times with a standard HPLC techniques, an LOQ of 0.1 mg/kg was
origin, all correlation coefficients were system. The Agilent Infinity 1260 achieved for 89 % of the target list of
>0.990. All quantitation was performed over 140 compounds.
using the external standard technique.
×103 ×105
4.5 Acequinocyl-hydroxyl 4.5
Daminozide
y = 431.322910*x – 16.426453 y = 23459.984452*x – 19216.444426
4.0 4.0 R2 = 0.9929
R2 = 0.9984
3.5 3.5
3.0 3.0
Response
Response
2.5 2.5
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
×106 ×105
2.0 Piperonyl butoxide 3.2 Spinosad A
1.8 y 2= 193076.619490*x + 13819.169477 y = 31259.748148*x – 3821.148105
2.8 R2 = 0.9979
R = 0.9975
1.6
2.4
1.4
2.0
Response
Response
1.2
1.0 1.6
0.8 1.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.2 0.4
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
×105 ×106
Spinosad D Spiroxamin
1.6 y = 15931.249556*x + 900.500069 y = 106277.163002*x – 10026.020654
1.0
1.4 R2 = 0.9972 R2 = 0.9978
1.2 0.8
Response
Response
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.6 0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL)
Figure 4. Select LC/MS/MS calibration curves (red triangles represent injected QCs).
8
Figure 5. Select LC/MS/MS MRM chromatograms.
9
Table 8. LC/MS/MS recoveries and %RSD (n = 5 replicates). All compound listed in Table 7 had LOQs of 0.1 mg/kg, except for those given in Table 8.
10
Table 9. Compounds with LOQs
different from those in Table 7.
Acknowledgements
LC-MS/MS
The authors would like to thank
Compound LOQ (mg/kg)
Joan Stevens for her contributions to
Clethodim 0.2
this work.
Cycloate 0.2
Triadimefon
Triadimenol
0.2
0.2
Disclaimer
Trifloxystrobin 0.2 Agilent products and solutions are
intended to be used for cannabis quality
control and safety testing in laboratories
Conclusion where such use is permitted under
state/country law.
Though cannabis flower provides
a challenging sample matrix, a
comprehensive approach to residue
analysis is possible. Using a simplified
extraction technique with a pass-through
SPE step can reduce the amount of
co-extracted materials. Using dispersive
cleanup techniques optimized for each
analytical system reduce matrix effects,
and increases the robustness of the
analysis. Using high sensitivity mass
spectrometers capable of low calibration
levels (0.2–0.4 ng/mL) provides large
dilution factors (up to 500-fold), again
reducing matrix effects, instrument
maintenance, and downtime. The
success of this approach was confirmed
by evaluating the % recovery and %RSDs
for a large compound list.
11
Appendix
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Dwell time (ms) Collision energy
Dichlorovos 185 Unit 93.1 Unit 80.00 10
12
Table A1. GC/MS/MS MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Dwell time (ms) Collision energy
Ethoxyquin 202 Unit 174.3 Unit 12.00 15
13
Table A1. GC/MS/MS MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Dwell time (ms) Collision energy
Aldrin 263 Unit 193 Unit 9.00 30
14
Table A1. GC/MS/MS MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Dwell time (ms) Collision energy
Chlordane cis/trans 375 Unit 266 Unit 14.00 25
15
Table A1. GC/MS/MS MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Dwell time (ms) Collision energy
Bromopropylate 341 Unit 183 Unit 18.00 20
16
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions.
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
3-Hydroxy carbofuran 238.11 Unit 163.08 Unit 80 10
17
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
Clothianidin 250.02 Unit 169 Unit 95 8
18
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
Fenpropathrin 350.2 Unit 55.1 Unit 115 48
19
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
Linuron 249.02 Unit 160.1 Unit 100 20
20
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
Pirimiphos-methyl 306.3 Unit 164 Unit 120 18
21
Table A2. LC/MS/MS Dynamic MRM Transitions (continued).
Compound Precursor ion MS1 Resolution Product ion MS2 Resolution Fragmentor Collision energy
Spiromesifen 388 Unit 273 Unit 110 10
www.agilent.com/chem