Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DILG Legal - Opinions 201132 Ffd0ca2fa7 PDF
DILG Legal - Opinions 201132 Ffd0ca2fa7 PDF
t' '
| ,'**.'' '
tt
.a. , -'"
IlepLrblic ol' thc Ph ilippines
Dcprrtment of thc lnterior :rnd Local Govcrnme nt
A. Frarrcisco Colcl Conclonril1iunr ll, liDSA, Dilintan, Quczon C)ity
LEGAL SERVICE
This Office was in receipt of a Memorandum from Regional Director (RD) Quirino M.
Libunao of DILG Regional Office No. XI, Davao City, in response to your query
which was earlier referred to the said office for appropriate action.
The query centers on the propriety of your act as City Legal Officer when you
notarized a contract between the winning bidder and the City Government of Digos
as represented by the city Mayor, when at the same time, you occupy a
concurrent position as Chairperson of the Bid and Awards Committee (BAC) who
approved the contract of the same winning bidder.
Attached to the said Memorandum is the position maintained by our Regional Office
in Davao City, signed by RD Libunao himself, and in gist, we quote the Pertinent
portion therdof:
"The law is clear that public officials and employees are generally
prohibited from engaging in the private practice of their profession
unless authorized by the Constitution or law. As opined by the
Supreme Court, the only exceptions are as follows: first, the private
practice is authorized by the Constitution or the law; and second, the
practice will not conflict' or tend to conflict' with his or her
official functions.
xxx
" Mentornnduln Cirurlnr No. -17 of tlv Execu ti.t,c Depnrtnent nllotos
gouernttrcnt cnt.ployces to a gngc diracfly in tlr prit,nte
Ttrnctice of tlreir
profession prottidcd tlrcrc is n ruri.ttcn. punrission
fron |lrc Depnrtntent
lrcnd. [t proztides:
Thus, it is emphasized by this Office that your notarial practice must have a prior
written authorization from the City Mayor of Digos, Davao who has control and
supervision over your position. Absent such authority, then the notarial act subject
of this review ls deemed improper and a prohibitive act.
Assuming arguendo that you have a standing authority to practice your profession,
the act of notarizing the contract which you approved as Chairperson of the BAC of
Digos City was contrary to the norms of conduct expected of public officials.
Republic Act No. 6713, otherwise known as the Code of Conduct and Ethicat
Standards for Public Officials and Employees, commitment to public interest and
professionalism:
In cfosing, we cite the case of Lorenzana vs Fajardo, A.C, No, 5712, 29 June
2005:
Tlrcse clutics nre t'urtfu:r ensluined in tlrc Attontey,s OtttlL rohiclt ez,ery
lmoyer in tl
s jurisdiction lms to tnke hcfore lrc is nllotpcd to
ltrncticc lntp. TIic
Attorney's Ontlt stntes in pnrt tlnt ez,ery lntpyL,r "shall support the
Constitution anil obey tlrc laus as zuell as the legal orders of the ih y
c onstitltt e tl authorit i e s ...,,
*-'..'-.- (
I e. oolue rv
\
DIR. QUIRINO M. LIBUNAO, CESO III
Regional Director, DILG Region XI
Matina, Davao City
File
LS:55/cga:ins
t'
t'