Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Open House Families Evaluation Report 2019
Open House Families Evaluation Report 2019
COM 2
OPEN HOUSE FAMILIES 2019
METHODOLOGY
The surveys included:
• Paper surveys completed on the day and online surveys completed after the event
• A survey for visitors to the general programme, comprising of marketing and event feedback, demographic information, outcomes for
visitors, and suggested improvements and one family tours, with the same mix of survey content.
• A survey for families bringing children with special needs and disabilities (SEND), with extra questions about how appropriate the event was
for their child’s particular needs. A copy of the SEND survey is included as Appendix A to show all the questions included used.
• All data is provided as percentages of the total number of people who responded to that specific question
• Percentages are rounded to the nearest full unit
DATA AVAILABLE
• 181 surveys returned
o 170 surveys from general programme visitors
o 10 surveys from families visiting events specially designed to cater for children with special needs and disabilities (specialist events)
o 1 survey from a family on a family tour
The surveys returned are a fairly accurate representation of the total audience. 181 surveys from 6647 people means Open House Families can be
95% confident that answers represent what all visitors would say, give or take 7%. An ideal representation would be at least 99% confident give or
take 5%. The minimum reliability usually found to be acceptable is 90% confident give or take 10%. So these results are strong but could be more
accurate with a higher number of survey responses.
LIMITATIONS
• SPECIALIST EVENTS: Of the data given in specialist event surveys; 60% came from specialist events (all at The National Gallery). The rest were
at standard events but completed the SEND survey, and so have been included as specialist event data.
• FAMILY TOURS: Only one family gave feedback about a family tour. This is included in full in the Appendix
OBJECTIVE: EXCITE AND ENTHUSE FAMILIES ABOUT LONDON’S AMAZING ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
Very strongly met
• 6647 visitors came to 50 events across 18 sites and venues.
• 6412 came to the general programme in and around London’s public spaces and cultural venues.
• 56 came to five events for families of children with special needs and disabilities at five cultural venues (specialist events).
• 179 came to four tours by families, for families, created in partnership with local schools and held at four cultural venues.
• Families were keen to praise the friendliness and welcome from staff and volunteers.
• Fun was by the far most regularly used word to describe visitors’ experiences across the weekend.
• 94% would definitely or probably come to Open House Families again (similar to the 96% in 2018).
• 100% of families at specialist events said their child’s needs were well or very well catered for.
• Activities also contributed to quality family time, understanding of environmental factors, opportunities to play with other children, learning,
and wellbeing.
OBJECTIVE: ENCOURAGE FAMILIES TO VISIT AND ENJOY BUILDINGS AND AREAS UNKNOWN OR UNFAMILIAR TO THEM.
Very strongly met.
51% of visitors had never been to the event site or venue before (an increase from 43% in 2018).
18% had never been to that part of London before (a good increase from 10% in 2018).
1. Families could be sure to get a look inside the host buildings (e.g. The Gherkin)
2. Directions, maps and signposting are clear and specific online, on site and in print
3. Facilities for all weathers and needs are ensured. Water and shade were in high demand (and not always available) for outdoor events this year;
and all locations need clearly signposted and accessible toilets very nearby.
4. Programming specifically designed to engage with families from Black and Black British backgrounds can be provided, given their presence was
noticeably lower than the average percent of such families living in London – in contrast to the other successes in attracting diverse visitors.
5. Programming and partnerships continue to benefit children with disabilities and life affecting conditions. A good start has been made but more
growth is needed.
Canary Gasholder 30 St Mary Axe, Here East The National Gallery The Here East Canary St Paul’s
Wharf Park The Gherkin 13% 60% Wallace 10% Wharf Cathedral
35% 34% 18% Collection 10% 10%
10%
• Programming - like being attracted by something different, the Lego or golf, 62%
or having had a good experience at last year’s events. designed something 55%
• Architecture - wanting to learn about the buildings, architect or building 60%
materials 50%
• Wellbeing - such as a chance to be outdoors drew something 45%
And at specialist events: 30%
• Programming – attracted by the specially arranged events
98%
• Social – spending time together as a family built something 86%
• Creative / sensory – wanting to draw, design or make 90%
All General Specialist
“Community
involvement about city
“Very inclusive, fun,
and people”
environmentally
friendly”
74%74%
70%
21%20% 20%
10%
5% 6%
0% 0%
The events had a positive impact on 94% of visitors, including general enjoyment, new ideas, feeling more informed, improved wellbeing, being
more environmentally aware, and being part of a local community.
The remaining 6% had no response as the events reinforced their existing position, usually because they were from an architecture background.
65% gave generic positive feedback, such as feeling good, fun, interested.
From the remainder who gave more specific feedback:
• 23% had new ideas such as feeling inspired or creative.
• 20% came away feeling more informed.
• 17% had improved wellbeing, for example feeling uplifted, transported or optimistic.
• 13% felt more conscious of the impact of buildings on the environment.
• 17% of the 30 (6% of the full total) felt no different, as mentioned above.
• 10% felt a sense of community, feeling proud of the area or more included.
The specialist events met the needs of children very well. “This was one of the better events - if not the best!”
How well did the event accommodate the specific needs, “Visually Impaired (registered blind). Cerebral Palsy. I
conditions, barriers or strengths in your child’s life? would say that it's always going to be difficult to cater
67%
for these disabilities but this was definitely one of the
better events - if not the best. A lot of museums etc
make a kind of token concession (such as a sensory
zone) which takes the child about one minute to
33% navigate!”
One family also talked about how they felt more able to
visit the venue generally: “It gave us encouragement to visit the National Gallery - guidance in
navigating the collection, & on context of 2 paintings and one space -
opportunity to engage with the material by building and playing around.”
Many families wanted to thank volunteers and staff for being so very
"Lovely positive volunteers” "Very helpful volunteers”
helpful, friendly and welcoming. This was by far the biggest response to this
question.
A few added further gratitude saying how much they love the events and
hope the programme continues in future years. "Nice friendly and "the staff were very
helpful volunteers” helpful with us”
FAMILIES: GROUPINGS
• Overall, families brought very young (0-4 years) and young (5-11 years) children in almost equal amounts. Teenagers barely registered, with
only 8 in total from over 300 children.
11-15 58%
3%
37% 38%
29%
5-11
46%
0-4 5%
51% 2%
Specialist General
General Specialist
44%
40%
36%
20%
0% 1%
Specialist General
FAMILIES: ETHNICITY
The programme is very successful in attracting a wide range of ethnically diverse families and has improved significantly on last year’s progress.
• BASELINE: The general population in London is 60% white (Office for 55% 55%
National Statistics, 2015)1 Last year’s Open House Families reported
50%
62% of visitors coming from White ethnic backgrounds.
• This year around half of all families described their ethnicity as white
(55% in total), so the programme is doing very well at attracting a 30%
wider range of ethnically diverse families.
20% 18% 20%
• More could be done to attract Black / Black British families, who 12% 13%
make up 13% of London’s population in general, but only visited in 8% 9%
5% 5%
very small numbers. 0% 0%
1
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/adhocs/005789numbersoflondonresidentsbyethnicitycobandstatus2015
Access for families of children with disabilities and conditions is improving, though there is scope to keep growing.
70%
• Overall 12% of families said someone in their party had a disability
of condition affecting daily life.
12%
• At specialist events, families were able to say more about the
8% conditions if they wanted to. These included a brain condition
which also affected everything else; several with visual
Yes No impairments; and cerebral palsy.
Specialist General All
2
https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-s-diverse-population-
The events are very successful at attracting families from some of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation Ranking
most deprived areas of the country. 35%
30%
The chart shows where visiting families live in terms of the Multiple 25%
Deprivation Index, which measures the quality of life3 in each postcode 20%
15%
district (i.e. first half of postcode) in England.
10%
• BASELINE: 22.5% of London falls within the most deprived 20 per 5%
cent of England (English Indices of Deprivation, 2015)4 0%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
most most most most most least least least least least
• 33% of all family visitors are within the most deprived 20%, far
General Specialist All
higher than the average London population.
• Around a fifth of visitors live in the top 10% most deprived areas.
• Around half live in the 30% most deprived areas in the country.
On this map the deeper the red, the more deprived the area.
The deeper the green, the less deprived the area.
• The map shows that the majority the families from more
deprived areas tend to live in North / East London boroughs.
3
Such as health, employment, crime, income etc.
4
https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/indices-of-deprivation-2015
Many of these requests echo those identified in 2018 and will need clear changes next time, in order to keep feedback as positive as it has been the
past two years.
In addition, not something families themselves have commented upon, but future improvements highlighted by survey data:
• More activities specifically designed to welcome Black / Black British families, since these are noticeably lower than the London average,
which is contrast to the general trend of excellent diverse representation amongst visitors.
• Continued work catering for families bringing children with disabilities or other special needs and conditions. Progress via the targeted events
this year has been very successful. Progress has grown from 7% to 12% this year which is impressive. A further 7% is needed to meet London’s
current average of 19%. A new census is due in 2021 and is likely to show far higher rates of disability given the rise in neurological disability
diagnoses and awareness (e.g. autism, dyslexia, dysgraphia etc) so ideally, Open House Families should work towards far exceeding 19% to be
truly representative.
APPENDIX A
SURVEY QUESTIONS
1. Which Open House Families site did you visit today?
2. How would you describe Open House Families in one sentence?
3. Please ask your kids for up to three words to describe the event
4. Had you visited this building / venue before today? No / yes once / yes more than once
5. Had you been to this part of London before today? No / yes once / yes more than once
6. Did anyone in your group (including adults) do any of these things at this event? Built something / drew something / watched something /
designed something / laughed at something / listened to something / talked about something / learned something
7. How likely would you be to come to an Open House Families event again? Definitely / maybe / probably or depends / probably not / definitely
not
8. At the end of your visit, how do you feel about buildings, architecture, design or London in general?
9. How did you hear about today’s event? (Tick all that apply) Festival brochure or leaflet / newspaper, magazine or press / word of mouth /
online including social media / other (please state where).
10. What in particular made you come along today? (Tick all that apply). Chance to see a specific building / to go to a new part of London / to
attend one of the events / to spend time together as a family / to draw, design or make / something else (please tell us what).
11. If you could improve one thing about Open house Families what would it be?
12. What else is important for you to tell us about this event?
13. Our group is made up of: number of children aged 0-4 / number of children aged 5-11 / number of children aged 11-15 / number of adults
(aged 16+)
Additional Questions for specialist events – designed to accommodate special needs and disabilities
17. How well did the event today accommodate the specific needs, conditions, barriers or strengths in your child’s life? Very well / well / unsure /
badly / very badly / not applicable
18. To help us keep improving the accessibility of our events, could you say what conditions / disabilities / needs your child has and how the
event did or didn’t take account of them?