Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ice Minus Bacteria
Ice Minus Bacteria
Ice Minus Bacteria
Ice-minus bacteria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main page Ice-minus bacteria is a common name given to a variant of the common bacterium Pseudomonas syringae (P. syringae). This strain of
Contents P. syringae lacks the ability to produce a certain surface protein, usually found on wild-type P. syringae. The "ice-plus" protein (INA
Featured content protein, "Ice nucleation-active" protein) found on the outer bacterial cell wall acts as the nucleating centers for ice crystals.[1] This
Current events facilitates ice formation, hence the designation "ice-plus." The ice-minus variant of P. syringae is a mutant, lacking the gene responsible
Random article
for ice-nucleating surface protein production. This lack of surface protein provides a less favorable environment for ice formation. Both
Donate to Wikipedia
strains of P. syringae occur naturally, but recombinant DNA technology has allowed for the synthetic removal or alteration of specific
Wikipedia store
genes, enabling the ice-minus strain to be created from the ice-plus strain in the lab.
Interaction
The ice nucleating nature of P. syringae incites frost development, freezing the buds of the plant and destroying the occurring crop. The
Help
introduction of an ice-minus strain of P. syringae to the surface of plants would reduce the amount of ice nucleate present, rendering
About Wikipedia
higher crop yields. The recombinant form was developed as a commercial product known as Frostban. Field-testing of Frostban in 1987
Community portal
Recent changes was the first release of a genetically modified organism into the environment. The testing was very controversial and drove the formation
Contact page of US biotechnology policy. Frostban was never marketed.
Print/export
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
Create a book Production [ edit ]
Download as PDF
Download as PDF To systematically create the ice-minus strain of P. syringae, its ice-forming gene must be isolated, amplified, deactivated and reintroduced
Printable version into P. syringae bacterium. The following steps are often used to isolate and generate ice-minus strains of P. syringae:
In the United States alone, it has been estimated that frost accounts for approximately $1 billion in crop damage each year.[citation needed]
As P. syringae commonly inhabits plant surfaces, its ice nucleating nature incites frost development, freezing the buds of the plant and
destroying the occurring crop. The introduction of an ice-minus strain of P. syringae to the surface of plants would incur competition
between the strains. Should the ice-minus strain win out, the ice nucleate provided by P. syringae would no longer be present, lowering
the level of frost development on plant surfaces at normal water freezing temperature – 0 °C (32 °F). Even if the ice-minus strain does not
win out, the amount of ice nucleate present from ice-plus P. syringae would be reduced due to competition. Decreased levels of frost
generation at normal water freezing temperature would translate into a lowered quantity of crops lost due to frost damage, rendering
higher crop yields overall.
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
Historical perspective [ edit ]
In 1961, Paul Hoppe of the U.S. Department of Agriculture studied a corn fungus by
grinding up infected leaves each season, then applying the powder to test corn for
the following season to track the disease.[2] A surprise frost occurred that year,
leaving peculiar results. Only plants infected with the diseased powder incurred frost
damage, leaving healthy plants unfrozen. This phenomenon would baffle scientists
until graduate student Stephen Lindow of the University of Wisconsin–Madison with
D.C. Arny and C. Upper found a bacterium in the dried leaf powder in the early
1970s. Lindow, now a plant pathologist at the University of California-Berkeley,
found that when this particular bacterium was introduced to plants where it is
originally absent, the plants became very vulnerable to frost damage. He would go Icy Lingonberry
on to identify the bacterium as P. syringae, investigate P. syringae's role in ice
nucleation and in 1977, discover the mutant ice-minus strain. He was later
successful at developing the ice-minus strain of P. syringae through recombinant DNA technology as well.[3]
In 1983, a biotech company, Advanced Genetic Sciences (AGS) applied for U.S. government authorization to perform field tests with the
ice-minus strain of P. syringae, but environmental groups and protestors delayed the field tests for four years with legal challenges.[4] In
1987, the ice-minus strain of P. syringae became the first genetically modified organism (GMO) to be released into the environment[5]
when a strawberry field in California was sprayed with the ice-minus strain of P. syringae. The results were promising, showing lowered
frost damage to the treated plants. Lindow also conducted an experiment on a crop of potato seedlings sprayed with ice-minus P.
syringae. He was successful in protecting the potato crop from frost damage with a strain of ice-minus P. syringae.[6]
Controversy [ edit ]
At the time of Lindow's work on ice-minus P. syringae, genetic engineering was considered to be very controversial. Jeremy Rifkin and his
Foundation on Economic Trends (FET) sued the NIH in federal court to delay the field trials, arguing that NIH had failed to conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment and had failed to explore the possible effects "Ice-minus" bacteria might have on ecosystems and
even global weather patterns.[4][7] Once approval was granted, both test fields were attacked by activist groups the night before the tests
occurred: "The world's first trial site attracted the world's first field trasher".[5] The BBC quoted Andy Caffrey from Earth First!: "When I first
heard that a company in Berkley was planning to release these bacteria Frostban in my community, I literally felt a knife go into me. Here
once again, for a buck, science, technology and corporations were going to invade my body with new bacteria that hadn't existed on the
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
planet before. It had already been invaded by smog, by radiation, by toxic chemicals in my food, and I just wasn't going to take it
anymore."[5]
Rifkin's successful legal challenge forced the Reagan Administration to more quickly develop an overarching regulatory policy to guide
federal decision-making about agricultural biotechnology. In 1986, the Office of Science and Technology Policy issued the Coordinated
Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology, which continues to govern US regulatory decisions.[4]
The controversy drove many biotech companies away from use of genetically engineering microorganisms in agriculture.[8]
References [ edit ]
1. ^ Love, J.; Lesser, W. (April 1989). "The Potential Impact of Ice- 4. ^ a b c Bratspies, Rebecca (2007). "Some Thoughts on the
Minus Bacteria as a Frost Protestant in New York Tree Fruit American Approach to Regulating Genetically Modified
Production" (PDF). Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Organisms" (PDF). Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy.
Resource Economics. 18 (1). p. 393. SSRN 1017832 .[dead link]
2. ^ Parrott, Carolyn C. (1993). "Recombinant DNA to Protect 5. ^ a b c "GM crops: A bitter harvest?" . BBC News. June 14, 2002.
Crops" . Archived from the original on September 18, 2012. Retrieved April 4, 2016.
Retrieved February 11, 2007. 6. ^ Thomas H. Maugh II (June 9, 1987). "Altered Bacterium Does Its
3. ^ Hynes, Patricia H. (1989). "Biotechnology in agriculture: an Job : Frost Failed to Damage Sprayed Test Crop, Company
analysis of selected technologies and policy in the United Says" . Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 4, 2016.
States" (PDF). Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. 2 (1): 39– 7. ^ Maykuth, Andrew (January 10, 1986). "Genetic wonders to come:
49. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 4, 2014. Some see boon, others calamity" . The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Retrieved February 11, 2007.
8. ^ Baskin, Yvonne (1987). "Testing The Future" . Alicia Patterson
Foundation. Retrieved February 11, 2007.
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
V·T·E Genetic engineering [hide]
Maize MON 810 · MON 863 · StarLink · List of varieties of genetically modified maize
Potato Amflora
Mammals Mouse (Knockout mouse · Oncomouse) · Enviropig · Herman the Bull · Knockout rat
Animals
Other animals Insects · Fish (Glofish · Salmon) · Birds · Frogs
Bacteria
Ice-minus bacteria · Hepatitis B vaccine · Oncolytic virus
and viruses
Agrobacteria · Biolistics · Electroporation · Genetic transduction · Lipofection · Microinjection ·
Inserting DNA
Processes Somatic cell nuclear transfer · Transfection
Genetically modified food (Controversies) · Pharming · Companies (BASF · Bayer · Dow AgroSciences ·
In agriculture
DuPont Pioneer · Monsanto · Syngenta)
Related Transgene · Detection of genetically modified organisms · Genetic pollution · Genetics in fiction · Human enhancement ·
articles Reverse transfection · Transhumanism · Genetic use restriction technology
Geography Europe · Africa · Asia · North America (US) · South America · Oceania
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
Categories: Pseudomonadales Genetically modified organisms Genetically modified organisms in agriculture
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy
Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD