Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lambino vs. Comelec
Lambino vs. Comelec
Comelec
G.R. NO. 174153, OCTOBER 25, 2006
Facts:
Issue:
Whether or not the Lambino Group's initiative petition complies with Section 2, Article
XVII of the Constitution.
Held:
No. The essence of amendments "directly proposed by the people through initiative
upon a petition" is that the entire proposal on its face is a petition by the people. This
means two essential elements must be present. First, the people must author and thus
sign the entire proposal. No agent or representative can sign on their behalf. Second,
as an initiative upon a petition, the proposal must be embodied in a petition. These
essential elements are present only if the full text of the proposed amendments is first
shown to the people who express their assent by signing such complete proposal in a
petition. Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution does not expressly state that the
petition must set forth the full text of the proposed amendments. In particular, the
deliberations of the Constitutional Commission explicitly reveal that the framers
intended that the people must first see the full text of the proposed amendments
before they sign, and that the people must sign on a petition containing such full text.
Indeed, Section 5(b) of the Initiative and Referendum Act, that the Lambino Group
invokes as valid, requires that the people must sign the "petition x x x as signatories."