Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Optimization of Brushless Permanent Magnet Hub Motor Drive Using FEA
Design Optimization of Brushless Permanent Magnet Hub Motor Drive Using FEA
load of 200Kg (80Kg scooter weight and 120 kg of 48 Slots 16 pole with skew
payload). The developed proto is also compatible to 1.00
C o g g in g T o r q u e in N m
accordingly the heat-sink cum cover box is developed.
The top side of the box contains the three wires as red, 0.00
yellow and blue for motor supply. The bottom side of the 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
15.00
48 Slots 16 pole with s ke w
0.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
Pos ition in de gre e s
4.00
48 Slots 16 pole with skew
Fig. 2 (a). Flux path in the 21 slots 16 pole geometry.
3.00 21 slots 16 pole without bifurcation with 0.85
mm airgap
21 slots 16 pole with bifurcation
2.00
0.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-4.00
-5.00
Pos ition in de gre e s
- 1478 -
100.0000
15 slot 16 pole
will be the reduced ripple in the developed torque. It has
80.0000
21 Slots 16 pole without bifurcation
been observed that at rated load condition designed motor
with 0.85 mm air gap
60.0000 21 slots 16 pole without bifurcation gives required performance at less current than it has been
with 0.6 mm air gap
40.0000
predicted; Hence efficiency of the drive is enhanced. A
torque of 10.5 N-m is developed at a speed of 530 RPM.
20.0000
Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 show the respective torque and power
Emf in Vo lts
0.0000
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00 capability of the prototype motor. The present application
-20.0000
requirement requires open loop control. The torque speed
-40.0000 characteristic as shown in Fig. 8 indicates the better speed
-60.0000 regulation of the present system. The efficiency at
-80.0000 different load is shown in Fig. 9. Developed motor drive
-100.0000
has been rigorously tested up to double the rated load
Po sition in de gre e s
condition and it has been observed that the motor
Fig. 3. Computed back emf using the FEM solver. efficiency remains almost constant.
TABLE III
DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
required to be pushed even at starting condition has been 48.00 58.00 68.00 78.00 88.00 98.00 108.00
-10.00
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are thankful to the Council Members of Crompton
Greaves Ltd. Mumbai, for giving us an opportunity to
work on this project in AMDTC Lab, CG Global R&D
Centre, Crompton Greaves Ltd, Kanjurmarg (East),
Mumbai-400042, India.
REFERENCES
1. D. C. Hanselman, Brushless Permanent Magnet Motor Design.
New
Fig. 7(b). Experimental current waveform during full load condition York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
2. R. Handershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent
Magnet Motors. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford, 1994.
700.0 3. P. R. Upadhyay, K. R. Rajagopal, “FE Analysis and CAD of
Radial-Flux Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Brushless DC
600.0 Motors,” IEEE tran. on magnetics, vol. 41, no. 10, october 2005.
4. M. Dai, A. Keyhani, and T. Sebastian, “Torque Ripple Analysis of
500.0 a PM Brushless DC Motor Using Finite Element Method”, IEEE
transactions on energy conversion, vol. 19, no. 1, march 2004.
S p e e d ( RP M )
400.0
5. S. M. Hwang and D. K. Lieu, “Reduction of torque ripple in
brushless DC motors,” IEEE Trans. Magn., pt. 2, vol. 31, pp.
300.0
3737–3739, Nov. 1995.
200.0
6. J. S. Hsu, B. P. Scoggins, M. B. Scudiere, L. D. Marlino, D. J.
Adams, and P. Pillay, “Nature and assessments of torque ripples
100.0 of permanent-magnet adjustable-speed motors,” in Proc. IEEE
Ind. Applicat Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 3, Orlando, FL, Oct. 1995,
0.0 pp. 2696–2702.
0 .8 9
1 .6 2
3 .4 6
5 .3 1
7 .0 8
9 .5 1
1 0 .7 9
1 1 .3 9
1 3 .1 6
1 4 .9 8
1 6 .2 5
1 7 .4 1
1 8 .9 0
2 0 .4 5
2 1 .1 6
2 2 .8 9
Torque (Nm)
7. R. P. Deodhar, D. A. Staton, and T. J. E. Miller, “Modeling of
skew using the flux-MMF diagram,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat.,
Fig. 8. Speed torque characteristics of BLDCM for scooter. vol. 32, pp. 1339–1347, Nov./Dec. 1996.
8. T. Y. Chuang, D. K. Lieu, and J. S. McAllister, “Optimization of
100.00
pole and slot widths for reluctance torque reduction in a brushless
DC spindle motor,” in Proc. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., Inform.
90.00
Storage Processing Division, vol. 2, Atlanta, GA, Nov. 1996, pp.
153–158.
80.00
9. C. Breton, J. Bartolome, J. A. Benito, G. Tassinario, I. Flotats, C.
W. Lu, and B. J. Chalmers, “Influence of machine symmetry on
reduction of cogging torque in permanent-magnet brushless
E f fic i e n c y ( % )
70.00
motors,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 36, pp. 3819–3823, Sept.
60.00 2000.
10. F. Caricchi, F. Crescimbini, G. Capponi, and L. Solero, “Novel
50.00 solidstate-commutator PM motor arrangement for EV
application,” in Proc.IEEE Ind. Applicat. Soc. Annu. Meeting,
40.00 Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 1999, pp. 2545–2551.
11. R. Krishnan and P. V. Vijayraghavan, “New power converter
30.00
topology for PM brushless DC motor drives,” in Proc. Ind.
5 3 .4 2
1 0 4 .7 9
1 7 8 .2 6
2 5 1 .3 0
3 2 2 .1 6
3 9 3 .6 3
4 5 8 .9 4
5 1 4 .8 7
5 7 8 .5 4
6 3 8 .1 7
6 9 8 .7 8
7 5 0 .6 5
8 0 4 .4 2
8 5 7 .8 6
9 0 7 .6 9