Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tables JANICE

    Uploaded by

    Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov
    8 views3 pages
    The document contains tables that show the level of validity, usability, reliability, and quality of an assessment as rated by three different groups: Master Teachers, LRMDS validators, and ICT experts. Each group's ratings ranged from 4.70 to 5.00 with weighted means above 4.80, indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality according to the provided legend. The overall general weighted mean across all three groups was 4.86, also indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Tables-JANICE.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains tables that show the level of validity, usability, reliability, and quality of an assessment as rated by three different groups: Master Teachers, LRMDS validators, and ICT experts. Each group's ratings ranged from 4.70 to 5.00 with weighted means above 4.80, indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality according to the provided legend. The overall general weighted mean across all three groups was 4.86, also indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    8 views3 pages

    Tables JANICE

    Uploaded by

    Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov
    The document contains tables that show the level of validity, usability, reliability, and quality of an assessment as rated by three different groups: Master Teachers, LRMDS validators, and ICT experts. Each group's ratings ranged from 4.70 to 5.00 with weighted means above 4.80, indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality according to the provided legend. The overall general weighted mean across all three groups was 4.86, also indicating a "Much Accepted" level of assessment quality.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Table 4.

    _ Level of _______ of the _______ by the Master Teachers

    OBJECTIVES INDICATORS Mean (M) Description


    Validity
    1. 5.00
    2. 5.00
    3. 4.70
    4. 4.80
    5. 4.80
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.86
    Interpretation
    Usability
    1. 4.90
    2 5.00
    3. 4.80
    4. 4.70
    5 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.86
    Interpretation
    Reliability
    1. 4.80
    2 4.80
    3. 4.80
    4 4.70
    5. 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.80
    Interpretation

    Quality
    1. 4.80
    2. 5.00
    3. 4.90
    4. 4.70
    5. 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.86
    Interpretation Much Accep

    GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN 4.85

    Interpretation
    Legend: Description Interpretation
    1.00-1.49
    1.50-2.49
    2.50-3.49
    3.50-4.49
    4.50-5.00
    Table 4._ Level of _______ of the _______ by the LRMDS validators

    OBJECTIVES INDICATORS Mean (M) Description


    Validity
    1. 5.00
    2. 4.90
    3. 5.00
    4. 4.70
    5. 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.90
    Interpretation
    Usability
    1. 4.90
    2 5.00
    3. 5.00
    4. 4.80
    5 4.80
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.90
    Interpretation
    Reliability
    1. 5.00
    2 4.80
    3. 4.90
    4 4.90
    5. 5.00
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.92
    Interpretation

    Quality
    1. 4.90
    2. 4.80
    3. 4.80
    4. 4.90
    5. 5.00
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.88
    Interpretation Much Accep

    GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN 4.90

    Interpretation
    Legend: Description Interpretation
    1.00-1.49
    1.50-2.49
    2.50-3.49
    3.50-4.49
    4.50-5.00
    Table 4._ Level of _______ of the _______ by the ICT experts

    OBJECTIVES INDICATORS Mean (M) Description


    Validity
    1. 5.00
    2. 4.90
    3. 4.70
    4. 4.70
    5. 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.84
    Interpretation
    Usability
    1. 4.90
    2 5.00
    3. 4.80
    4. 4.60
    5 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.84
    Interpretation
    Reliability
    1. 5.00
    2 4.70
    3. 4.60
    4 4.90
    5. 5.00
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.84
    Interpretation

    Quality
    1. 4.70
    2. 4.70
    3. 4.80
    4. 4.70
    5. 4.90
    WEIGHTED MEAN 4.76
    Interpretation Much Accep

    GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN 4.82

    Interpretation
    Legend: Description Interpretation
    1.00-1.49
    1.50-2.49
    2.50-3.49
    3.50-4.49
    4.50-5.00

    OVERALL GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN = 4.86

    You might also like