Every Muslim Is NOT A Terrorist

Every Muslim is NOT a Terrorist
1
Every Muslim is
NOT a terrorist
Every Muslim is
NOT a terrorist
BY
SANJEEV NEWAR & VASHI SHARMA

Every Muslim is NOT a terrorist
Copyright © 2016 by Agniveer
All rights reserved. This publication may not be

reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans-
mitted in whole or in part, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, re-
cording, or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of Agniveer.
For information contact

books@agniveer.com
SANJEEV NEWAR & VASHI SHARMA
First Edition: July 2016

ABOUT AUTHORS
Sanjeev Newar
Sanjeev Newar is the founder of Agniveer. He is the
brain behind all major Agniveer’s initiatives. He was
the first person in world to predict the role of Zakir
Naik in future terror acts back in 2010 which is now
being accepted by intelligence agencies worldwide.
Has miraculously accurate foreseeing capabilities vis
a vis terrorism. The only genius, who understands Is-
lamic terrorism in India inside out and the way for-
ward. A data scientist by profession. His risk manage-
ment products have been named in top 20 of world
for 2014, 2015, and 2016. He is the only Indian (and
Asian) to have ever made to this list. He has been
behind several inclusive and encompassing tech inno-
vations for agriculture, defense, food security, energy
security. He is a mentor to several eminent young sci-
entists of country. He is the most popular writer on
Kashmiri Pandits on Quora. Sanjeev is an alumnus
of IIT Guwahati and IIM Calcutta.
Vashi Sharma
Dr Vashi Sharma is a renowned scholar of religions,
extremism, history, Islamic invasions and an expert
I
on de-radicalisation. He is an eloquent author, poet,

prose writer, speaker and a scientist. He has written
several books in English and Hindi on Islamic ex-
tremism, history and motivation. An alumnus of IIT
Bombay and recipient of prestigious INSPIRE Fac-
ulty Award from Government of India for Scientific
Research, Dr Vashi has also published many world
class researches in peer-reviewed Scientific Journals
of international repute. He is currently the president
of Agniveer.
II
Preface
PREFACE
For the first time, a complete refutation of every point
a Jihadi thinks to justify his hate against non-believ-
ers. The only book of its kind to solve the problem
of brainwashing and self-radicalization.
Zakir Naik’s rise has been significantly correlated
with the rise of terror attacks across the globe. The
terrorists involved in Dhaka siege, the ISIS Hyder-
abad Module Chief, Areeb Majeed who fled from In-
dia to join ISIS - all had one trait in common. Zakir
Naik was their mentor.
Anyone from the Indian subcontinent who has
been active on the terror-related issue would have,
definitely, come across hundreds of young fanatic
Muslims, who believe that Allah will grant them 72
virgins in Heaven if they convert non-Muslims and
hate idol-worshipping Hindus.
The vulnerable Muslim youth from Indian
sub-continent, who does not know Arabic, relies on
his interpretation of Quran and Hadiths as authentic
Islam. Now his spread has reached weak minds in
other countries as well.
III
They quote verbatim from lectures and writings of

Zakir Naik that are a sure-shot recipe for breeding
terrorists. These fanatics would turn violent if you
counter-question. The situation is indeed terrifying.
Unless we do something, a vast number of terrorists
are already breeding worldwide who would conduct
another Florida attack or Dhaka killing - lone-wolf or
planned - as a religious duty.
The fanatic belief-set comprises following
• Only Muslims will go to Heaven. All non-Mus-
lims will burn forever in Hell. Even if she is
Mother Teresa or Gandhi.
• Among Muslims, only those who have convert-
ed non-Muslims will go to Heaven.
• Jihad against non-Muslims is a gateway to Heav-
en.
• Osama Bin Laden was not a terrorist. America
is a terrorist.
• Sharia Law must be implemented worldwide.
• As per Sharia Law, those who leave Islam must
be killed.
IV
Preface
• In Muslim rule, non-Muslims must not be al-

lowed to preach. But Muslims must preach in
non-Muslim countries.
• Those who worship graves - like Sufis - are
worst of creatures.
• Hindus deserve to be called Kafirs - the worst
of creatures.
Agniveer raised the alarm against Zakir Naik 8
years ago and has been working relentlessly against
radical Islam. Several youths who came back from
clutches of Zakir Naik have narrated shocking details
of his brainwashing cartel.
To fight this rise of terror, Agniveer created de-
tailed rebuttals to Zakir’s speeches and articles that
saved a vast number of youths from adopting the
path of hatred. It exposed the workings of Islam-
ic Research Foundation formed by Zakir Naik that
funded and promoted people who instigated geno-
cide and war against India.
Many of these expose had to be withdrawn be-
cause government underestimated the threat Zakir
posed to world peace and instead Agniveer had to
face security threats.
V
In this book, we bring together all those writings

that establish the threat that Zakir Naik poses. And
soundly, thrashes his every radical argument.
Not just Zakir Naik, the book soundly answers ev-
ery radical argument of every fanatic who instigates
people to adopt hate as religion.
This book can save the world if translated into ma-
jor languages and circulated among vulnerable youth.
And will equip non-Muslims not to fall trap to his
promise of false Heaven by hating non-Muslims. It
has already saved thousands and prevented many ter-
ror attacks.
The only way to counter self-radicalization is to
destroy the source - those fanatics who breed ha-
tred against non-Muslims in the name of Islam that
means Peace.
Funds from the book will be used to fight terror-
ism and prevent the next attacks.
Sanjeev Newar 08 July 2016, New Delhi
VI
Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER
In this book, by Islam, I mean the interpretation of
Islam suggested by radical Islamists and their follow-
ers who deny equal rights and heaven to non-Mus-
lims and justify the killing of apostates. By Quran,
I imply the translations of Quran as patronized by
these fanatics and freely circulated on the internet to
radicalize weak minds. There are alternate interpreta-
tions of Islam and Quran by humanist scholars, who
are considered apostates by these fanatics and they
are victimized. We respect these humanists and their
faith. These, however, are not focus of this book.
Nothing in the book must be considered to refer to
them. All my criticisms are exclusively for radical ele-
ments, and none else.
VII
Contents
ABOUT AUTHORS
PREFACE
DISCLAIMER
THE MENTOR OF TERRORISTS................................................................................................. 1
ALL IS FAIR IN RAPE AND TERROR.......................................................................................12
HATE INDIA, GET HEAVEN..................................................................................................... 30
HATE HINDUS, GET HEAVEN..................................................................................................44
HATE NON-MUSLIMS, GET HEAVEN......................................................................................57
HATE WOMEN, GET HEAVEN....................................................................................................71
RAPE WOMEN, GET HEAVEN................................................................................................. 92
WHY MUSLIMS HATE ZAKIR NAIK SO MUCH?....................................................................117
ABOUT AGNIVEER
VIII
CHAPTER 1
THE MENTOR OF TERRORISTS
W e are often asked why we single out Zakir

Naik and focus so much on him. Yes, we
agree to do so. Almost all adverse refer-
ences to Islam on used by Agniveer actually refer to
the brand of Islam that Zakir Naik and his follow-
ers preach. There may be intellectual differences with
other sects and religions also, and that is even desir-
able among scholars so as to understand truth better.
With them, even arguments and debates are the same
as what happens between different members of our
family. But Zakir Naik is one person who is one of
1
the greatest threats to humanity today. I would put

him higher than Osama Bin Laden as a terrorist be-
cause while Osama conducts terrorist acts himself,
likes of Zakir Naik act as breeders of terrorism to
give birth of Osama Bin Ladens of tomorrow. It is
a matter of shame and foolishness that such psycho-
path anti-socials are allowed to propagate their hatred
in India and in some other parts of the world.
We have already exposed virtually all his arguments
and ideologies in our previous works. We have shown
his blatant double standards and shamelessness. In
this chapter, we shall see why and how Zakir Naik
is a terrorist. We shall address him, Terrorist Naik,
henceforth.
Zakir Naik is sympathizer of Osama Bin Laden
Zakir Naik would never condemn Osama Bin Lad-
en. He would simply say he has not met him, so he
doesn’t know if he is terrorist or not! Now, why is
meeting necessary to know about Osama? Are they
supposed to get into some secretive/private acts to
know each other better?
How many people on whom Terrorist Naik com-
ments freely has he actually met? He says Hitler killed
the largest number of people in history. While this
2
The Mentor of Terrorists
is a wrong fact and Muslim invaders of India (from

Qasim to Khilji to Tughlaqs to Babur to Akbar to
Aurangzeb to Muslim League etc.) have each killed,
raped and sodomized a larger number of innocents,
has Zakir actually met Hitler to comment on his ter-
rorism? He says that all the greatest terror-acts of last
several centuries were done by non-Muslims as per
some website best known to him. But has Zakir met
those people to comment on them?
Zakir blames it all on media and says no one knows
the truth. But in that case, even all other events he
comments upon are also media reported. The ex-
aggerated claims of Gujarat Massacre in 2001 were
also media reported. Why does he so easily believe in
them then?
In final defense, Zakir says that if Osama is terror-
izing America – a terrorist nation – he is with Osa-
ma and appeals all Muslims to be a terrorist to scare
other terrorists! Now, what proof does Zakir have to
conclude that America is a terrorist? Does he live in
the white house?
Zakir will never even utter that if Osama conduct-
ed 911 as indicated in media, then he considers Osa-
3
ma to be among the worst sinners! He would simply

say I don’t know.
Zakir conveniently ignores a host of interviews
that Osama himself gave to proclaim his terrorist de-
signs! But he is convinced that America is a terrorist!
Does he have insiders in CIA or White House? No
wonder that may also be true. After all attacks like
911 are implausible without the involvement of in-
siders, as Zakir himself acknowledges!
There is a popular video on his stand on Osama.
Most of you must have already watched it, but those
who haven’t, check it out and google for more such
videos from Terrorist Naik.
His summary is clear – If Osama is with Quran, he
is with him, even if the whole world is against him.
The reasons are obvious as even other Islamic
scholars have presented. Unless there are spurious
sources of funds, one cannot become such a lavish
preacher!
Zakir Naik prohibits propagation of other reli-
gions
Zakir has unusually very clear views on the status of
4
non-Muslims in Muslim countries. He says:

Non-Muslims should be prohibited from propa-
gating their religion in Muslim countries because this
is against Shariat and Quran.
He however vehemently defends that Muslims
should be allowed to freely propagate Islam in
non-Muslim countries. His logic is two-fold
• Logic 1: Islam is the only religious scripture
on earth to claim that it is the best and only
book of Allah. Since other books are not so
‘shamelessly’ self-glorifying, it is their loss! So
as per Islam, Muslim countries cannot entertain
non-Muslim ideologies. But since other coun-
tries do not have such scriptures, they should
allow Islam!
• Logic 2: Countries like India are secular coun-
tries and hence they cannot prohibit propaga-
tion of Islam. He also states that Islamic law is
better than secularism!
He goes further and says that had non-Muslims
been so sure about their religions, they would have
already prohibited propagation of other religions in
their countries!!
5
Thus, it is win-win-win for Muslims

• If say India becomes a Hindu country, then no
book of religion says prohibit others from free-
dom of expression. Hence Muslims should be
allowed to preach.
• Since India is a secular country, by law Muslims
are free to preach.
• If tomorrow Muslims have a majority in India
and implement Shariat, then non-Muslims are
prohibited from preaching. Hence ONLY Mus-
lims should be allowed to preach!
Can there be a greater height of fanaticism? If you
think NO, you are wrong! Simply read on.
Zakir Naik gives terrorism-inspiring speech
Zakir clearly supports that Muslims, who leave Islam
or turn apostate, should be murdered in an Islamic
country. His logic is hilariously fanatic:
• Shariat and Islamic law are the best laws.
• As per Shariat, a person who rejects Islam is a
traitor.
• In many countries, traitors who give secrets of
6
the nation to outsiders are punished to death

for being a traitor. By the same logic, Islam also
punishes apostates with a death sentence.
• Since non-Muslim countries are not following
Shariat and are secular, they cannot give such
punishments. So in these countries, one is free
to become Muslims. But the opposite cannot
happen in Muslim countries!
We have rarely heard a more terrorism-inspiring
speech being conducted in police protection! Cyber-
space is full of his videos where he foolishly com-
pares leaving Islam with selling secrets to enemies.
This example itself shows clearly the mindset of
Muslim clergies like him:
• What they propagate openly is not true Islam.
One would come to know of true Islam only
after conversion when secrets would be unrav-
eled.
• These secrets are so dangerous that if known
to the public, it can have a damaging impact on
Islam. So traitor has to be quickly killed!
• The concept of ‘No compulsion in Religion’ is
applicable only in non-Muslim dominated areas.
7
The moment there is a Muslim majority; Islam

is like a crime mafia. One can enter, but cannot
leave without leaving his life as well!
Zakir Naik’s strategy to spread terrorism
Dear non-Muslim fellow kafirs. The designs of fanat-
ics like Zakir Naik are very clear. As per their Islam,
they have to propagate Islam by all means. The strat-
egies are as follows:
• If in the minority or powerless, emphasize that
Islam is only about peace and love. Highlight
incomplete verses or canceled verses to show-
case how there is no compulsion or violence in
Islam. (This will be exposed in later chapters.)
• Even if that demands falsehood, it is accept-
able under the concept of Taqiah. You can even
deny doing Taqiah or fraud.
• Never condemn a fellow Muslim, even if he
be a terrorist like Osama. Simply pretend igno-
rance.
• Meanwhile, work for hands in hands, and get
funds from spurious sources for lavish public-
ity.
8
• Do massive conversions at ground level through

a mixture of all above means.
• Work with a time-bound target of conversions
to increase majority and meanwhile, also start
preparing for armed struggle.
• As and when the opportunity comes, strike and
attack and terrorize.
• When you gain power, force one-way conver-
sions, have a death sentence for apostasy and
rape, and loot like Muslim invaders have done
for 1000 years and what the ISIS is doing today.
Summary – What Muslims and Non-Muslim
should do
Remember, Islam of Zakir Naik is not a religion. It
has less to do with spiritualism and more to do with
global political power capture agenda. Thus it acts as
a terrorist manual ably supported by other texts like
Hadiths and Tafseers.
All non-Muslims should start preparing to combat
the present and future threats from such fanatics that
are inevitable. And all sensible Muslims should work
on two paths:
9
• Path 1: Reject radical Islam vocally and adopt

the religion of humanity so as to get rid of both
the stigma of being associated with such fanat-
ics and witness what a truly spiritual and free
life is all about. Say openly that non-Muslims
can also get into Heaven if they follow their
religion with dedication. This will also go a long
way in thwarting the evil designs of fanatics like
Zakir Naik and Osama. After all, it is a number
game for them!
• Path 2: Oppose Zakir Naik as much as they can.
Criticize terrorists as much as they can. While
most of such criticisms are politically motivated
and ways to fool public at large, genuine con-
demnation should come through conversion
out of radical Islam as a mark of protest against
the view of Islam supporting the murder of
apostates.
This is a question of our survival. We did not have
bombs and modern weapon for 1000 years and hence
we survived plunder of Muslim looters. But now it
shall become a do-or-die situation if we do not rise
up and start creating awareness about this impending
danger. Many young terrorists consider Zakir, their
10
role model.
Let every one of us work together to thwart the
designs of these false terror prophets and the entire
mafia that is hiding behind his facade.
Let us all work together to expose fanatics and
drive in society tolerance, peace and equality! Let’s do
it very quickly. In Peace TV, it was announced in 2008
that they would go all way to make India a Darul Is-
lam in next few years to fulfill a 1000 years old dream.
The work has already begun on all fronts very aggres-
sively and meticulously.
We do not know, how far this entire terror-
ists-preachers-corrupts-sickulars-traitors chain of
mafia goes and what all do they influence today. But
we know that unless we get into acts quickly and
smartly and emphatically, our survival would be un-
der question mark very soon.
11
CHAPTER 2
ALL IS FAIR IN RAPE AND TERROR
L isten to any of the Zakir Naik videos or read

any of his defence of terrorism not being a
Muslim monopoly, and he would quote in his
characteristic semi-stammering shoulder shrugging
style: Quran Surah 5 Verse No 32 says that “If you
kill an innocent human, it is as though you have killed
the entire humanity.” Almost similar is the statement
of another popular stuttering star Shahrukh Khan
when he eulogizes Islam for being the religion of
peace! (Sorry for the comment, but Zakir being a
medical student, knows that one stutters and shrugs
12
All is Fair in Rape and Terror
shoulders when he lies! At least he should know so if

he actually remembers medical studies as well, as per
his claims!)
Zakir Naik using Taqiah to fool the world
Indeed a very noble thought, and we salute all those
great men and women who believe in the above verse
with utmost sincerity. We also agree that Zakir Naik is
not providing a wrong reference. The only problem is
that he is quoting the verse incomplete and using Ta-
qiah to fool the world. Now Taqiah is an interesting
concept used in several sects of Islam which means
that it is fair to use deceit and fraud to defeat the en-
emy or non-Muslim.
To know the reality, let us review what the verse ac-
tually means as per leading translations and commen-
taries of Quran. Note that we only refer to authentic
Islamic sites and books for reference and not sites
of anti-Muslim kafirs who are bound to burn in Hell
forever! With these Kafirs, we shall, in any case, be
spending eternity after Judgement Day! For now, we
shall only live in the company of those with whom
we shall never meet in Hell because they would be
enjoying virgins in Heaven while our skins are being
roasted in Hell!
13
As per Quran non-Muslims are not innocent

Now this particular verse appears in different places
in different versions of Quran. We are not sure where
it actually appears in first Quran that was written 20
years after Muhammad’s death. But in new versions
of Quran available today, it is verse 35 of Chapter
5 in some editions and verse 32 in others. Let Zakir
Naik decide and explain this discrepancy in number-
ing of verses in final message of God. But for us, the
focus is actual verse as given by various translators.
Sahih International
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of

Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for
corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain
mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if
he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers
had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then
indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout
the land, were transgressors.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
Because of that, which Cain did, We decreed for the

Children of Israel that whoever slays a soul for oth-
14
er than a soul, slain, or for, other than, corruption,

committed, in the land, in the way of unbelief, for-
nication or waylaying and the like, it shall be as if he
had slain mankind altogether; and whoever saves the
life of one, by refraining from slaying, it shall be as
if he had saved the life of all mankind — Ibn ‘Abbās
said [that the above is meant] in the sense of violat-
ing and protecting its [a soul’s] sanctity [respectively].
Our Messengers have already come to them, that is,
to the Children of Israel, with clear proofs, miracles,
but after that many of them still commit excesses in
the land, overstepping the bounds through disbelief,
killing and the like.
Yusuf Ali
On that account: We ordained for the Children

of Israel that if any one slew a person–unless it be
for murder or for spreading mischief in the land- -it
would be as if he slew the whole people: And if any
one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of
the whole people. Then although there came to them
Our Apostles with Clear Signs, yet, even after that,
many of them continued to commit excesses in the
land.
Now several points are very clear from the verse:
15
• This verse is applicable only for people of Isra-

el, and that is why Muslims like Zakir Naik hate
Jews so much!
• Zakir’s God did not know of the world beyond
Israel, or else the final message for the whole
world should have provided a message for the
entire world and not only Israel! Though we
appreciate the spirit of fanatics who now try
to implement draconian inhuman teachings of
this new book to the entire world, as though the
entire world is Israel!
• The verse provides the conditions of exception.
Anyone who is corrupt can be killed. A corrupt
person is not innocent as per Islam. So far so
good. Even we believe that corruption should
have a severe punishment. But let us go a step
further and see what exactly is corruption or
innocence as per Zakir’s Islam. Tafseer-e-Jala-
layn details this – corruption includes unbelief
among other variants.
So in summary, if you are not a Muslim, or you
disbelieve in Allah, Rasul, Quran, Angels, Judgment
Day, Heaven, Hell you are not an innocent as per Za-
16
kir Naik and his Quran. You are corrupt, and hence
this verse is no way applicable to you. If you want to
be innocent or not corrupt, accept Islam.
Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate
To further substantiate this definition of innocence/
corruption, let us review the following: Refer to the
youtube video titled “Killing of Non-Muslims is Le-
gitimate”
The mullah, a very eminent one, claims very clear-
ly that a non-Muslim is not innocent and whatever
a Muslim does, including terrorism, cannot be con-
demned by another Muslim. That is why Zakir Naik
never condemns Osama Bin Laden.
Zakir Naik himself answers a question stating that
if non-Muslims are perturbed because they are called
Kafirs, they should embrace Islam. Refer his book on
“Common Questions non-Muslims ask about Mus-
lims.”
Whole of Zakir’s Quran is full of treatment to be
meted out to Kafirs and are further elaborated by
Hadiths. We shall provide some excerpts here itself.
The very next verse from same Surah 5 (Verse 33
17
in Sahih International version) explains the context

of the previous verse. It says:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war
against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon
earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be
killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut
off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from
the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world, and
for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,”
The Tafseer-e-Jalalyn only elaborates upon this
meaning more brutally, and readers can check out for
themselves from quran.com.
The intent is clear – if you are corrupt (as per Is-
lamic definition), or oppose Allah/ messenger; you
would be punished in most brutal manner.
I would have wished that a book of peace would
have emphasized more on forgiving and not the pun-
ishments that would be meted out if you do not yield.
Thus the very verse which is cited as the verse of
Peace by Zakir Naik and ShShShahrukh Khan are ac-
tually verses of blackmail and threat.
18
Allah would forgive anything but not disbelief

Some Muslims inspired by Zakir may argue that cor-
ruption does not include disbelief in Allah/ Muham-
mad but only publicly mischievous activities. Our
counter-question would be to show one single verse
from entire Quran that explicitly says that non-Mus-
lims or disbelievers are to be treated equally and that
disbelief is not the gravest crime. In fact, a huge
number of verses exist which claim that disbelief is
the worst crime deserving worst punishment.
As per fanatic version of Islam propagated by Za-
kir’s Quran, Allah would forgive anything but not dis-
belief in Allah / Rasul / Quran. If peaceful disbelief
is indeed innocence and not corruption, why would
Allah punish peaceful innocents forever in Hellfire?
Fasting: Compensation If believer is killed
To understand true character of peace in Zakir’s Is-
lam, let us review the following verses from Chapter
4:
Chapter 4, Verse 92
Never should a believer kill a believer; but [If it

so happens] by mistake, [Compensation is due]: If
one [so] kills a believer, it is ordained that he should
19
free a believing slave, and pay compensation to the

deceased’s family unless they remit it freely. If the
deceased belonged to a people at war with you, and
he was a believer, the freeing of a believing slave
[Is enough]. If he belonged to people with whom
ye have a treaty of Mutual alliance, compensation
should be paid to his family, and a believing slave be
freed. For those who find this beyond their means, [is
prescribed] a fast for two months running: by way of
repentance to Allah: for Allah hath all knowledge and
all wisdom.
Chapter 4, Verse 93
If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recom-

pense is Hell, to abide therein [For ever]: And the
wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a
dreadful penalty is prepared for him.
Very clearly, Hell is recommended only for kill-
ing a believer and not an innocent or non-believer.
Further, in the case of emergency, even if a believer
is killed unintentionally, it is NOT as though entire
humanity is killed. You can compensate by freeing a
slave or paying compensation or fasting. That is why
terrorists are so comfortable throwing bombs around
and then compensating through fasts!
20
Belief in Allah and Muhammad is must

Zakir’s Islam makes it more clear in Surate Nisa 150,
151 that those who differentiate between Allah and
Muhammad and say that they shall believe in some
things but not on other, and want to have a middle
path are true Kafirs. And we have prepared worst of
punishments for them. Clearly, disbelief is the great-
est corruption and the favorite verse of Zakir and
Shahrukh are not going to save you!
We have explained in this book and others Why
Zakir’s Islam is fanatic to find numerous verses that
ensure that a non-believer is not innocent, and dis-
belief is the greatest form of corruption or mischief.
And hence as per his Quran, non-Muslims simply do
not qualify to be called human beings forget about
innocent humans.
Often parrots like Zakir Naik claim that Jehad is
misinterpreted and in fact he himself is true Jehadi.
I agree that Zakir Naik is a true Jehadi. But so are
Baghdadi, Osama Bin Laden, Kasab and all terrorists
who spread Islam through violence. Recent arrests of
Zakir-inspired ISIS Jihadis in Bangladesh and India
make it crystal clear. Tafsir e Husaini clearly states
that to overpower non-believers with the might of
21
Islam, Quran or Sword is Jehad.

Surate Imran 28 is elaborated by Jalalyn as follows:
If for fear or self-defense, one has to make friends
with Kafirs, there is no harm provided in heart you
have hatred and jealousy with Kafirs. That is why likes
of Zakir Naik tend to fool people (read non-Muslim
kafirs) by showcasing Islam as a peaceful religion and
working in-hand with Bin Ladens of the world. This
was also the strategy of Sufis like Chistis whose sole
aim was to spread Islam by fooling Hindus and acting
as spies of terrorists like Muhammad Ghauri.
Muslim Rights and Human Rights are separate
Visit the site of Darul Uloom Deoband. It states
Rights of Muslims and Rights of Human Beings
separately. All compassion and brotherhood are only
for Muslims. You are expected to conceal their short-
comings, overlook his faults, remove his difficulties,
accept his excuses and do 36 more things for him.
That is why Zakir Naik et al. never condemn Mus-
lim terrorists and overlook their faults and remove
their difficulties.
That is why a fatwa is never issued against Shahrukh
Khan for his vulgar movies, but they will have an ob-
22
jection to idol worship! And for humans, very tact-

fully, it is mentioned that innocents should not be
harmed. (We know definition of innocent in above
analysis) After two more silly points, it is mentioned
that they should be punished only as per Shariat. Now
they assume here that non-Muslims would be inter-
acting with Muslims only when Shariat (Islamic law)
is applied for punishments and not otherwise. And
what Shariat would say would be clear to all by now.
Readers can visit “Rights in Islam” on internet and
check out further details on the minds of the fanatics.
No Mercy for women in Zakir’s Islam
Do not have the illusion of comfort that if you are a
woman and have a child, Jihadi would have mercy on
you. In Islamic wars, women are the worst tortured.
Men die, but women have to face the torments of
remaining alive. That is why throughout history, dur-
ing Muslim wars, Hindu women preferred to commit
Jauhar (committing suicide by burning self-alive) or
have themselves killed. The ghastly practice of Sati
has its origin in the Islamic view of Kafir women.
So we appeal to all sensible non-Muslims to beware
of fanatics like Zakir and others who emphasize on
modern Quran being a book of peace.
23
The only Muslims, who are peaceful, are those

who do not believe in Zakir’s Islam or do not take
Zakir’s Quran seriously or have never read it. If you
ever find a Muslim who claims that he has studied
the Zakir’s Quran thoroughly and believes it to be
final and the ONLY book of Allah and completely
perfect, considers that all non-Muslims would go to
Hell; rest assured, he is simply doing Taqiah (fraud)
and can potentially be as dangerous as Osama or Za-
kir. Rise up to unite people against such bombs and
time bombs before it’s too late.
We quote from authentic (Sahih) Hadiths on Is-
lamic view on kafir women:
Sahih Muslim: Innovative rape techniques for
Jehadis
Sahih Muslim: Book 008, Number 3371:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he

pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-
’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Al-
lah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the ex-
pedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some
excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we
24
were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at

the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So
we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but
by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ
before emission of semen to avoid conception). But
we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Mes-
senger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked
Allah’s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he
said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every
soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection
will be born.
Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him)

reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to
do ‘azl (coitus interruptus) with them. We then asked
Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about
it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do
it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born
until the Day of judgment must be born.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 137: Narrated Abu
Said Al-Khudri:
We got female captives in the war booty, and we

used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked
Allah’s Apostle about it, and he said, “Do you really
25
do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no

soul that is destined to exist but will come into exis-
tence, till the Day of Resurrection.”
Agniveer:
Zakir’s Prophet says to his followers to verily go

ahead and rape the captive infidel women. With such
evil, ridiculous teachings in his version, how can Za-
kir Naik claim Islam to be practical for women rights
and human rights! Or is it practical only for the rap-
ists?
Sahih Muslim: Killing those who refuse to ac-
cept Islam
SAHIH MUSLIM CHAPTER 1: REGARDING

PERMISSION TO MAKE A RAID, WITHOUT
AN ULTIMATUM, UPON THE DISBELIEVERS
WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN INVITED TO
ACCEPT ISLAM
Ibn ‘Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi’ inquiring from

him whether it was necessary to extend (to the disbe-
lievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before meet-
ing them in the fight. The Messenger of Allah (may
26
peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq

while they were unaware and their cattle were hav-
ing a drink at the water. He killed those who fought
and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captured
Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi’ said that this tradition
was related to him by Abdullah b. Umar who (him-
self) was among the raiding troops.
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of
Ibn ‘Aun and the name of Juwairiya bint al-Harith
was mentioned beyond any doubt.
Agniveer:
Thus, if any one of us has ever been invited to ac-

cept Islam (as done through Peace TV and websites),
now we can be murdered by the grace of Zakir’s God
without any notice! Does Osama Bin Laden need any
other justification? And that is why Zakir Naik can-
not criticize Osama after all this?
Sahih Muslim: Killing Women and Children
SAHIH MUSLIM CHAPTER 9: PERMISSIBILI-
TY OF KILLING WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN
THE NIGHT RAIDS
27
It is reported on the authority of Sa’b b. Jaththa-

ma that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon
him), when asked about the women and children of
the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said:
They are from them.
It is narrated by Sa’b b. Jaththama that he said (to

the Holy Prophet): Messenger of Allah, we kill the
children of the polytheists during the night raids. He
said: They are from them.
Sa’b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet

(may peace be upon him) asked: What about the chil-
dren of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the
night raid? He said: They are from them.
Agniveer:
What additional gospel do terrorists need to plant

bombs, hijack planes and conduct 26/11 or 9/11!
Conclusion
The message is very clear. If you are not a Muslim,
28
you are NOT innocent. If you are not a Muslim, you

are the most corrupt person. Rapists and murderers
may be forgiven by Zakir’s God, but not you. So de-
spite how much you admire Zakir Naik’s antics or
Shahrukh Khan’s nautanki, there is no way that mod-
ern Islam can recommend peace for you!
We appeal to all true lovers of peace and brother-
hood, Muslim or non-Muslim, to rise up to combat
the fraud and fanaticism propagated by these perverts
and help make the world a safer place.
Let us join hands to tackle the menace of intoler-
ance and deceit. Let us no more be fooled by false
promises of peace by those who, in any case, curse
us to Hell forever for not agreeing with them. Let
us wake up to combat such terrorist and fraudu-
lent mindsets ourselves and justify our existence as
Manushya – creatures who can think, analyze and rise
above the self for the welfare of all.
May the truth prevail!
29
CHAPTER 3
HATE INDIA, GET HEAVEN
N o one knows why the land of believers of

Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah (May all be in
bliss) faced continuous attacks on its terri-
tory from last 1400 years by foreign invaders. Did In-
dians go to Mecca and sack it, desecrate Kaba? If no,
for what sin of ours the Arabs, Turks and many more
returned us the favor by demolishing thousands of
temples like Somnath, Ayodhya, and Kashi? Did we
ever send our armies to capture Arab and Turkey for
which any tyrant Arab or Turk is invading us start-
ed breaking records of atrocities set by the previous
30
Hate India, Get Heaven
Ghazi? What are we left with today after losing half

of our territory and people to a foreign cult in the last
thousand years?
Why do we glorify these butchers like Babur, Akbar,
Aurangzeb, Humayun, Moinuddin Chishti, Tughlaks,
and Khiljis? Shame on those who wrote Babur as the
founding father of unity among kingdoms in Indian
subcontinent irrespective of the fact that he was a
self-confessed butcher claiming to have raised pillars
of cut heads of thousands of Hindus to make India
land of Islam. Same with Akbar, who is claimed to be
the greatest king of India till date by many wicked so-
called historians, but was actually the killer of 30000
innocent civilian Hindus in one day of conquering
Chittaur Fort.
But there is another frame of reference to look
at all this according to Zakir Naik, and that is the
will of Allah and His Rasul! According to the leading
commentators and translators of Quran approved by
Zakir Naik, Allah in Quran [9:5] commands Muslims
to slay the polytheists and idol worshippers wherever
they are found! In [9:29], Allah is claimed to say that
Muslims should fight anyone who disbelieves in any
of Allah, Quran, Muhammad, heaven, hell, angels,
31
etc. until they become Muslim. Whoever refuses to

convert to Islam, make him/her pay Jizyah Tax which
is the price of being safe to be paid by NonMuslim in
an Islamic country and at the same time the symbol
of his subdued position in front of Muslims.
Those who refuse to pay Jizyah, act as per [9:5]
and send them to the eternal hellfire! In history too,
whoever Arab or Turk, demonstrated these verses in
practice and waged war against Kafir India, carried
out the massacre, plunder, loot, abduction, rape, slav-
ery, etc., were considered as fighters of Allah (Muja-
hideen) and hailed as Ghazis by Muslims. Even today
all these Ghazis are rated very high by the subconti-
nent Muslims.
In our opinion, Muslims of the Indian subconti-
nent are the most unfortunate people living on earth.
These are the same people whose mothers and sis-
ters (Hindu and Buddhists that time) were dragged
out of their houses by Arab Army and shipped to
Arab to fill Harems of Caliphs as well as the slave
market where they could be purchased as sex slaves
by Allah’s chosen people Arabs. The same has been
extensively covered in Arab and Mughal chronicles.
32
These are the same people whose fathers’ and

brothers’ heads were used to raise pillars of cut heads
so that the whole city could see the wrath of Allah’s
army for the sin of not accepting Islam- the religion
of peace. [To know more, please read Baburnama by
Babur, Diary of Taimur, Abul Fazal’s Aain e Akbari
and other autobiographies of Muslim rulers in India].
The saddest part is that the unfortunate descendants
(today’s subcontinent Muslims) of those mothers
and fathers today applaud these butchers of their an-
cestors.
Readers would be aware that Allama Iqbal, Muham-
mad Ali Jinnah, Bhutto Family of Pakistan (Julfikar Ali
Bhutto and Benjeer Bhutto), etc. were Muslims since
a few generations only! For example, Iqbal’s grandfa-
ther was a Kashmiri Hindu and Jinnah’s grandfather
was a Gujarati Hindu. Bhutto family belongs to the
Rajput ancestry. But alas! The damage done to India
and Hindus by these recent converts is unmatched in
the history.
And now there is another name in the list! This is
Zakir Naik, the descendant of Maharashtrian Hin-
du. He preaches Islam in India and abroad. Whole
India hates him for his anti-humanistic approach on
33
various subjects like hell to all Non-Muslims irrespec-

tive of their good deeds, support of polygamy and
sex slavery, the death penalty for apostates, disallow-
ing Non-Muslims to preach their religion in Islamic
countries, etc.
Zakir Naik lies to Hindus
But now he is not restricted to supporting Laden
alone which he has done openly! We are going to ex-
pose the dangerous plots of his team against his own
motherland India, which has been recently made pub-
lic by one of his close allies. Readers will find what
his friends are doing to the country that nurtured him
and gave him fame. But before that, let’s have a look
what Zakir Bhai has to say to Hindus.
There is no compulsion in religion!
To you, your religion, to me mine!
Islam does not allow to kill innocents. In Islam, the
killing of one innocent is equivalent to the killing of
entire humanity.
Islam is the religion of humanity.
Islam means peace.
34
Islam is the solution to humanity!

Islam was not spread by the sword in India because
we Muslims ruled India for 1000 years and if we had
wished, we could have converted each of the Hin-
dus to Islam. But India still has 80% of Hindu pop-
ulation, and this is the proof that Islam was spread
peacefully.
No Muslim can force you to his religion
Traitor Israr Ahmed‘s Alliance with Zakir Naik
These are some favorites of Zakir Naik while among
Hindus. But look at what his Pakistani Peace TV ally
says in Pakistan!
Dr. Israr Ahmed was a Pakistani scholar and a re-
nowned speaker of Zakir’s channel Peace TV also.
He passed away recently. His programs are still aired
on Zakir’s channel. One could check Peace TV web-
site to ascertain that Israr Ahmed is the part of Za-
kir’s team.
This Mullah, before he died, in an interview with a
Pakistani Channel, revealed that the Muslim Armies
would once again attack India and this time, will com-
pletely establish Islamic rule in India. This gentleman
35
has given the references from Hadith of Muhammad

and has assured of the fulfillment of those because
of being sayings of Prophet Muhammad. Please
check his videos where he talks about the upcoming
Islamic victory over India (Ghazwa e Hind)!
He says- “…. Allah has destined two armies of my
Ummah (Muslims) for the heaven. One of those will
attack India… Afghanistan and Pakistan will make
together a greater Islamic kingdom that will expand
in both directions (east and west) and will establish
Islamic rule everywhere.”
[Readers are also requested to read Hadith regard-
ing attack on India - Ghazwa e Hind at https://ghaz-
watulhind.wordpress.com/]
By now our readers would have been aware of
what Zakir and his organization wants to achieve! Is
there any doubt that his aim is to make Indians slaves
of Islamic rule? Now because no one can dare to
announce publicly that Hadith inspire Islamic terror-
ists to attack India, Zakir Bhai is very cleverly using
the Islamic concept of lying, Taqiyya! He repeats the
above lines- Islam means peace etc. in front of Hin-
dus whenever they remember the bloody history of
36
Islam in India or some violent verses of Quran and

at the same time, preparing Muslims in Islamic coun-
tries such as Pakistan and Iraq to attack India to fulfill
the Hadith of Muhammad.
The idea is to keep fooling Hindus of India that

there is no compulsion in religion and agitate Mus-
lims of outside to be among the army of those Gha-
zis who are going to land directly in heaven as per
Muhammad’s Hadith! Give Islam=peace garbage to
Hindus from inside and wait for the divine army of
Muhammad to attack from outside! And some day,
attack India like Muhammad Bin Qasim and paint it
with Islamic color. Convert Kafir Hindus to Muslims
or make them pay Jizyah. Kill those refusing both
options.
We are aware that this book and particularly this

chapter will excite Jihadi quarters all around leading
to lots of rebuttals/responses getting published. We
cover here four possible excuses that came to our
mind which would be used to defend Zakir Naik
along with our questions and demands for each-
37
Jihadi: Zakir Naik has no relation with Israr

Ahmed
Zakir Naik has no relation with Israr Ahmed. Thus
Naik is not accountable to any of Israr’s comments
or actions.
Agniveer:
• If that is so, does that mean Zakir Naik con-

siders those Hadith wrong that Israr thinks as
right? If yes, why did not Zakir condemn Israr
who portrayed Islam in a bad light?
• Why did Zakir Naik continue to have him in his
team even after he spewed venom against India,
the motherland of Naik? Even today, the re-
cordings of this terrorist Israr Ahmed are aired
on Zakir’s Peace TV, why?
• We demand that if Naik disagrees with Israr on
this, then he should declare him a terrorist for
being involved in anti-Indian plots of conquer-
ing and establishing a rule forcefully.
• We also demand that Zakir Naik apologizes for
his ties with such enemy fanatic till the end.
If Zakir Naik thinks Israr was wrong, then he must
38
announce that the Hadith Israr referred were wrong

and were lies. Also, he should either get Fatwa issued
against those Mullahs who consider these Hadith au-
thentic or prove to them that these are wrong.
Jihad: Israr Ahmed never forced anyone with his
beliefs
Everyone has right to opine. Israr gave his views, why
you have problems? He never forced anyone with his
beliefs!
Agniveer:
• Great! But what happens in Islamic countries

where anyone’s opinion against Quran or Mu-
hammad becomes the cause of death punish-
ment for that person? When Muslims can’t
listen to anyone’s opinion on Muhammad or
Quran, why should someone be spared in the
name of opinion, who is guilty of dangerous
plotting against Hindus and India?
• The way Muslims love Muhammad, the same
way true Indians love India and its culture. So
it’s the duty of every patriot to demand severe
punishment for anyone having atrocious mo-
tives against our country. Anything wrong with
39
it?
• By the way, what is the reason that no Non-Mus-
lim can ever give his opinion on his faith in Is-
lamic countries but Muslims everywhere de-
mand this right?
Jihadi: Israr’s Hadith is not correct
The Hadith that Israr quoted are not Sahih but weak.
Thus it’s not right to build a case based on such Ha-
dith.
Agniveer:
• What is the reason that the Hadith that remain

weak/wrong in Hindu majority India suddenly
become Sahih and invincible truth from Mu-
hammad’s tongue few miles across the border
(in Pakistan)? Is there any Mullah in Islam-
ic countries who can declare these Hadith as
weak/wrong?
• If these Hadith are wrong/weak as per Zakir,
he should openly criticize these along with the
scholars, publishers and writers/narrators who
have defamed Islam in the world as an intoler-
ant religion by supporting, publishing and com-
40
piling/narrating these.
• For what reason these Hadith should be con-
sidered wrong/weak when a scholar like Dr. Is-
rar Ahmed has confirmed these as Sahih? And
what about the Fatwa issued by Islamic center
which unequivocally states that these Hadith of
attack on India by Muslim Army is Sahih?
Here we provide the important portion of this
Fatwa:
Question
What is your ruling on the hadith in Nisai Shareef
about Ghazwa tul Hind? Are the hadith authentic &
also whether this Ghazwa has already taken place in
the past or will take place in the future. It would be
appreciated if the answer is descriptive and explana-
tory.
Answer
…This Hadeeth in which the conquest of India
is mentioned was reported by An-Nassaa’i, Ahmad,
Al-Bayhaqi and others from Thawbaan may Allaah
be pleased with him, and Shaykh Al-Albaani may Al-
laah have mercy upon him classified it as Saheeh in
41
“Saheeh Al-Jaami’.”
Besides, Ibn Katheer may Allaah have mercy upon
him said in his book “An-Nihaayah Fil-Fitan Wal Ma-
laahim”: “Indeed, the Muslims conquered India in 44
(A.H) during the reign of Mu’aawiyah Ibn Abi Su-
fyaan may Allaah be pleased with him and some in-
cidents took place, and we mentioned them in detail.
Also, the great king As-Sa’eed Al-Mahmoud Ibn Su-
biktikeen, the ruler of Ghaznah and its surroundings
conquered it in about 400 (A.H), and he did there
some renowned acts and good matters, and he broke
the great idol called “Somnath” and took its garlands
and swords and returned to his country victorious
and safe.”
Jihadi: The Hadith’s attack on India has ful-
filled
The Hadith of attack on India is Sahih, but it has
already been fulfilled. Hadith was referring to the at-
tack on India by Muhammad Bin Qasim, which has
already happened. So no divine planning of forceful-
ly capturing Indian again!
Agniveer:
42
• Israr Ahmed and the Fatwa we shared both un-

doubtedly say that final Hadith of Ghazwa e
Hind (conquering of India) is yet to be fulfilled.
Please go back to Point 1 (a) and (d) if you are
planning to differ with Israr on this issue!
• If this Hadith is assumed to have been fulfilled

already, this again proves that Islam came to In-
dia with sword and ruled India by the sword,
and all this happened with the divine inspira-
tion of Allah and Rasul. This way Zakir Naik is
again caught doing Taqiyya (lying) because his
stance on Islamic invasion in India is that Mus-
lims did not spread/rule Islam through sword
whereas this Hadith seems to say otherwise!
It is evident from the activities of Zakir Naik it is

evident that his sole aim is to destroy India complete-
ly in the name of Allah and Muhammad.
43
CHAPTER 4
HATE HINDUS, GET HEAVEN
T here is no compulsion in religion- another fa-

vorite quote of Zakir Naik to showcase his
brand of Islam as a religion of peace. Even
we agree that Surah Bakar 2:256 is one of the most
benevolent verses of Quran. Had this been the only
verse in Quran, I would have hailed it as the greatest
slogan for tolerance and peace. Let me reproduce this
great verse here:
44
Hate Hindus, Get Heaven
Surah Bakar 2:256: There is no compulsion in

religion
“La ikraha fee addeeniqad tabayyana arrushdu mina
alghayyi faman yakfur bittaghootiwayu/min billahi
faqadi istamsaka bilAAurwatialwuthqa la infisama
laha wallahusameeAAun AAaleem”.
“There is no compulsion in religion. The right
direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he
who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath
grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Al-
lah is Hearer, Knower.”
I believe this verse must be belonging to the origi-
nal Quran. This was the time when Muhammad was
joining people together in Medina for his great faith.
He wanted to make it as lenient and tolerant as one
could. But this is only a small part from beginning of
Quran. The real story unfolds from here:
Abrogated Verses in Quran
In Zakir’s Quran, many Ayats/ verses are supposed
to have been abrogated and replaced with new Ayats.
Sounds confusing! But that’s true! Because there was
no other way to create a new Quran from the old
message of Muhammad. Let us explain this concept
45
of abrogation a bit here:

This doctrine of abrogation is based on two vers-
es that, according to Zakir, God allegedly instructed
prophet to put into the Quran.
“None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause
to be forgotten, but We substitute something better
or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power
over all things?” Surah 2: 106
“When We substitute one revelation for another,
and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),
they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them
understand not.” Surah 16:101
As per these, new verses (Nasikh) in Quran replace
old verses (Mansoukh). Out of 114 Chapters of Qu-
ran, at least 71 are supposed to have been affect-
ed by this concept of abrogation. Refer “al-Nasikh
wal-Mansoukh” (The Abrogator and the Abrogated)
which was authored by the revered Muslim schol-
ar Abil-Kasim Hibat-Allah Ibn-Salama Abi-Nasr.
The book goes through every Surah (chapter) in the
Quran and cites in great detail every verse that was
cancelled-out/overridden by particular verses that
were written later.
46
The summary conclusion is clear. Out of 114

chapters of Zakir’s Quran, a maximum of 43 chap-
ters remain which can be taken as authentic.
Quran 9.5: Slay the idolaters wherever you find
them
Without getting into much details, let us come to the
main point – Verse 2.256 that claims there is no com-
pulsion in religion was abrogated and replaced by
Verse 9:5 – The verse of sword. Now let us see what
this verse is:
Sahih International
And when the sacred months have passed, then

kill the polytheists wherever you find them and cap-
ture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them
at every place of ambush. But if they should repent,
establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their
way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Pickthall
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay

the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them
(captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them
each ambush. But if they repent and establish wor-
ship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free.
47
Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Shakir
So when the sacred months have passed away, then

slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take
them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for
them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep
up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free
to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
Jalalayn
Then, when the sacred months have passed — that

is, [at] the end of the period of deferment — slay the
idolaters wherever you find them, be it during a law-
ful [period] or a sacred [one], and take them, captive,
and confine them, to castles and forts, until they have
no choice except [being put to] death or [acceptance
of] Islam; and lie in wait for them at every place of
ambush, [at every] route that they use (kulla, ‘every’,
is in the accusative because a [preceding] genitive-tak-
ing preposition has been removed). But if they re-
pent, of unbelief, and establish prayer and pay the
alms, then leave their way free, and do not interfere
with them. God is Forgiving, Merciful, to those who
repent.
48
The essence is that kill the idol worshippers wher-

ever you can. The next verses explain why you can
never have a treaty with idol worshippers, and there
are other verses which say that even if you have to
make friends with Kafirs, make sure you have hatred
against them in your heart. (Surah Imran 28)
There is no compulsion in religion
Now, in recent times, many scholars have started ar-
guing that 2.256 was not abrogated, and it remains
a valid verse of Zakir’s Quran. But this argument is
contradictory of facts and itself:
• If indeed there is no compulsion in religion,
why is punishment for apostasy DEATH in Is-
lamic Shariat? Why does no scholar like Zakir
Naik or anyone else ever proclaim that Suadi
Arabia and all those countries who give death
punishment for apostasy and insulting Islam/
Prophet are against Islam and anti-Muslim?
• If indeed this peaceful verse is valid, why is the
propagation of non-Muslim religions prohibit-
ed in Muslim countries?
• If indeed there is no compulsion in religion,
why are there countless verses asking to have
49
hatred against non-believers and kill them or

force them to become Muslim?
Some other scholars say that this verse was indeed
abrogated, but abrogation means that in a different
context of war, the verse of Sword (9.5) would be
valid, else in non-war situation verse of no compul-
sion would be applicable.
• If that be so, this implies double standards.
It basically means that if you are not power-
ful enough, let there be no compulsion. So
talk peacefully, but having hatred in heart for
non-Muslims as per Sura Imran 28 and work
for your agenda tactfully.
• But the moment you attain power, the verse of
Sword gets applicable. Then kill the non-believ-
ers unless they ask for mercy and agree to be-
come Muslims.
This has been testified in the history of the growth
of Islam. Wherever they were powerless, they talked
of peace and no-compulsion. And the moment they
got powerful, they started forcing Islam through the
threat of the sword.
Even in the history of Quran, the no-compulsion
50
verse was revealed when Muhammad was still try-

ing to get a set of followers for his mission. And the
verse of sword was allegedly revealed after Islam had
already become dominant. We suspect, by this time,
Prophet would have been imprisoned, and all false
verse were inserted in his name. Or perhaps, after his
death, this verse was inserted by his followers who
were killing each other on the might of sword.
In any case, only a very few scholars have started
claiming that no-compulsion verse is not abrogated,
primarily after Islam has been in scrutiny in last few
years after its extremist face came to fore. They rep-
resent a minority, and no one dare condemn Muslim
countries for having capital punishment for apostasy
and ‘denigrating’ Islam.
Please also note that Zakir’s Islam claims to be the
only religion of the world. It refuses to provide the
status of religion to other belief systems and puts
them in forever Hell. Thus the verse on ‘no com-
pulsion in religion’ only relates to minute differences
within Islamic fold and does not refer to non-Mus-
lims.
Some Muslim scholars say that only religions are
51
Islam, Christianity and Judaism, and Islam is the only

true one among them. So perhaps some terrorists
may spare Christians and Jews as per this verse, but
idolaters like Hindus are for sure not under the pur-
view of this verse. This is evident from history where
Islam was spread in India, merely by force of sword
after killing and rapes of millions. They say Hitler
performed the largest genocide. But if one looks into
deeds of each of the barbaric Muslim looter from
Muhammad Bin Qasim to Babur to Akbar to Au-
rangzeb to Tipu Sultan, each of them had been miles
ahead of Hitler in brutality with added flavor of sex-
ual perversion amounting to rape and sexual punish-
ments.
As per Zakir ‘Terrorist’ Naik, if a country follows
Islamic law (and Islamic law is the best law as per
Him since Islam is the best religion!), then it is justi-
fied to kill an apostate as per Holy Quran! In fact, Za-
kir Naik quotes from Quran to claim that Islam alone
is a religion! Hence the concept of no-compulsion is
valid only for Muslims!
Agniveer’s appeal – Summary
We appeal to all Muslims and non-Muslims alike to
52
come out of the trap of such an inhuman ideology.

• Neither is there any evidence of Zakir’s Quran
being actually a work of Muhammad nor is it a
book which stands anywhere on parameters of
human rights, tolerance, peace, and rationality.
• It remains a book written by barbarians for a
barbaric society that is no way applicable to-
day. It is the only book on earth where God is
supposed to have revised and canceled his own
previous message.
• There is nothing new in Quran that is not al-
ready there in other ancient texts. Belief in Za-
kir’s Quran is based basically on blind belief on
imaginary stories that provide no evidence or
logic to be true. And blind belief can only breed
intolerance.
• The evil designs of these fanatics is clear. They
will showcase Islam as peaceful and friendly and
tolerant and go all extent to prove this when
they are not in the majority.
• The moment their power increases, they will
start showing their true face and start applying
verse of Sword. This is how they plundered In-
53
dia and rest of the world. This is how Zakir’s

brand of Islam contributes to the almost en-
tire supply of terrorism today. This is how any
peaceful place in the world becomes violent as
Muslim population rises above a minimum lev-
el.
At least Indians should be aware of their evil de-
signs. This is how they grabbed Pakistan and Bangla-
desh and became 20% of Indian population at least.
Hindus have been having their sisters, daughters,
and mothers raped by barbaric looters shouting Al-
lah-Hu-Akbar for 1000 years and its high time they
started understanding the true meaning of no com-
pulsion.
An amnesiac person who enjoys feeding milk to
snakes despite being bitten innumerable times is
bound to be killed one day.
The worst victims of this blinded intolerant cult
are those innocent Muslims, who cannot get out of
its clutches due to fear of death and repression, and
can also not gain the trust of rest of the world due to
misdeeds of terrorists and extremists who predomi-
nantly hail from Islam in last 1400 years.
54
We appeal to them to come to humanity, which is

beyond barriers of caste and race, has no supersti-
tions and only demand belief in the path of truth.
As with other chapters, all criticisms here are di-
rected to a version of Islam as presented by fanatic
mindsets like Zakir Naik, and their followers. It is not
directed towards a host of minor sects and ideologies
in Islam which themselves face a lot of atrocity for
their beliefs. Some of them are:
Hashamiya / Taraqibiyah: They Predicate a body
to Allah and also allege Prophet (PBUH) of disobe-
dience to Allah.
Khazimiyah: They believe Allah loves men of all
faiths even if one has been disbeliever most of his
life.
Nazzamiyah: Followers of Abu-Ishaq Ibrahim ibn-
Saiyar. They do not believe in the miraculous nature
of the Holy Quran nor do they believe the miracles
of Holy Prophet (PBUH) like splitting the moon.
Ibriyah: They believe that Holy Prophet (PBUH)
was a wise man but not a prophet.
Fikriyya: They believe that doing Dhikr and Fikr
55
(Remembering and thinking about Allah) is better

than worship.
Tanasukhiya: They believe in the reincarnation of
the soul.
Ahadiyah: They believe in the Fardh (obligations)
in faith but deny the Sunnah.
Ammaliyah: They believe that faith for one is what
he/she sincerely practices.
Hujjatiya: They do not believe in the punishment
for deeds on the grounds that because everything is
determined so whatever one does s/he is not respon-
sible for it.
Lafziyah: They believe that Quran is not the word
of God, but only its meaning and essence is the word
of God. Words of Quran are just the words of the
narrator.
56
CHAPTER 5
HATE NON-MUSLIMS, GET HEAVEN
T he problem with literally following intolerant

religious texts as the word of God is that it
corrupts one’s mind absolutely. You not only
become intolerant from deep within but also start
believing that you are morally right in doing so. Un-
fortunately, Dr. Naik’s brand of Islam is a perfect
example of such mindset. More unfortunately, many
Muslims treat him as a role model and champion of
True Islam. This is a very sad truth as it’s a sign of
growing intolerance in the Muslim psyche.
There is a limit to the intolerance a society can
57
digest. Dr. Naik must understand it best, as he has

been banned in the US and the UK because of his
videos showing his open support of Osama, killing
of apostates and calling the US a terrorist state. Now
ISIS fighters and Dhaka attackers etc. have openly
accepted to have been inspired by him. To protect
his brand of Islam, he went on to glorify Yazid (kill-
er of Prophet Muhammad’s grandson Hussain) and
was thus declared kafir by many Muslim sects. He has
just managed a temporary stay on a non-bailable war-
rant issued against him for not appearing in a session
court hearing on charges of waging war against India.
These reactions are bound to happen as the literal
brand of Islam that he preaches, is extremely intol-
erant, and this is clear from his videos where he says
Non-Muslims must not be allowed to exercise their
freedom of religion in Islamic states but demands
that Non-Muslims should give all privileges to Mus-
lims in their states! It’s anybody’s guess as to how long
humanity could tolerate such intolerance.
In this chapter, we examine Dr. Naik’s views where
he responds to “why don’t you allow non-Muslims
to enter Mecca and Medina?” and will respond to his
intolerant arguments.
58
Hate Non-Muslims, Get Heaven
While we edit this chapter, a blast happened in Me-

dina near Prophet’s grave!
Mecca and Medina are the cantonment area of
Muslims
Every country has a cantonment area where only
those people who are involved in the defense of the
country are allowed. Similarly, Mecca and Medina are
the cantonment area of Muslims. So only those peo-
ple (i.e. Muslims) who are involved in fighting and
protecting and defending Islam are allowed to enter
Mecca and Medina.
Agniveer:
Great! Dr. Naik is elsewhere seen preaching us that

Islam is the religion of Peace. But what do we have
here? He is comparing Islam with a military estab-
lishment! The Mecca and Medina are cantonment ar-
eas! And all this while silly non-Muslims thought that
these were sacred sites of pilgrimage of the religion
of PEACE!
Moreover, we suspect that Dr. Naik also knows
about Abu Tahir’s desecration of Kaaba. That’s why
he has no faith in Surah Al-Feel of Quran that claims
that Allah can protect His house on His own. And
59
thus Dr. Naik believes that Muslims must fight, de-

fend and protect what God Allah himself could not.
Quran prohibits the entry of Kafirs in Mecca
and Medina
Allah gives the promise in glorious Quran from 9:28
that from this day do not allow the non-believers to
enter Mecca and Medina.
Agniveer:
Now Dr. Naik plays Taqiyya (the religion sanc-

tioned art and license of lying or hiding the truth in
Islam) by half-quoting and ill-quoting verse 9:28 of
the Quran.
Let’s have a look at the complete verse 9:28 of the
Quran:
“O you who believe (in Allâh’s Oneness and in His
Messenger (Muhammad SAW)! Verily, the Mushrikûn
(polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the One-
ness of Allâh, and in the Message of Muhammad
SAW) are Najasun (impure). So let them not come
near Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah) after this year,
and if you fear poverty, Allâh will enrich you if He
will, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allâh is All-Knowing,
60
All-Wise. ”
He ill-quotes because this verse only talks about
keeping the non-Muslims away from Masjid Al-
Haraam (at Mecca) and not the entire cities of Mec-
ca and Medina. So the Muslims are prohibiting what
even their God did not command them to prohibit!
He half-quotes because he does not want to tell
the non-Muslims the real reason behind not allow-
ing the Non-Muslims to enter the Masjid Al-Haraam
in Makkah. And the reason given in the verse is
that Non-Muslims are unclean/impure (Najis)!!!
Dr. Naik and his fans must hang their heads in
shame. Is their Islam a religion or a cult that insti-
gates irrational unwarranted religious apartheid? (do
we even need to answer that explicitly now?)
Do you know what all is najis (impure) in Islam?
• Urine, Feces, Semen, Dead body, Blood, Dog,
Pig, Alcoholic liquors, the sweat of an animal
who persistently eats najasat. And
• Kafir [Polytheists, Atheists, any Christian or Jew
that does not believe in Muhammad (in other
words all Non-Muslims)]
61
Aren’t you delighted O non-Muslims! You can’t

enter Mecca because you are as impure as a pig, feces
or dead body as per Zakir’s Islam!
This is straight out of Zakir’s version of Quran.
A book that openly calls non-Muslims “filthy.” If a
Muslim touches a najis thing, he becomes najis (im-
pure)! We are at a loss how could any secular state
tolerate such nonsense. And above all how can the
so-called rational, moderate Muslims treat such a
hate-filled doctrine as a religion of choice. We simply
don’t understand!!!
And please don’t be in any doubt about what Za-
kir’s God thinks of Non-Muslims. Here’s another set
of verses that makes it amply clear that Non-Muslims
are the vilest of creatures in the eyes of his God!
Quran 98:6:
Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Is-

lâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad (Peace be
upon him)) from among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in
the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
Quran 8:55:
Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures be-
62
fore Allâh are those who disbelieve, – so they shall

not believe.
Dr. Naik half-quoted the verse to hide this ugly
truth of his brand of Islam from the audience. He
thinks Non-Muslims live on some shutter island and
would not come to know of this truth. Gone are
those days! And moderate Muslims should seriously
start thinking about how could they tolerate this non-
sensical religious apartheid and still wear the “moder-
ate” and “tolerant” tags.
To enter in Mecca and Medina, you need a Visa
For entering any country, you need a visa. If you re-
fuse to produce it or to abide by the laws of that
country, you will not be allowed to enter. Don’t agree
don’t come! YOU CAN’T ARGUE! Similarly to en-
ter in Mecca and Medina you need a Visa, which is to
say with your lips- Lailah illallah Muhammadur Ra-
soolullah. (That there is no God but Allah and Mu-
hammad is His final messenger.)
Agniveer:
When one can’t even argue as per Islam on the en-

try of Non-Muslims in Mecca and Madina, how wise
of Zakir is to give arguments in its defense?
63
Thanks again Zakir Bhai MBBS to accept that Is-

lamic traditions and beliefs can’t be argued. Dear read-
ers, hope you are discovering the tolerance and logic
in Islam which is being assured to you Non-Muslims
by Islamists of today! However in the same breath,
we equally oppose all those beliefs that claim exclu-
sivity of entering Hindus or Christians in any Temple
or Church. Can Zakir Naik or any Mullah in the world
condemn this discriminatory command of Quran the
same way?
I wonder what will happen if Hindus of India,
Christians and Atheists of the West start making the
same Visa policy! Imagine Hindus having a law in In-
dia- whoever wants to live or enter in India, he/she
must recite Gayatri Mantra or Jai Shree Ram. Whoev-
er fails to do so, will be sent back to his/her respective
place. So any Muslim who refuses to recite Jai Shree
Ram will not be allowed to live in India anymore! Af-
ter all, you have to abide by the laws of the country,
and you CAN’T ARGUE those!
As such, we have no objection against this argu-
ment when looked from the standpoint of Saudi as a
nation state. It has the right to allow or disallow entry
to outsiders in restricted zones. The objection here
64
is against the reason behind banning Non-Muslims

at these sites, as the reason is inhuman and reeks of
nonsensical religious apartheid. Anyways, the Sau-
dis, in a way, are helping humanity by not hiding the
truth of Islam as the likes of Dr. Naik do. Humanity
should seriously take note of how Zakir’s Islam treats
the other and what are the implications of allowing
Dr. Naik’s Islam in a tolerant multi-religious society.
By the way, on this VISA argument, we have an
embarrassing question for Dr. Naik at the end of the
chapter.
Summary
Zakir’s arguments show that Islam is more of a mili-
tary religion than a religion of peace where the Mus-
lims have to fight, protect and defend God’s house
as God is incapable of doing the same on His own.
God, as per the Quran verse quoted by Dr. Naik, is
a religious bigot who thinks non-Muslims are as im-
pure as pig and feces and hence must not be allowed
in his house! And finally, we agree with Dr. Naik on
just one point that the Saudis have the right to ban
Non-Muslims in Saudi cities as it’s their Islamic coun-
try after all, and they are free to show the true face
of Islam to the rest of the world. But in the same
65
breath, we ask our Muslim friends to think about the

consequences of Hindus demanding same right to
ban Muslims in India! Will Muslims agree with this
peacefully or they only want peace to be practiced by
Non-Muslims?
The way out
When you interpret the commands and injunctions

literally, there are bound to be embarrassments of all
sorts. To avoid embarrassment, religions MUST do
away with any bigotry and inhuman practices that are
currently being followed or condoned by them.
Thankfully majority of Muslims who recite the in-
tolerant verses of the Quran in their daily prayers and
tilawat in Arabic, don’t know the actual meaning of
these verses. The real moderate and rational Muslims
still have the opportunity to sensitize the community
that literal following of the Quran and Hadis will
make Islam extremely intolerant and ill-fit in the 21st
century. The way forward and way out for Islam is
reform. Zakir’s Islam needs to humanize itself and
stop dehumanizing Non-Muslims.
On argument 3, a question for Dr. Naik: Why Kaf-
irs were requested to enter Mecca without the “Is-
66
lamic Visa” by Zakir Naik’s Saudi Masters?

We would remind our readers, especially Zakir
Naik and his Wahabi friends, about the other humil-
iating incident that took place on November 20th,
1979. Yes, we are talking about the Grand Mosque
Seize when a Muslim claiming himself to be Mahdi
(the redeemer prophesied in Islamic books to come
before doomsday)- Abdullah Hamid Mohammed
Al-Qahtani attacked the Kaaba with his few hundred
armed Mujahideen. He took thousands of the pil-
grims, preparing to offer prayers at the Kaaba, hos-
tage. His goons killed a few hundred including Saudi
soldiers.
Finally, a team of French Commandos was re-
quested by Saudi Government to help rescue the
hostages and clear the mosque from the Mahdi and
his Mujahids! To cut the long story short, the Kaf-
ir French Commandos accomplished the mission,
executed the Mahdi and his goons, and rescued the
Kaaba and the Muslims. As soon as the benevolent
mission was over and the Kaaba was secured, the Wa-
habis started downplaying the fact that Kafir French
soldiers helped Muslim Saudis in that operation. Af-
ter all, they had to defend the Wahhabi position that a
67
Muslim equals ten Kafirs in strength! Some Islamists

had tried to salvage the word of Allah of Muslim
supremacy over Kafir in strength, by floating a story
that those French Soldiers were made to recite the
Kalma aka Islamic Visa as per Zakir Naik (Laillah il-
lallah Muhammadur Rasoolullah) before they entered
the Kaaba for the operation!
So as per these storytellers, the French Comman-
dos became Muslims and hence Kaaba was recap-
tured by Muslims only! It doesn’t matter to them if
these Kafir French recited a few words that they did
not understand at all and could hardly recite because
of their accent! On top of it, they also fail to explain
as to why Saudi Muslims who used to recite Laillah il-
lallah Muhammadur Rasoolullah five times a day, 365
days a year throughout their lives and of whom Allah
is the friend, could not rescue their shrine on their
own?
Can Zakir Naik answer?
We would like Zakir Naik to answer following que-
ries
• Why were the Kafir French Soldiers allowed to
enter Mecca without the Islamic Visa aka Lail-
68
lah illallah Muhammadur Rasoolullah?

• Why was Saudi Muslim army so incompetent
to eliminate few hundred oppressors? Why did
Allah let whole Muslim Ummah down by not
helping them against the attackers? Why did
not Allah act as per His assurance in Quran to
help Muslims, especially for Saudis whom Allah
loves the most?
• Why ten times weaker Kafirs were requested by
Muslims to carry out the operation? Was your
version of Quran wrong in estimating the rela-
tive strengths of Kafirs and Momins?
• Will those brave French soldiers go to Jannah
(heaven) for the holiest of the works one can
ever do i.e. to save the HOUSE OF ALLAH-
KAABA? Or they will go to hell just like oth-
er great people such as Bismil, Azad, Subhash
Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru
for the only fault of being Non-Muslims?
• If Dr. Naik believes in the story that the French
Commandos were made to read Kalma before
the operation, then we have one more query:
Even if it is assumed that these French Kaf-
69
irs became Muslims during the operation, they

ultimately practiced Christianity after the oper-
ation. So they become apostates as per Zakir
Naik’s Islam. And everybody knows that Dr.
Naik supports the death penalty for apostates.
We are interested in knowing from Dr. Naik
as to how does he plan to punish these unholy
apostates who protected the Holy Kaaba?
Do they deserve death here and eternal hell here-
after?
This Chapter is co-authored by Indian Agnostic.
70
CHAPTER 6
HATE WOMEN, GET HEAVEN
T hanks to his fans, we have enough YouTube

video postings of Dr. Naik’s take on various
aspects and practices of his brand of Islam.
Continuing with our objective of denouncing falsity
and irrationality, we now analyze Zakir on his defense
of the indefensible hijab.
The Hindu lady in a video asks Dr. Naik that isn’t
a Hindu woman who wears a salwar kameez modest?
Why degrade women by forcing Hijaab (veil)? She
also mentions that since Dr. Naik is so inspired by re-
71
formist Raja Ram Mohan Roy, why doesn’t he accept

his stand against the purdah (hijab, veil) system?
Dr. Naik, the literalist follower of Islamic scrip-
tures that he is, presents the following arguments to
defend the retrograde 7th-century Arabic practice.
Zakir Naik: I can’t agree with ALL reformists’
ideas
Dr. Naik argues that just because he agrees with many
of Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s reformist ideas, it does not
mean that he must agree with ALL the reformist ide-
as of Raja Ram Mohan Roy.
To reinforce his argument, Dr. Naik gives the ex-
ample of Mr. L. K. Advani’s statement that “rapists
deserve death punishment”. He supports Mr. Ad-
vani’s statement because it’s in line with Islam. But
this does not mean he will agree with every statement
of Mr. Advani.
Agniveer:
• We concur with Dr. Naik that it’s impossible to

agree with or follow all the views of any person,
no matter how great that person be. This much
of Dr. Naik’s argument is rational indeed, and
72
Hate Women, Get Heaven
we would add that Dr. Naik should apply the

same logic on Prophet Muhammad too. Many
Muslims blindly follow each and every tradition
of the Prophet (Sunnah) no matter how inor-
dinate or irrational they be in current context.
[For instance wearing Mera Naam Joker trou-
sers that don’t reach your ankles!. Others refuse
to use soap after lavatory because soaps were
not manufactured during Prophet’s era!]
• But the rest of this argument of Dr. Naik is a
departure from rationality and a surrender to
blind belief. Nowhere does Dr. Naik enlight-
en us about Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s arguments
against purdah and his rebuttal of those argu-
ments? Instead, he gives us a glimpse of the rig-
id yardstick that he uses to accept or reject an
argument. This is evident from the example he
presents. He agrees with Mr. Advani that “rap-
ists should be put to death” NOT because of
any rational merit (that it may act as a deterrent)
BUT only because that statement is in line with
Islamic Law (Sharia). Dr. Naik in a way admits
that his brand of Islam is not open to reforms.
It’s well known that a religion that is not open to
73
noble ideas from within and without is bound

to transform into an irrational fanatic cult dom-
inated by dumb-heads.)
Anyways, this part of the lady’s question and Dr.
Naik’s response has little bearing on the subject topic
of Hijaab. It only highlights the rigidity of Dr. Naik’s
doctrine. So let’s move forward.
Zakir Naik: Modesty levels differ according to
different regions
He then informs us that modesty levels differ ac-
cording to different regions/cultures. What is mod-
est here may be considered immodest elsewhere. He
also takes a jibe on Indian Saree and eulogizes the
great Islamic culture of not casting a second glance
on women as this would be considered “feasting on
her beauty.”
Agniveer:
• When Dr. Naik knows that modesty is better

defined by the culture and region we live in,
how foolish it is for his brand of Islam to force
a single rigid dress code on women (and men)
across the world? Dr. Naik has rather naively
exposed his brand of Islam that does not re-
74
spect cultural differences but wants all cultures

to succumb to a 7th-century Arabic culture, no
matter what the negative implications of such a
custom be on the people! Very Sad indeed.
• While taking a Jibe at Indian Saree, Dr. Naik
forgot that modesty of any other culture might
seem taboo and preposterous in another cul-
ture. Does he know that an Arab village woman
may lift her skirt to cover her face if spotted
without a veil (as for her revealing her face is
the most immodest act !). She may end up re-
vealing what most of the world may consider
immodest exposure.
• Dr. Naik also doesn’t know or doesn’t want the
audience to know that the Islamic dress code
was not a reformist step for women at large.
One must know that slave women were NOT
ALLOWED to wear the veil. So the devout
Muslims were always free to “feast on the beau-
ty”(yuck!) of slave women all the time! Islamic
veil is not to maintain modesty of women but
to make distinction b/w free Muslimah and a
slave girl! [By the way, isn’t allowing Muslims to
keep women as slaves expose how much Islam
75
is concerned about modesty of women?].

What springs up from the literal accounts of Islam
is that women in Zakir’s Islam are no more than sex
objects. Some of whom (called wives) are protected
exclusively for husbands and rest (called slave wom-
en) need not be protected as their modesty carries
no weight and they are public property in Dr. Naik’s
terminology.
Here’s how it’s been immodestly and explicitly
mentioned in the Tafsirs and Sahih Hadith: (These
are not taken from anti-Islamic sites by the way. They
are lifted straight from Islamic Publication Houses
versions that are online on almost every other Islamic
site.)
Quran [33:59], Tafsir Ibn Kathir-
Here Allah tells His Messenger to command the

believing women, especially his wives and daughters,
because of their position of honor, to draw their Jil-
babs over their bodies, so that they will be distinct in
their appearance from the women of the Jahiliyyah
and from slave women…..if they do that, it will be
known that they are free, and that they are not ser-
vants or whores.
76
Sahih Bukhari Vol 5 Hadith 523:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet stayed with

Safiya bint Huyai for three days on the way of Khai-
bar where he consummated his marriage with her.
Safiya was amongst those who were ordered to use
a veil.
Sahih Bukhari Vol 5 Hadith 524:
Narrated Anas: ….The Muslims said amongst

themselves, “Will she (i.e. Safiya) be one of the
mothers of the believers, (i.e. one of the wives of the
Prophet ) or just (a lady captive) of what his right−
hand possesses” Some of them said, “If the Prophet
makes her observe the veil, then she will be one of
the mothers of the believers (i.e. one of the Prophet’s
wives), and if he does not make her observe the veil,
then she will be his lady slave.” So when he departed,
he made a place for her behind him (on his and made
her observe the veil.
The brand of Islam that Dr. Naik follows glorifies
the traditions of 7th century Arabic Muslims, which
is an insult to modesty anywhere in the world today.
Keeping women as a slave is not only immodest but
cruel and inhuman. Isn’t it painfully ridiculous that
77
Muslim men cannot stare Muslim women but stare

and rape slave women? Can this at all help in keep-
ing the Muslim men modest in their thought, speech,
dress, and action?
Here are few Sahih Hadith which expose how
much Islam cares for modesty of women.
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he

pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-
’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Al-
lah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the ex-
pedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some
excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we
were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at
the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So
we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but
by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ
before emission of semen to avoid conception). But
we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Mes-
senger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked
Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he
said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every
soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection
78
will be born.
Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him)

reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to
do ‘azl (coitus interruptus) with them. We then asked
Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about
it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it,
verily you do it, but the soul who has to be born until
the Day of judgment must be born.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 137:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives

in the war booty, and we used to do coitus interruptus
with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it, and he
said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question
thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but
will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.
So this is the “modesty” that early Islam brought to
the world. How comfortable would you be with this
kind of twisted modesty? “Allowing rape of innocent
women,” is this about modesty at all?
Zakir Naik: Modesty as per Quran and Hadith
Then he quotes the Quran and Hadith to inform us
79
about all that Islam considers as modesty and how

men and women should guard their modesty.
Agniveer:
Dr. Naik has cleverly skipped the context in which

the veiling verses were revealed. The context would
have surely helped his audience appreciate how this
“noble” practice of wearing the hijaab was started in
Islam. There must have been some good reason for
starting this practice…Right?
Well, no problem, we will give the context, and you
be the judge!
Here’s how Umar, the companion of the proph-
et, forced the veil on Muslim women for all times to
come
Sahih Bukhari (an authentic Islamic scripture) Volume 1,
Book 4, Number 148:
Narrated ‘Aisha: The wives of the Prophet used

to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at
Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar
used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,”
but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda
bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’
time, and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and
80
said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so,

as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the
observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be re-
vealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A
complete body cover excluding the eyes).
Did you read it right? YOU SURE DID! Shock-
ingly, while it was Umar who deserved punishment
for harassing the prophet’s wife, Dr. Naik’s God
chose to punish the wife instead of punishing Umar
for the uncivilized and indecent act. The All-Just God
of Dr. Naik’s hadits rewards the culprit and punishes
the victim.
Well, this is just half the story. You must be in-
terested in knowing as to how effective was the veil
injunction of the All-Knowing God in defending the
woman’s modesty!
If you are a rational person, you would have al-
ready guessed that by letting the perpetrator go scot
free and punishing the victim, no good could have
possibly come out of this injunction. And that is
what exactly happened.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 318:
Narrated Aisha: Sauda (the wife of the Prophet)
81
went out to answer the call of nature AFTER it was

made obligatory (for all the Muslims ladies) to ob-
serve the veil. She was a fat huge lady, and everybody
who knew her before could recognize her. So ‘Umar
bin Al-Khattab saw her and said, “O Sauda! By Allah,
you cannot hide yourself from us, so think of a way
by which you should not be recognized on going out.
Sauda returned while Allah’s Apostle was in my house
taking his supper and a bone covered with meat was
in his hand. She entered and said, “O Allah’s Apostle!
I went out to answer the call of nature and ‘Umar
said to me, so-and-so.” Then Allah inspired him (the
Prophet), and when the state of inspiration was over,
and the bone was still in his hand as he had not put in
down, he said (to Sauda), “You (women) have been
allowed to go out for your needs.
Tell me, dear friends, what kind of a cruel joke is
this. A man harasses a woman going out to answer
the call of nature. Allah punishes the woman by forc-
ing her to wear a veil and even after veiling herself;
she is still harassed. Dr. Naik’s God, as reflected in
the hadith, is incompetent and completely incapable
of correcting the corrupt. Instead, He unjustly pun-
ishes the victim.
82
• Which sane woman in the world would like to

wear a veil on this ground?
• Is this about modesty at all or about defending
an eve-teaser simply because he is a favorite of
God’s favorite Prophet?
• Can letting the eve-teaser culprit go away scot
free help the victim?
• Can punishing the victim reform the culprit?
And if yes, why not apply the same standards
to self ?
As we said, YOU BE THE JUDGE!
Ironically this icon of injustice is draped and aped
mindlessly by Muslim women across the world. Or
perhaps even if they have the mind after getting ill
due to Vitamin D deficiency, still who cares about
half-intelligent women in the fanatic Islamic world?
Ignorance is not always bliss.
Zakir Naik: Six criteria of modesty in the had-
iths
Then Dr. Naik lectures us on the six criteria of mod-
esty as described in the hadiths, one of which is that
a man should not wear a woman’s garment.
83
Agniveer:
This criterion is absolutely shocking to us, and it

could be equally shocking for Dr. Naik too. We are
informed by some Islamic sites that the Prophet re-
ceived revelations when he was in the garment of his
beloved youngest wife. It was for this reason that he
preferred to stay more with her than the other wives.
We would request Dr. Naik to protest against these
sites which highlight this cross-dressing account of
the Prophet as Sahih (Authentic)
She told that the people used to choose: ‘A’isha’s
day to bring their gifts, seeking thereby to please
God’s messenger. She said that God’s messenger’s
wives were in two parties, one including ‘A’isha, Haf-
sa, Safiya, and Sauda, and the other including Umm
Salama and the rest of God’s messenger’s wives.
Umm Salama’s party spoke to her telling her to ask
God’s messenger to say to the people, “If anyone
wishes to make a present to God’s messenger, let him
present it to him wherever he happens to be.” She
did so, and he replied, “Do not annoy me regarding
‘A’isha, for inspiration had not come to me when I
was in any women’s garment but ‘A’isha’s.” They then
called Fatima, sent her to God’s messenger, and she
84
spoke to him, but he replied, “Do you not like what

I like, girlie?” She said, “Certainly,” so he said, “Then
love this woman.” (Bukhari and Muslim.) Mishkat Al
Masabih, Volume II Book XXVI
A similar account is available online says:
He said to her, ‘Do not injure me regarding ‘A’isha.
The revelation does not come to me when I am in the
garment of any woman except ‘A’isha.”
We await Dr. Naik’s future videos which clarify if
cross-dressing is halaal (and modest) or if there’s any
proof that the above hadiths are false. The intention
of presenting this Sahih Hadith is not to embarrass,
but to help the likes of Dr. Naik in appreciating that
it’s naive to be so rigid on dress codes when even the
Prophet was flexible about such things.
Zakir Naik: Hijaab prevents the teasing of
women
He then frivolously gives the example of twin sisters
walking the street and encountering a ruffian. He is
sure (how?) that a ruffian will tease the sister in a mini
skirt and not the other sister in a hijaab.
85
Agniveer:
We have already seen through Sahih hadiths that

despite wearing a veil, the wife of the prophet was
harassed by Umar Al- Kattab. Umar is regarded as
one of the best Muslims, a Sahaba (companion of
the Prophet). If one of the best Muslims can behave
like an eve-teaser against veiled women, a ruffian may
end up harassing both the gals in all probability…
Right?
So the argument that a woman wearing a veil can
be any deterrent is proved wrong from hadiths them-
selves.
Also, Dr. Naik forgets to ponder as to Why are
not men forced to wear the veil? Can’t they have the
charms to distract women the same way women can?
Dr. Naik would do good to learn from the Vedas in
which both men and women are encouraged to wear
non-provocative dresses, and strict punishment is
prescribed for anyone who teases women. The defi-
nition of provocative dress is left to social situations.
Zakir Naik: Quotes the Hindu scriptures
Finally, Dr. Naik quotes the Hindu scriptures to show
that hijaab and cross-dressing are prohibited in Hin-
86
duism too and had Raja Ram Mohan Roy known this
he would not have gone against the purdah (veil, hi-
jaab) system.
Agniveer:
Instead, what we learn from Dr. Naik’s brand of

Islam is a shocking account of how unjust is the prac-
tice of forcing women to wear a veil. If Raja Ram
Mohan Roy would have known this and if the home
minister of India comes to know of it, then they
would’ve sure banned the veil as it has been banned
in France. The reason why this practice was started
is pathetic and grossly unjust. No human being can
condone such injustice just for the sake of literally
following your religion. The societies that don’t re-
form and do not respect women are bound to perish.
21st Century Muslims are against Burqa
Having refuted the more unjust than irrational argu-
ments of Dr. Naik above, we draw your attention to
the sane voices in the Islamic world, who are not na-
ive to follow scriptures literally. They are proud Mus-
lims (and Muslimahs) that live in the 21st century, re-
spect the diversity of cultures and most importantly
understand the harmful effects of such retrograde
practices on health and safety:
87
Ban the burqa? A Canadian Muslim view
Sample this rational article by a Canadian Muslim.

Source: Ban the burqa? A Canadian Muslim view
This person highlights how the burqa is an ill-fit
and a threat to Canadian society and the Muslim
women.
Security: In July this year, an armed man dressed
in a burka robbed the Scotiabank in Mississauga and
made off with an undisclosed amount of cash.
Safety: In October 2007, a Calgary school bus was
involved in a roadside accident in which one girl was
killed. Although no news outlet was willing to report
this, news clips of the driver showed she was wearing
a very restrictive head covering that had almost cer-
tainly compromised her peripheral vision and could
have been the reason she slammed into a truck parked
on the shoulder on a clear day.
Health: New studies in England and Ireland have
found that Muslim women who wear the burka or
niqab (and their breast-fed children) tend to get rick-
ets due to an insufficiency of vitamin D, through lack
of exposure of their skin to sunlight. A study released
by British National Health Service doctors said hijab
88
and burka-wearing women were putting their health

at risk because they do not get enough sunlight, an
alarming number who wear the burka are suffering
from bone deficiencies due to lack of vitamin D.
Gender equality: The MCC agrees that the state has
no place in the bedrooms or wardrobes of the coun-
try. However, if the status of any woman in Canada
is affected by what happens in the bedroom or ward-
robe, be it spousal abuse or the forced wearing of at-
tire meant to marginalize girls or women, then we feel
the state must intervene. Society has a role to play to
ensure the human rights of girls and women are not
being compromised behind closed doors.
Girl defies burqa diktat for denim
There’s another dangerous aspect to the veil. That

it is now being forced on women in radicalized pock-
ets even in our own country. To remind you of this
reality here’s a news byte. [Source: “Girl defies burqa
diktat for denim”, published at www.deccanherald.
com/]
Rayana R Khasi is a 23-year-old engineering gradu-
ate preparing for civil services main exams. However,
she has an even tougher task than preparing for the
89
competitive tests, for she has been facing threats from

religious fundamentalists. And the two policemen
posted outside her house at Vidyanagar in Kasargod
show the enormity of the threat. Rayana’s “crime”
was that she began wearing jeans and top instead of
the burqa. “It is not that I am exposing myself. I don’t
do it. But they want me to cover my entire body, in-
cluding the face, with burqa as other Muslim women
do it here, which I don’t want to,’’ the girl told Dec-
can Herald over the phone.
Imagine, this is happening to an educated girl in a
so-called secular democracy! What would be the fate
of the Muslimahs, majority of whom are uneducated
and cannot be as brave as this girl? Well, haven’t we
heard of Muslims being killed or having acid thrown
on their faces for not wearing the veil? It’s barbaric,
retrograde and despicable!
Conclusion
Women are human beings like men (it’s unfortunate
that we have to state this explicitly). Just like men,
their sexuality is only a fraction of who they are. To
reduce them to the status of a sex-object from head
to toe is to deny them their humanity, dignity, and in-
tegrity. The veil is also an insult to men! It presumes
90
that men are sex maniacs who can get aroused by just
looking at a woman’s face! How can a normal Muslim
man accept such an insult upon himself ?
Modesty is to be maintained, of course, but as de-
fined by the society and native culture and as agree-
able to human health, safety, security, dignity and
equality. It must not be dictated or forced through
rigid and unjust religious injunctions, as in Dr. Naik’s
brand of Islam, where the veil is actually a symbol of
a failed strategy to ostensibly protect the victim by
further victimizing her.
Wake up and wake others to stop this inhuman
practice and terrorists in the guise of doctors.
This Chapter is co-authored by Indian Agnostic.
91
CHAPTER 7
RAPE WOMEN, GET HEAVEN
T he greatest ‘women rights’ activist of our

times, Dr. Zakir Naik proudly declares that
Quran is the only scripture on earth to rec-
ommend ‘marry only one.’ And then he declares po-
lygamy as a sure shot way to stop women-exploita-
tion! We will analyze each of his claims one by one
now.
Claim 1: Quran says marry only one
Islam is the only religion and Quran is the only reli-
gious scripture on the face of the earth which says
92
Rape Women, Get Heaven
“marry only one” [Quran 4:3].

If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly
with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two
or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be
able to deal justly [with them], then only one… [Za-
kir Naik takes pause here though the verse continues
further, please wait for 8th comment to know why.]
Agniveer:
• “Marry women of your choice.” Hmm. Haven’t seen

a single verse till now which commands a wom-
an to “marry the man of your choice.” Enjoy the
gender equality in Zakir’s Islam!
• According to Zakir Naik, Quran is the only
book to prescribe- “marry only one.” So what
is the conclusion? Is it that Allah wants strict
monogamy to be practiced, but Muhammad
himself set the wrong example by marrying
9/11/13+ women as per books prescribed by
Zakir Naik?
• Use of wife in plural every time (wives) in
Quran while dealing with the matters of hus-
band-wife relationship/women/duties of man
and woman, haram-halal description, etc. ex-
93
poses the lies of Zakir’s “marry only one” phi-

losophy blatantly!
• Extracting “marry only one” from the above
verse is as foolish as implying “do not slay
idolaters” from the below verse
But when the forbidden months are past, then
fight and slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and
seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them
in every stratagem [of war]; but if they repent, and
establish regular prayers and practice regular charity,
then open the way for them… [Quran 9:5]
• This verse starts with “Marry women of your
choice, Two or three or four” and then it says
“if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly,
then only one.” “Marry only one” of Quran
is actually a suggestion to those men who are
unable to handle multiple wives. So instead of
promoting “marry only one” as a healthy prac-
tice among masses, Quran seems to link it with
one’s impotency and making a monogamous
man believe that he is unable to do justice! Thus
this verse actually provokes one to be polyga-
mous which will be the proof of him being just!
94
Some scholars like Dr. Ghali state that ‘justice’

means being able to manage the larger dependents.
By this logic, if you are wealthy enough, you can mar-
ry as many as you want and produce as many off-
springs you desire. He also suggests that the verse
does not mean ‘marry two, three or four’ but ‘in twos,
threes, and fours,’ implying that at one time, don’t
marry more than four!
Here is a Sahih Hadith which explodes the Taqiyya
(lie) of Zakir Bhai MBBS of “marry only one.”
Sahih Bukhari 7.62.7 Narrated Saìd bin Jubair:
Ibn Àbbas asked me, “Are you married?” I replied,
“No.” He said, “Marry, for the best person of this
(Muslim) nation (i.e., Muhammad) of all other Mus-
lims, had the largest number of wives.” According
to Dr. Ghulam Jelani Barq, in his book Dual Islam,
the Hadith is like this- “The best man amongst my
followers is the one who has the greatest number of
wives.”
So whatever be the case with this Hadith, one thing
is crystal clear that “having the largest number of
wives” has been linked with one’s status to be best/
superior. Moreover, the best Muslim is the one who
95
follows Sunnah (copycat of Muhammad in simple

words) of Muhammad. Thus a monogamous male
has one more reason to feel inferior to polygamous
males that he is not following Sunnah of the prophet.
• Note that the verse [4:3] (refer beginning of sec-
tion Claim 1) starts with a mention of orphans.
How is unjust dealing with orphans related to
marrying women of one’s choice in the verse?
• If someone can’t deal justly with orphan girls,
how can he deal justly with other women?
• This verse [4:3] is contradicted by [4:129] which
says- Ye are never able to be fair and just as between
women, even if it is your ardent desire… In fact, in
the presence of [4:129], [4:3] is automatically
out of the question.
• If [4:3] and [4:129] have to be true at the same
time, the only way out is strict monogamy. If A
can be practiced only when B is fulfilled and B is
impossible to fulfill, it means A should/cannot
be practiced. Please replace A by “polygamy”
and B by “being fair and just” in A-B analogy
and then draw conclusion which is obvious:
That polygamy can’t be practiced without being
96
unjust and thus without violating Quran [4:129].

“or [a captive] that your right hands possess, that
will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing in-
justice.” [this is the remaining part of [4:3] which Za-
kir chose not to quote deliberately]
Right-hand possesses means slave-girls with whom
you have full rights to have sex without restriction of
numbers and consent.
So Zakir’s Quran is clear! If you want to have more
than one woman, but can’t marry twice or thrice or
even once because you can’t do justice, then no prob-
lem. Have innumerable captive women in your house
and rape them whenever you wish. And don’t need to
bother about being just to them because they, being
slaves, don’t deserve to be treated justly! So we see
Islamic method of preventing injustice to a woman
is hidden in forcing many other women to be raped!
Now many Muslim scholars claim that sex-slavery
does not amount to rape. As per them, this is a way
to entertain the slave-girls!
Claim 2: Vedas don’t say marry only one
Zakir Naik claims that except Quran no other text
97
supports monogamy. While we have proved in the

previous section that monogamy of Quran is only
an exception for the less potent, and hence, greatest
insult to women rights; we shall showcase how Vedas
very clearly recommend only monogamy as the way
for the sensible ones.
Analysis of Vedas on polygamy and monogamy:
All the Mantras related to the husband-wife rela-

tionship in entire Vedas appear in “Dwivachan”- dual
numbers and this alone establishes that monogamy
is omnipresent in entire Vedas. Please note that San-
skrit has a dual number apart from singular and plural
which is exclusively used for TWO persons, not for
more than two or less than two. This number TWO
wipes out any possibility of polygamy/polyandry
completely in Vedas.
In Atharva Veda 7.35.4 both husband and wife
state that, “You establish me in your heart so that our
minds become one and same.”
In Atharva Veda 7.38.4, wife says that “You should
only be mine. You should not even discuss other
women.”
Rig Veda 10.101.11 states that a man with two wives
98
is pressed from both sides and weeps like a horse that

neighs when pressed from both sides by spokes while
driving a chariot.
Rig Veda 10.101.11 state that two wives make life
aimless.
Atharva Veda 3.18.2 prays that may a woman never
face the threat of another co-wife.
Claim 3: Dashrath and Shri Krishna had many
wives
In Ramayan, Dashrath had three wives, Shri Krishna
as per Mahabharat had 16108 wives, Bollywood star
Dharmendra has two wives then why can’t we Mus-
lims have four?
Agniveer:
• Nice try Zakir Bhai! But why only Dashrath?

Try Ravan next time which will help you claim
that in Ramayan when Ravan could abduct Mata
Sita, why can’t We Muslims abduct women of
infidels?
• Don’t you understand the difference between
a book of knowledge and a book of history?
Ramayan and Mahabharat are historical texts,
99
and Vedas are texts of knowledge. So Ramayan

and Mahabharat stories are to be judged based
on Vedic morality and then accepted or rejected
accordingly.
• Have you forgotten your own idiom- “don’t
judge a car by its driver”? Why judging Hin-
duism on the basis of Dashrath or Shri Krishna
or Dharmendra when you accept that Vedas are
the foremost authority in Hinduism? What if
we start judging Islam from the deeds of Mus-
lims like Aisha or Ayatollah Khomeini or Ka-
trina Kaif or Zeenat Aman instead of Quran
and Ahadith?
• Dashrath is no role model or prophet for us
in whose acts we have to believe blindly as is
the case with you who has to believe divinity in
Muhammad.
We very clearly assert that whosoever married
more than once was against Vedas in this aspect of
life. It does not matter whom you name. But will Za-
kir Naik be bold enough to assert that if a Prophet
married more than once, or a scripture suggests po-
lygamy, then they are wrong?
100
• I liked your desperate innocence hidden in your

words “why can’t we Muslims have four”! But I pray
to Allah not to give such innocence to Hindus,
who could then be ready to attack Muslim na-
tions with the logic that when Muslims could
invade our land, kill our ancestors, convert-
ed them forcefully, rape the women, loot the
temple, desecrate our idols, why can’t we attack
Kaba or Arab?
• We have the courage to reject the deeds/stories
written in any of the book no matter whosoev-
er is claimed to have done/written that, do you
have same courage? After knowing that accord-
ing to Sahih Hadith and Quran cited by you,
the prophet married and played with a 6-year-
old baby, had sex with 9-year old, married more
than ten times, kept sex slaves which in the civ-
ilized world is equivalent to rape, do you reject
the SAHIH Hadith and Verses of Quran relat-
ed to sex slavery, pedophilia, and rape? Schol-
ars like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Dr Ghulam
Jilani rejected and faced tremendous threats to
life.
101
Claim 4: Jewish scriptures and Bible permit po-

lygamy
Jewish scriptures and Christian Bible give permission
to marry as many times as you wish. Abraham had
three wives; Solomon had 700 wives.
Agniveer:
• The scriptures of Jews and Christians which

Zakir Naik is complaining about not putting a
restriction on a number of wives were sent by
SAME ALLAH who sent Quran! Was it wrong
earlier or now?
• If Zakir argues that Allah modifies His word
because of evolution of human mind, and thus
“no restriction” in previous books was accord-
ing to the people of that time and “restriction”
in Quran is correct for now, then why is He try-
ing to establish supremacy of one text on the
other which are not comparable at all? Also,
why does not Allah send a new revelation when
Quranic lifestyle is grossly outdated today and
we live in a digital world?
• Solomon, who had 700 wives, was a messen-
ger of Allah as per Quran! So how giving an
102
example of Solomon’s 700 marriages can help

Zakir Naik prove Islam better than Judaism or
Christianity when Solomon was the prophet
of Islam according to Zakir Naik? [Please note
that as per Zakir Naik, Islam came to the world
at the inception of humans with Adam, and all
the messengers of Allah were prophets of Is-
lam!]
Claim 5: Hindu law and not Hinduism is mo-
nogamy
According to Hindu scriptures you can marry as many
times you wish, it is Indian government which passed
the special law- Hindu special marriage act according
to which Hindu should marry only one.
Agniveer:
Please see section 2 of the chapter to know what

Vedas have to say about polygamy.
• Can we ask how could Indian government pass
the special law for monogamy for Hindus so
easily if Hindus or Hindu scriptures were the
fans of polygamy?
• Can we ask how could not Indian government
103
pass the special law for monogamy for Muslims

till date if Muslims or Muslim scriptures are the
only supporters of the concept of “marry only
one” on the face of the earth?
• Who proposed this law of strict monogamy for
Hindus in India? Hindus themselves! It only
means that Hindus did/do not take the stories
of polygamy in their history books seriously,
and they were/are firm believers of the Vedic
teaching of monogamy by heart. All the great
legends of Hinduism, whom many Hindus
consider to be their role models, were purely
monogamous or Brahmachari- Vishnu, Shan-
kar, Ram, Lakshman, Bharat, Shatrughan, Ha-
numan, and Krishna.
• At the same time, no Muslim has ever proposed
monogamy law for Muslims in spite of the fact
that Muslims are the only believers of “marry
only one” on the face of the earth as per Zakir
Bhai! Strange!
Claim 6: There are more females in the world
than males
Female children are more than the male children.
104
There are more females in the world than males. Thus

polygamy is the only solution.
Agniveer:
• Wrong! No country in the world has more

female children than male children up to the
age of 15 years! For most of the countries, male
to female ratio is greater than one along with
very few where this ratio is equal to 1.
[Reference: Central Intelligence Agency]
• Zakir Bhai is again wrong on the population of
females more than that of males in the world.
Here are the actual figures for world sex ratio
according to which there are more males in the
world than females. [Reference: Central Intelli-
gence Agency]
Sex ratio at birth: 1.07 male(s)/female
Under 15 years: 1.07 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.02 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.79 male(s)/female
Total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2011 est.)
105
This data shows that Zakir Naik is misleading his

semi-literate followers by giving them fake numbers
which they can’t cross check or even analyze in the
absence of basic knowledge of mathematics and sta-
tistics. [Our foremost priority towards helping Mus-
lim Ummah is to convince Mullahs governing Ma-
darsa chains throughout India, to include subjects
like mathematics and statistics in Madarsa curricu-
lum that will help Madrasa graduates discover more
dimensions to explore, which, till now, has been re-
stricted to parroting Arabic literature 24x7 devoid of
any maths or analytical thinking therein.]
Now when it is proven that males are actually more
than the females worldwide, will Zakir Bhai MBBS
recommend polyandry by sticking to the same logic
of numbers?
Interestingly, Zakir’s claim of more women than
men only befits the age group of 65 years and above,
in which no one marries! Perhaps Zakir seems to be
providing a solution to the people who don’t have any
problem in the first place! We advise Zakir to think
about other issues related to Grandmas in their sev-
enties such as their nourishment and caring instead
of marriage!
106
Claim 7: In West, there are more females than

males
In USA, UK, Germany, there are 7.8, 4, 5 million
more females than males respectively. So the only op-
tion for these extra women, who are left unmatched
after the “market is saturated”, is to marry to already
married males or become “public property”.
Agniveer:
Mullah Zakir at his best! He is exposed again in

front of the world that he and his Islam thinks of a
woman as property, when married it is called- Per-
sonal property and when can’t be married it is called-
Public property! Later is better called as a slave or
right-hand possession in the terminologies of Quran
that can be raped, sold, purchased, and beaten any-
time when the master wills as mentioned in Quran
and Hadith of Zakir! Exactly what ISIS does.
Being a non-practicing medical undergraduate, Za-
kir is not aware of statistical techniques required to
infer the useful information from data like the cen-
sus. He is unaware of the fact that demographic data
is analyzed using ratios and not absolute numbers.
That is why we talk of sex ratio.
107
Errors of just 5 to 10% in the census (which is

quite common) can roughly lead to 15 million more
males than females or vice versa for the United States
alone with a total population of around 30 Crore!
Now imagine how wise of Zakir to come up with the
idiotic justification of polygamy because his census
confirms 7 million more females than males in the
US! Only God knows how much error Zakir’s data
has whose source is best known to him alone!
Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Zakir’s
data has been directly sent down by all-knowing God
from the seventh heaven! Now we have, according to
Zakir Naik, 7 million more females than males who
are on the verge of becoming public property! Imag-
ine, just 15% males of America start taking Quran
[4:3] seriously and think that they are capable enough
to give justice to multiple wives! Keeping in mind Al-
lah’s words of [4:3]- “Marry women of your choice,
Two or three or four”, 5% of American males marry
twice, 5% marry thrice and remaining 5% marry four
times. [rest 85% don’t consider themselves capable
of dealing with multiple wives justly and hence are
happy to get one wife]. Let us assume the US to have
a 30 Crore population, of which 14.5 Crore is male
108
and remaining 15.5 Crore is female (I have eased Za-

kir by increasing surplus female population of US
from 7 million to 10 million)!
Now see, 15% of US males (2.175 Crore) have en-
gaged with 42% of US females (6.525 Crore)! So rest
12.325 Crore males of US are left with 8.975 Crore
females leading to 3.35 Million US males turning to
Gigolos or gays in the absence of female counter-
parts!
Perhaps, in that case, God will be forced to send a
new revelation on Zakir Naik which will allow poly-
andry to deal with the situation!
When the result of taking the verse [4:3] seriously
only by 15% of US males can lead to such disaster,
how can such teaching be for whole humanity?
As always, in this claim too, Zakir has lied again by
giving wrong figures from the unknown census. Here
we give the sex ratios corresponding to the age group
15-64 Years which includes all males and females of
marriageable state for the four countries Zakir men-
tioned
In USA: 1 male(s)/female
109
In UK: 1.03 male(s)/female

In Germany: 1.04 male(s)/female
[Reference: Central Intelligence Agency]
Thus, the data used by Zakir Naik was simply cop-
ied from Ahmad Deedat’s speech and is completely
wrong. If these Mullahs had taken facts, logic, and
evidence seriously, how could have Osama ruined the
world sitting in Islamabad!
What solution does Zakir Naik have for the actual
scenario of the world in which we have 70 Million
surplus males than females falling in 15-65 age-group?
Finally, I ask Zakir Naik, if we assume his data is
correct then his logic says that 7 Million women in the
US alone will become public property. Has he heard
of any woman becoming public property because she
could not find a groom till now? If no, why? Is your
data wrong or logic or both?
Claim 8: India has more males because of fe-
male feticide
India has more males because of female feticide and
infanticide, and if this evil practice stops, India too
will have more number of females than males.
110
Agniveer:
• Agreed with the fact that female feticide is to be

stopped at any cost but we don’t agree with Za-
kir’s motivation behind it. He dreams of having
more females so that he can encourage people
to practice polygamy as per Quran! But we be-
lieve that a female has an equal right to exist as
her male counterpart and should come to the
earth to live dignified and prosperous life.
• By the way, India is the land of Kafirs (Dar ul-
Harb), so it may not match Islamic standard
census where women outnumber men hugely!
But I wonder what happens in Islamic countries
actually! Here are the sex ratios for prominent
Islamic countries for age group 15-64 years
Afghanistan: 1.05 male(s)/female
Qatar: 2.44 male(s)/female
Saudi Arab: 1.27 male(s)/female
Bangladesh: 0.89 male(s)/female
Pakistan: 1.09 male(s)/female
Iran: 1.02 male(s)/female
111
Iraq: 1.03 male(s)/female

Indonesia: 1.01 male(s)/female
Kuwait: 1.79 male(s)/female
Except Bangladesh, every prominent Islamic coun-
try has millions of males who will not find partners as
per Zakir’s logic! And Bangladesh has been demand-
ing to become secular instead of Islamic! That is why
Dhaka attacks happened.
How will Quran solve this problem which exists
even in the chosen land of Allah- Arab?
Claim 9: More males die than females in war
More males die in accidents, war, and due to consum-
ing alcohol than females. Thus females are more and
males are less.
Agniveer:
“More females than males” argument is factually

wrong as has been proved above.
Now look at another trick of Zakir Bhai MBBS!
He blames the unfortunate practices like female feti-
cide for the lower number of females in India and he
hopes that this practice stops so that women outnum-
112
ber men and the divine practice of polygamy starts in

India too. But at the same time, he argues that since
many males die due to war, alcohol and accidents, po-
lygamy should be allowed! Now this is heads I win
tails you lose situation for him! He blames one unfor-
tunate practice as unnatural and causing imbalance
whereas makes other unfortunate occurring like war,
accidents, and alcohol as the foundation for practic-
ing polygamy! What if I say that it is because wars, al-
cohol, and accidents that males are less. And if these
don’t occur through prosperity and peace, men will
be more and thus polygamy should not be allowed! If
he prays Allah against female feticide, why does not
he do same for war, alcohol and accident that these
also should never happen? Or does he believe that
it is his religious duty to continue engaging India in
wars and terror-attacks by nurturing Jihadis?
Imagine rule of Islam has been established as per
Zakir Naik’s wish in the whole world. Now there are
no engine vehicles (all advancements of science will
doom as the Kafir inventors of technologies will re-
main no more), only camels and donkeys for transpor-
tation, so no accidents! Islamic rule- no war because
a Muslim can not fight another Muslim as per Quran,
113
and no alcohol because Islam prohibits it. So no acci-

dent, no war, no alcohol, so surplus males stop dying
and thus males will be more than females. What will
be done now? Or is it that alcohol, war, and accidents
are necessary to keep women more than men always
so that the divine practice of polygamy can continue
in an unperturbed manner?
That’s great anyway! Wage war on non-believers
(as mentioned in Quran 9:5 and 9:29), kill all the men,
take away the women as slaves and then argue- since
men are killed in wars, women should be distributed
among other men so that they can find partners! This
is Islamic solution to the problem- first, kill the men
of other women and then like an angel seduce her
with sword in hand - Hey! Marry me as I don’t want
to see you become public property! And if you don’t,
I will behead you for insulting Allah. This is exactly
what ISIS is doing with Yezid women?
Claim 10: In Islam, polygamy protects the mod-
esty of woman
In Islam, the second wife has equal rights as the first
wife. Polygamy is to protect the modesty of woman
not to degrade her.
114
Agniveer:
With this, we agree completely! The second wife

has exactly equal rights as the first wife. She will be
treated as half intelligent just like the first wife. [Please
refer Sahih Bukhari]. She will have all rights to read
Quran and pray to Allah except for the days of her
menses. During that time she will not be allowed to
touch Quran. She will not be allowed to pray to Al-
lah just like the first wife. She will remain wife of the
husband just like the first wife until he calls Talaaq
three times. She will have all rights to welcome the
third wife just as the first wife welcomed her.
I want to add that third wife will also have same
rights as first two. But alas! The fourth wife will not
have enjoyed equal rights. She will not get any oppor-
tunity to welcome the fifth wife because Islam only
allows up to four wives! But wait! All is not lost! The
fourth wife will have the opportunity to welcome
innumerable concubines which her husband’s right
hand possesses. So this way polygamy protects the
modesty of a woman and upgrades her is just like
raping a slave girl upgrades her and stops her becom-
ing public property.
This was our analysis of the glorious and divine
115
practice of polygamy which Allah has assigned only

for those who can deal justly. Though one may ask if
is it trait of noble or a perverted man who is not sat-
isfied with his devoted wife and desires more wom-
en? But as we know, Allah knows the best. We end
this with a Hadith
Sahih Bukhari 5.58.166: Narrated Àisha: I did not
feel jealous of any of the wives of the Prophet as
much as I did of Khadija though I did not see her,
but the Prophet used to mention her very often…
When I sometimes said to him, “(You treat Khad-
ija in such a way) as if there is no woman on earth
except Khadija,” he would say, “Khadija was such−
and−such, and from her, I had children.”
This Hadith is narrated by Aisha, beloved wife of
Muhammad and mother of believers. Now imagine-
the blessed wife of the best man ever born- Muham-
mad used to feel jealous of other wives because of
unequal treatment. Just think, when even prophet
could not deal justly with his multiple wives, how can
you and I expect to do the same?
116
CHAPTER 8
WHY MUSLIMS HATE ZAKIR NAIK SO

MUCH?
Z akir Bhai MBBS aka Dr. Zakir Naik has been

among the most hated public figures of today.
Deoband recently issued a fatwa against him.
There is no doubt that Zakir Bhai is among the most
smartly marketed religious celebrity of last few years.
He claims to represent and propagate Islam. He con-
siders himself a servant of Muhammad (PBUH). Yet
it is the Muslims and Islamic clerics who hate Zakir
Naik the most. In this chapter, we shall briefly list out
117
reasons why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much that

many claim that he would be the first person to enter
Dozakh.
Background – 72 Muslim sects
Let us provide a brief background. Most people con-
sider Islam to be the religion propagated by Prophet
Muhammad and narrated in Quran. On the surface, it
appears all so simple. Quran proclaims that one who
submits to the word of final messenger of Allah shall
achieve Heaven. But things are not so simple for a
layman, and even a scholar. Because while there is
only one Quran and one Prophet Muhammad, there
is tremendous variety in the types of interpretations
that so-called Muslims make out of this book and
this great social- reformer.
In short, Islam is not as monolithic as it appears
to be. The number of sects in Islam is more than 72,
and they are as different from each other as dry is
from wet and cold is from hot. All these sects have
different customs, different levels of tolerances for
non-Muslims, different food habits, different inter-
pretations of Quran, different level of importance
given to Muhammad and his associates and different
descriptions of Heaven and Hell. The Shia-Sunni war
118
Why Muslims Hate Zakir Naik So Much?
is clearly known.
What makes the things even more confusing is
the belief of these more than 72 Sects. Only one is
on the path of truth and hence only one will go to
Heaven. Rest of the sects will go to Hell. Thus, it is
not sufficient to just be a Muslim to achieve Heaven;
you need to follow only the right sect. Now each sect
fights to prove that they are the genuine sect. Some
sects are liberal enough to allow even non-Muslims to
Heaven. Some Muslims are even promoters of vege-
tarianism. Some consider nation ahead of everything
else. But there are some who believe that all except
those who fully believe in their sect and its practices
without questioning anything, alone will go to Heav-
en. Rest of all will be in Hell forever.
Zakir Naik’s Wahabi sect – The most fanatic
Among the most fanatic of these cults is the Wahabi
cult. This is supposed to be the producer of the larg-
est number of terrorists including ISIS, Osama, Al
Qaeda since its inception in the 18th century and has
been a cause of disgrace for rest of the peace-lov-
ing Muslims. Dr. Zakir Naik belongs to this Wahabi
cult, believes that only this Wahabi version of Islam
can bring anyone close to Heaven, and rest of all will
119
go to Hell. And things are not as simple. Further, he

mixes his Wahabism with material from other schol-
ars of different sects to create his own Zakirism that
in the process blatantly insults and disgraces the vi-
sion of Islam as per other sects, including the more
tolerant ones.
Zakir Naik humiliated Wahabis
Zakirism goes to such extent that he does not even
spare Wahabis from humiliations. Zakir Naik claims
to be an expert on comparative religions. In his site,
he has put lots of articles on comparative religions
under his name. But in reality, they are merely a word
to word copy of texts from Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya
sources. So what is wrong if one refers to Qadiyani
or Ahmadiyya sources? Perhaps nothing, except that:
Qadiyanis/ Ahmadiyyas are considered Kafirs and
they are prosecuted by most Muslims for their radical
beliefs.
Wahabis have been greatest enemies of Qadiyanis
The content of the Qadiyani writings that Zakir
Naik has swindled under his own name are blatantly
against core beliefs of rest of the Muslims including
Wahabis.
120
For example, Zakir Bhai MBBS tries to prove that

Vedas prophecize about Muhammad. (This has been
completely refuted in another book by Agniveer)
Now this belief gels with the Qadiyani belief that
Vedas were also revelations. But Wahabis and oth-
er sects refuse to believe so. Hence even Zakir Bhai
MBBS writes in another article that he is not sure if
Vedas are revelations. He conveniently forgets that he
himself has proved that Vedas reveal Muhammad in
another article! (Perhaps because he forgot to read it
before asking his henchmen to copy from Qadiyani
book and paste under his name on his site and in
books.)
In summary, Zakir Bhai continues to use Qadiyani
sources to show his scholarly capabilities but refus-
es to accept Qadiyanis as Muslims because he claims
to be Wahabi and is funded by Wahabi militants. Or
is he a Qadiyani spy in Wahabi disguise? Only Zakir
Bhai knows the reality, but his acts suffice to invite
hatred of Qadiyanis as well as other Muslim sects.
Progressive Muslims hates Zakir Naik
Zakir Bhai justifies non-vegetarianism as a scientific
Islamic trait. While he does acknowledge that even
a Muslim can be vegetarian, he attempts to justify
121
meat-eating on crazy arguments including research

by some farmers. (Agniveer has already busted this lie
in another book). This catches ire of several progres-
sive Muslims, who refuse to believe that meat-eating
has any association with religion. Many progressive
Muslims have even started a Muslim Vegetarian Soci-
ety that is among the most powerful protagonists of
Vegetarianism and opponents of Halal meat. They
have severely condemned Zakir Naik and his spuri-
ous research for disgracing Islam to justify the lust of
his own tongue.
Deoband issued a fatwa against Zakir Naik
Being a Wahabi he has a soft corner for Osama Bin
Laden. When someone questioned him on his views
on Osama, he replied that he admires him because
he has terrorized America! He shied away from criti-
cizing terrorist activities of Osama. This created a lot
of furor among Muslims and Deobandi even issues
a Fatwa against Zakir Bhai for his tacit support for
Osama Bin Laden.
Reasons are obvious -- the money that funds Osa-
ma and money that funds Zakir Bhai have allegedly
the same sources. Many terrorists caught in recent
times involving the ones of Dhaka attacks, Chief
122
of Hyderabad ISIS Module, first Indian ISIS fighter

Areeb Majeed have allegedly accredited Zakir Naik to
be their inspiration.
Devout Muslim hates Zakir Naik for wearing
Kafir dress code
While on the surface, he claims to be a conserva-
tive Muslim; he wears a non-Islamic dress which as
per Islamic hadiths would lead one to be treated as
a non-Muslim during Judgment Day. Many devout
Muslims thus consider their dress very seriously and
hate Dr. Zakir Naik for setting wrong examples by
wearing Kafir dress of tie, suit, and coat. Zakir Naik
teaches fanaticism to others but himself adopts con-
veniences as per his own will.
Sufis and graves worshipers hate Zakir Naik
Wahabis have destroyed many Sufi shrines and the
even house of Prophet Muhammad because they be-
lieve these to be signs of idol worship. They killed
many Muslim men, women, and children in their
campaigns to destroy tombs and holy places. In the
same footsteps, Zakir Naik severely condemns these
practices to be anti-Muslim and hence is hated by
those who worship graves, Sufis and tombs.
123
Shias hate Zakir Naik

Shias obviously have a reason to hate Zakir Bhai
MBBS because of his staunch anti-Shia stance, being
a Wahabi. But his admiration of Yazeed, considered
to be the culprit for the massacre of Prophet’s family
in Karbala has been a strong point of contention for
other Muslims. So much is the hatred against Yazeed
that many people curse by the name of Yazeed. But
Zakir Naik respects Yazeed in same way as Prophet
Muhammad by stating ‘Peace be Upon Him’ after his
name. This PBUH is restricted only for the most re-
vered people in Islam.
Progressive Muslims hates Zakir Naik for his
ultra-fanaticism
Zakir justifies the ban on the worship of other reli-
gions in Muslim countries. He however also justifies
that Muslims should be allowed in other countries to
promote their religion. The logic is curious -- as per
Zakir Bhai, in matters of religion, Muslims are the
best. So they should be allowed everywhere -- Muslim
or non-Muslim countries. But non-Muslims should
not be allowed to build places of worship in Muslim
countries because their religions are inferior to Islam!
Such ultra-fanaticism irks the most progressive
124
Muslims, who want to integrate with rest of the world

and rise above religious dogmas and hatred.
Muslims hate him for being ultra-conservative
Being an ultra-conservative, he propagates that de-
spite a person being as much good or noble, unless
he unconditionally accepts his version of Islam, he
will go to Hell and Hell alone and forever. This goes
against beliefs of more progressive Muslims, who be-
lieve that all who act with genuineness, regardless of
their religion will go to Heaven and not Hell.
Muslim women hate Zakir Naik
Muslim women obviously have all the reasons to hate
Zakir Bhai because in the name of pseudo-science
he is simply restricting their freedom that has been
ordained by the Creator. For example, he states that
Muslim women should always wear Hijab and Bur-
qa and cover their entire body always. Medical re-
searchers are worried that such unreasonable prac-
tices cause dreaded diseases due to lack of Vitamin
D in Muslim countries which enforce such beliefs on
women. More liberal Muslims see such insistence as
dangerous dogma harming the cause of Muslims and
Human Rights.
125
He further states that Muslim women should not

work in offices because they may have a chance to be
alone with men even for a second. The only men that
a woman is allowed to be alone with are her husband
and those who have suckled her. Taking this crazy
dogma of Zakir Bhai further, the Head of Hadith
Department of the most reputed university of Is-
lam in the world recently issued a fatwa that Muslim
women should allow their male colleagues to suckle
their breasts five times. This will allow them to work
with these men, even when alone. Because after this,
they will be like mothers to them!
Zakir Bhai debars women from being any doctor
except gynecologists because that is haram as per
his version of Islam. Women should not take part in
sports as well!
He further defends polygamy by furnishing false
data on population but disallows polyandry.
He justifies the belief that women are less intelli-
gent than men, and hence evidence of two women
equal that of one man!
He thus also justifies that women cannot inherit
equally to their male counterparts!
126
No wonder, he agrees to the dogma that to prove

rape, a woman should bring an ample number of wit-
nesses who have witnessed actual penetration!
Wahabis calls Zakir Naik a Shaitan
The list of people who hate Zakir Naik can go on
and on. So much that now even Wahabis have started
calling Zakir Bhai a Shaitan.
Other sects who do not receive as much funding as
Osama or Zakir Naik try tooth and nail to debunk his
fraud through all means.
They are even more upset by the fact that Zakir
Naik does not even know how to read Arabic and
merely imitates Ahmed Deedat, another preacher
considered deviant by many scholars.
Conclusion
The process of seeking truth demands process of
elimination. One may not be sure and continue to
debate on which of the 72 or more sects of Islam
would lead one to Heaven, or whether Quran itself is
the authentic Quran and not the new Quran as cre-
ated recently. One may not be sure whether a per-
manent Hell or Heaven or Angels or Genies exist in
127
first place. One may doubt if Muhammad was a great

non-divine social -reformer or actually a Messenger
of Allah’s word. One can debate if Quran deserves
to be the final word of Allah and what should be
its interpretation. Or what new good concept Quran
provides that was not present in previous books.
But one fact is sure. There is not even a scope for
debate - Certain persons should be out-rightly ban-
ished to Hell or hell-like place for the benefit of rest
of the peaceful, civilized society. They include:
• people who dare not condemn terrorists like
Osama Bin Laden. And instead say “Every
Muslim should be a terrorist”. “Every Muslim
must terrorize America.”
• people who consider that all except their sect
will burn in permanent Hell despite how-so-
much good they do in their lives
• people who cannot tolerate others but want
themselves to be tolerated everywhere
• people who believe that women are inferior or
bereft of intelligence
• people who justify inferior rights and curtail-
128
ment of freedom for women

• people who refuse to change their stands de-
spite the presence of factual information prov-
ing the opposite
• people who do not clear their stand and purely
use material prepared by someone else to claim
scholar status for self and yet condemn the
source
Such terrorism sympathizers are a threat to any
civilized society. Progressive and even conservative
Muslims have shown the right way by criticizing Za-
kir Naik so severely. The first and foremost religion
of humans is humanity. The way noble-minded Mus-
lims have shown courage and mettle to condemn the
dangerous frauds of Zakir Naik that are detrimental
to entire humanity is warmly welcomed. Such steps
in right direction pave the way for right direction for
seekers of true knowledge.
129
ABOUT AGNIVEER
Agniveer was founded by Shri Sanjeev Newar, an
IIT-IIM professional, data scientist, and Yogi to
provide a solution-oriented, spiritually driven, and
honest approach to improving the world - within and
outside an individual. Agniveer specializes in practical
applications of timeless wisdom of Vedas, Geeta, and
Yoga to address the contemporary challenges of life.
Thousands of testimonials of transformation - from
people who were on verge of committing suicide,
fighting depression, confused about life, direction-
less, unable to address social injustice around - attest
the massive change it has been able to bring.
Agniveer takes credit in bringing several ignored,
uncomfortable but critical issues to public attention.
Agniveer is the leading advocate of social equality in
India and pioneer of ‘Dalit Yajna’ initiative to break
caste and gender barriers. Agniveer spearheaded the
Muslim women rights campaign facing severe backlash
from conservative and fanatic elements. Yet, it was
successful in bringing details of disgusting practices
like Halala, sex-slavery, polygamy, triple talaq and love
jihad to limelight and evolving a consensus against
them. Agniveer women helpline deals with such cases
130
About Agniveer
and has brought many smiles.

Agniveer also introduced the concept of unarmed
combat workshops across sensitive parts of country
to create a skilled team that is able to defend vulnerable
from criminals. Agniveer is a prominent champion of
de-radicalization and has brought innumerable youth
to join the mainstream path. Agniveer’s narrative
on history has created a significant momentum to
question the authenticity of populist history taught
out of political compulsions.
Agniveer has published several books on social
equality, caste equality, gender equality, human rights,
the controversial religious rights and history, apart
from books on self-help, Yoga, Hinduism, and life-
hacks. Readers appreciate the books for straightfor-
ward, original, solution-oriented, practical, fresh, and
mind-bending experience.
Everyone keen to live a meaningful life to fullest is
welcome to join or support Agniveer mission.
To know more about us, kindly visit
Website: www.agniveer.com.
Facebook: www.facebook.com/agniveeragni
131
Youtube: www.youtube.com/agniveer
Twitter: www.twitter.com/agniveer
To join us to be part of Agniveer, please fill our
membership form: www.agniveer.com/member-
ship-form/
To contribute to Agniveer, kindly make payment
through
Payment page: www.agniveer.com/pay
Paypal: give@agniveer.com
To purchase other books from Agniveer, please
visit: www.agniveer.com/books
AGNIVEER
SERVING NATION | PROTECTING DHARMA
132

Every Muslim Is NOT A Terrorist - Digital PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Every Muslim Is NOT A Terrorist - Digital PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Every Muslim Is NOT A Terrorist - Digital PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SANJEEV NEWAR & VASHI SHARMA

All rights reserved. This publication may not be

For information contact

SANJEEV NEWAR & VASHI SHARMA

First Edition: July 2016

on de-radicalisation. He is an eloquent author, poet,

They quote verbatim from lectures and writings of

• In Muslim rule, non-Muslims must not be al-

In this book, we bring together all those writings

Sanjeev Newar 08 July 2016, New Delhi

THE MENTOR OF TERRORISTS

W e are often asked why we single out Zakir

the greatest threats to humanity today. I would put

is a wrong fact and Muslim invaders of India (from

ma to be among the worst sinners! He would simply

non-Muslims in Muslim countries. He says:

Thus, it is win-win-win for Muslims

the nation to outsiders are punished to death

The moment there is a Muslim majority; Islam

• Do massive conversions at ground level through

• Path 1: Reject radical Islam vocally and adopt

ALL IS FAIR IN RAPE AND TERROR

L isten to any of the Zakir Naik videos or read

shoulders when he lies! At least he should know so if

As per Quran non-Muslims are not innocent

Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of

Because of that, which Cain did, We decreed for the

er than a soul, slain, or for, other than, corruption,

On that account: We ordained for the Children

• This verse is applicable only for people of Isra-

in Sahih International version) explains the context

Allah would forgive anything but not disbelief

Never should a believer kill a believer; but [If it

free a believing slave, and pay compensation to the

If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recom-

Belief in Allah and Muhammad is must

Islam, Quran or Sword is Jehad.

jection to idol worship! And for humans, very tact-

The only Muslims, who are peaceful, are those

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he

were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him)

We got female captives in the war booty, and we

do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no

Zakir’s Prophet says to his followers to verily go

SAHIH MUSLIM CHAPTER 1: REGARDING

Ibn ‘Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi’ inquiring from

peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq

Thus, if any one of us has ever been invited to ac-

Sahih Muslim: Book 19, Number 4321:

It is reported on the authority of Sa’b b. Jaththa-

It is narrated by Sa’b b. Jaththama that he said (to

Sa’b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet

What additional gospel do terrorists need to plant

you are NOT innocent. If you are not a Muslim, you

HATE INDIA, GET HEAVEN

N o one knows why the land of believers of