Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Magnetic Particles Examination
Magnetic Particles Examination
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
1/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
2/29
1. SCOPE
2. APPLICABILITY
3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
4. PRE-REQUIREMENTS
5. PROCEDURE
6. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
7. NON CONFORMITY
8. REPORTS
ATTACHMENTS
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
3/29
1. SCOPE
2. APPLICABILITY
This specification applies to the magnetic particles examination of welded and non-
welded components including sheets, forged and melted sections of ferromagnetic
materials.
3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
4/29
4. PRE-REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Before carrying out the examination, the TECHINT inspector must check that the
personnel that carries out the examination by magnetic particles procedure (MS) as
well as the personnel that issues and signs the relevant acceptance report, is
qualified in compliance with the internal procedure of the supplier and/or of the
same executor of the examination.
4.3 The whole documentation proving the carried out qualification and/or validation or
renewal of certification of personnel shall be available for the TECHINT inspector
that can take note of it.
4.4 The calibration of equipment utilized for MS examination must be certified in order
to prove the correlation between values indicated by instruments and the one really
utilized in examinations.
N.B. The calibration certification is generally valid for one year unless any
event that can affect its reliability has occurred: it is filed by the
supplier and must be shown to TECHINT inspector on his request.
4.5 All materials utilized during the examination must be certified by the relevant
manufacturers.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
5/29
5. PROCEDURE
5.1.1 The magnetic particles examination (MS) shall be carried out in phases and at the
moment indicated in relevant technical control documents such as PFC/PCQ
(Quality Control Plan) (Construction and control activity timetables), drawings
and/or applicable technical specifications.
5.1.3 If the manufacturing cycle includes the execution of a heat treatment (stress
relieving, reheating, etc.) on components to be tested, the MS examination must be
carried out after this phase.
5.2.1 Parts to be examined and per cent extension are defined in relevant PFC/PCQ
and/or technical specification of order. Derogation and integration are allowed as
indicated at item 5.1.2 above.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
6/29
5.2.3 In order to define the extension of examination, the Techint inspector can make use
of the cooperation of GEM responsible personnel, of 3 rd level staff of firm and/or
Techint Design Department.
The definition of parts to be examined and the same extension of the examination
is reported and countersigned for acceptance by parties and/or indicated in
relevant PFC/PCQ.
5.2.4 If reference documents foresee the "spot" magnetic particles examination, involved
zones can be individuated and indicated in test documents.
In absence of a defined and complete indication, the Techint inspector shall choose
sections to be tested making use of the preventive visual examination (item 5.1.5).
5.2.5 Independently from the extent of MS examinations indicated at item 5.2.3 above, the
examination shall be extended beyond foreseen when:
5.2.5.1 The visual examination of welds points out some zones with noticeable irregularities
of bead, with arc pickup and disconnection carried out incorrectly that show the
poor training of welder, the utilization of unfit welding parameters and electrodes or
fuses conserved in a wrong way.
5.2.5.2 The MS examination points out "non acceptable" zones, according to what indicated
under item 6.0. In this case the examination must be extended on both sides of
checked area for an extension at least equal to three times the length of the zone
that was considered "non-acceptable". This zone must meet conformity
requirements. The same concept applies to “spot” examinations of parts having
reduced dimensions, taking into account that, instead of “parts”, examination is
carried out on 3 samples of the same lot chosen by chance by the Techint
inspector.
.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
7/29
5.2.6 In case all above-said conditions are met, all non-acceptable zones shall be treated
in compliance with what indicated at item 7 below.
5.3.1 Generally, MS examinations are carried out directly at the part and/or component
supplier's.
Examinations in different places and times can be necessary when the part and/or
component assembly is not carried out at the Supplier's. In this case the supply
scope shall include operations, modalities of execution and relevant reports of
required tests.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
8/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
9/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
10/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
11/29
Current must be applied for at least ½ second with subsequent pulses. Current
density, expressed in Ampere x mm, is indicated in the table on Att. 2 together with
normally allowed distances of points and thickness of the element to be examined.
During the examination points must be positioned at a distance of 200 mm approx.
Reduced distances are allowed in particular cases, but they cannot be lower than
76 mm; in this case magnetization current shall be reduced in compliance with
pointed out in table of Att. 2. Point distances higher than 200 mm are allowed but,
in this case, the magnetization current must be increased accordingly, while the
tangential magnetic field intensity must be checked by means of instruments
described under item 5.4.4 and an appropriate rechecking (re-coating) of zones
that, adjacent to points, could be “saturated”.
If, in case of a wrong operation and/or incorrect utilization of load point covers,
electric arcs should form between points and element to be examined, involved
surfaces must be ground and MS or LP examinations must be carried out again. As
stated above, the area to be examined must be checked in two phases, so that, as
much as possible, all points positioned on the element are perpendicular one to the
other (Fig. 1, Att. 3).
The indications that can be pointed out more easily are the ones positioned along
the generatrix that joins the current electrodes (Fig. 2 – Att. 3).
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
12/29
The “Lifting Power” check must be carried out by the Supplier's Quality Control
according to what indicated in Att. 4.
The examination sensitivity check and the magnetic field direction in the zone are
to be checked.
As concerns the magnetization direction and the covering of examined areas,
what stated at item 5.4.4 and pointed out in Fig. 2 of Att. 5 applies.
Unlike the point procedure, the indications that can be pointed out more easily are
the ones positioned transversally to the generatrix that joins pole expansions of the
yoke (Fig. 1 Att. 5).
5.4.4.3.1Magnetization procedure
By this procedure, magnetization is obtained making current pass through fixed
coils (made of cables) wound around the element or the length to be examined. In
this way magnetic field parallel to the coil axis is generated.
This is particularly important if the useful length of the coil is more than 10 times
longer than the transverse length of the element.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
13/29
35,000
a) RATIO L/D 4, Ampere turns = (L/D) 2
L 45,000
b) RATIO 2 < 4, Ampere turns =
D L/D
c) In case dimensions and/or geometric shape do not permit the apply above-
said formulas, the adequacy of the magnetic field must be defined
experimentally by means of indicators indicated at item 5.4.4 and in
Attachment 2.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
14/29
No use can be made of equipment the calibration of which has already expired or
that the TECHINT inspector considers not to be appropriate.
a) Dry powders: when making use of dry powders, their color must ensure a
suitable contrast with the surface to be examined. No examination with dry
powder can be carried out if the temperature of the surface to be examined
exceeds 316°C.
b) Wet powders: when making use of wet powders, their color must ensure a
suitable contrast with the surface to be examined and the concentration of
magnetic particles in the suspension must be checked with frequency. The
optimal concentration is:
- 1.2 to 2.4 cm³ of magnetic particles every 100 cm³ of solution for
colored powders.
- 0.1 to 0.5 cm³ every 100 cm³ of solution, for fluorescent pastes.
The check of concentration can be carried out making 100 cm³ of solution
settle in special calibrated test tubes and reading the quantity of settled
powder. The time necessary for the settling depends on the kind of utilized
powder.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
15/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
16/29
The formation of indications must be already observed during the application and
the removal of the exceeding powder.
Slight interruptions in magnetization current passage (operating on switch
positioned on point) can increase particle mobility in particular when making use of
direct current, for powder can be better oriented on the indication.
All what stated above for the electric point examination, applies also to other
procedures, the only difference consisting in the utilization of magnetomotive power
instead of magnetized current.
Similar considerations can be made for the utilization of powder in liquid
suspension, with relevant limitations.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
17/29
5.4.6.3 Some of the pros and cons of both dry and wet magnetic detection procedures are
listed in the following table:
PROS CONS
- It permits to detect sub-surface - Less sensitive than wet powder
defects easily procedure when detecting small
- Its application is easier on defects
elements having wide surface - More difficult application on
making use of movable elements with irregular
equipment geometry
- It allows a good mobility of - It is slower than wet powder
magnetic particles procedure
- It can be utilized on elements - Its automatic execution is more
with temperatures up to 316°C. difficult.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
18/29
PROS CONS
- It is the most sensitive procedure - It does not detect sub-surface
for the detection of surface discontinuities
defects - It is flammable if the vector
- It can be applied easily on large liquid is kerosene
elements with irregular shape - In case of solutions created
- The mobility of particles is good automatically a suspension
(yet lower than dry powder one) circulating and stirring circuit
- Its automatic execution is easy. must be installed
- The suspension concentration
must be checked frequently
- It can be utilized only if
temperature does not exceed
57°C
5.4.8 Demagnetization
Usually demagnetization is not carried out, unless otherwise required in contract
documents and/or applicable Standards.
In particular, when the element must undergo a heat treatment above AC2
temperature (760°C approx.) after MS examination, demagnetization is
superfluous.
Anyway, every time residual magnetism can affect subsequent mechanical working
and welding, demagnetization shall be carried out by the Supplier even if it is not
foreseen in the relevant Standards and/or explicitly required by the TECHINT
inspector.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
19/29
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
20/29
As concerns the examination of edges prepared for welding and of welding joints, if
not otherwise required, the TECHINT inspector can follow what indicated in
relevant Standard UNI 7704 “General procedures for the magnetic particles
examination of welding joints”.
In this case the sensitivity class to be applied must be chosen according to moment
at which the examination is carried out; and precisely Class L, in case of joint
examination before welding; Class S after welding. For both classes the lower or
higher sensitivity (class L1 or L2 and class S1 or S2, SS) is to be defined according
to the type of possible discontinuity to be detected. The effective help of Supplier's
3rd level personnel can support TECHINT inspector's decisions.
5.4.11 Derogation
No derogation to this specification is allowed if not agreed upon in advance with
the TECHINT inspector.
6) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Acceptance criteria are defined every time and included in the technical
specification of order and/or in examination documents.
In absence of precise indications, they must comply with what required in code
ASME Sect. VIII and indicated below.
Cracks are never allowed.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
21/29
As concerns examination sensitivity classes that can be applied, all what stated at
item 5.4.9 applies.
Thickness
LINEAR ROUNDED Thickness LINEAR ROUNDED
(all values)
NO CRACK
INDICATIONS LINEAR 1 3a
“ ROUNDED 1 3a
MOREOVER:
- 4 OR MORE ROUNDED INDICATIONS THAT ARE ACCEPTABLE BUT ALIGNED AND SEPARATED BY LESS THAN 1.6
MM FROM EDGE TO EDGE
- 10 OR MORE ACCEPTABLE ROUNDED INDICATIONS EVERY 39 CM² (OR 3900 MM²) OF SURFACE HAVING MAXIMUM
DIMENSION = 150 MM.
* INDICATIONS THAT DO NOT EXCEED ABOVE-SAID LIMITS ARE CONSIDERED “NOT IMPORTANT” AND, THEREFORE
ACCEPTABLE (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CRACKS).
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
22/29
7) NON CONFORMITY
The term "Non conformity" (N.C.) means the failed meeting of specified
requirements (UNI-ISO 8402).
Note
N.C. must be reported making use of the specific form.
8. REPORTS
8.1 At the completion of MS examination the manufacturer will get the attached
examination report (or similar form to be agreed with TECHINT) drawn up by the 2 nd
level operator. In addition to examination interpretations, the report must include at
least the following data:
- Stamp and official name of the Supplier
- Name and individuation of the operator that carried out the examination, if
different from the Supplier
- Number and revision of scale sketch drawn up for the examination, complete
with data necessary for permitting the localization and correlation with the tested
length (to be attached to the MS examination report).
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
23/29
8.2 This report must be handed over to the TECHINT inspector together with the
mapping of examined zones. The report issued by the Supplier shall be
countersigned by the TECHINT inspector if he could check all what stated and
agrees upon it.
In case of repair of particular importance, a special report must be drawn up, in
compliance with specification TPXITQUA013 about utilized procedure and
achieved results.
Both procedure agreed upon for execution of repairs and qualification of
procedures, as well as operators' qualification must be certified.
8.4 In case the testing operator (or the supplier) has his own form, TECHINT reserves
the right to examine it for the relevant approval and possible utilization in place of
its own form.
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
24/29
1. APPLICATION PROCEDURE
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
25/29
Note: Combinations of various procedures are not only allowed but suggested,
especially as concerns item 3.Other procedures, such as passing rod, direct
electric contact by current heads, can be taken into consideration.
ATTACHMENT 1
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
26/29
Fig. 1
DISTANCE BETWEEN POINTS MUST NOT EXCEED 203 mm (8’’). LOWER DISTANCES CAN BE UTILIZED
ACCORDING TO THE ELEMENT GEOMETRY OR THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA TO BE EXAMINED OR
IN ORDER TO INCREASE SENSITIVITY; DISTANCES LOWER THAN 76mm (3’’) CANNOT BE ALLOWED
OWING TO PARTICLES THAT CUMULATE AROUND POINTS.
ALL CONTACT SURFACES OF POINTS MUST BE KEPT CLEAN AND POINTS MUST BE KEPT PRESSED
AGAINST THE SURFACE, THAT MUST BE CLEAN TOO, AS REQUIRED, IN ORDER TO AVOID THE
CREATION OF ELECTRIC ARCS. IN CASE OF ELECTRIC CIRCUITS WITH VOLTAGE HIGHER THAN 25 V
WE RECOMMEND TO MAKE USE OF POINT COVERINGS MADE OF LEAD OR ALUMINUM, IN ORDER TO
AVOID ANY POLLUTION OF THE MATERIAL TO BE EXAMINED IN CASE OF ARCS.
MAGNETIZATION CURRENT
DIRECT RECTIFIED CURRENT WITH A MINIMUM VALUE OF 100 AND A MAXIMUM VALUE OF 125 A FOR
EVERY 25 mm (1’’) OF DISTANCE BETWEEN POINTS MUST BE UTILIZED FOR LENGTHS HAVING
THICKNESS OF 19 mm (3/4’’) OR MORE.
FOR THICKNESS VALUES LOWER THAN 19 mm (3/4’’) CURRENT TO BE USED VARIES FROM 90 TO 110 A
FOR EVERY 25 mm (1’’) OF DISTANCE BETWEEN POINTS.
ATTACHMENT 2
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
27/29
ATTACHMENT 3
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
28/29
Fig. 1
YOKES
ATTACHMENT 4
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc
TPX ITQUA 028
QUALITY SYSTEM
Comm U.F. Ente Forno Tipo N. Rev.
00
Titolo/Title:
Pag./
Page
MAGNETIC PARTICLES EXAMINATION
29/29
ATTACHMENT 5
File:/conversion/tmp/scratch/433569800.doc