Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 4 Palvi Final
Experiment 4 Palvi Final
Experiment 4 Palvi Final
EXPERIMENT 4
ID: S11144724
ID: S11144458
Chromium is aBtransition element and ions of theseNelements in aqueous solution for complexNions. The chro
mium salt is surroundedNby two bidenate oxalateNligands and two-monodenate waterNligands. The methods
that arM used in
thisNexperimentare grinding, evaporation, decanting, centrifuging, boiling (steam bath), filtration andNlastly sp
ectroscopy. The purpose of thisNexperiment is to prepare many complexesNthat are forms between oxalate
andMchromium (III), and examiningBsome of the properties and determiningNthe purity of the sample
prepared.
EXPERIMENTAL:
Apparatus used:
Burette dropper
Spatula
PROCEDURE:
To a solution of 4.5g of oxalic acid dehydrate in 10ml of warm distilled water, portion of 1.5g of potassium
dichromate was added. The resulting solution was heated to boiling with addition of 1.8g of potassium oxalate
with constant stirring when the vigorous solution was subsided. The solution was cooled to room temperature,
added 2ml of ethanol, and continued cooling (using ice-bath) until the blue-green crystals was separated from
the black solution. The product was collected into a filter paper (using suction), washed with 5ml of 1:1 mixture
of ethanol and water and finally with 5ml of pure ethanol. The product was dried on a filter paper and the
percentage yield was calculated.
RESULTS:
PART 1:
= 0.5202 g
= 1.5 g
294.10 g/mol
= 0.0051 mol
N ( H2C2O4.2H2O) = m/Mr
= 4.5 g
126 g/mol
= 0.0357 g/mol
N ( K2C2O4.H2O) = m/Mr
= 1.8 g
184 g/mol
= 0.0098 g/mol
Equation 1:
Mole ratio
1 : 1 : 2
0.0051 : 0.0357 : 0.0098
0.0051 mol : x
M = n x Mr
= 6.91 g
Theoretical yield
= 0.5202 g x 100
6.91 g
= 7.54 %
DISCUSSION:
The percentage yield of the product is low which was 7.54% because the experiment may have contained some
impurities, may have been evaporated during the process when kept outside and also some of the chemicals
might have been wasted while transferring from one place to another. The experiment contained some errors
such as weighing errors and measuring instruments.
ANALYSIS:
PROCEDURE:
2.0g of the sample was weighed accurately into a 250ml conical flask. 50ml of water was added followed
by 3ml of Conc. H2 SO4. 1.5g of solid KBrO3 was added and boiled for 10 minutes. 5.0g of ammonium
sulphate was dissolved in the minimum volume of hot water and added to the hot reaction solution. The
whole solution was boiled for 30-40 minutes until all the excess of Br2 was been volatilized. Now 10ml of
1M HCI solution was added and boiled again until starch-iodine paper was not stained when held in the
stream. The liquid was cooled, 10ml of conc. HCI was added and 1.0g of solid KI. Titrated the liberated
iodine with the standard thiosulphate solution providing to the first light green color.
RESULTS:
Titre = 18.50 mL
Equation 2:
2MnO4-(aq) + 5C2O42-(aq) 26H+ → 2Mn2+ + 8H2O (aq) + 10CO2 (aq)
Moles of Oxalate (C2O42-)
Mole Ratio Mass of Oxalate
2MnO4-(aq) : 5C2O42-(aq) M = n/Mr
2 : 5 =0.74mol/88.02g.mol
0.296 : X =0.0084g
1.48 : 2x
2x 2x
X = 0.74
DISCUSSION:
The results obtained from the two results had few difference in the average volume for both oxalate and
chromium ions. They did not have much difference in the titre values. There were some of the errors made
while the experiment was carried out which might have affected the product as well. Such as misreading
volumes which might affect the final result. However the percentage of the final product was very low.
1. Oxalic acidNsolution is heated before titrationNwith KMnO4 solution because this reactionNhappens
only in certain temperature. If not heated the Light pinkNtitrated solution turns brown soon
andNreaction takes longer time. All reactionsBrequire activation energy and the correctBorientation. If
you do not heat the mixture, the reactants won't haveBenough activation energy (in a short time) to start
theNreaction even they are in the correctBorientation. However, if you heat, the heat energyNgained by
particles convert it to kineticNenergy, so they move withNhigher speed. This results in
higherNfrequency of collision among theNparticles, so, increased frequency ofNeffective collision.
Thus, rate of reaction increasesNand you will be able to obtain yourMresults in a shorterNtime.
2. The green precipitate that formed was oxalate.
CONCLUSION:
It can be concluded, that after doing the experiment it can be said that the percentage yield differs hence the
percentage purity always differs because there might have been some of the impurities held during the
experiment and also errors were being made thus, the purity percentage might be very low in a sense it had lot
of impurities in the oxalate percentage of purity.
REFERENCE: