Alfred Adler's theory proposes that people feel innate inferiority that drives them to strive for superiority. However, the document disagrees, arguing that not all who strive experienced inferiority. For example, a child may strive to be better than their sibling after being compared by their mother, feeling a challenge rather than inferiority. The document also agrees with Adler's concepts of fictional finalism and that personality is shaped by one's free will rather than childhood experiences alone. It notes Adler's concept of social interest is valid, as people need social environments and cooperation to attain personal and social goals.
Alfred Adler's theory proposes that people feel innate inferiority that drives them to strive for superiority. However, the document disagrees, arguing that not all who strive experienced inferiority. For example, a child may strive to be better than their sibling after being compared by their mother, feeling a challenge rather than inferiority. The document also agrees with Adler's concepts of fictional finalism and that personality is shaped by one's free will rather than childhood experiences alone. It notes Adler's concept of social interest is valid, as people need social environments and cooperation to attain personal and social goals.
Alfred Adler's theory proposes that people feel innate inferiority that drives them to strive for superiority. However, the document disagrees, arguing that not all who strive experienced inferiority. For example, a child may strive to be better than their sibling after being compared by their mother, feeling a challenge rather than inferiority. The document also agrees with Adler's concepts of fictional finalism and that personality is shaped by one's free will rather than childhood experiences alone. It notes Adler's concept of social interest is valid, as people need social environments and cooperation to attain personal and social goals.
Alfred Adler’s theory of individuality, our feelings of inferiority it is our
innate drive that makes us compensate for our physical inferiorities. But I disagree on this because not everyone who strives for superiority , actually experience a feelings of inferiority , say for instance in your home, if your mother compared you to your sister and said that “You should be more like your sister”, you will actually feel a drive to strive for superiority. The difference is there is no feelings of inferiority present, you strive you superiority because you felt a challenge to be more than what you are sister could be so that you’re mother wont compare you to her again. I also agree with the concept of fictional finalism because we do set our ultimate goals In life that we follow and that motivates us to strive more until we reach that final goal. I also agree that our lifestyle is a pattern of behaviours that we do consistently. I also agree that our personality is created by our selves, that our free will is what enables us to shape our personality and behaviours, while as to Freud our personality and behaviour is shaped from our childhood and also depending on how our parents interact with us in our childhood. However the concept of creative power is merely a fiction and cannot be scientifically studied. Due to the lack of operational definitions, individual psychology is rated low on internal consistency. I also agree with his concept of social interest that we all have an innate potential to cooperate with other members of the society in order for us to attain our goals whether personal or societal, because according to John Donne, “No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent”. Also in keeping with his holism, it is easy to see that anyone “striving for perfection” can hardly do so without considering his or her social environment. As social animals, we simply don’t exist, much less thrive, without others, and even the most resolute people-hater forms that hatred in a social context, this is according to Dr. C. George Boeree. John Carlo H. Amolato Ab-psychology