Derridaist reading in the works of

Koons
Wilhelm V. Humphrey

Department of Politics, University of Western

Topeka

1. Derridaist reading and pretextual capitalist theory

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of

neodialectic consciousness. But the capitalist paradigm of reality states that
truth is fundamentally impossible. The subject is interpolated into a
Derridaist reading that includes narrativity as a whole.

Thus, Bataille uses the term ‘subcultural structural theory’ to denote not
theory, as Derridaist reading suggests, but posttheory. Several constructivisms
concerning subtextual discourse may be found.

Therefore, the premise of conceptualist narrative implies that society has

objective value, given that language is interchangeable with art. A number of
narratives concerning the difference between consciousness and sexual identity
exist.

But the genre, and therefore the defining characteristic, of the capitalist
paradigm of consensus intrinsic to Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow emerges
again in Mason & Dixon. Marx uses the term ‘conceptualist narrative’ to
denote the role of the participant as reader.

2. Contexts of genre

“Society is part of the defining characteristic of truth,” says Sontag.

However, if Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, the works of Pynchon
are reminiscent of Spelling. Baudrillard’s analysis of Derridaist reading holds
that the State is intrinsically dead.
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between
masculine and feminine. Therefore, several deconstructions concerning
conceptualist narrative may be discovered. The premise of Derridaist reading
suggests that reality is used to marginalize minorities.

“Sexual identity is responsible for hierarchy,” says Marx. In a sense, any

number of discourses concerning a poststructuralist totality exist. Sontag
promotes the use of the dialectic paradigm of discourse to attack society.

If one examines Derridaist reading, one is faced with a choice: either

reject conceptualist narrative or conclude that narrativity is capable of
truth. Thus, Derridaist reading implies that sexual identity, paradoxically,
has intrinsic meaning, given that Debord’s critique of pretextual capitalist
theory is valid. Scuglia[1] states that we have to choose
between Derridaist reading and neotextual capitalist theory.

The primary theme of Tilton’s[2] essay on conceptualist

narrative is not, in fact, theory, but pretheory. But several materialisms
concerning neomodernist theory may be found. Debord uses the term ‘pretextual
capitalist theory’ to denote the common ground between society and sexual
identity.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a cultural paradigm of context

that includes truth as a whole. If conceptualist narrative holds, we have to
choose between Derridaist reading and subconceptual sublimation.

In a sense, Sartre suggests the use of dialectic Marxism to challenge the

status quo. The premise of Derridaist reading implies that narrativity may be
used to reinforce class divisions.

But McElwaine[3] states that we have to choose between

pretextual capitalist theory and posttextual theory. The feminine/masculine
distinction prevalent in Gaiman’s The Books of Magic is also evident in
Death: The Time of Your Life, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

However, Derridaist reading holds that sexuality has objective value. A

number of dematerialisms concerning not discourse, as Debord would have it, but
prediscourse exist.

But if conceptualist narrative holds, we have to choose between pretextual

capitalist theory and conceptual nihilism. Von Ludwig[4]
states that the works of Gaiman are modernistic.
In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a Derridaist reading that
includes consciousness as a paradox. The main theme of the works of Gaiman is
the difference between class and sexual identity.

Thus, Foucault uses the term ‘subcultural rationalism’ to denote not

desublimation, but neodesublimation. The characteristic theme of Hanfkopf’s[5]model
of pretextual capitalist theory is the role of the
observer as participant.

3. Gaiman and conceptualist narrative

“Society is fundamentally elitist,” says Lyotard. Therefore, the subject is

contextualised into a postdialectic cultural theory that includes narrativity
as a whole. Foucault’s analysis of Derridaist reading holds that the
establishment is capable of significance.

If one examines conceptualist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

accept pretextual capitalist theory or conclude that the purpose of the reader
is significant form, but only if truth is equal to language. But an abundance
of appropriations concerning Derridaist reading may be discovered. The main
theme of the works of Gaiman is not theory, but pretheory.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of

neocapitalist narrativity. However, if conceptualist narrative holds, we have
to choose between constructive discourse and the subdialectic paradigm of
consensus. A number of narratives concerning the common ground between sexual
identity and class exist.

It could be said that the characteristic theme of Dahmus’s[6] essay on conceptualist

narrative is the role of the poet as
artist. Bataille uses the term ‘pretextual capitalist theory’ to denote a
self-supporting totality.

However, conceptualist narrative suggests that language is part of the

dialectic of narrativity. Bailey[7] states that we have to
choose between pretextual capitalist theory and postmaterialist nihilism.

Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a Derridaist reading that

includes culture as a reality. The example of pretextual capitalist theory
intrinsic to Gaiman’s The Books of Magic emerges again in Death: The
Time of Your Life.
It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a constructive
paradigm of narrative that includes narrativity as a totality. An abundance of
theories concerning conceptualist narrative may be found.

1. Scuglia, W. C. P. (1983) The

Genre of Class: Conceptualist narrative and Derridaist reading. Harvard
University Press

2. Tilton, T. A. ed. (1974) Derridaist reading in the

works of Gaiman. Schlangekraft

3. McElwaine, Y. (1998) Deconstructing Socialist realism:

Derridaist reading and conceptualist narrative. University of Southern
North Dakota at Hoople Press

4. von Ludwig, J. I. ed. (1973) Conceptualist narrative

and Derridaist reading. Yale University Press

5. Hanfkopf, L. (1992) Expressions of Paradigm: Derridaist

reading and conceptualist narrative. Schlangekraft

6. Dahmus, T. C. P. ed. (1984) Conceptualist narrative and

Derridaist reading. University of Massachusetts Press

7. Bailey, S. G. (1999) The Fatal flaw of Society:

Conceptualist narrative in the works of Gaiman. University of Southern
North Dakota at Hoople Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by
the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a
bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada
Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified
very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 21,389,696 essays since 25/Feb/2000
18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of

Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and
Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU
Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a
cultural criticism publication.

Attribution note – this was created using the Postmodern Jukebox Postmodernism Generator.