This document compares three potential routes by calculating the total resistant length (Xo) and total elevation change (Σy) for each route. Route 1 has a total resistant length of 6893.51 meters and total elevation change of 162.37 meters. Route 2 has shorter total resistant length of 6383.05 meters and elevation change of 145 meters. Route 3 is not a viable option as it has no distance or elevation change recorded. The document evaluates each potential route option using resistant length and elevation change metrics to determine the optimal route.
This document compares three potential routes by calculating the total resistant length (Xo) and total elevation change (Σy) for each route. Route 1 has a total resistant length of 6893.51 meters and total elevation change of 162.37 meters. Route 2 has shorter total resistant length of 6383.05 meters and elevation change of 145 meters. Route 3 is not a viable option as it has no distance or elevation change recorded. The document evaluates each potential route option using resistant length and elevation change metrics to determine the optimal route.
This document compares three potential routes by calculating the total resistant length (Xo) and total elevation change (Σy) for each route. Route 1 has a total resistant length of 6893.51 meters and total elevation change of 162.37 meters. Route 2 has shorter total resistant length of 6383.05 meters and elevation change of 145 meters. Route 3 is not a viable option as it has no distance or elevation change recorded. The document evaluates each potential route option using resistant length and elevation change metrics to determine the optimal route.