Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Use Less: Model MS The Part, Be Our 3 Schedule. We Parts Will Be
Use Less: Model MS The Part, Be Our 3 Schedule. We Parts Will Be
A 25-year-old male presented for replacement of a was also noted that the back of his hand was erythe-
cranial bone flap, following full recovery from a head matous with a wheal along the line of the vein which
injury several months previously. He was a well- was typical of drug-induced histamine release. His
controlled epileptic on phenytoin (100 mg tds) and cardiovascular system had remained stable with no
was otherwise fit and well. He had no previous history hypotension.
of asthma, was not atopic and was a non-smoker. The question arises as to which of the drugs had
He was unpremedicated and a 21G butterfly needle caused the release of histamine. since thiopentone,
was inserted into a vein in the back of his hand. lignocaine and atracurium have all been reported to
Induction was with thiopentone (7 mg/kg) followed do so.
by atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). His lungs were then hyper- Therefore while the patient was still anaesthetised,
ventilated for 2 minutes with nitrous oxide and oxygen, skin tests were performed on these drugs. Aliquots
during which time his vocal cords and trachea were of 0.1 ml atracurium (0.1 mg), thiopentone (2.5 mg)
sprayed with 5 ml of 4% lignocaine. A 9.0 nun latex and lignocaine (0.1 mg) were each injected intra-
reinforced tracheal tube was then introduced. dermally into the forearm skin, together with 0.1 ml
It was immediately apparent that there was broncho- gallamine (4 mg), tubocurarine (1 mg) and a control
spasm with bilateral wheezes, which resolved after 5 of normal saline. Within five minutes the atracurium
minutes with the introduction of 0.5% halothane. It had produced a 2 cm wheal with a 6 cm flare, which
5 12 Correspondence
was still visible 45 minutes later. There was no reaction mention is made of bronchospasm.
to any of the other d r u g indicating that the patient Atracurium has advantages over existing muscle
was specifically hypersensitive to atracurium. There relaxants, Hoffman degradation and non-accumula-
was no cross sensitivity with the other muscle relaxants, tive properties and may well become increasingly
gallamine and tubocurarine, both of which are known popular. However, in susceptible patients, is it possible
to retease histamine readily. This result suggests that that bronchospasm may prove to be a problem?
the bronchospasm may also have been due to
atracurium. Department of Anaeslhesia. J.P. SALE
The data sheet for atracurium reports that hypo- The Royal Free Hospital,
tension due to histamine release may occur, but no Hampstead, London N W3