Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Un Pan 031235
Un Pan 031235
1
INTRODUCTION
2
3.0 THE IMPACT OF MATERIAL AND FINANCIAL RESOURCE
CONSTRAINTS ON SERVICE DELIVERY
3
Every government is mandated to ensure that quality services are
made available to the public. However, because of limited
material and financial resources, quality at times is compromised.
The reason is that the public sector is expected to deliver
regardless of the fact that financial and material resources are
limited. The focus shifts to the number of people who access
goods and services while little attention is paid to quality. The
media are replete with stories about the deterioration of the
quality of services in such critical areas as education, health,
transport and communication. The list is endless.
4
Public goods and services have to be accessible to the public.
However, inadequate financial and material resources have a
negative bearing on the efficiency and effectiveness of the
delivery of goods and service. Most governments have devolved
power to local authorities to ensure that services are accessible to
the populace. However, such decentralised services need to be
supported financially and materially. It is common to find local
authorities referring clients to the central government because
resources have failed to trickle down to them. This usually
happens in situations where financial resources are limited.
5
Effective service delivery demands that services have to be
accepted by the target group. However, in some isolated cases,
services are not accepted by the target group. Due to top down
planning, some Public Services ‘impose’ projects on the citizens
resulting in lack of ownership by the intended beneficiaries. This
may be due to inadequate consultation. Cases of some religious
sects discouraging their members from seeking treatment at
clinics or hospitals are familiar to us. Consequently, clinics and
hospitals built in such areas are under-utilised. Effective service
delivery demands that issues relating to the acceptability of Public
Services should merit higher priority in public service delivery.
6
delivery to the public. Several strategies can be adopted to
mitigate the adverse impact of limited financial and material
resources. These include:-
7
evaluation should not be treated as an after-thought, but as part
and parcel of project planning.
8
4.5 Improvement of conditions of service
9
4.7 Information Technology (IT)
4.8 Networking
5.0 CONCLUSION
10
environments. These include, encouraging the participation of
non- state actors, continuous and constant review of conditions of
service of public servants among other things. It cannot be over-
emphasized that Public Services cannot abrogate their role of
ensuring effective service delivery because of inadequate financial
and material resources. Ways and means have to be continuously
sought and implemented to ensure that service delivery is not
interrupted.
11