Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cinematica Mecanismelor Plane - 20.07.2017
Cinematica Mecanismelor Plane - 20.07.2017
Cinematica Mecanismelor Plane - 20.07.2017
a) b) c) d)
e) f) g)
Fig. 3. Dyads
In Fig. 4 there are shown particular cases of dyads: a) RPR-dyad with one
zero length element; b) PRP-dyad with two zero length elements; c) RPP-dyad with
one zero length element.
a) b) c)
Fig. 4. Particular cases for dyads
In the cases shown in Fig. 5 some of the revolute pairs may be replaced by
prismatic pairs.
Remarks
For a simplified writing, the following notations are made, taking into account
that the software used below supports only simplified writing:
𝑋𝐵 = 𝑋𝐵; 𝑌𝐵 = 𝑌𝐵
𝑋𝐵̇ = 𝑋𝐵 ′ ; 𝑌𝐵̇ = 𝑌𝐵 ′
𝑋𝐵̈ = 𝑋𝐵 ′′ ; 𝑌𝐵̈ = 𝑌𝐵 ′′
etc.
In mathematical expressions there are also used the notations , ’ = and
’’= , and in the diagrams there are used notations as Fi, Fi' and Fi''.
The driving link shown in Fig. 1 has the position given by the angle ,
measured for counterclockwise rotation with respect to the positive x-axis, the
angular velocity being positive for counterclockwise rotation and negative for
clockwise rotation (shown in the picture), and the angular acceleration ’’ is positive
for counterclockwise rotation (shown in the picture) and negative for clockwise
rotation. The velocity of point B is a vector perpendicular to AB, oriented like ’,
which can be broken down into Cartesian components XB' and YB'. The acceleration
of point B has a certain direction (calculated) and breaks down by the axle system
into Cartesian components XB '' and YB''.
𝑋𝐵 ′ = −𝐴𝐵𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 ∙ 𝜑′
𝑌𝐵 ′ = 𝐴𝐵𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 ∙ 𝜑′
The accelerations are obtained by a new differentiation with respect to time:
Here the acceleration of point B is not zero although ’’=0, since ’’ only
occurs in the tangential component of the point B acceleration; the normal
component will be different from zero because it is equal to ’2 AB.
For a complete rotation of the driving link, there are obtained the velocities
components shown in Fig. 4, and the accelerations components shown in Fig. 5 for a
angular step equal to 20.
Fig. 4. The velocities for a complete rotation
20.
0.0 X B [mm]
Y B [mm]
-20.
-40.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 6. The coordinates of the point B
By comparing this diagram with the one shown in fig. 1 it may be seen that
starting from the x-axis, point B rotates to the left, so the value of XB decreases and
YB increases, then YB decreases, and XB decreases until it pass y-axis when both
values become negative; in Fig. 6 it is shown the further evolution of XB and YB.
This is how the kinematic diagrams are read.
100.
50.
-50.
-100.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 7. The components of the point B velocity
In Fig. 7 it is shown the variation of the velocity components of B, and in Fig. 8
the variation of the components of point B acceleration.
200.
100.
-100.
-200.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 8. The components of the point B acceleration
If the direction of the angular velocity is changed to ’= 2 mm/s, then Fig. 9 and 10
are obtained, and they are different from the ones in the previous case.
This element is shown in Fig. 10. His position is given by the stroke S, so it
follows:
where S' is the velocity and S'' is the acceleration in the translational motion. In this
case, the velocities of the link points are equal, and their accelerations are equal too.
In this case (Fig. 11) the link CBE has known lengths BC and BE and the
angles and , as well as ’ and ’’ are known too. There are written the
expression for positions, which then are differentiated twice with respect to time.
𝑋𝐶 = 𝑋𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼
𝑋𝐸 = 𝑋𝐵 + 𝐵𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛼 + 𝛿)
𝑌𝐸 = 𝑌𝐵 + 𝐵𝐸𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝛼 + 𝛿)
𝑋𝐶 ′ = 𝑋𝐵′ − 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′
𝑌𝐶 ′ = 𝑌𝐵 ′ + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′
𝑋𝐸′ = 𝑋𝐵′ − 𝐵𝐸𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼′
𝑌𝐸 ′ = 𝑌𝐵 ′ + 𝐵𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼′
2
𝑋𝐶 ′′ = 𝑋𝐵 ′′ − 𝐵𝐶 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′ − 𝐵𝐶 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′′
2
𝑌𝐶 ′′ = 𝑌𝐵 ′′ − 𝐵𝐶 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′ + 𝐵𝐶 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′′
2
𝑋𝐸 ′′ = 𝑋𝐵 ′′ − 𝐵𝐸 cos(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼 ′ − 𝐵𝐸 sin(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼′′
2
𝑌𝐸 ′′ = 𝑌𝐵 ′′ − 𝐵𝐸𝑠𝑖 𝑛(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼 ′ + 𝐵𝐸 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛼 + 𝛿) ∙ 𝛼′′
This version has as driving link the crank AB and the slider C with zero length
as the last driven kinematic element. In a car engine, the crank is the crankshaft and
the slider is the piston. This version corresponds to the start of the engine, using the
crank or the starter, then the explosion occurs in the combustion chamber and the
piston becomes the leading element, the case being analyzed below in version 2.
The slider crank mechanism is shown in Fig. 1, being formed by the driving
link AB and the RRP dyad, BC. The link BCE is the connecting rod in planar motion.
For kinematics computations, there are applied the above expressions for driving link
in rotation and for link in planar motion. The method of contour equations is used,
i.e. it is considered a vector contour ABC which is projected on the axes of the
reference frame.
⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ = 𝐴𝐵
𝐴𝐶 ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ + 𝐵𝐶
⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗
By projecting on Cartesian axes there are obtained the following expressions:
𝑋𝐶 = 𝑋𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼=0
The second expression being equal to zero, it allows the calculation of sin ,
so it results immediately:
𝑌𝐶 − 𝑌𝐵 2
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 = ±√1 − ( )
𝐵𝐶
The angle and XC were also determined, so it was obtained the kinematics
of the link in planar motion shown above.
It may be noticed that in the expression of cos the sign ( ) appears before
the radical, therefore there are two solutions and as consequence two positions of
the mechanism. In Fig 1, the second position corresponding to the sign (-) was also
plotted using interrupted line.
In Fig. 2 it is shown a position of the mechanism for the sign (+). Input data: = 62,
AB = 35 mm, BC = 55 mm, BE = 32 mm, = 48.
For a complete rotation of the driving link (0 ... 360) the successive
positions of the mechanism are shown in Fig. 4 for the sign (+) and in Fig. 5 for the
sign (-).
The trajectory of point E is shown in Fig. 6 for the sign (+) and in Fig. 7 for the
sign (-).
It is noted that for the sign (-), both successive positions and trajectory result
as well as for the sign (+), but they are positioned differently. Next, only the (+) sign
will be considered.
The variations of the point E coordinates are shown in Fig. 8, the variations of
the point E velocity components in Fig. 9, and the variations of the point E
acceleration components in Fig. 10. There were used the expressions obtained by
twice differentiating with respect to time the relations expressing the point E
positions, the same as those from the kinematics of the link in planar motion. It was
considered that YC'= 0, YC''= 0, so angular velocity and angular acceleration were
computed as follows:
−𝑌𝐵′
𝛼′ =
𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼
′′
−𝑌𝐵′′ + 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′2
𝛼 =
𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼
There were considered as input data: ’= 2 rad / s and ’’=0. There were
obtained the diagrams shown below.
60.
40.
20. X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
0.0
-20.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 8. The variations of XE and YE
100.
50.
-50.
-100.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
100.
-100.
-200.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 10. The variation of the components of point E acceleration
Some trajectories obtained by changing the angle are shown in the pictures
below (Fig. 11 ... 19).
Fig. 12 ( =45)
Fig. 13 ( =90)
Fig. 14 ( =120)
Fig. 15 ( =180)
Fig. 16. ( =220)
Fig. 17 ( =270)
Fig. 18 ( =300)
Fig. 19 ( =330)
Further, the motion of the piston C was determined: XC (Fig. 20), XC' (Fig. 21)
and XC’’ (Fig. 22).
100.
80.
[m m ]
60.
X C
40.
20.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
50.
X C ' [ m m /s]
0.0
-50.
-100.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 21. The piston velocity
200.
100.
Y C ' ' [ m m /s/s]
0.0
-100.
-200.
-300.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 22. The piston acceleration
The curves for the angular velocity of the connecting rod, ’, and for the
angular acceleration ’’ are shown in Fig. 23.
4.
2.
-2.
-4.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 23. Connecting rod angular velocity and acceleration
Version 2: piston - crank mechanism
This mechanism is shown in Fig. 24, having as actuator the piston B and a RRR-type
dyad BCD. It is known the motion of the piston and the motion of point D (fixed
point), therefore the dyad is determined and its kinematics are computed. Since this
dyad will also appear in other mechanisms, its kinematics are detailed here (Fig. 25)
There are written the expressions for the positions of the mechanism and the
resulted nonlinear algebraic system is solved, and so , , XC, YC are determined.
𝑋𝐶 = 𝑋𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 = 𝑋𝐷 + 𝐶𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 = 𝑌𝐷 + 𝐶𝐷𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
Then the expressions are differentiated twice with respect to time resulting the
following equations, used to compute the linear and angular velocities and
accelerations.
𝑋𝐶 = 𝑋𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 = 𝑋𝐷 + 𝐶𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐵 + 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 = 𝑌𝐷 + 𝐶𝐷𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
′
𝑋𝐵′ − 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′ − 𝑋𝐷′
𝛽 =
−𝐶𝐷𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
′
−𝑐𝑡𝑔𝛽(𝑋𝐵′ − 𝑋𝐷′ ) − 𝑌𝐵 ′ + 𝑌𝐷′
𝛼 =
𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 − 𝑡𝑔𝛽 ∙ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝐵𝐶
2
𝑎1 = 𝑋𝐵"-BC∙cosα∙α'2 ; a2 =XD" − 𝐶𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝛽 ′ ;
2
𝑎3 = 𝑌𝐵"-BC∙sinα∙α'2 ; a4 =YD" − 𝐶𝐷𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 ∙ 𝛽 ′
𝑋𝐶 ′′ = 𝑎1 − 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′′ = 𝑎2 − 𝐶𝐷𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 ∙ 𝛽′′
𝑌𝐶 ′′ = 𝑎3 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′′ = 𝑎4 + 𝐶𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝛽′′
𝑎3 + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′′ − 𝑎4
𝛽" =
𝐶𝐷𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽
𝑎2 − 𝑡𝑔𝛽(𝑎3 − 𝑎4 ) − 𝑎1
𝛼" =
−𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 + 𝑡𝑔𝛽 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 ∙ 𝐵𝐶
For the kinematics of point E there are used the above relations written
for the link undergoing planar motion.
The coordinates of point E are shown in Fig. 28, the components of the point
E velocity are shown in Fig. 29, and the components of the point E acceleration are
shown in Fig. 30.
60.
40.
20.
0.0 X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
-20.
-40.
-60.
-60. -40. -20. 0.0 20. 40.
X B [mm]
Fig. 28. The coordinates of the point E
6.
4.
2. X E' [mm/s]
Y E' [mm/s]
0.0
-2.
-60. -40. -20. 0.0 20. 40.
X B [mm]
Fig. 29. The components of the point E velocity
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-60. -40. -20. 0.0 20. 40.
X B [mm]
Fig. 30. The components of the point E acceleration
The angular velocities and accelerations of the links BC and CD were also
computed and their variations are shown in Fig. 31 and 32.
0.2
0.1
0.0
Alfa' [rad/s]
Alfa' ' [rad/s/s]
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-60. -40. -20. 0.0 20. 40.
X B [mm]
Fig. 31. The angular speeds and accelerations of the link BC
0.2
0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-60. -40. -20. 0.0 20. 40.
X C [mm]
Fig. 32. The angular speeds and accelerations of the link CD
*
There are differences between the results of the two versions. The reason is
that in the first version the driving element is the link AB, with a linear variation of
angle , resulting a non-linear variation of coordinate XC. In the second version, the
driving element is the slider B with a linear variation of coordinate XB, and the driven
element is the link CD with a non-linear variation of the angle , so the input law for
the second version is not the exit law of the first version.
4. KINEMATICS OF THE FOUR - BAR MECHANISM
The input data were the followings: AB = 40 mm: BC = 50: CD = 60: XD = 65:
BE = 50: = 60: 2 rad / s:
The mechanism is shown in FIG. 2, its positions in FIG. 3, and the trajectory
of point E in FIG. 4.
The trajectories of point E for different values of angle are shown in Fig.
5.....13.
Fig. 5. ( =0)
Fig. 6. ( =90)
Fig. 7. ( =120)
Fig. 8. ( =180)
Fig. 9. ( =220)
50.
X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
0.0
-50.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 14. The variation of the coordinates of point E
The velocities and accelerations are computed with the expressions given
forward for the driving link undergoing rotation, the RRR dyad and the link
undergoing planar motion. The variation of the components of point E velocity is
shown in Fig. 15.
3000.
2000.
1000.
X E' [mm/s]
Y E' [mm/s]
0.0
-1000.
-2000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 15. Components of point E velocity
Very large values of accelerations were obtained when > 180 for these
mechanism dimensions; this is the reason why the components of the point E
acceleration were shown in Fig. 16 and Fig.17.
300.
200.
100.
-100.
-200.
-300.
0.0 50. 100. 150. 200.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 16. Components of point E acceleration for = 0…180.
4.E+6
3.E+6
2.E+6
X E' ' [mm/s/s]
Y E' ' [mm/s/s]
1.E+6
0.0
-1.E+6
150. 200. 250. 300. 350. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 17. Components of point E acceleration for >180.
5. KINEMATICS OF THE OSCILLATING CRANK LEVER
MECHANISM
The oscillating crank lever mechanism is shown in Fig. 1. For the kinematic
calculation, the relations for the driving link in rotational motion and the relations of
the kinematics of the plane-moving element are used. Next, there are written the
relations for the link BC in order to compute S and . These expressions are
differentiated twice with respect to time and there are determined S’, S’’ and ’, ’’.
Other trajectories (the coupler curve shown in Fig. 5 ... 12) have been drawn,
too.
Fig. 5. ( =0)
Fig. 6. ( =90)
Fig. 7. ( =120)
Fig. 8. ( =180)
Fig. 9. ( =220)
100.
50. X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
0.0
-50.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 13. The variation of the coordinates of point E
500.
-500.
-1000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 14. The variation curves for XE’ and YE’
Fig. 15 shows the variations of the acceleration components, with very high
values in the area = 180 degrees.
1.E+4
5000.
0.0
Y E' ' [mm/s/s]
Y E' ' [mm/s/s]
-5000.
-1.E+4
-1.5E+4
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 15. The variation curves for XE’’ and YE’’
The diagrams for the variation of ’ and ’’ were drawn as shown in Fig. 16.
300.
200.
100.
-100.
-200.
-300.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 16 Angular velocities and accelerations
KINEMATICS OF THE MECHANISM R-PRP
𝑋𝐶 = 𝑆1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 = 𝑋𝐴 + 𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑆1 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 = 𝑆2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
𝑆2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
𝑡𝑔𝜑 =
𝑋𝐴 + 𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽
−𝑋𝐴𝑡𝑔𝜑
𝑆2 =
cos 𝛽𝑡𝑔𝜑 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
XC′ = 𝑆1′ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 − 𝑆1 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 = 𝑆2′ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 − 𝑆2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 ∙ 𝛽 ′
YC′ = 𝑆1′ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 + 𝑆1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 ′ = 𝑆2′ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 + 𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝛽 ′
𝑆2′ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 − 𝑆1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 ′ + 𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝛽′
𝑡𝑔 𝜑 = ′
𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 + 𝑆1 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 ′ − 𝑆2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 ∙ 𝛽′
−𝑆1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 − 𝑆1 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑 ∙ 𝑡𝑔𝜑 ∙ 𝜑 ′ + 𝑆2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 ∙ 𝛽 ′ ∙ 𝑡𝑔𝜑 + 𝑆2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝛽′
′
𝑆2′ =
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛽 ∙ 𝑡𝑔𝜑 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
400.
200.
0.0 X C [mm]
Y C [mm]
-200.
-400.
-600.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 5. The coordinates of point C
1000.
750.
500.
0.0
-250.
-500.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 6. Components of point C velocity
As the link BC tends to become parallel to the base (at the top or bottom), AC,
YC, YC 'and YC'' tend to infinity, so that YC is limited to a maximum of 500 mm, so
the diagrams have jumps for large values. It is possible to limit the range of motion
so that the values are convenient. In the areas where straight lines appear in the
chart, jumps were made in order to avoid the diagram frame exceeding.
1000.
500.
-500.
-1000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
1000.
500.
-500.
-1000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig 7. XC’’, YC’’ variations
The variations of S1, S2 (fig. 8), S1’, S2’ (fig. 9), S1’’, S2’’ (fig. 10) were
similarly determined.
750.
500.
250.
0.0 S1 [mm]
S2 [mm]
-250.
-500.
-750.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
750.
500.
250.
0.0 S1 [mm]
S2 [mm]
-250.
-500.
-750.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 8. The strokes S1, S2
4000.
2000.
-2000.
-4000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 9. The velocities S1’, S2’
1000.
500.
-500.
-1000.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 10. The accelerations S1’’ and S2’’
KINEMATICS OF R-PPR MECHANISM
This mechanism (Fig. 1) consists of the driving element BC in rotation and the
PPR dyad AC; a zero-length element connects the two sliders. It is similar to the
mechanism R-PRP described in the previous section, however, in the point C there
is not a revolute pair but a welding and the link AC is mobile.
Further, there were also determined other trajectories for different values of angle .
100.
50. X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
0.0
-50.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 12. The coordinates of point E
300.
200.
100.
-100.
-200.
-300.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 13. The components of point E velocity
750.
500.
250.
-250.
-500.
-750.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 14. The components of point E acceleration
There were similarly obtained diagrams for S1 and S2 (Fig. 15), S1' and S2'
(Fig. 16) and for S1'' and S2 '' shown in Fig. 17.
100.
50.
0.0 S1 [mm]
S2 [mm]
-50.
-100.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 15. Variation of S1 and S2
200.
100.
-100.
-200.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 16 Variation of S1’ and S2’
600.
400.
200.
-200.
-400.
-600.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 17 Variation of S1’’and S2’’
KINEMATICS OF A MECHANISM WITH TRIAD
It is considered the mechanism with triad shown in Fig. 1 and the lengths of
the kinematic element 3 are set to zero in the form of a slider, having as result the
mechanism shown in Fig. 2 which will be studied.
This time the mechanism has two independent loops: ABCG and GCD. The
number of independent loops N is given by the expression N = c - n, where c is the
number of the pairs, and n is the number of mobile parts. In the considered case n =
5, c = 7, resulting N = 2. Each loop, considered vector contour is projected on the
axis, the contour sides being considered as vectors and so the obtained position
equations are as follows:
𝑋𝐶 − 𝑋𝐵 𝑌𝐶 − 𝑌𝐵
𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∝= ; 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∝=
𝐵𝐶 𝐵𝐶
𝑌𝐶 𝑌𝐶
𝑡𝑔ψ = ;𝑆 =
𝑋𝐶 − 𝑋𝐷 5 𝑠𝑖𝑛ψ
The expressions for positions are differentiated with respect to time in order to
calculate the velocities, taking into account that the points G and D are fixed.
𝑋𝐺 ′ = 0; 𝑌𝐺 ′ = 0; 𝑋𝐺 = 0; 𝑌𝐺 = 0;
𝛾 ′ = 0; 𝛾 = 0; 𝑋𝐷′ = 0; 𝑌𝐷′ = 0; 𝑋𝐷 = 0; 𝑌𝐷" = 0
𝑋𝐵 ′ − 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∝∙∝′ = 𝑆4′ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛾 = 𝑋𝐶 ′
𝑌𝐵 ′ + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∝∙∝′ = 𝑆4′ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛾 = 𝑌𝐶 ′
𝑌𝐵 ′ + 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∝∙∝′
𝑡𝑔𝛾 =
𝑋𝐵 ′ − 𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∝∙∝′
′
𝑌𝐵 − 𝑋𝐵 ′ 𝑡𝑔𝛾
∝=
−𝐵𝐶𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∝ 𝑡𝑔𝛾 − 𝐵𝐶𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∝
𝑋𝐵 ′ − 𝐵𝐶 ∙ 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∝∙∝ ′
𝑆4′ =
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛾
𝑌𝐶 ′ − 𝑆5 cos ∙ ′
𝑡𝑔 =
𝑋𝐶 ′ + 𝑆5 sin ∙ ′
𝑌𝐶′ − 𝑋𝐶′𝑡𝑔
𝜑′ =
𝑆5 sin ∙ 𝑡𝑔 + 𝑆5 cos
𝑋𝐶′ + 𝑆5 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∙ ′
𝑆5′ =
cos
2
XC′′ = 𝑋𝐵′′ − 𝐵𝐶 cos 𝛼 ∙ 𝛼 ′ − 𝐵𝐶 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′′ = 𝑆4 " cos 𝛾
2
YC′′ = 𝑋𝐵′′ − 𝐵𝐶 𝑠𝑖𝑛 α ∙ 𝛼 ′ + 𝐵𝐶 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝛼 ∙ 𝛼′′ = 𝑆4 " sin 𝛾
YB ′′ − BC sinα ∙ α′2 + BC cos α ∙ α"
𝑡𝑔𝛾 =
XB" − BCcosα ∙ α′2 − BCsin α ∙ α"
2
XC′′ = 𝑆5" 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑 − 2𝑆5′ sin ∙ ′ − 𝑆5 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∙ ′ − 𝑆5 sin ∙ ′′
2 2
YC′′ = 𝑆5" 𝑠𝑖𝑛 + 2𝑆5′ cos ∙ ′ − 𝑆5 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∙ ′ + 𝑆5 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ∙ ′
2 2
YC” −2𝑆5′ BC cos∙′+𝑆5 𝑠𝑖𝑛∙′ −𝑆5 𝑐𝑜𝑠∙′
𝑡𝑔 =
XC"+2𝑆5′ sin∙′+𝑆5 sin∙′′+𝑆5 cos∙′2
𝑏1 −𝑏2 tg
" = 𝑆 sin ∙tg−𝑆5 sin
5
The following pictures give us the coordinates of point C (Fig. 16), the
components of point C velocity (Fig. 17), the components of point C acceleration
(Fig. 18).
60.
40.
20.
X C [mm]
Y C [mm]
0.0
-20.
-40.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 16. The coordinates of point C
1000.
500.
0.0
X C' [mm/s]
Y C' [mm/s]
-500.
-1000.
-1500.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 17. The components of point C velocity
200.
0.0
-400.
-600.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 18. The components of point C acceleration
It is noted that the mechanism doesn’t allow to the link AB to make a full
rotation (due to the links length), so that in the mechanism operation a break
appears visible in charts by straight lines (the software connects through a line the
value before the break with the value after the break) .
Fig. 19 reveals the variation of and the variation of ’, and in Fig. 20 it is
shown the variation of ’’.
20.
0.0
-20.
PSI [deg]
PSI' [rad/s]
-40.
-60.
-80.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 19. The variation of and ’
750.
500.
250.
P S I ' ' [ rad /s/s]
0.0
-250.
-500.
-750.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
40.
20. X E [mm]
Y E [mm]
0.0
-20.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 21. The curves XE, YE
150.
100.
50.
-50.
-100.
-150.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 22. The curves XE’, YE’
250.
0.0
-250.
-750.
-1000.
-1250.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 23. The curves XE’’, YE’’
POSITIONS AND TRAJECTORIES FOR A MECHANISM WITH TWO
DYADS
Already knowing the position of point E, there are written the expressions only
for the second dyad as follows:
𝑋𝐹 = 𝑋𝐸 + 𝐸𝐹𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛾 = 0
𝑌𝐹 = 𝑌𝐸 + 𝐸𝐹𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛾 = 𝑆
𝑋𝐺 = 𝑋𝐸 + 𝐸𝐺𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛾 − 𝜀)
𝑌𝐺 = 𝑌𝐸 + 𝐸𝐺𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝛾 − 𝜀)
The first expression is used for angle computation and the second one is
used for the stroke S computation. The following two expressions establish the
position of point G.
Input data: AB = 38: 45 BC = CD = 40: XD = 55 = 25: BE = 55 = 45: EG = 45:
EF = 100.
In Fig. 2 it is shown the mechanism for = 25, and Fig. 3 shows the
successive positions of the mechanism.
Fig. 2 The mechanism position for = 25
In Fig. 4 there are given the trajectory of point E (the left one) and the
trajectory of point G motion. They are similar.
Fig. 4. The trajectories of points E and G
The following figures give us the trajectories of point G for some values of
angle .
Fig. 5. = 0
Fig. 6. = 90
Fig. 7. = 120
Fig. 8. = 180
Fig. 9. = 220
The curves for the coordinates of the points E and F are given in Fig. 12.
150.
100.
XE [mm]
50. YE [mm]
XF [mm]
YF [mm]
0.0
-50.
0.0 100. 200. 300. 400.
Fi [deg]
Fig. 12. The coordinates of points E and F
It is noted that the mechanism has the complete cycle, without pauses, and
the curves are similar. The stroke S has the same variation law as YF variation law
presented in Fig. 12.