The accused, Gendry Waters, is submitting evidence for the criminal case of robbery with extortion against them. Exhibit 1 is the accused's cellphone to prove communications with the complainant and authenticate WeChat conversations. Exhibit 2 contains the WeChat conversations to corroborate the accused's testimony that no extortion occurred and money was not demanded, and to support the accused's claims. The accused requests the court admit these exhibits to refute the prosecution's arguments.
The accused, Gendry Waters, is submitting evidence for the criminal case of robbery with extortion against them. Exhibit 1 is the accused's cellphone to prove communications with the complainant and authenticate WeChat conversations. Exhibit 2 contains the WeChat conversations to corroborate the accused's testimony that no extortion occurred and money was not demanded, and to support the accused's claims. The accused requests the court admit these exhibits to refute the prosecution's arguments.
The accused, Gendry Waters, is submitting evidence for the criminal case of robbery with extortion against them. Exhibit 1 is the accused's cellphone to prove communications with the complainant and authenticate WeChat conversations. Exhibit 2 contains the WeChat conversations to corroborate the accused's testimony that no extortion occurred and money was not demanded, and to support the accused's claims. The accused requests the court admit these exhibits to refute the prosecution's arguments.
The accused, Gendry Waters, is submitting evidence for the criminal case of robbery with extortion against them. Exhibit 1 is the accused's cellphone to prove communications with the complainant and authenticate WeChat conversations. Exhibit 2 contains the WeChat conversations to corroborate the accused's testimony that no extortion occurred and money was not demanded, and to support the accused's claims. The accused requests the court admit these exhibits to refute the prosecution's arguments.
ACCUSED, through the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable
Court, most respectfully offers in evidence the following exhibits for the above titled case, to wit:
EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION PURPOSE/S
“1” Cellphone of the To prove that it was the device used
Accused by the Accused in communicating with the private complainant; and To prove that the WeChat conversations between the Accused and the private complainant, as recorded in the device, were properly authenticated. “2” The WeChat To corroborate the testimony of the conversations Accused regarding the real contents between the of the chats between him and the Accused and private complainant; Arya Stark as To prove that the Accused did not contained in the extort money from the private cellphone of the complainant, and that the Accused Accused never threatened her for said purpose; and To substantiate the testimony of the Accused in its material points.
Aforesaid exhibits are being offered to refute the prosecution’s claims,
arguments, and all questionable assertions of facts. WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed unto this Honorable Court that the foregoing object and documentary exhibits be admitted and with the formal submission of the aforesaid coupled with the testimonies of the witnesses who testified thereon.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Makati City, Philippines, May 7, 2019.
JACINTO & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICE
Counsel for the Accused 7th Floor, 1611 Multinational Bancorporation Centre Ayala Avenue, Makati City, Metro Manila
By:
Atty. Jeninah Calimlim
PTR No. XXXXXXX Issued on: X/XX/XX Issued at: Manila City IBP No. XXXXX Issued on: X/XX/XX Issued at: Manila City Roll No. XXXXXX, X/XX/XX MCLE Compliance No. XXXXX
Copy furnished:
KRISTINE ANGELA M. SURLA
City Assistant Prosecutor
JUDGE ISAIAH O. ASUNCION III
RTC Branch 123 National Capital Region Manila City