Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Paper
Research Paper
Research Paper
Abstract:
Concrete is a widespread material wh ich is being used in the world for various structures. It is susceptible
to shrinkage cracks and these cracks will permit the entry of destructive materials to the essential reinfo rcing bars.
This will lead to deterioration of the rebars and will considerably reduce the durability of the structure. Also,
Cement, a ma in constituent in the concrete releases a huge quantity of heat of hydration when it interacts with water,
which adds to CO2 emission to the atmosphere. This calls for a sustainable sort of material which should
furthermore be strong and durable. One such tool is bio concrete which yields microbial calcite precipitation. The
preceding works have dealt with bio engineered concrete with partial substitution of cement by fly ash. The present
study deals with the effects of bacillus megaterium MTCC 3353 on the strength and durability properties on the
concrete specimens. Cement has been substituted by metakaolin in the concentrations of 10%, 12.5%, and 15%
which comb ines with calciu m hydroxide and produces additional cementing compounds. The calcite precipitatio n
within the structure will be confirmed using the SEM analysis and XRD.
Keywords: Bio Engineered concrete, Bacillus Megaterium MTCC 3353, calcite precipitation, compressive strength,
acid attack , SEM.
initial strength was obtained, the specimens were The mechanical property of strength in compression
immersed inside the curing mediu m (50g/l of CaCl2 and was evaluated and it was found that the bacterial
20g/l of urea) for 7, 14 and 28 days. Normal concrete samples were stronger in comparison to control
specimens were also casted using a similar practice with specimens. Fig 1 shows the rise in co mpression
a minor differentiat ion that only regular potable water strength, 10% metakaolin being optimal. Bacterial
was used in the mixing process and cured in normal specimens with 10% offered an improved strength of 22
water. The specimens were taken out on the necessary %, 12.5% and 15% presented 13.8% and 9.72% increase
days and were tested via Co mpression testing machine respectively when compared with the ordinary concrete.
according to IS standards and the results were
Likewise Fig 2 demonstrates a surge in the strength,
compared.
12.5% metakao lin being optimal in this mix. Bacterial
2.3.2 Aci d attack test specimens with 12.5% offered an improved strength of
26.04 %, while the other cases (10% and 15%
Cubes were cast and cured in a similar way as the
respectively) presented 11.4% and 20.83% increase
compression strength specimens. The specimens were
when compared with the ordinary concrete.
then immersed in a solution containing 5% concentrated
sulphuric acid for 7, 14 and 28 days. They were tested
for the compression strength in comparison with the
standard concrete specimens.
2.3.3 Scanning Electron Microscope (S EM) anal ysis
The SEM analysis was done to visually examine the
microbial precip itation of calcite in the bio concrete. A
small portion of the co mpression test specimen was
taken after the tests end and was cleaned to make it free
fro m dust. The specimen was then oven dried and was
coated using sputter coating machine. SEM apparatus
was used to examine the pores and focus the
precipitation.
Table 2: Mix proportions used in the experiments
(Mix1)
`
Fig 2: Compression test results for Mix 1
Cement Metakaolin Fine Coarse Water
(Kg/m3 ) (Kg/ m3 ) aggregates aggregates (lit/ m3 )
(Kg/ m3 ) (Kg/ m3 )
450 0 675 1172 227
405 45 675 1172 227
393.75 56.25 675 1172 227
382.5 67.5 675 1172 227
Table 3: Mix proportions used in the experiments
(Mix2)
`
Acknowledgement
We like to thank Dr. Ku mutha and Ms. Kavitha Mary
for their support in cultivating the bacterial solution. We
also like to thank M r. John Stanley for his support in
serial d iluting the bacterial solution.
5 References
[1] Virginie Wiktor, Henk M. Jonkers “Quantification of crack-
healing in novel bacteria-based self-healing concrete”, Cement
& Concrete Composites 33 (2011) 763–770.
[2] Varenyam Achal, Abhijit Mukherjee, M Sudhakara Reddy,
“Microbial concrete: Way to enchance the durability of
structures”, Journal of materials in Civil Engineering @ ASCE,
June 2011.
[3] M.V. Seshagiri Rao, V. Srinivasa Reddy, M. Hafsa, P.
Veena and P. Anusha , “Bioengineered Concrete - A Sustainable
Self-Healing Construction Material”, Research Journal of
Engineering Sciences, ISSN 2278 – 9472 Vol. 2(6), 45-51, June
(2013).
[4] S. Krishnapriya, D.L.Venkatesh Babu, Prince Arulraj G,
“Isolation and identification of bacteria to improve the strength
of Concrete” Microbiological.
[5] A.T .Manikandan, A.Padmavathi “An Experimental
Investigation on Improvement of Concrete Serviceability by
using Bacterial Mineral Precipitation”, IJRSI, Volume II, Issue
III, March 2015.
[6] Varenyam Achal, Xiangliang Pan, Nilüfer Özyurt “Improved
strength and durability of fly ash-amended concrete by microbial
calcite precipitation”, Ecological Engineering 37 (2011) 554–
559.
[7] Guang Jiang, Zhidan Rong, Wei Sun,
“Effects of metakaolin on mechanical properties, pore structure
and hydration heat of mortars at 0.17 w/b ratio”, Construction
and Building Materials 93 (2015) 564–572.
[8] Hong-Sam Kima, Sang-Ho Lee, Han-Young Moon, “Strength
properties and durability aspects of high strength concrete using
Korean metakaolin”, Construction and Building Materials 21
(2007) 1229–1237.
[9] Ali Vahabia, Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour and Kambiz Akbari
Noghabi, “A preliminary insight into the revolutionary new line
in improving concrete properties using an indigenous bacterial
strain Bacillus licheniformis AK01, as a healing agent”,
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Vol.
19, No. 5, 614–6279 (2015).
[10] IS: 383 - 1987, “Specification for coarse and fine aggregates
from natural sources for concrete.
[11] IS: 12269 – 1987, “Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland
cement”.
[12] IS: 10262 – 1982, “Recommended guidelines for concrete mix
design”.
[13] IS: 456 – 2000, “Plain and reinforced concrete – Code of
practice”.
[14] IS: 1727 – 1967, “Methods of test for pozzolanic materials”.
[15] IS: 516 – 1959, “Methods of tests for strength of concrete”.
Abstract:
Internal moist curing by Super Absorbent Polymer (SAP) plays an important role in strength development and
durability o f High Performance Concrete (HPC). The aim o f this study is to examine how the strength reduction
happens by adding super absorbent polymer and rect ification of strength reduction using micro fillers. The
amount of SAP added to the concrete was calculated usin g the absorption capacity that was obtained as a result
of tea bag test. The present study also involves the use of super absorb ent polymer in gel and dry state to both
mortar and concrete. First strength property was tested in mortar fo r both gel and dry state. It was found that
SAP added in dry state to mortar has no negative effect on co mpressive st rength and tested. In the present work
additional micro filler (silica fu me) with d ifferent ratios: 0.0%, 10%, 15%, 20% of weight of cement is added to
improve the mechanical propert ies of high strength concrete with SA P. The concrete specimens are subjected to
atmosphere curing and mechanical properties (co mpressive strength and modulus of rupture) were evaluated at
different ages, up to 28 days. Durability property such as Sorptivity was conducted on HPC. The effect of
internally cured concrete was studied and compared with conventionally cured concrete.
Key words: Internal curing, Super Absorbent Polymer, High Performance concrete, Silica fu me, Mechanical
properties, Durability.
capacity. It was proved that IC using SAP was 2.1 Materials used:
capable of eliminating autogenous shrinkage. But
Ordinary Port land Cement with specific weight of
these IC agents leave pores which weaken the
3.12 and silica fu me widely available in powder
mechanical properties [4,5]. Mostly IC agents can
form with silica of 95%, river sand as fine aggregate
be more effective with low w/c rat io wh ich reduce
and gravel as coarse aggregate of nominal size of
the self dessication and autogenous shrinkage
10mm were used. Super absorbent polymer is
[1,8,11]. However most of the works focus on
spherical in shape with the particle size of 300
cement pastes and mortars [1, 8, 9, 11] only limited
microns. The tea bag test method was used to find
researches have been done on concrete. And it was
the absorption capacity of SAP by immersing the
experimentally proved that IC by SAP has no
SAP in water and cement solution wh ich was shown
negative effects on compressive strengths. Craeye
in fig 1. In water it has maximu m absorption
B, et.al [5] studied low w/b ratio HPC has negative
capacity of 100g of water /g of SAP and in cement
effects on mechanical properties due to the addition
solution 30g of water /g of SAP . When it reaches the
of curing water and SAP. So me studies focused on
maximu m absorption capacity after a while
optimization of SAP where shrinkage reduction is
desorption of water or cement solution fro m SAP
highly possible and strength reduction less.
takes place which indicate that it will release water
Christof Schroefl, Viktor Mechtcherine,
for concrete during hydration process.
PeterVectontobel, Jan Hovind, Eberhard Leh mann
Superplasticizer used CERAPLA ST 400 wh ich is of
[6] conducted tests with different SAP that shows
sulphonated melamine formaldehyde condensate
different absorption behaviour in concrete. Due to
type.
this free water may loss in concrete which affects
the rheological behaviour and the characteristics. In
order to maintain the same rheological behaviour
and characteristics of concrete preliminary
investigations are done in SAP [6,9,12]. Tea bag
test was conducted in SAP to find the abs orption
capacity of water and cement pore solution [1, 11].
Using this absorption capacity SAP amount is
added to concrete. The advantage of IC high
performance concrete was reduced autogenous
shrinkage and cracking, reduced permeability and
increased durability. But the strength reduction was
10 to 30% of conventional concrete [4, 5]. To
improve the strength property additional Fig 1: Teabag test in cement solution and water
cementit ious material or micro fillers can be used
[2, 3, 14, 15]. 2.2 Concrete mixtures and Speci men
preparati on:
1.2 Research significance:
2.2.1 Concrete mi xture proporti ons:
The present study focuses on the addition
of amount of SAP and mechanical As per ACI211.4 mix proportion for HPC was
properties of concrete. calculated. The mix ratio for M 75 concrete is 1:
1.03: 1.973: 0.269. The quantity of concrete batches
To improve the flexural strength and is given in table1. In order to keep the required
compressive strength of concrete, slump mini slu mp test was conducted on cement
additional micro filler Silica Fu me (SF) paste with w/c ratio of 0.26 and various SP dosages.
added to the concrete. The optimu m dosage was found and used in each
concrete mix.
To avoid the absorption of free water fro m 2.2.2 Mortar mixture proportions:
mortar or concrete, the study on
absorption capacity of SAP should be In order to reduce the trials on determin ing the
carried out. (in both water and cement strength of concrete it is checked using mortar
solution) initially. The mixture p roportion for mortar is as
same as the cement and fine aggregate content in
The aim of this study is to evaluate the concrete. The ratio of 1:1.03 with the w/c ratio of
effects of IC on mechanical properties and 0.26 is used to check the strength property.
durability o f HPC with different silica
fume of 10%, 15%, 20% by weight of
cement.
2. Experi mental program:
Mix Cement in Mix water Silica IC water Fine aggregate Coarse SAP SAP Super-
notation Kg/m 3 3 fume Kg/m 3 3 aggregate 3 3 plasticizer
Kg/m Kg/m Kg/m Kg/m
Kg/m 3 Kg/m 3 % 0f wt of
cement
C 583.41 151.686 - 57 602.55 1258 0.57 1.9 1.2%
C1 583.41 151.686 - 57 602.55 1258 0.57 1.9 1.2%
SF1 525.069 151.686 58.341 57 602.55 1258 0.57 1.9 1.3%
SF2 495.898 151.686 87.512 57 602.55 1258 0.57 1.9 1.4%
SF3 466.728 151.686 116.682 57 602.55 1258 0.57 1.9 1.4%
2.2.3 Preparation of mortar and concrete measured in mm for all the mixes. The mix and
specimen: spread diameter for all mixes shown in table 2. For
compressive strength of hardened mortar cube of
A set of Portland cement mortar cubes of size
size 7cm x 7cm x 7cm was casted and tested under
70.6mm x 70.6mm x 70.6mm fo r each mixture was
compression testing mach ine with load capacity of
cast to study the compressive strength on 7th and
2000KN. Mortar cubes internally cured are tested
28th day. To check the mechanical and durability
for 7th and 28th day.
properties of concrete, cubes (100mm x 100mm x
100mm ) and beams (100mm x100mm x 500mm) 2.3.2 Compressive strength and flexural
were casted for both the absorption capacities from strength of hardened concrete:
water (SAP pre soaked with extra curing water
As per IS 516(1959) Co mp ressive strength of
becomes gel and added to concrete while mixing)
specimen were tested by compression testing
and cement solution(dry SAP directly added to
mach ine with the load capacity of 2000 KN after
concrete while mixing). The control specimens are
curing of 7 and 28 days. Load applied gradually at
cured in water tank for 28 days and for remaining
the rate of 140kg/cm2 per minute t ill the specimen
cubes air- dried curing was done in room
fails. Three specimens are tested at the selected age
temperature fo r 28 days.
and the average comp ressive strength of three
specimens was noted. For modulus of rupture of
hardened concrete, the prism specimens are tested
for two point loading to create pure bending as per
IS 9399-1979 [1979].
2.3.3 Sorpti vity:
Sorptivity can be determined by the measurement
of the absorption rate of capillary rise on a
reasonably homogeneous material. The concrete
specimens are tested for sorptivity after 28 days.
The sample was kept in the oven at 50o C for 24
Fig 2:Pre-soaked SAP Fig 3: Dry SAP hrs. After 24 hrs the specimens are taken out of the
oven and cooled for 2hrs at laboratory temperature
2.3 Determi nation of properties of mortar and and then the experiment is carried out. The
concrete: specimens are weighed initially and note it as W 1.
Then specimens are coated with epo xy at the
2.3.1 Slump test of fresh mortar and surroundings leaving the top and bottom surface for
compressive strength of hardened mortar: the penetration of water. Impermeab le base sticks
The fresh state property slump was checked are kept in tray to keep the specimen on top of the
immed iately after mixing mo rtar. The mortar was stick to allow water to penetrate from the bottom.
hand mixed in pan with the proportion as Record the weight of each specimen at the time
mentioned above. Fill the slu mp cone, lift it interval (t) 3, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 min. Note
immed iately after pouring mo rtar and leave them to down the weight as W 2 .Make sure the surface of
take 25 jo lt. Then spread diameter of mortar was the exposed specimen befo re weighing should be in
surface saturated condition.
100gm Absorption capacity 30gm Absorption capacity 100gm Absorption capacity 30gm Absorption capacity
C 48 77 50 77 8 8
C1 43 68.75 46.875 63 6.5 7.75
SF1 41 62.5 48.75 71.5 7 8.5
SF2 40 65.62 42 65.5 6.25 6.75
SF3 43.5 70 40 67.75 6.25 6.25
30
the workability and strength increment between AC)
25
SAP added pre soaked with IC water(100g m A C) 20 7th Day (30gm
and directly added dry SAP (30g m AC) with 15 AC)
incorporation of silica fu me. The results are 10
compared between the absorption capacities. The 5
same procedure was followed to study the effect of 0
IC on concrete. C C1 SF1 SF2 SF3
60
0,00035
50 0,0003
Sorptivity mm/min
40 0,00025
strength in MPa
Compressive
Fig 6: Compressive strength of internally cured Fig 9: Sorptivity of internally cured concrete with
concrete on 7th day with different absorption 30gm absorption capacities (AC)
capacities (AC)
The mechanical properties of concrete specimen
were reported in table 3. Fig 3 and fig 4 shows that
SAP added pre soaked with IC water(100g m A C)
90 has more strength reduction when co mpared to
80 directly added dry SAP(30g m AC). 30g m
70 absorption capacity absorbs alkaline solution from
strength in MPa
Compressive
3
N/mm²
4% and modulus of rigid ity was higher than [14] Semion Zhutovsky, Konstantin Kovler. „Effect of
conventionally cured concrete. Reduced porosity in internal curing on durability-related properties of
high performance concrete‟. Cement and Concrete
SF3 is good for durability due to high replacement
Research 42 (2012) 20–26 .
of cement with silica fu me. Further microstructure [15] Gaston Espinoza-Hijazin, Álvaro Paul ,Mauricio
study can be done on SAP with concrete to find Lopez, „Concrete Containing Natural Pozzolans:
reason for strength reduction. New Challenges for Internal Curing‟ .Journal of
Materials in CivilEngineering, Vol. 24, No. 8,
August 1, 2012
References:
Email: prabhathranjankumar@gmail.com,poorni.engg@gmail.com
Abstract:
A distinctive strength and durability associated phenomenon in nu merous concrete structures are subtle
cracks and pores in the concrete. Principally, related cracks and pores result in increasing permeability of cement
concrete matrix. Entry of water, at mospheric pollutants and their byproducts can deteriorate the matrix and corrode
the installed reinforcement which in turn enhances the maintenance cost. Previous research works have dealt with
conventional repair methods like epo xy injection, latex treat ment and provision of further steel in design to limit the
crack width within permissible limit .On the other hand, bioconcrete is reliable in enhancing the strength, durability
and healing of cracks. In this research the bacterial strain,Bacillus Licheniformis MTCC 3606 derived fro m soil is
used for calcite precipitation and for achieving better strength and durability properties in hardened concrete.It is
inferred fro m the test results that the compressive strength gets increased significantly.Itincreased the resistance to
acid attack in concrete appreciably . SEM analysis has shown the calcite precipitation inside the bacterial concrete.
The results obtained from SEM analysis were confirmed by XRD.
Keywords: Bioconcrete, Bacillus Licheniformis MTCC 3606, calcite precipitation, SEM, XRD.
calcite and sustains better in alkaline conditions which Locally available coarse aggregate was used. Aggregate
is common inside concrete.There are a few sources of passed through IS 20 mm sieve and retained on IS 12
calciu m such ascalcium n itrate (Ca(NO3 )2 ), calciu m mm sieve was used for casting the specimens. The
lactate (C6 H10 CaO6 ), calciu m acetate(C4 H6 CaO4 ) and physical tests performed on the aggregates are given in
calciu m chloride (CaCl2 )among which, calciu m chloride the table 2.
was used in the curing media as a supply of the calciu m Table 2:Physical properties of coarse aggregate
source since it has better solubility.
Specific gravity Water absorption
M.V. Seshagiri Rao et al [3], exp lained that even though
the calcite precipitation is possible in nature by several
2.74 1.8%
processes, urease enzyme reaction is used presently. It
was found that in most of microbes extracted fro m soil
the urease activity is high. Urea is a detoxification The obtained results conform to IS 383-1970.
product whichexists naturally in environ ment. By using 2.4 Water
bacterial concentration of 105 cells per ml in concrete,
significant co mpressive strength was achieved. Potable water was used for casting the specimens. The
tests performed on the water gave the PH value as 7.8
1.2 Conceptual understanding of calcite preci pitation and the obtained results conform to IS 456-2000.
Limited precipitation of calcite in concrete is possible 2.5 Bacteria
due to the reaction between Ca(OH)2 and CO2.This
inadequate calcite can be improved by active The particular type of bacteria Bacillus Licheniformis
contribution of ureolyticbacteriain concrete by its urease MTCC 3606 was received in the form of freeze dried
activity which init iates the hydrolysis of urea.In this condition from MTCC (M icrobial Type Culture
process, urea gets converted into carbamate and Collection) Chandigarh. The particular details of
ammon ia. Carbamate again hydrolyses into carbonic bacteria are given by MTCC is shownin the table 3. The
acid and ammonia. Afterwards these products form liquid gro wth med ia used for growth of bacteria
bicarbonate, ammoniu m and hydroxide ions causing contained beef extract (1.0g/l), yeast extract
increase in local p Hvalue. This leads to formation of (2.0g/l), peptone (5.0g/l), NaCl (5.0g/l).
more carbonate ions. These carbonate ions react with
Table 3: Particulars of bacteria
sufficient amount of calciu m ions from curing med ia
leading to format ion of calcite on cell surface [4]. Genus Name Bacillus
2. Materials and Methods
Species Name Licheniformis
2.1. Cement
Type B
The binding material used was Portland Pozzolona
cement(PPC) containing 25% fly ash. The physical tests MTCC No. 3606
performed on the cement have given results of fineness
as 2.95%,specific gravity as 2.9, and consistency as Isolated or Derived fro m Soil (new Delhi)
36%. It meets requirements of IS 1489-1 (1991).
2.2 Fine aggregate Temperature 370 c
The locally available clean and dry sand was used. Sand Growth condition Aerobic
passed through IS 4.75 sieve was used to cast all the
specimens. The physical tests performed on the material Incubation 24 hours
are given in the table 1.
Subculturing period 20 days
Table 1:Physical properties of sand
Specific gravity Zone Water absorption
2.6 Compati bility of bacteria wi th super pl asticizers
2.80 2 3% The bacteria which was used in this present study was
checked for co mpatibility with three super plasticizer
The obtained results conform to IS 383-1970. (SP) families namely polycarbo xy late (PCE),
Lignosulphonate (LS), Sulphonated Naphthalene
2.3 Coarse aggregate
Formaldehyde (SNF). Certain percentage of super
plasticizer was added to nutrient broth thenbacteria was
allo wed to grow in this media. The amount of bacteria
grown along with each type of super plasticizer was gently.The same procedure is followed till the last test
checked by streaking operation in petriplates. There was tube F.The serially diluted procedure was done in such a
no significant change in bacterial gro wth with and way that the last test tube F will be having the least
without super plasticizer therefore this particular concentrated bacterial solution.The test tubes were then
bacterial strain is compatib le with 3 SP’s . kept inside the incubator shaker and left for 24 hours to
get the serial d iluted solution of required concentration.
The cell concentration in each test tube was checked by
substituting the OD value in equation (1).
3.Laboratory tests
3.1 Compressive strength test
Fig 3 : Bacterial solution of high concentration Potable water was used for the preparation of normal
concrete mix.The bacterial water (5ml bacterial solution
2.8Serial dilution of high concentration bacteri al of concentration 105 cells per ml per liter o f water) was
solution used for preparation of bacterial concrete. Samp les of
Initially, equal volu me of 8 ml nutrient broth was size 100 x 100 x 100 mm were prepared fo r both.The
transferred into 6 test tubes and labeled from A to F. curing process was done in normal water for normal
Then 1 ml of the mother culture was taken by using concrete specimens whereas the curing was done in
micro pipette and transferred into the test tube A and separate curing media (50g/l of CaCl2 and 20g/l of urea)
mixed gently.Again 1 ml of the solution fro m the test for bacterial specimens. The compression testing has
tube A was transferred into test tube B and mixed
been carried out for 7, 14, and 28 days according to IS: Table 5: Results for compressive strength
516 (1959) and results were tabulated.
Type of concrete Grade 7th 14th 28th
3.2 Aci d attack test day day day
Four specimens of cube size 100 mmwith each normal
and bacterial concrete were castedand cured in their Normal M25 24 33 40
corresponding curing med ia fo r 28 days. One specimen concrete(N/mm2 )
fro m each type of concrete was tested for compressive M40 30 36 50
strength. The rest of the specimens were checked for
compressive strength after immersion in 5% Bacterial M25 27 37.5 48
concentrated sulphuric acid solution for7th ,14th and 28th concrete(N/mm2 )
days. The percentage loss in strength was calculated by M40 33 42 60
using following formu la[7].
Si −Sf % increment in M25 12.5 13.6 20
Percentage loss in strength = × 100 strength
Si
M40 10 16.6 20
where, Si is initial co mpressive strength(before
immersion) and Sfis final co mpressive strength (after
immersion). Table 6: Results for acid attack
Type of Grade % loss in strength
concrete
7th 14th 28th
day day day