Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ghanshyam Dass HC
Ghanshyam Dass HC
VERSUS
Versus
Sr. Manager,
Punjab National Bank,
Chandni Chowk Branch,
New Delhi. ` … Contemnor/
Respondent
To
1
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
to file the present Civil Contempt Petition before this Hon’ble Court, as the
Hon’ble Court and have not complied with the Orders passed by this
(Colly).
2. The Petitioner submits that all the relevant facts and circumstances
leading to the filing of the present Petition have been set out in detail in
the afore-mentioned writ petition and the same are not being repeated
herein for the sake of brevity and to avoid unnecessary repetition. The
Petitioner craves leave of this Hon’ble Court to refer to and rely upon the
same at the time of hearing for the purpose of adjudication of the present
Petition.
to file the present contempt Petition before this Hon’ble Court and also to
apprise this Hon’ble Court of the wrongful conduct of the Contemnors all
along:
spices etc.
2
(b) In the aforesaid Writ Petition the only question that arose for
(c) In the aforesaid Writ Petition the amount of duty was not in dispute,
only dispute was with respect to the date from which the interest on
India Vs. Bangalore Wire Rod Mill [(1996) 3 SCC 588]. It needs to
[e] This Hon’ble Court while deciding the aforesaid Writ Petition clearly
kept alive during the pendency of the present matter would stand
3
discharged. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with no
order as to costs.
Annexure-P/1.
[g] While passing the order on the aforesaid Misc. Application the
its orders dated 14th August, 2003 and 29th August, 2003.
release the FDR pledged with you as margin money together with
interest thereon and also the tittle deed of property bearing No.A-8,
4
Green Park Extension, New Delhi. Further on 8 th September, 2003
[k] On 28th of March, 2004 the Petitioner further wrote a letter to the
the margin money FDR’s and the original title deeds of the
herewith as ANNEXURE-P/2.
5
[m] At this stage it is further pertinent to mention that a contempt
Respondent in the aforesaid letter did not press for release of the
Delhi.
[n] It is further submitted that the holding of the aforesaid original tittle
[o] It is further submitted that after the disposal of Contempt Case (C)
however, the Respondent did not pay any heed to the request
made by them.
[p] Being aggrieved the Petitioner sent a legal notice dated 2.8.2005
6
equitable mortgage, and as such they have no locus standie to
[q] That the refusal of not having the tittle deeds is contrary to the
writ petition will stand defeated if the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court
are not enforced and given effect to according to their letter and spirit and
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may
7
[b] Pass such other and further order or orders as the Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case.
FILED BY:
DRAWN BY:
8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MEMO OF PARTIES
VERSUS
Versus
Sr. Manager,
Punjab National Bank,
Chandni Chowk Branch,
New Delhi. ` … Contemnor/
Respondent
FILED BY:
9
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION
CONT. CAS [C] No. OF 2005
IN
WP [C] NO.1648 OF 1991
VERSUS
S. PARTICULARS Page
No. No.
1. Notice of Motion A
B
2. Urgent Application
3. Memo of Parties C
5. ANNEXURE-P/1 (Colly)
The true copies of the orders dated 14.8.2003 and
29.8.2003.
6. ANNEXURE-P/2
A true copy of the letter dated 29.4.2004.
8. Vakalatnama
FILED BY:
10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION
CONT. CAS [C] No.1221 OF 2005
IN
WP [C] NO.1648 OF 1991
VERSUS
INDEX
S. PARTICULARS Page
No. No.
FILED BY:
11
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.7 SECTION III
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CC No.356/2006
(From the judgement and order dated 8.04.2005 in WP No.1648/1991
of the High Court of Delhi at N. Delhi)
Versus
CORAM:
12
ORDER
There is delay of 160 days in filing the petition which has not
Sd/- Sd/-
(Ganga Thakur) (Anand Singh)
PS to Registrar Court Master
13
14