Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reaction Paper (Regional Seminar On Transformational Leadership and Governance)
Reaction Paper (Regional Seminar On Transformational Leadership and Governance)
ZINAMPAN
Course Title: Investment Theory and Analysis
With the onset of accelerated globalization and the emerging new technologies,
education has to respond to global perspectives for sustained leadership and
governance.
In this regard, Saint Paul University Philippines has taken the initiative of
enhancing graduate school students’ transformative leadership competencies through
the conduct of a Regional Seminar with the theme: ““Transformative Leadership in
the 4th Industrial Revolution”. The seminar aims to deepen understanding on
transformative leadership, familiarize the participants on the requirements,
opportunities, challenges and impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and enhance
participants’ transformative leadership competencies.
Unlike the innovations of the past industrial revolution, the one we have now
is changing more than the way we do things. Its all-encompassing impact is also
challenging our ideas about what it means to be human. As such, we need to redesign
existing processes and institutions to face it, as well as to leverage the abundance of
new opportunities. But first, we need a clear grasp of the transformative force of the
Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Undoubtedly, the Fourth Industrial Revolution can make lives better. On the
other hand, the Fourth Industrial Revolution brings pitfalls along with it. Some
companies might fail to adapt. Socio-economic changes can increase social tensions.
Shifting power can lead to critical security concerns. Governments might be unable to
implement regulations properly. Jobs will become obsolete.
With technology rapidly changing our economic, cultural and social realities,
the question of how to prepare the younger, and even the current, generation for the
fourth industrial revolution has been a pressing issue for contemporary higher
education. How do we educate for the fourth industrial revolution? Are our education
systems and programs relevant to the fourth industrial revolution? And if not, how do
we reconstruct our education systems so that they are?
There is a need to ensure that the world’s population, and not just the younger
generation, has the ability to continuously learn, adapt and apply rapidly changing
technologies to the rapidly changing learning and work environment and adapt to
cultural, economic, political and social developments. There is a need to redesign
contemporary education systems to create an adaptable and flexible system that
supports educating for the fourth and future industrial revolutions. In order to educate
for the fourth and future industrial revolutions, there is a need to embrace the
technologies associated with them.
Of course, teachers, who are the primary facilitators of learning, should also be
continuously learning so they can acquire the necessary skills and competencies to
adapt and use current and new technologies into the continuously changing required
learning process and environment. In short, there is a need to focus on ICT and future
technologies, teacher education and lifelong learning for an adaptable and flexible
education system.
If not now, when; if not us, who? If we don’t do it now, it may be too late.
Higher education institutions may lose their role as educators of both young people
and the adult population and national governments may decide to further reduce
higher education funding. Last but not the least, the world’s future population and
citizens will not be prepared for a rapidly changing society which will not be limited to
the world of work.
Technology has made our lives easier and comfortable, further, it brought
education into a whole new level where sensible information can be accessed within
few clicks. But Fr. Adalbert mentioned the vital role of spirituality in the fourth
industrial revolution. Technology is good but with proper moderation of its usage. But
if value of temperance isn’t observed, it can actually dehumanize us.
Perhaps the most important today, however, is the need for inspired
intelligence—nourishing our spiritual and creative faculties to ensure that we retain
and build a collective moral consciousness that allows us to work together to overcome
both common and individual challenges. We must therefore take every opportunity to
draw on the power of faith to catalyze a new cultural renaissance that will enable us
to be part of something much larger than ourselves—a global, connected civilization.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution will increasingly give citizens the ability to use
technology to seek greater autonomy, which will challenge the power of government
and institutions in disruptive ways.
If government agencies are too slow to adopt new technologies, they will both
fail to generate the efficiency gains needed to keep public services going, and damage
the reputation of government. If the disruptive effects of technology are too great and
too rapid, or if governments fail to mitigate them, rising employment and inequality
could lead to serious social unrest, especially if the middle classes, which have a vested
interest in the status quo, suddenly find that the status quo is working against them.
Governments need to address four key areas if they hope to harness the full
potential of 4IR.
Second, they need to ensure their countries have the infrastructure in place to
benefit from the enormous advantages of technological change, and they need to
address the risks of cybersecurity, whether criminally or politically motivated.
Government needs to be an enabler of change, even if it does not itself seek to “pick
winners” or manage the market.
For a prosperous future, we must ask how all of us, and the technological
systems we design and build, can serve the proper ends and not be confined to the
means. Our efforts must focus on the impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on
human beings, society and the environment, and not just focus on technological
progress or economic productivity.
I see four principles which should guide our policy and practice as we progress
further into this revolution.
And lastly, we must focus on key values as a feature of new technologies, rather
than as a bug. Technologies used in a way that increase disparity, poverty,
discrimination and environmental damage work against the future we seek. For the
investment in these technologies to be justifiable, they must bring us a better world,
not one of increased insecurity and dislocation.
We need new ways of working together to tackle issues that arise faster than
ever, provide clarity of operating environment for business, and provide society with
confidence that it is moving forward into a technological future where the
opportunities and benefits outweigh risks and unknowns. Leadership in these complex
times requires nothing less than a wholesale shift of our mental models, a step change
in collaborative engagement, and the ability to collectively envisage the futures that
we want to create, and manage ourselves away from the dystopias which
technological progress can conjure.