Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plasma Sprayed Coatings of Hydroxyapatite
Plasma Sprayed Coatings of Hydroxyapatite
K. de Groot
Department of Biomaterials, Free University. P. 0. Box 7161, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R. Geesink
Department of Orthopedics, State University, S t . Annadal 1, Maastricht, The Netherlands
C. P. A. T. Klein
Department of Biomaterials, Free University, P. 0. Box 7161, Amstwdam, The Netherlands
P. Serekian
Osteonics Inc., Allendale, New Jersey
The technique of plasma spraying has been as the (absence of) influence of the coating
applied to deposite a thin, dense layer of process on fatigue properties of the sub-
hydroxylapatite onto a titanium substrate. strate. Animal studies showed similar his-
Bond strength of such apatite coatings with tological reactions to apatite coatings as to
the substrate have been measured, as well (well documented) apatite bulk materials.
INTRODUCTION
It has been well documented that living bone may show a strong bond
with implants made of sintered hydroxylapatite,'r2hereafter called HA. Due
to this phenomenon, implants with a surface of HA are called bioactive. On
the other hand, implants having only intimate contact with bone are called
bioinert. Therefore, both bioactive and bioinert implants can be os-
seointegrated (= having close contact with bone) after implantation, but only
bioactive implants show bonding with bone as
Unfortunately, the biomechanical properties of sintered HA are poor.
Although a compressive strength of up to 600-700 MPa may be achieved and
a tensile strength of up to 200-250 MPa, the resistance against fatigue failure
is very low. Normal physiological tensile loading causes fatigue fracture of
dense HA tooth implants within several months. The conclusion therefore is
that HA implants can only be applied if either no forces at all, or only
compressive forces, act on the implant.'
Therefore, it has been suggested to use thin coatings of HA on metalIic
substrates if tensile loading is to be expected (p. 216, ref. 1). The thickness
of such a coating must be a compromise between two limiting conditions. On
the one hand, the thinner a ceramic coating, the better its mechanical prop-
erties, and on the other hand, our finding that within the first few months
15-20 Frn of a HA surface may dissolve as stated in Ref. 4. In this reference,
Plasma spraying
plasma s p r a y i n q
powder
11
anode /: * ...
plasma
Substrate
Powder
The powder used for coating was either produced in our laboratory, or
obtained commercially from Merck.
Mechanical testing
Animal testing
total bone contact area. The bone contact area was calculated using the
formula A = 3,14.d.h., where d is the diameter of the implant with the
coating (4.6 mm) and h is the cortical thickness around the implant.
One implant from each femur was selected at random and left intact for
histological examination. After formalin fixation and alcohol dehydration the
implants were embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. Next, 100 pm thick-
ness sections were prepared using a lowspeed diamond cutting wheel with
cooling. These sections were used for microradiographic observations.
For light microscopy sections of 7pm were prepared by using a Jung K
microtome, after removing the implant material by a milling machine and
reembedding the cavity with polymethylmethacrylate.
RESULTS
TABLE I
Strength Properties of Titanium Coated with Hydroxylapatite (HA)
~ ~~
TABLE I1
Push-Out Test of Ti Plugs, Coated and Uncoated
with HA Shear Strength in MPa (standard error: zk207c)
Time postoperative
Ti plugs with HA Ti plugs without HA (inviith)
50 0,6 1,5
55 0.6 4
62 6
PLASMA SPRAYED COATINGS OF HYDROXYLAPATITE 1379
Animal testing
In the endosteal part, many granulocytes and plasmacells were seen after
6 weeks of implantation. After 12 weeks of implantation the amount of
inflammatory cells was decreased.
DISCUSSION
References
1. K. de Groot, "Degradable ceramics," in Biocompatibility of Clinical lmplaizf
Materials, Val. I , D. F. Williams (Ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1981,
199-222.
2. M. Jarcho, "Calciumphosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics,"
Clin. Orfhop. Rel. Res., 157, 259-278 (1981).
3. I? I. Branemark, et al., Osseointegrated Implants, Almqvist and Wiksell
International, Stockholm, 1977.
4. C.A. van Blitterswijk, J. J. Grote, W. Kuypers, W.Th. Daems, K.
de Groot, "Macroport tissue ingrowth: a quantitative and qualitative
study on hydroxyapatite ceramic," Biomaterials, 7, 137-144, (1986).
5. R. F. Bunshah (Ed.), Deposition Technologiesfor Films and Coatings, Noyes
Publications, Park Ridge, NJ.
6. J. L. Lacout, J. Assarane, J. C. Trombe, "Sur la fixation du titane par les
minerais phosphates," C. R.Acnd. Sc.Paris, 298, Serie 11, 173-175 (1984).
7. P. Ducheyne, W. van Raemdonck, J . C. Heughebaert, and M.
Heughebaert, "Structural analysis of hydroxylapatite coatings on titan-
ium," Biomaterials, 7, 97-104 (1986).
8. H. F. Moore, "Fatigue tests," in Metals Handbook, Publ.American Society
for Metals, 1948, pp. 118-124.
9. E. Barth, H. Ronningen, and L. F. Solheim, "Comparison of ceramic and
titanium implants in cats," Acfn Orthop. Scand., 56, 491-495 (1985).
10. J. D. Bobijn, P. M. Pilliar, H. U. Cameron, and G. C. Weatherly, "The
optimum pore size for the fixation of porous surfaced metal implants by
the ingrowth of bone," Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 150, 263-270 (1980).