Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAC JPS SS 3G B 008panutanjusisu
PAC JPS SS 3G B 008panutanjusisu
City Palembang
Abstract
This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Provisional Acceptance site based for commercial UMTS launch.
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3
1.2. General Cluster Information ......................................................................................... 3
1.2.1. New Site ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.2.2. First Tier Neighbor Sites .............................................................................................. 3
1.2.3. Google Earth Snapshot ............................................................................................... 4
1.3. Drive test route and cluster border ............................................................................... 4
2 Performance Result ................................................................................................... 5
2.1. Drive Test .................................................................................................................... 5
2.1.1. Coverage Map Accuracy ............................................................................................. 5
2.1.2. RSCP Plot ................................................................................................................... 6
2.1.3. Ec/Io Drive test ............................................................................................................ 7
2.1.4. DL Throughput Drive Test............................................................................................ 8
2.1.5. Bad Spot Analysis ....................................................................................................... 9
2.1.6. Physical Tuning Summary ........................................................................................... 9
2.1.7. DT Optimization Result .............................................................................................. 10
2.1.8. Overshooting Analysis from TP Status....................................................................... 11
2.1.9. MRR KPI ................................................................................................................... 12
2.2. NMS KPI UMTS ......................................................................................................... 14
2.2.1. Accessibility ............................................................................................................... 14
2.2.2. Retainability ............................................................................................................... 14
2.2.3. RTWP ........................................................................................................................ 14
2.2.4. NMS KPI Trend ......................................................................................................... 15
2.2.5. Traffic & UTILIZATION .............................................................................................. 16
3 KPI 2G....................................................................................................................... 18
3.1. List of 2G sites inside 3G Polygon ............................................................................. 18
3.2. NMS 2G..................................................................................................................... 18
4 KPI Justification ...................................................................................................... 19
4.1. Bad Spot RSCP ............................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
4.2. Bad Spot DL Throughput .............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 19
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 3 (23)
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
This document presents the result of Drive test and Network Performance KPI based on active
measurement and OSS data collection for Cluster JPS_SS_3G_B_008.
The drive-test KPIs are evaluated by drive-test coverage and statistic according to the pre-defined drive-
test route that is mutually agreed by both parties.
The results of the measurements are then compared with the passing criteria agreed upon by XL and
HUAWEI.
2 Performance Result
There are 2 Classification KPIs to be optimized, Drive Test result and NMS KPI result.
Quality
Bad
spot Bad spot type Bad spot Description Action taken
Number
Found no potential resident at this spot, no
Bad coverage due to hilly contour and forest
- Bad coverage need further action
1 blocking. The distance is 2.62 Km from site
and quality
3275687G9_ 3G_MUARA_BAYUNG.
*Justification on Chapter 4.2
Bad coverage due to hilly contour blocking and Need to TS VSWR issue on site
- Bad coverage, availability issue on site 3274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin
2 quality & THP 3274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin sec2
DL sector 2. The distance is 3.57 Km from site
3G_MUARA_BAYUNG. *Justification on Chapter 4.2
Bad coverage due to hilly contour and forest
Speed up on air iste
- Bad coverage, blocking. The distance is 6.93 Km from site
327A822G9_227A822_Senawar Bayung
3 quality & THP 3274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin
Lencir or find another location that no have
DL and 6.12 Km from site
community issue to put a new tower
3274138G9_4138_Bayung_Lencir_Kota
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 10 (23)
RSCP
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 11 (23)
EcIo
RSCP Plot
EcIo Plot
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour when CS voice traffic
reach the peak value.
2.2.1. Accessibility
2 PS Access Rate >= 99.52% Cell (Aggregated Cluster Level) 99.57% Pass
2.2.2. Retainability
2 PS RAB Drop <= 0.67% Cell (Aggregated Cluster Level) 0.36% Pass
2.2.3. RTWP
CS Access Rate already achieved KPI Target after new PS Access Rate already achieved KPI Target after new site
site on air on air
PS RAB Drop already achieved KPI target after new site Speech Drop Rate already achieved KPI target after new site
on air on air
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 16 (23)
PS RAB Drop already achieved KPI target after new site on RTWP already achieved KPI target after new site on air
air
2G+3G Voice Traffic increased after new site on air. (Only 2G+3G Payload Data increased after new site on air. (Only
for information) for information)
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 17 (23)
Code Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for CE Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for
information) information)
Power Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for CNBAP Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only
information) for information)
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 18 (23)
3 KPI 2G
Drive Test is out of 3G vendor scope of work. Therefore, the 2G aspect only review the NMS KPIin PAC report.
The target for NMS KPI is maintained of improved, comparing the best week (within 3 weeks) after new site on air
versus the week when PAC is collected.
2G nodes involved are applicable for nodes which are inside 3Gnew site polygon, regardless they have collocated
3G installed or not. All KPI, except availability are calculated during busy hour-payload UL+DL daily, averaged within
a week. Availability is monitored 24 hr daily.
3.2. NMS 2G
KPI Baseline Week PAC Week Comments*
Assignment Success Rate 99.86 99.86 Maintain
Perceive Drop Rate 1.21 1.21 Maintain
Perceive Congestion Rate 0.08 0.00 Improved
SDCCH Drop Rate 0.01 0.01 Maintain
SDCCH Congestion Rate 0.00 0.00 Maintain
SDCCH Success Rate 99.89 99.90 Improved
TBF Failure Rate 0.24 0.01 Improved
Cell Availability 98.73 99.81 Improved
HO Success Rate 99.88 99.88 Maintain
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 19 (23)
4 KPI Justification
Bad Spot Justification
Badspot
Badspot type Badspot Description Action taken
Number
Badspot position
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 20 (23)
Badspot
Badspot type Badspot Description Action taken
Number
Bad coverage due to blocking by contour from
site 3275687G9_3G_MUARA_BAYUNG sec2
Need to TS VSWR issue on site
- Bad coverage, also maximum coverage about 3.57 km, and also
2 3274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin
quality & THP DL VSWR issue on site
sec2
3274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin
sec2, already escalate every day
`
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 21 (23)
Badspot
Badspot type Badspot Description Action taken
Number
Bad RSCP Due to maximum coverage about 6.93 Km
Speed up on air iste
from site 274139G9_4139_Sukajaya_Musi_Banyuasin
327A822G9_227A822_Senawar
and 6.12 Km from site
- Bad coverage, Bayung Lencir or find another
3 3274138G9_4138_Bayung_Lencir_Kota
quality & THP DL location that no have
This area should be cover by site
community issue to put a new
327A822G9_227A822_Senawar Bayung Lencir but this
tower
site is drop site.
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 22 (23)
5 Conclusion
We conclude that PAC of Cluster JPS_SS_3G_B_008 is: