Mandvi DPR (Iwmp III)

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 1
Table of Contents
Chapter-I : Project Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Table no.1: Basic project information ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16
Need of Watershed Development Programme:- ........................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Table no.2: Weightage of the project .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 17
Table no:2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ................................................................................................................................................... 18
Table no.3: Watershed information ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 20
Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: .......................................................................................................................................... 21
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmer in the project area:............................................................................................................................................... 22
Project Implementing Agency ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24
Table no. 6: Detail of PIA:................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 27
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Basic Information of Project Area:- ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31
Soil and Topography ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 34
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ................................................................................................................................................................................... 35
11. Edaphic Factors ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .............................................................................................................................................................. 36
Land and Agriculture:- .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 38
Table no. 14: Land ownership details............................................................................................................................................................................................. 38
Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39
Irrigation ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table no. 17.1: Crop details: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Table no. 17.2: Crop details: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops .................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Livestock:.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Table no. 18: Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44

Drinking water: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45
Table no. 19: Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45
Table no. 20.1: Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................................................ 46
Table no. 20.6 Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................................................. 48

Table no. 20.10: Details of Common Property Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 50
Table no. 20.11 Details of Common Property Resources ............................................................................................................................................................... 51
3.6 Socio-economic profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 53
Table no. 22: Literacy rate .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
Migration pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 54
Table no. 23: Migration details ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55
Poverty ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55
Table no. 24: Poverty ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 57
25 Infrastructure facilities ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 58
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 58
Livelihood pattern: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Table no. 27: Income ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
28. Dependence on Common Property Resource .......................................................................................................................................................................... 60
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR....................................................................................................................................................................................... 60
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ....................................................................................................................................................... 61
Watershed Activities..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 63
Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details Village:Kalmoi ........................................................................................................................................................... 72
Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details Village:Khodamba ................................................................................................................................................. 73

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details Village:- Patal ........................................................................................................................................................ 74
Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details Village:- Uteva ....................................................................................................................................................... 75
Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details Village:- Titoi ......................................................................................................................................................... 76
Table no. 31.6 Watershed Committee details Village:- Amba ........................................................................................................................................................ 77
Table no. 31.7 Watershed Committee details Village:- Pardi ......................................................................................................................................................... 78
Table no. 31.8Watershed Committee details Village:- Karvali ....................................................................................................................................................... 79
Table no. 31.9 Watershed Committee details Village:- Regama .................................................................................................................................................... 80
Table no. 31.10Watershed Committee details Village:- Fali ......................................................................................................................................................... 81
Table no. 31.11 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kolsana .................................................................................................................................................. 82
Table no. 31.12 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kasal ....................................................................................................................................................... 83
Table no. 31.13 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kalibel .................................................................................................................................................... 84
Table no. 32.1 : SHG detail Village:-Kalmoi .................................................................................................................................................................................... 86
Table no. 32.2 : SHG detail Village:-Khodamba .............................................................................................................................................................................. 86
Table no. 32.3 : SHG detail Village:-Patal ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 87
Table no. 32.4 : SHG detail Village:-Uteva ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 87
Table no. 32.5: SHG detail Village:-Titoi ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 88
Table no. 32.6 : SHG detail Village:-Amba...................................................................................................................................................................................... 88
Table no. 32.7 : SHG detail Village:-Pardi ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 89
Table no. 32.8 : SHG detail Village:-Karvali ................................................................................................................................................................................... 89
Table no. 32.9 : SHG detail Village:-Regama .................................................................................................................................................................................. 90
Table no. 32.10 : SHG detail Village:-Fali ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 90
Table no. 32.11 : SHG detail Village:-Kolsana ................................................................................................................................................................................. 91

Table no. 32.13 : SHG detail Village:-Kalibel.................................................................................................................................................................................. 92
Table no. 32.12 : SHG detail Village:-Kasal ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 92
User Group:- ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 93
Table no. 33.1: UG detail Village:- Kalmoi ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Table no. 33.2: UG detail Village:- Khodamba ................................................................................................................................................................................ 94
Table no. 33.3: UG detail Village:- Patal .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 94
Table no. 33.4: UG detail Village:- Uteva......................................................................................................................................................................................... 95
Table no. 33.5: UG detail Village:- Titoi .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 95
Table no. 33.6: UG detail Village:- Amba........................................................................................................................................................................................ 96
Table no. 33.7: UG detail Village:- Pardi ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 96
Table no. 33.8: UG detail Village:- Karvali ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 97
Table no. 33.9: UG detail Village:- Regama ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 97
Table no. 33.10: UG detail Village:- Fali .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 98
Table no. 33.11: UG detail Village:- Kolsana ................................................................................................................................................................................... 98
Table no. 33.12: UG detail Village:- Kasal ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 99
Table no. 33.13: UG detail Village:- Kalibel .................................................................................................................................................................................... 99
4.3.1 Entry point Activity (EPA): .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 100
Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................................................................................ 100
Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................................................. 102
Watershed Development Works: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 103
Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................. 110

Table no.36.8 Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................................. 117
Table no.36.10: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................... 119
Table no.37.1: Activities related to water Conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................... 123
Table no.37.2: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .......................................................................... 123
Table no.37.8 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................... 126
Table no.37.9 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................... 127
Table no.37.10 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................... 127

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ................................................................................................. 129
Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target .............................................................................................................................. 134
40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .......................................................................................................................................................... 135
Table no.40.2: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ....................................................................................................................................... 136
Table no.40.4: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*....................................................................................................................................... 138
Table no.40.6: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*....................................................................................................................................... 140
Table no.40.10: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .................................................................................................................................... 144
Table no.40.11: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .......................................................................................................................................... 145
Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ......................................................................................................... 148

Table no.41.10: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ....................................................................................................... 157
Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities.......................................................................................................................................................................... 161
Table no.42.10: Details of allied / other activities ....................................................................................................................................................................... 170
Livelihood Intervention............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 174

Production System -1: Goatry Unit (Boer Unit) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 176
Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages .............................................................................................................................................. 177
Table: 42.iv Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft) .............................................................................................................................................. 180
Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting ........................................................................................................................................................................... 181
Production System – 3 Washing Powder (Detergent) & Soap Making .......................................................................................................................................... 182
Production Cost : ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 185
Total Selling (Monthly) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 186
Production System – 4 Nursery Raising ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 187
Production Capacity ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 187
Production system – 5 Sewing Machine & Stitching .................................................................................................................................................................. 189
Production system – 6 Mandap Decoration ............................................................................................................................................................................... 193
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................... 197
4.4 s Capacity building and Institutional collaboration ................................................................................................................................................................ 199
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ................................................................................................................................................................................. 200
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 201
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ......................................................................................................................................... 201
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project .............................................................................................................................................................................. 203
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP ............................................................................................................................... 204
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 205
Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes.............................................................................................................................................. 206
Table no.50.2: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ......................................................................................................................................... 207

Table no.50.10: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ....................................................................................................................................... 215
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects .................................................................................................................................................. 218
6.1 Expected Outcomes .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 220
Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 221
6.1.2 Migration ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 222
Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area .................................................................................................................................................... 223
6.1.3 Ground water table ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 223
Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in Feet) .......................................................................................................... 224
Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 225
Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas ................................................................................................................................................ 226
Table no. 57: Area under horticulture .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 232
Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 233
6.1.8 Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 234

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................... 234
(For fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) .......................................................................................................... 234
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages................................................................................................................................................................................... 236
7 Quality and Sustainability Issues .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 242
Vigilance and Monitoring Committees ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 242
Research support in watershed management.............................................................................................................................................................................. 243
Farmer organization and empowerment ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 243
7.2 Plans For Project management: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 244
7.3 Watershed Development Fund: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 244
Table No. 61. Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF) ................................................................................................................................................... 244
CHAPTER – 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 245

CHAPTER-1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

Chapter-I : Project Background
Patal(IWMP-III) project is located in Mandvi Taluka, Surat District of Gujarat State. The Project is a cluster of 10 micro watershed with 5C1A4a1g,
5C1A4a1f, 5C1A4a1e, 5C1A4a1h, 5C1A4a1d, 5C1A4a3b, 5C1A4a3a, 5C1A4b1g, 5C1A4b1e, 5C1A4a1b as their respective codes. The total project area of the
watershed is about 7741 ha. out of which 5000 ha is proposed for treatment under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).
The nearest town is Mandvi which is taluka place and also about 12 kms. from project area villages. All villages are well connected with pacca roads
except kalmoi village. The project consists 13 no. of villages. Mainly Chaudhari, Vasava, Gamit all ST communities are the primary inhabitants of the
villages. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry and wage labour.

Table no.1: Basic project information
Villages Total
PIA
Sr Name of the Gram Area of the Area proposed project
Name Census code Taluka District
No. project Panchayats project to be treated cost
(Lacs)
1 Kalmoi 220070167940000 Kalmoi 266.6 61
2 Khodamba 220070168200000 Khodamba 868.20 293
3 Patal 220070167930000 Patal 1111.90 715
4 Uteva 220070168340000 Uteva 993.40 630
5 Titoi 220070168350000 Titoi 647.40 419
6 Amba 220070168600000 Amba Surat 637.20 570

(IWMP-III)
Patal Project 220070168700000 429.30 390
7 Pardi Pardi Mandvi 600.00
in Mandvi
8 Block Karvali 220070168710000 Karvali 529.90 470
9 Regama 220070168190000 Regama 756.10 433
10 Fali 220070168320000 Fali 441.60 410

Social
11 Kolsana 220070167910000 Kolsana 150.10 143 Forestry
Division,
12 Kasal 220070168690000 Kasal 339.20 321
Surat
13 Kalibel 220070168360000 Kalibel 570.40 145
Total 7741.30 5000 600.00 -

Need of Watershed Development Programme:-
Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of 13 parameters namely poverty index, percentage of ST population, actual wages,
small & marginal farmers, ground water status, area under rain fed agriculture, drinking water situation in the area, productivity potentials of the land,
cluster approach etc. The cumulative score is 96.
The rains in this area are comparatively good but due to Geohydrological situation, the moisture index is low. Drinking water is not a major
problem even though people are facing crises during summer season.
Table no.2: Weightage of the project

Project Project
Weightage
name type
I ii Iii iv v Vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii Total

Patal Micro
5 10 5 3 3 10 10 0 10 10 5 10 15 96

Table no:2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
S.No. Criteria Maximum Ranges & scores
Score
i Poverty index(% of poor to 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20

population)
ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are Actual wages are equal to
significantly lower than or higher than minimum
minimum wages (5) wages (0)
iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80%(10) 50 to 80%(5) Less than 50 %(3)
farmers
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Criteria (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/DPAP /DDP 15 -66.7 & Below (15) -33.3 to -66.6(10) 0 to -33.2 (0)
Block
DDP Block DPAP block Non DPDAP/DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed 15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90 %(10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%(Reject)
agriculture
viii Drinking water 10 No Source(10) Problematic village(7.5) Partially covered(5) Fully Covered(0)
ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20%(10) Low-less than 10% of

TGA (5)
x Productivity Potential of the 15 Land with low Lands with moderate Lands with high

land production & where production & where production & where
productivity can be productivity can be productivity can be
significantly enhanced enhanced with marginally enhanced
with reasonable efforts reasonable efforts (10) with reasonable efforts
(15) (5)
xi Contiguity to another 10 Contiguous to Contiguity within the Neither contiguous to

watershed that has already previously treated micro watersheds in previously treated
been developed/treated watershed & contiguity the project but non watershed nor
within the micro contiguous to contiguity within the
watersheds in the previously treated micro watersheds in
project (10) watershed (5) the project (0)
xii Cluster approach in the 15 Above 6 micro – 4 to 6 micro 2 to 4 micro watersheds

plains (more than one watersheds in cluster watersheds in cluster in cluster (5)
contiguous micro- (15) (10)
watersheds in the project)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills 15 Above 5 micro – 3 to 5 micro 2 to 3 micro watersheds
(more than one contiguous watersheds in cluster watersheds in cluster in cluster (5)
micro-watersheds in the (15) (10)
project)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information
Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order
5C1A4a1g, 5C1A4a1f, 5C1A4a1e,

5C1A4a1h, 5C1A4a1d, 5C1A4a3b,
IWMP-III-Patal 10 Micro Watershed
5C1A4a3a, 5C1A4b1g, 5C1A4b1e,
5C1A4a1b
Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:-
The following works have been taken up under the scheme during last two years.
(1) MGNREGS: There are about 3615 job card holders. Pond deepening and widening of road works, construction of road, and desilting of three check
dams, Drainage percolation tank with cost of 5.30 lakh has been completed till date.
(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: Under IWDP project, total area of 900 ha in total project area have been treated where all activities
related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Two solar street-light installed so far under IWDP to promote non conventional
source of energy in each village.
(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 338 toilets in BPL Houses and 798 toilets in APL houses in project villages have been constructed under TSC
programme in the project area.
(4) Indira Awas Yojana: There are 1159 houses have been constructed in the villages of Project area. 5 in Kalmoi, 159 in Khodamba,85 in Patal,
100 in Uteva , 110 in Titoi, 77 in Amba 55 in Pardi , 68 in Karvali, 94 in Regama ,100 in Fali 198 in Kolsana, 74 in Kasal and 34 in Kalibel under IAY.
(5) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 40 % of the houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme.

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:
Estimated
Sr Name of the Objectives of the Villages
Sponsoring agency Year of commencement number of
no programme/scheme programme/scheme covered
beneficiaries
Rural Development
1 TSC Sanitation 2004-05 13 3038 HH
Dept.
Rural Development
2 Indira Avas Yojana Housing 1992-93 13 1398 HH
Dept.
Rural Development
3 NREGS Employment 2007-08 13 3615 HH
Dept.
Govt of Gujarat
4 WASMO Water facilities 2003-04 5 1215 HH

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmer in the project area:
Expenditu %
No. Of %
Proje Area Totalf re financia
Sr Year Name of micro Watershed Funding Nodal physical
ct under PIA cost incurred l
no started villages waters codes source agency completio
name treatment (Lacs) up to start comple
hed n
of IWMP tion
1 Khodamba 5C1A4a1g 200 10.200 7.30 71.57% 70%
2 Patal Patal 5C1A4a1f 200 10.200 7.15 70.10% 65%

Taluka
3 Proje Uteva 4 5C1A4a1e 300 DoLR DRDA Panchayat, 15.300 10.33 67.52% 70%
ct Mandvi
Kalibel 200 70%
4 5C1A4a3a 10.200 6.22 60.98%
2005-06
Total 900 45.90 31.00 67.53% 68.75%

CHAPTER-2
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIA would be
responsible for implementation of watershed project. This PIA may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/Central
Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayat, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of Patal Watershed Project is
Social forestry, Surat.
Social Forestry Division, Surat
The Organization and its Objectives:-
The Social Forestry Division, Surat is the PIA of Patal Project. It was sanctioned as a PIA on 1st Feb 2009 under a Memorandum of
Understanding(MoU) between the DWDU,Surat(District Level Nodal Agency) and Forest Department to implement the work approved in the detailed
project report. The Social Forestry has dedicated and experienced staff comprising Deputy Conservator of Forest.Assisant Conservator of Forest and Range
forest Officer at Mandvi and Watershed Development Team (WDT) of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, Civil engineer, accountant,
computer operator and messenger.The Watershed Development Team has their office at Forest quarters, Van darpan, near health center, Mandvi.
The objective of the Social Forestry Division, Surat is supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed
development project and related development activities in the project area.
The Major functions of PIA:
a)To Prepare Detail Project Report.
b) To provide necessary technical guidance for preparation of development plan for the watershed.
c) To undertake community development activites.

d) To supervise watershed development activities.
e) To inspect and authenticate project account.
f) To encourage adoption of low cost technologies and build upon indigence technical knowledge.
g) To monitor and review the overall project implementing and set up institutional arrangement for post-project operation & maintenance & further
Development of the assets created during the project period.
SWOT Analysis of Social Forestry
Strength:-
Dedicated and experienced staff and Watershed Development Team.
Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agriculture universities, and NGOs for capacity building technical guidance.
Scientific plan in watershed project with the help of BISAG, Ghandhinagar.
District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee.
Well establishmed, PRIs for social audit.
Weakness:-
Insufficient funds for complete watershed project per hectare.
No permanent staff.

No permanent office building.
Project area is located for away from District head quarter.
Opportunities:-
Sustainable livelihood generation landless and assetless.
Improvement of socio economic status of poors.
Awareness generation among the illiterate through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.
Reduction of migration rate.
Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.
Threates:-
Lack of sustainable agriculture development.
Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.
Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people.
Erratic rainfall in the project area.
Low literacy rate in the project area.

Table no. 6: Detail of PIA:
Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA
Type of organization Line Department
Name of organization Social Forestry Division, Surat
Designation & Address DCF, Social Forestry Division,Surat

1 IWMP-III,PatalProject
Telephone 0261-2651644
Fax 0261-2651643
E-mail surdwduiwmp3@gmail.com

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level
Sr Monthly
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned
no remuneration
Deputy Conservator Project

1 F.L.Khobung 35 M IFS 12 yrs 45000
of forest Management
Assistant
Project
2 K. A. Rathod 57 M conservator of Bsc ,LLB 30 yrs 42000
Management
forest
Supervision of
3 Amrat chaudhri 57 M R.F.O. Bcom 28 yrs 17000
works
5 yrs &3
3. Santilalbhai Vasava 41 M WDT-Civil Diploma in civil civil work 10000
months
Agri & forestry

4 Bhavesh Vasava 27 M WDT-Agri MRS 3 yrs 9000
Work
5 Ankita Patel 24 F WDT-Com.Mobilizer Msc Home science 6 moths Mobilization 9000
6 Jayeshbhai Prajapati 28 M Accountant Mcom 1 yrs Accounting 8000
Computer
7 Raksha 25 F Data entry Operater BA with computer 4 yrs 7000
operating
8 Shah Prakash 32 M Messenger Dip. mechanical 5 yrs Office work 3000

Chapter-3
Basic Information of Project Area

Basic Information of Project Area:-
Patal project is located in the district of Surat about 70 km from district head quarters. The area is having moderate rainfall and temperature. The
total area of the project is 7741.30ha out of which 5000 ha. will be treated under IWMP. The area is having moderate to gentle slope.
Land Use Pattern.
The net geographical area of Patal watershed project is 7741.30 ha, out of which 19% is forest area which is about 1544.12ha. The area is having
sparse vegetation due to over grazing. Due to murum soil vegetative cover is affected. About 4466.98 ha land is under agriculture, out of which 986 ha
(22%) is irrigated through canal(5%) , Open Well and Bore(17%) rest of the agriculture rain fed. There is about 7 percent of wasteland of which 4 per cent
is cultivable.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:
Wasteland
Names of Geographical Area Land under Rainfed Perm-anent
Forest Area Non-
Sr. No. villages of the village agricultural use area pastu-res Cultivable
cultivable
1 Kalmoi 266.6 258.1 61.50 180.00 0.00 61.50 0.00
2 Khodamba 868.20 372.8 241.83 650.00 58.56 40 18.90
3 Patal 1111.90 154.22 660.74 890.00 96.00 12 54.30
4 Uteva 993.40 0 480.46 800.00 212.96 150 95.00
5 Titoi 647.40 221.97 386.88 520.00 38.56 30 7.00
6 Amba 637.20 7.5 535.25 300.00 101.92 75 30.20
7 Pardi 429.30 0 389.76 225.00 39.57 30 82.90
8 Karvali 529.90 0 479.37 300.00 50.51 40 25.20
9 Regama 756.10 302.93 333.11 756.00 120.04 100 11.00
10 Fali 441.60 0 368.40 441.60 73.23 50 4.30
11 Kolsana 150.10 0 140.84 150.10 9.23 8 1.80
12 Kasal 339.20 0 292.84 240.00 46.39 30 1.00
13 Kalibel 570.40 226.6 96.00 570.40 43.00 35 28.70
Total 7741.3 1544.12 4466.98 6023.1 889.97 600 360.3

Soil and Topography
Patal Watershed Project (IWMP) falls under South Gujarat Agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly deep black clayey soils. The surface
soil is Reddish brown to dark in hilly area, very dark grayish brown to dark brown & dark to Yellowish brown . The depth of soil is moderate to deep
about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is heavily dominated by clay particles. The fertility of soil is poor with less Nitrogen while Phosphorus
is medium, Potash is also medium. The order of soil is mainly Inceptisols, Vertisols, and Entisols. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 10-
15 % slope and undulating in the forest area.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:
Name of the Names Major soil types
Area
Sr. Agro-climatic of the
in b) Area Topography
No. zone covers villages a)Type
ha in ha
project area
1 266.6 Kalmoi Deep to moderate Clayey 213.28 Flat to moderate slope
2 868.20 Khodamba Deep to moderate Clayey 694.56 Flat to moderate slope
3 1111.90 Patal Deep to moderate Clayey 889.52 Flat to moderate slope
4 993.40 Uteva Deep to moderate Clayey 794.72 Flat to moderate slope
5 647.40 Titoi Deep to moderate Clayey 517.92 Flat to moderate slope
6 637.20 Amba Deep to moderate Clayey 509.76 Flat to moderate slope
7 429.30 Pardi Deep to moderate Clayey 343.44 Flat to moderate slope
South Gujarat
8 529.90 Karvali Deep to moderate Clayey 423.92 Flat to moderate slope
9 756.10 Regama Deep to moderate Clayey 604.88 Flat to moderate slope
10 441.60 Fali Deep to moderate Clayey 353.28 Flat to moderate slope
11 150.10 Kolsana Deep to moderate Clayey 120.08 Flat to moderate slope
12 339.20 Kasal Deep to moderate Clayey 271.36 Flat to moderate slope
570.40 Deep to moderate 456.32 Flat to moderate slope
13
Kalibel Clayey
# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:
Sr no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Kalmoi 1994, 2006 -
2 Khodamba 1994, 2006 -
3 Patal 1994, 2006 -
4 Uteva 1994, 2006 -
5 Titoi 1994, 2006 -
6 Amba 1994, 2006 -
7 Pardi 1994, 2006 -
8 Karvali 1994, 2006 -
9 Regama 1994, 2006 -
10 Fali 1994, 2006 -
11 Kolsana 1994, 2006 -
12 Kasal 1994, 2006 -
13 Kalibel 1994, 2006 -

11. Edaphic Factors
Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)
Type of Salinity
Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH
(Inherent/Ingress)
Kalmoi 36 7.20 Neutral
Khodamba 232 6.89 Neutral
Patal 45 7.38 Neutral
Uteva 87 7.10 Neutral
Titoi 20-21 6.90 Neutral
Amba 73 7.00 Neutral
Pardi 166 7.15 Neutral
Karvali 60 7.10 Neutral
Regama 16-A 7.70 Neutral
Fali 4 7.00 Neutral
Kolsana 27 7.35 Neutral
Kasal 61 7.10 Neutral
Kalibel 92 7.00 Neutral

Land and Agriculture:-
The area is dependent on rain fall . The rain fall is normal. The average rain fall of this area is about 1488 mm (from past five year data).
This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the stream and rivulets. Mandvi taluka have "Goradu" Soil. The soil testing analysis results
have revealed that the project has content of nitrogen and phosphorous foundless. Content of potash has normally found adequate. There is a vast scope of
organic farming in the area there is a need of proper IEC activity between farmers.
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Last 5 Year Average temperature
Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 Summer Winter
years
Max Min Max Min
2005 2002 mm 37 26 30 18
2006 1989 mm 38 28 32 20
Patal Project 2007 1271 mm 36 29 30 21
2008 1267 mm 38 26 29 22
2009 913 mm 39 27 28 20

The project area receives ample amount of rainfall during monsoon but assess of surface water runoff has decreased sufficient base for
irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 1.47 ha. of which the land holding is ranging from 0.2 Ha to 4 ha. The excess
rainfall and lack of proper vegetative cover has resulted high rate of surface runoff of both soil and water. Paddy, Pulses (Tuver, Mag, Math, Adad, and
Chola), Grounnut and Soyabean are main Kharif Crops grown. Wheat, Juvar , Chola, and Sugarcane are main Rabi crops grown. Paddy covers 72%
area under the Kharif crops. The land conservation measures, surface water recharge activities; drip irrigation system may help farmers to take up
vegetable and other high value crops.Pasture development can also become a major resource for animal husbandry. By this activity dairy product can be
increase.
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams
Patal 0-15 meters 10 – 15 % Tapi River, Varai River
Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr Total owned land (ha.) HHs giving land HHs taking land
Village
no Gen OBC SC ST on lease on lease
1 Kalmoi 0 0 0 8.94 4 52
2 Khodamba 0 0 0 436.83 57 120
3 Patal 0 0 7.46 650.3 0 0
4 Uteva 0 0 0 573.46 157 373
5 Titoi 0 0 0 386.88 21 111
6 Amba 0 0 335.49 66 31
7 Pardi 0 394.758 2 17
8 Karvali 0 7 238.68 221 151
9 Regama 0 6.4 326.71 61 204
10 Fali 0 0 0 368.4 28 107
11 Kolsana 0 0 0 140.84 29 73
12 Kasal 0 0 0 292.84 0 0
13 Kalibel 0 0 0 291.99 28 8
Total 0 0 20.86 4446.12 674 1247

Table no. 15: Agriculture
Net sown area (in Ha.)
Sr no Village
One time Two times Three times
1 Kalmoi 254 2.5 -
2 Khodamba 403 35 10
3 Patal 857 160 70
4 Uteva 657 226 95
5 Titoi 328 55 35
6 Amba 471 93 12
7 Pardi 370 65 50
8 Karvali 479 50 22
9 Regama 306 83 30
10 Fali 365 31 18
11 Kolsana 135 25 18
12 Kasal 284 15 15
13 Kalibel 281 90 40
Total 5190 930.50 415
Irrigation
The irrigated area is 986.01 ha, which is 22 % of the total agricultural area of the village. Main source of irrigation is from previously
constructed pond, check dams or wells/borewell. A few farmers of Patal Project get irrigation to their field by check dams and from earthen dams which
were previously constructed by different departments. Some farmers of Uteva, Titoi and Kalmoi get water for irrigation from the main dugout pond cum
earthen dam.

Table no. 16: Irrigation
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well
Sr
Village Availability Availability Availability Gross
no Net area Gross area Net area Gross area Net area
months months months area
1 Kalmoi - - - - - 8 - 2.5 2.5
2 Khodamba - - - 8 12 12 - 23 23
3 Patal - - - 10 23 12 9 45 45
4 Uteva 8 - - 8 67 12 9 95 95
5 Titoi 8 64 64 - - 10 9 45 45
6 Amba 8 10 10 8 8 12 - 12 12
7 Pardi 8 73 72 8 11 12 - 17 17
8 Karvali 8 85 85 - 95 12 - 37 37
9 Regama - - - 9 20 10 9 63 63
10 Fali - - - 7 8 10 9 23 23
11 Kolsana 12 6.51 6.51 - - 10 - 18 18.49
12 Kasal 8 8 8 8 6 10 - 6 6
13 Kalibel - 8 - 9 15 12 - 75 75
Total 60 254.51 246.51 75 270 142 45 461.50 461.99

Table no. 17.1: Crop details:
Khariff(monsoon)
Sr Crop 1(Jawar Crop 2(Tuver) Crop 3(Paddy)
Village
no Production(kg Productivit Productio Productivi
Area Area (HA.) Area Production Productivity
) y n ty
1 Kalmoi 212.46 102000 480.09 225.86 20030 88.68 42 16050 382.14
2 Khodamba 18.81 5920 314.73 14.77 1845 124.92 7.2 4500 625.00
3 Patal 316.92 64290 202.86 128.08 17450 136.24 69.04 14880 215.53
4 Uteva 109.26 31020 283.91 86.6 18240 210.62 113.4 57385 506.04
5 Titoi 131.52 203066 1543.99 116.51 210640 1807.91 47.6 56935 1196.11
6 Amba 105.16 31622 300.7 85.18 35475 416.47 12.08 7650 633.28
7 Pardi 65.76 9620 146.29 67.88 40750 600.32 36.8 6910 187.77
8 Karvali 101.76 30000 294.81 109.26 11010 100.77 107.1 43550 406.63
9 Regama 14.04 19700 1403.13 250.5 123400 492.61 144.54 60123 415.96
10 Fali 208.42 35820 171.86 211.65 132800 627.45 97.2 15960 164.20
11 Kolsana 48.6 16030 329.84 27.72 4065 146.65 16 5460 341.25
12 Kasal 82.49 179000 2169.96 38.66 21240 549.41 4.28 1500 350.05
13 Kalibel 99.2 951000 9586.69 87.01 45550 323.5 80.16 14560 181.64
Total
1514.4 1679088 1108.74 1223.82 682495 557.68 777.4 305463 392.93

Table no. 17.2: Crop details:
Rabi(winter)
Sr Crop 1(Jawar) Crop 2(Tuver) Crop 3(Groundnut)
Village
no Production Productivi Production Area Production Productivit
Area (ha) Area (ha) Productivity
(Kg) ty (Kg) (ha) (Kg) y
1 Kalmoi 11.6 8400 2.00 6 2350 391.67 2.00 1200 600
2 Khodamba 4.4 2360 536.36 3.8 1450 381.58 5.40 2670 494.44
3 Patal 17.2 2900 168.6 4.8 1680 350.00 58.92 12820 217.58
4 Uteva 8.8 5170 587.5 3.6 1500 416.67 9.60 4600 479.17
5 Titoi 22.82 24290 1064.42 1.6 850 531.25 1.80 3395 1886.11
6 Amba 2.68 1060 395.5 4.8 5700 1187.50 9.60 5670 590.63
7 Pardi 6 1560 260 1.6 850 531.25 1.60 800 500
8 Karvali 15.6 13920 892.31 2.4 1200 500.00 0.60 400 666.67
9 Regama 23.54 3568 151.57 1.6 930 581.25 0.80 700 875
10 Fali 11 3830 348.18 6.2 7500 1209.68 8.40 2640 314.29
11 Kolsana 14 3030 216.43 8 2050 256.25 14.80 4000 270.27
12 Kasal 5.52 3830 693.84 8 7500 937.50 26.32 250 9.5
13 Kalibel 10.24 3030 295.9 6 7000 1166.67 8.00 2520 315
Total
153.4 76948 501.62 58.4 40560 694.52 147.84 41665 281.82

17 .0 Reasons of Low productivity of various crops
Over a period of time by continuous usage of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality of soil particularly
reduction of carbon content and increase of salinity. One of the reasons ascribed to low response of bio-fertilizers in dry lands is their low status of soil
organic matter. Rejuvenation of soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with specific emphasis on recovery of its nutritional value. More thrust
need to be given on adopting methods such as multi-cropping, rotation of crops and organic farming. Organic farming, nutrient management continues to
be a focal issue in dry lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to pick up significantly unless water supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be
sustained only through maintenance of organic matter and achieving better fertilizer-use efficiency through integration of moisture-conservation practices
along with soil-fertility management.
Quality of Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land
productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. The
agricultural land of the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall. In villages mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has
resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.
Traditional farming methods: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and
technologies such as multiple cropping.
Lack of Rural Credit: Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly for the
purchase of various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair of implements. They use long term credit for buying land, and for investment
to improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.
Livestock:
The project area has 1267cows and 3538 buffaloes while the other domestic animals include 1242 bullocks and 748 goats. This show there
is an ample potential for producing organic manures and promote organic farming in this area. But there is need to make farmer understand the
advantages of using organic manures and practice organic farming. The need for integrating the animal husbandry with promotion of organic
farming needs to be given high priority. The productivity of milk is so less due to lack of availability of good quality of fodder due to less per capita land
availability.

Table no. 18: Livestock
Total Milk
Sr Buffalo Cow Goat
Village (Buffalo+Cow) Sheep Bullock Hen Others
no
No milk(ltr) No Milk (ltr) ltr No Milk
1 Kalmoi 16 14600 13 14235 28835 0 0 72 23 34 -
2 Khodamba 236 215350 134 146730 362080 275 36300 19 111 1 -
3 Patal 268 244550 115 125925 370475 10 1320 215 149 206 -
4 Uteva 327 298381 207 226665 525046 7 924 70 155 338 -
5 Titoi 1292 1178950 47 51465 1230415 4 528 0 94 102 -
6 Amba 90 82125 66 72270 154395 0 0 13 45 129 -
7 Pardi 104 94900 65 71175 166075 0 0 153 62 0 -
8 Karvali 370 337625 306 335070 672695 7 924 33 117 380 -
9 Regama 229 208963 155 169725 378688 139 18348 223 193 6 -
10 Fali 125 114063 57 62415 176478 70 9240 70 70 132 -
11 Kolsana 48 43800 12 13140 56940 5 660 10 26 45 -
12 Kasal 235 214438 64 70080 284518 227 29964 686 132 20 -
13 Kalibel 198 180675 26 28470 209145 4 528 8 62 103 -
Total 3538 3228420 1267 1387365 4615785 748 98736 1572 1239 1496

Drinking water:
Source of drinking water in the project area is Bore and Dug well. These provide drinking water to the villagers 12 month. The quality of the water is
Potable.
Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr Ground water Source of drinking water Availability in months
Village Quality
no table (ft) Bore Well Tube Well Well
1 Kalmoi 15 13 2 12 month 12 month Potable
2 Khodamba 17 24 3 12 month 12 month Potable
3 Patal 18 35 20 12 month 12 month Potable
4 Uteva 19 45 8 12 month 12 month Potable
5 Titoi 22 25 5 12 month 12 month Potable
6 Amba 20 30 2 12 month 12 month Potable
7 Pardi 22 20 15 12 month 12 month Potable
8 Karvali 18 15 4 12 month 12 month Potable
9 Regama 19 45 6 12 month 12 month Potable
10 Fali 20 36 4 12 month 12 month Potable
11 Kolsana 15 7 1 12 month 12 month Potable
12 Kasal 19 20 - 12 month 12 month Potable
13 Kalibel 17 18 3 12 month 12 month Potable
Total 333 73 12 month 12 month Potable

Table no. 20.1: Details of Common Property Resources
Total Area (ha)
Area available for treatment (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of
S. Names of CPR
No. Village Govt. Govt.
Particulars Any other Pvt. Any other
Pvt. persons (specify PRI (specify PRI
(Pl. Specify) persons (Pl. Specify)
deptt.) dept.)
Wasteland/ degraded land 8 8

1 Kalmoi
Forest 53 53

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
No. Village Govt. Any other Govt.
Particulars Pvt. Any other
Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl. (specify PRI
persons (Pl. Specify)
deptt.) Specify) dept.)
Wasteland/ degraded land 237 237.00
2 Khodamba Pastures 40 40
Forest 16 16

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
3 Patal Pastures 49 49
Forest 6 6

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR

4 Uteva
Pastures 150 150

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR

5 Titoi
Pastures 30 30
Forest 3 3
Table no. 20.6 Details of Common Property Resources

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR

6 Amba
Pastures 75 75

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR

7 Pardi
Pastures 30 30

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR

8 Karvali
Pastures 40 40

Total Area (ha)
Names Area owned/ In possession of
S. CPR
of Govt. Govt.
No. Particulars Any other Any other
Village Pvt.
Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl. (specify PRI (Pl.
persons
deptt.) Specify) dept.) Specify)

9 Regama
Pastures 100 100.00

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
deptt.) dept.)

10 Fali
Pastures 50 50

Table no. 20.11 Details of Common Property Resources
Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
deptt.) dept.)

11 Kolsana
Pastures 8 8

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
deptt.) dept.)

12 Kasal
Pastures 30 30

Total Area (ha)
S. Names of CPR
deptt.) dept.)
13 Kalibel Pastures 10 10
Forest 14 14
3.6 Socio-economic profile

Patal project covers 13 villages in Mandvi Taluka. It has total 3038 households with population 19135 with 7908 females and 11227 males. There are
about 1398 BPL families. The average family size is of six members. The literacy rate is about 64 per cent with male literacy 51.86 per cent and 28.70 per
cent female literacy. The major caste in the village is Chaudhari, Vasava and Gamit. Most of the population is involved in the agriculture and animal
husbandary. Around 676 families are landless.

Table no. 21: Demographic information
Sr Population SC ST
Village
no Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Kalmoi 192 115 76 - - - - 192 115 76 100%
2 Khodamba 1658 993 663 - - - - 1658 993 663 100%
3 Patal 3368 2020 1347 15 8 7 0.45% 3353 2012 1340 99.55%
4 Uteva 2366 1419 946 - - - - 2366 1419 946 100%
5 Titoi 1208 724 483 - - - - 1208 724 483 100%
6 Amba 1575 945 630 - - - - 1575 945 630 100%
7 Pardi 1228 630 598 - - - - 1228 630 598 100%
8 Karvali 1450 870 580 10 6 4 0.69% 1440 864 576 99.31%
9 Regama 1715 1029 686 9 4 5 0.53% 1706 1025 681 99.47%
10 Fali 1096 657 438 - - - - 1096 657 438 100%
11 Kolsana 219 138 87 - - - - 219 138 87 100%
12 Kasal 2500 1350 1150 - - - - 2500 1350 1150 100%
13 Kalibel 560 337 224 - - - - 560 337 224 100%
Total 19135 11227 7908 34 18 16 - 19101 11209 7892 99.82%

Table no. 22: Literacy rate
Literacy Literacy % above Literacy % below
Sr no Village
Total % Male % Female % age 14 age 14
1 Kalmoi 154 80 63 55 34 45 32 18
2 Khodamba 912 55 596 60 298 45 22 18
3 Patal 2021 60 1212 60 539 40 24 16
4 Uteva 1538 65 922 65 520 55 26 22
5 Titoi 846 70 434 60 338 70 28 28
6 Amba 1103 70 614 65 284 45 28 18
7 Pardi 737 60 252 40 179 30 24 12
8 Karvali 943 65 348 40 203 35 26 14
9 Regama 1201 70 720 70 446 65 28 26
10 Fali 658 60 269 41 197 45 24 18
11 Kolsana 120 55 76 55 26 30 22 12
12 Kasal 1750 70 675 50 345 30 28 12
13 Kalibel 364 65 222 66 134 60 26 24
Total 12347 64 6403 51.86 3543 28.7 25.6 11.48
Migration pattern:
Migration of the villagers is observed mainly from November to May when they do not have any work to do. The agricultural labourers find some
employment during the monsoon season in their own village. Large numbers of villagers migrate in semi-bonded areas such as Surat and Bharuch to work
as cane-cutters in the sugar co-operatives. They even migrate as agricultural labours i.e. for construction works. The income they earn during the migration
period ranges from Rs. 4500 per month.

Table no. 23: Migration details
Migration Migration by months Income
Total Main reason during
Sr no Village Up to 3 More than 6
population Total Male Female 3-6 months for migration migration /
months months
month
Discussed as Rs 4500/-in
1
Kalmoi 192 77 58 19 35 15 27 above month
2 Khodamba 1658 663 497 166 298 133 232 “ “
3 Patal 3368 1347 1010 337 606 269 471 “ “
4 Uteva 2366 946 710 237 426 189 331 “ “
5 Titoi 1208 483 362 121 217 97 169 “ “
6 Amba 1575 630 473 158 284 126 221 “ “
7 Pardi 1228 491 368 123 221 98 172 “ “
8 Karvali 1450 580 435 145 261 116 203 “ “
9 Regama 1715 686 515 172 309 137 240 “ “
10 Fali 1096 438 329 110 197 88 153 “ “
11 Kolsana 219 88 66 22 40 18 31 “ “
12 Kasal 2500 1000 750 250 450 200 350 “ “
13 Kalibel 560 224 168 56 101 45 78 “ “
Total 19135 7653 5741 1916 3445 1531 2678
Poverty
The villages have a acute of poverty due to lack opportunity in various pockets of villagers. Nearly 46.02 per cent of the total household are poor of which
30 per cent lies 0-16 while other 70 per cent are in 16- 20. There is a ample need of developing various livelihood opportunity to increase the standard of
life of these poor.

Table no. 24: Poverty
BPL % of land less

Sr no Village Total Household % of BPL HH Total Land less HH
0-16 16-20 Total HH
1 Kalmoi 52 8 25 33 63.46 15 28.85
2 Khodamba 303 107 112 219 72.28 133 42.22
3 Patal 381 45 274 319 83.73 127 33.33
4 Uteva 405 22 14 36 8.89 105 25.93
5 Titoi 270 13 152 165 61.11 21 7.78
6 Amba 147 80 64 144 97.96 48 32.43
7 Pardi 94 0 25 25 26.6 43 31.16
8 Karvali 322 26 114 140 43.48 50 15.53
9 Regama 360 27 49 76 21.11 62 16.67
10 Fali 200 51 48 99 49.5 37 20
11 Kolsana 59 10 20 30 50.85 5 9.62
12 Kasal 35 31 60 91 260 22 7.83
13 Kalibel 117 3 18 21 17.95 8 6.84
Total 3038 423 975 1398 46.02 676 22.25

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Schools Other
Pucca Distance Milk Milk
Post Banks cooper
Sr road to from collectio cooperat
Colleges Office (Number) atives Any other
n Village the LP UP HS nearest n centre ive
(Number) (Distance Distance in / CBIs institution
o village market (Number (Numbe
in KM) km (Numb
(Y/N) yard ) r)
er)
1 Kalmoi N Y N N N N (2) N (8) N (15) N(4) N - Aaganvadi
N (6) N (13) Aaganvadi,Gram
2 Y Y Y N N Y Y N -
Khodamba Panchayat
N (6) N (15) Y Aaganvadi,PHC,
3 Y Y Y N N Y N -
Patal Gram Panchayat
N (4) N (11) Y Aaganvadi,Gram
4 Y Y N N N Y Y -
Uteva Panchayat
N (4) N (10) Y Aaganvadi, Gram
5 Y Y N N N N (2) N -
Titoi Panchayat
6 Y Y Y Y N Y N -
Amba Panchayat
7 Y Y N N N N(1) N -
Pardi Panchayat
8 Y Y N N N N(2) N -
Karvali Panchayat
9 Y Y N N N Y N -
Regama Panchayat
10 Y Y N N N N(4) N -
Fali Panchayat
11 Kolsana Y Y N N N N(2) N (8) N (18) Y N - Aaganvadi,

12 Y Y N N N Y N -
Kasal Panchayat

13 Y Y N N N N(3) N -
Kalibel Panchayat

25 Infrastructure facilities
All watershed villages are well connected with others villages within the taluka with pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram
Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 90 per cent of households in the villages have their personal electric meters. The villages have primary school with
all facilities like personal computers. Out of Thirteen villages 10 villages are having separate GPs .with panchayat office.
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

HHs with HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with HHs with HHs
Sr HHs with HHs with
Village safety cooking Drinking with
no electricity Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler TV set
latrines gas water fridge
1 Kalmoi 63 49 40 35 6 0 0 3 42 3
2 Khodamba 230 75 56 40 35 0 25 16 252 1
3 Patal 162 28 56 60 40 3 54 19 305 15
4 Uteva 400 80 32 25 20 0 22 20 324 2
5 Titoi 265 25 15 11 14 1 21 14 216 10
6 Amba 147 226 134 254 115 23 183 7 118 50
7 Pardi 26 22 3 10 13 0 6 7 110 4
8 Karvali 320 120 15 35 29 4 35 16 258 1
9 Regama 168 124 23 44 40 1 20 19 298 6
10 Fali 184 228 22 45 34 1 22 9 148 13
11 Kolsana 50 117 34 47 32 1 43 3 42 14
12 Kasal 50 120 23 50 16 1 50 14 225 13
13 Kalibel 115 50 22 40 62 1 30 6 94 15
Total 2180 1264 475 696 456 36 511 153 2432 147

Livelihood pattern:
The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they go as daily wage labour to sugar
field , Bricks work and diamond polishing works . Another major occupation of the people is Business and service and working in Shapar village industrial
zone and diamond polishing industries at Surat.
Table no. 27: Income

Sr no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total
1 Kalmoi 37.53 6.41 29.94 89.57 163.45
2 Khodamba 415.00 20.63 11.04 25.10 471.77
3 Patal 92.23 9.79 11.08 0.20 113.3
4 Uteva 12.77 6.60 15.81 5.80 40.98
5 Titoi 25.44 10.00 15.91 1.27 52.62
6 Amba 13.78 1.95 3.17 78.23 97.13
7 Pardi 4.51 2.07 1.27 2.29 10.14
8 Karvali 15.83 5.41 16.75 8.06 46.05
9 Regama 10.54 5.18 9.28 0.60 25.6
10 Fali 23.38 7.64 11.00 11.44 53.46
11 Kolsana 6.84 4.88 14.23 9.88 35.83
12 Kasal 72.81 6.57 8.71 1.20 89.29
13 Kalibel 15.53 0.35 2.96 0.50 19.34
Total 746.19 87.48 151.15 234.14 1218.96

28. Dependence on Common Property Resource
The vast majority of the denizens of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand-to-mouth existence. Their
pathetic poverty seems, in fact, to have further worsened in recent years, as their traditional pasture lands have been rapidly depleting due to over-grazing and
encroachments. Excessive mining and quarrying in the area has also resulted in depetion of the fertile land due to deposition of unfertile land mass and erosion of
these deposits to fertile lands. This has also resulted in diversion of the natural drains and disturbing the natural hydrology of the area.
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Benefit type 1(Grass) Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2 Total
Sr no Village
% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income income
Kalmoi 50 0.18 40 1.87 - - 2.05
1
2 Khodamba 45 0.3 50 2.40 100% 3.06 5.76
3 Patal 60 0.156 0 0.00 - - 0.16
4 Uteva 0 0 45 0.60 - - 0.6
5 Titoi 60 0.21 10 0.04 - - 0.25
6 Amba 0 0 30 0.32 - - 0.32
7 Pardi 0 0 0 0.07 - - 0.07
8 Karvali 0 0 40 0.07 - - 0.07
9 Regama 20 0.254 80 0.38 - - 0.63
10 Fali 0 0 50 0.33 - - 0.33
11 Kolsana 0 0 60 0.65 - - 0.65
12 Kasal 0 0 55 0.57 - - 0.57

13 Kalibel 22 0.1884 40 0.43 - - 0.62
Total - 1.2884 - 7.73 - 3.06 12.08
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr Total Animal Agriculture + Casual
Village Agriculture Services Handicraft Others
no workforce husbandry (AH) AH labour
1 Kalmoi 180 144 115 134 58 29 10 2
2 Khodamba 1559 1244 995 1161 497 249 83 17
3 Patal 3166 2526 2021 2358 1010 505 168 34
4 Uteva 2224 1775 1420 1656 710 355 118 24
5 Titoi 1136 906 725 846 362 181 60 12
6 Amba 1481 1181 945 1103 473 236 79 16
7 Pardi 1154 921 737 860 368 184 61 12
8 Karvali 1363 1088 870 1015 435 218 73 15
9 Regama 1612 1286 1029 1201 515 257 86 17
10 Fali 1030 822 658 767 329 164 55 11
11 Kolsana 206 164 131 153 66 33 11 2
12 Kasal 2350 1875 1500 1750 750 375 125 25
13 Kalibel 526 420 336 392 168 84 28 6
Total 17987 14352 11482 13396 5741 2870 957 193

CHAPTER-4
Watershed Activities

Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy is adapted by government of India especially in the rain fed region of semi-arid tropics. These regions
are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, law literacy and high incident of migration. The inherit
ant low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have very law biological efficiency.
Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The
common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Patal project consist of
four micro-watersheds namely 5C1A4a1g, 5C1A4a1f, 5C1A4a1e, 5C1A4a1h, 5C1A4a1d, 5C1A4a3b, 5C1A4a3a, 5C1A4b1g, 5C1A4b1e, 5C1A4a1b as their
respective codes. Further Patal watershed project is in continuation with other watershed programme namely IWDP.
(2)Baseline survey
To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be constructed. This acts a benchmark for
any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was been undertaken which involved
household census survey, Bio-physical survey and village level data collection from Talati-cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed
questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village,
the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, and average milk production of
the castles and varies schemes running and their benefits.
Bio-physical survey was been undertake to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in
the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.
a) Door to Door Survey
The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the
information related to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to head of the families.

Mostly females (between 65% and 70%)
Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)
High School education
Sarpanch and Talati of respective Gram Panchayats.
Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers, electric drum making units and workers of thresher units.
Cattle Breeders
Landless labour
The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to
Village details
Population details
Water supply details
Water source details
Questions about community engagement
Questions about Livelihood
Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed
Desire to do more activities related to occupation
Productivity of farms
The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports. Secondary data
related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments of Government agencies such as Revenue Office, Primary Health

Center, District Rural development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme office, working on poverty alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and
development societies etc.
b) Field to field Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also
includes the soil profiles, no of wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. The
details of agriculture as well as pasture lands of the village where the existing condition and structures to be proposed, were written down. Almost all the
farmers of the village were there to support the survey team. The purpose of the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns of water use
and peoples’ understanding & perceptions about both surface and groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis of such
detailed work. This also survey looked at the pattern of surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding of farmers regarding groundwater
recharge and discharge. This understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term
protocols of groundwater management in respective areas.
c) Demand survey: To know about the livelihood pattern of the village and the present status and practice capacities required are discussed. Quantitative
involved also on possible micro enterprise development for sustainable development of village extensively for SC/ST and landless/migrated poor people.
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the
programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological knowledge (ITK) while
planning for any activity. Participatory approach Provide a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a
complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decrease the effort of the ground staff i.e. WDT members and involves more of villagers as implementers.
Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the
village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like matrix ranking, vane
diagram were used to indentify various local vegetation (apt for af forestation ), fodders crops, various institution and their significance in the life of the
farmers.
In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect of all the villages of the cluster, we conducted Participatory Rural Appraisal
(PRA) exercise with the help of the villagers. It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the opportunity to interact with more
than 600 numbers of people in each village. To reach a concrete conclusion we requested a few villagers for focused discussion and it was entertained. As
per their convenience we conducted focused group discussion at the Community hall and Panchayat Bhavan ground. In majority of the discussion, we
listened to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise is placed below

Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern of village, community pasture land, farm areas, about the river
etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources of the village.
Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location of different institution of the village. During this exercise we also had informal
discussions with the participants about the importance of these institutions. Important location pointed out during this exercise was Community Centre,
Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location.
(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements of villagers across the twelve months of the year. We found
that rainfed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months of the year. About drinking water they informed that,
situation in the month of March to June is really difficult as they get water once in three days.
(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees of the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder, medicine , timber etc. Major
trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara etc. Taking into consideration all the utilities it was
found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon.
(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source of liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to know that there are two
major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton, ground nut and fodder crops and in rabi, major crops grown are wheat, cumin,
gram and vegetables.
(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources of income of villagers and how the money earned by the
villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source of earning among villagers are farming, dairy, service etc. Major expenditure
component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling of children, medicines, festivals, relatives, and paan etc.

One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status of different Self help Group operating in the village. This discussion concentrated
around the activities of SHG, terms and conditions of membership, working pattern of different SHG and their role in the development of society etc
Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution of the village. Apart from different institution discussion was concentrated
about gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation of women and deprived section of the society in the decision making

process, their representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process of development and poverty alleviation. In this process its relation
with different institution of village like dispensary, Aanganwari Kendra, Primary School and High school was also discussed.
The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income, expenditure,
crisis management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time of men and women, and market network for agricultural produce etc.
In the gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division of labour, the status of women in relation to the right to use, to own and sell
different household properties, the means of production of the household, and the role and participation of women in decision-making at intra household
and community levels.
To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different
types as shown below to know all the details of the village in a stipulated time.
Small and marginal farmers
Large farmers
Landless farmers
Women
Gram Panchayat members
Cattle grazing population
Business man and women
Problems Identification
After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as
Poor fertility of soil and low agricultural productivity
Soil Erosion from farm land

Improper Crop Rotation
Less use of bio-fertilizers
Almost negligible cultivation of arid fruits
Less cultivation of vegetables
Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds
No use of vermi compost
Lack of value addition practices
Drinking Water
Less availability of fodder
Market (No nearby)
Migration
Sanitation Problems
Less Nutritional Level
Malnutrition in few farm families
Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological,
Soil, BPL population, ST/ST population, Ground water status, and Drinking water situation slope percent. These were all given proper weight ages
according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
Planning
A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent,
soil depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agriculture land.
Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be
used to create a map. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water
conservation structures.
C) Hydrological modeling
Hydrological modeling technique was being used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. This
model overlaid over cadastral map hell to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human
error which generally occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used
Planning
Cluster approach Yes
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the
Yes
Institute
Baseline survey Yes
Hydro-geological survey Yes
Contour mapping Yes
Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover -
Ridge to Valley treatment Yes
Online IT connectivity between

Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes
DRDA and SLNA Yes
SLNA and DoLR Yes
Availability of GIS layers
Cadastral map Yes
Village boundaries Yes
Drainage Yes
Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes
Land use Yes
Ground water status Yes
Watershed boundaries Yes
Activity
Crop simulation models#
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Station
Inputs
Bio-pesticides
Organic manures Yes
Vermicompost Yes
Bio-fertilizer Yes
Water saving devices Yes
Mechanized tools/ implements Yes
Bio-fencing Yes
Nutrient budgeting Yes
Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No
Any other (please specify) No
#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum

Institutional formation in watershed
Watershed Committees (WC)
These are the committees formed by gram sabha to implement the watershed project works within their village with technical support of
WDTs’. These committees are to be registered under societies Registration Act-1860. Chairman & secretary of the committee is selected by gram sabha and
both the persons are from their villages. Capacity building training to watershed committee members was given by WDT members.The watershed
committee has pivotal role during various process like PRA & overall planning.
Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details Village:Kalmoi

Date of An Educa- Function
N Names Registration as Name of Member Designatio M/ S S S L Land G y tional /s
MF UG SHG
o. of WCs a Society n F C T F F -less P oth qualifi- assigned
(dd/mm/ yyyy) er cation #
Maganbhai K.
President M ¡ - - ¡ - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Divanbhai R. ¡ - - ¡ - - - - - -
Secretary M 4th
Chaudhari
Santilalbhai J. ¡ - - - - - -
Member M ¡ - - civil
Vasava
Ramilaben ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 4th -
D.Chaudhari
Waters Meenaben G. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 4th
hed Vasava
1 commit Under Progress Meenaben A. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Member F - 4th
tee Chaudhari
Kalmoi Nayanaben A. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - 1st -
Chaudhari
Umeshbhai N. ¡ - - - -
Member M ¡ - - - - 3rd
Chaudhari
Thakorbhai K. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 7th
Chaudhari
Manganbhai M. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 4th -
Chaudhari
Gamabhai K. Gamit Member M ¡ - ¡ - - - - - illiterate -

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details Village:Khodamba
Date of
Educa-
Sr Registratio Name of Function
Any tional
. Names of n as a Member Designatio M/ S Land G /s
ST SF MF LF UG SHG othe qualifi
N WCs Society n F C -less P assigned
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Jyantibhai N.
President M ¡ - - ¡ - - - - - 9th -
Gamit
Hiteshkumar L. ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 12th
Chaudhari
Vasava
Kamuben F. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 8th -
Gamit
Rasilaben R, ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 8th
Gamit
Watershed
Under Jyantibhai J. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
2 committee Member M - 3rd
Progress Gamit
Khodamba
Narmadaben C. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - 12th -
Vasava
Amarsinhbhai K. ¡ - - - -
Member M ¡ - - - - 12th
Gamit
Lalabhai M. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 3rd
Gamit
Jagubhai C. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 3rd -
Chaudhari
Gumanbhai S. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 4th
Vasava

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details Village:- Patal
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Natubhai R.
President M ¡ - ¡ - - - - - - 5th -
Gamit
Shaileshbhai M. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - - -
Secretary M BA
Gamit
Member M ¡ - - Civil
Vasava
Dharmisthaben ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 9th -
R. Gamit
Sunitaben D. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 5th
Gamit
Watershed
Under Ramaben R. ¡ - - - - - ¡ illiterat -
3 committee Member M -
Progress Gamit e
Patal
Ramanbhai K. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - 11th -
Vasava
Bachubhai P. ¡ - - - -
Member M ¡ - - - - 5th
Patalvala
Dayarambhai U. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 5th
Gamit
Jyantibhai M. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 4th -
Gamit
Sahpurbhai B. ¡ - - - - - - illiterat -
Member M ¡
Gamit e

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details Village:- Uteva
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Pravinbhai S.
President M ¡ - ¡ - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Kaushikbhai B ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 10th
Chaudhari
Vasava
Sakutalaben S. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Umaben A. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 4th
Watershed Chaudhari
Under
4 committee Jasuben S. Gamit Member F ¡ - - - - - ¡ - 4th -
Progress
Uteva Sumanbhai M. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - 7th -
Chaudhari
Shaileshbhai R. ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari
Virsinhbhai R. ¡ - illiterat -
Member M ¡ - - - - - -
Chaudhari e
Kanubhai D. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Magtabhai S. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 7th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details Village:- Titoi
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Dilipbhai L.
President M ¡ - ¡ - - - - - 8th -
Gamit
Laljibhai D. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 12th
Chaudhari
Vasava
Sudhaben P. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 12th -
Chaudhari
Taraben A. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 9th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Nitaben R. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
5 committee Member F - 12th
Progress Chaudhari
Titoi
Ashokbhai K. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - 8th -
Chaudhari
Ishwarbhai S. ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari
Arjunbhai C. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - BA
Chaudhari
Virsinhbhai R. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Harsanbhai B. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 7th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.6 Watershed Committee details Village:- Amba
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Ansuyaben G.
President F ¡ - ¡ - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Vimalbhai J. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M MA
Chaudhari
Vasava
Parvatiben B. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Daxaben J. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 5th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Sunitaben N. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Progress Chaudhari
Amba
Atulbhai J. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - DP ed -
Chaudhari
Devlabhai C. ¡ - - - Illitera -
Member M ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari te
Rakeshbhai M. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 12th
Chaudhari
Mukeshbhai R. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Ramanbhai R. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 10 th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.7 Watershed Committee details Village:- Pardi
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Kasilaben N.
President F ¡ ¡ - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Nileshbhai R. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 12th
Chaudhari
Vasava
Alitaben R. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 5th -
Chaudhari
Sonaben U. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 7th
Chaudhari
Watershed Vanitaben S. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Under Member F - 6th
7 committee Chaudhari
Progress
Pardi Vasantbhai M. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - 12th -
Chaudhari
Lalsinhbhai M. ¡ - - - illiterat -
Member M ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari e
Kishorbhai D. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 12th
Chaudhari
Savalabhai A. ¡
Chaudhari Member M - ¡ - - - - - 12th -
Mohanbhai M. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 9th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.8Watershed Committee details Village:- Karvali
Date of
Registratio Name of Member Educa-
Sr. Function/
Names of n as a M/ Land Any tional
N Designation SC ST SF MF LF UG SHG GP s
WCs Society F -less other qualifi-
o. assigned#
(dd/mm/ cation
yyyy)
Dalsinhbhai M.
Chaudhari President M ¡ ¡ - - - - - MA -
Vijaybhai P. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M B ed
Chaudhari
Vasava
Sarmilaben P. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Ilaben V. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 10th
Watershed Chaudhari
Under
8 committee Chetanbhai T. ¡ - - - - - ¡ illiterat -
Progress Member M -
Karvali Rathod e
Virsinhbhai M. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Dipakbhai U. ¡ - - - illiterat -
Member M ¡ - - - -
Halpati e
Ishwarbhai G ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 7th
Halpati
Vadsibhai D. ¡ illterat
Member M - ¡ - - - - - -
Chaudhari e
Machhabhai M. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 7th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.9 Watershed Committee details Village:- Regama
Date of
Educa-
Sr Registratio Name of Functi
Any tional
. Names of n as a Member Designatio M/ S Land G on/s
N WCs Society n F C -less P assign
r -
o. (dd/mm/ ed#
cation
yyyy)
Bahadurbhai R.
President M ¡ ¡ - - - - - B ed -
Chaudhari
Dilipbhai J. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 12th
Chaudhari
Vasava
Nanduben L. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 10th -
Chaudhari
Sakutlaben D. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 12th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Desaibhai J. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Progress Chaudhari
Regama
Jasuben D. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Kesavbhai S. ¡ - - - -
Vasava
Naginbhai S. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 7th
Chaudhari
Kamleshbhai G. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Revalabhai M. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 7th
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.10Watershed Committee details Village:- Fali
Date of
Educa-
Sr Registrati Name of Function
Any tional
. Names of on as a Member Designatio M/ S Land G /s
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Vinodbhai C.
President M ¡ ¡ - - - - - B com -
Gamit
Niteshbhai N. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M BA
Gamit
Vasava
Ushaben S. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 4th -
Gamit
Anjanaben N. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member F 12th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Kavjibhai K. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Progress Chaudhari
Fali
Meenaben S. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - 8th -
Gamit
Ravindrabhai S. ¡ - - - illitera -
Member M ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari te
Gulabbhai M. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 8th
Gamit
Ishawarbhai R. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 2nd -
Gamit
Nasvantbhai B. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 4th
Gamit

Table no. 31.11 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kolsana
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Jitubhai M.
President M ¡ ¡ - - - - - 3rd -
Chaudhari
Bipinbhai R. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M 12th
Chudhari
Vasava
Kanchanben N. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - 7th -
Chaudhari
Jayaben P. Gamit Member F ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - 9th -
Watershed Nanubhai V. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Under Member M - 2nd
11 committee Chuadhari
Progress
Kolsana Mukeshbhai B. ¡ ¡ -
Member M - - - - - - 4th -
Chuadhari
Naranbhai V. ¡ - - - illiterat -
Member M ¡ - - - -
Chuadhari e
Manchhibhai D. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 10th
Chuadhari
Samjibhai T. ¡ illiterat
Member M - ¡ - - - - - -
Chaudhari e
Rameshbhai J. ¡ - - - - - - illiterat -
Member M ¡
Chaudhari e

Table no. 31.12 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kasal
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Arunbhai V.
President M ¡ ¡ - - - - - 12th -
Chaudhari
Satishbhai L. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M BA
Chaudhari
Vasava
Nitaben S. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Vijaybhai S. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member M 12th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Surekhaben J. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Progress Chaudhari
Kasal
Alkaben S. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - 8th -
Chaudhari
Girishbhai K. ¡ - - - -
Member M ¡ - - - - 2nd
Chaudhari
Jyantibhai K. ¡ - -
Member M ¡ - - - - - - 3rd
Chaudhari
Chhitubhai R. ¡
Member M - ¡ - - - - - 4th -
Chaudhari
Pareshbhai C. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 3rd
Chaudhari

Table no. 31.13 Watershed Committee details Village:- Kalibel
Date of
Educa-
Any tional
r -
o. (dd/mm/ #
cation
yyyy)
Arunaben N.
President F ¡ ¡ - - - - - 11th -
Chaudhari
Kavjibhai U. ¡ ¡ - - - - - - -
Secretary M BA
Chaudhari
Vasava
Kenaben I. ¡ ¡
Member F - - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Satishbhai N. ¡ - - - - - ¡ - - -
Member M 8th
Chaudhari
Watershed
Under Nitaben K. ¡ - - - - - ¡ -
Progress Chaudhari
Kalibel
Induben K. ¡ ¡ -
Member F - - - - - - BA -
Chaudhari
Manjibhai D. ¡ - - - -
Chaudhari
Manabhai N. ¡ - Illitera -
Member M ¡ - - - - - -
Chaudhari te
Divalabhai G. ¡ illiterat
Member M - ¡ - - - - - -
Chaudhari e
Natubhai D. ¡ - - - - - - -
Member M ¡ 7th
Chaudhari

Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning
C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments
E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation
G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
Self Help group (SHG)
Self Help group are motivated, small homogeneous group organised together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self Help Group
initiative especially for women to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST
women.
SHG initiative in Patal watershed was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogeneous communities of women
based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are:
Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institutes.
Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders.
Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structure.
Lack of small micro- loans without collaterals and high interest rates.
Lack of knowledge on credit, Thrift activity and banking.
With a view point of these problems it was planned to organized these women to a in to group consisting of 12 to 20 to each groups. With
detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG
activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this included spices packing, embroidery
activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into a better human development in the village.

Table no. 32.1 : SHG detail Village:-Kalmoi
No. of ST in each No. of BPL in each
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members
category category
Sr. No. With
With only With
only Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 26 26 0 26 26 0 26 26
1 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 26 26 0 26 26 0 26 26
Table no. 32.2 : SHG detail Village:-Khodamba

category category
S.
With
No. With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 13 13 0 13 13 0 7 7
(ii) SF 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 6
2 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 24 24 0 24 24 0 18 18

Table no. 32.3 : SHG detail Village:-Patal
category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 8 8 0 8 8 0 3 3
(ii) SF 0 21 21 0 21 21 0 9 9
3 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 29 29 0 29 29 0 12 12
Table no. 32.4 : SHG detail Village:-Uteva

No. of BPL in each
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of ST in each category
category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 7 7
4 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 14 14 0 14 14 0 11 11
(iv) LF 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
Total 0 25 25 0 25 25 0 18 18

Table no. 32.5: SHG detail Village:-Titoi
category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
(ii) SF 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 3 3
5 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 14 14 0 14 14 0 5 5
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 25 25 0 25 25 0 9 9
Table no. 32.6 : SHG detail Village:-Amba

category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
(ii) SF 0 12 12 0 12 12 0 9 9
6 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 4 4
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 20 20 0 20 20 0 14 14

Table no. 32.7 : SHG detail Village:-Pardi
No. of BPL in each
category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 15 19 34 15 19 34 0 10 10
7 1 2 0 3
(iii) MF 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 15 24 39 15 24 39 0 10 10
Table no. 32.8 : SHG detail Village:-Karvali

No. of BPL in each
category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 10 10
8 0 3 0 3
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 10 10

Table no. 32.9 : SHG detail Village:-Regama
category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4
(ii) SF 9 5 14 9 5 14 4 9 13
9 1 1 0 2
(iii) MF 1 5 6 1 5 6 1 5 6
(iv) LF 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total 11 14 25 11 14 25 5 18 23
Table no. 32.10 : SHG detail Village:-Fali

category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2
(ii) SF 6 7 13 6 7 13 6 7 13
10 1 1 0 2
(iii) MF 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
(iv) LF 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2
Total 10 10 20 10 10 20 10 10 20

Table no. 32.11 : SHG detail Village:-Kolsana
category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2
(ii) SF 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 3 3
11 0 1 0 1
(iii) MF 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 2 2
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 7 7

Table no. 32.12 : SHG detail Village:-Kasal
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of ST in each No. of BPL in each

No. of members
category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 10 18 28 10 18 28 6 10 16
12 1 2 0 3
(iii) MF 2 5 7 2 5 7 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 12 23 35 12 23 35 6 10 16
Table no. 32.13 : SHG detail Village:-Kalibel

category category
S. No. With
With only With
Women both
Men
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 3 3
13 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 3 3

User Group:-
These are homogeneous group of persons having land holding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity
or asset on long term basis. The user group collect user charge from their members. Some of the point with was considered while forming a user group in
Patal were:
In case of check dam all the beneficiary of the individual check dam where involved as user group members.
In case of Vermi compost all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members.
Membership was on voluntary and democratic.
Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members.
It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Table no. 33.1: UG detail Village:- Kalmoi

No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each
Total no. of UGs No. of members
S. No. category category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 22 0 22 22 0 22 22 0 22
1 4 0 1 5
(iii) MF 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 0 4
(iv) LF 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2
Total 4 0 1 5 28 0 28 28 0 28 28 0 28

Table no. 33.2: UG detail Village:- Khodamba
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 28 2 30 28 2 30 28 2 30
2 5 0 1 6
(iii) MF 19 2 21 19 2 21 19 2 21
(iv) LF 10 1 11 10 1 11 10 1 11
Total 5 0 1 6 57 5 62 57 5 62 57 5 62
Table no. 33.3: UG detail Village:- Patal

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 63 2 65 63 2 65 27 0 27
3 6 0 2 8
(iii) MF 18 1 19 18 1 19 17 0 17
(iv) LF 12 1 13 12 1 13 0 0 0
Total 6 0 2 8 93 4 97 93 4 97 44 0 44

Table no. 33.4: UG detail Village:- Uteva
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 55 5 60 55 5 60 38 2 40
4 7 0 2 9
(iii) MF 13 2 15 13 2 15 7 1 8
(iv) LF 6 1 7 6 1 7 0 0 0
Total 7 0 2 9 74 8 82 74 8 82 45 3 48
Table no. 33.5: UG detail Village:- Titoi

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 46 4 50 46 4 50 40 5 45
5 5 0 1 6
(iii) MF 13 2 15 13 2 15 10 2 12
(iv) LF 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0
Total 5 0 1 6 70 6 76 70 6 76 50 7 57

Table no. 33.6: UG detail Village:- Amba
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 54 3 57 54 3 57 22 3 25
6 7 0 2 9
(iii) MF 12 3 15 12 3 15 5 2 7
(iv) LF 8 2 10 8 2 10 0 0 0
Total 7 0 2 9 74 8 82 74 8 82 27 5 32
Table no. 33.7: UG detail Village:- Pardi

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 35 2 37 35 2 37 9 0 9
7 6 0 1 7
(iii) MF 15 2 17 15 2 17 5 0 5
(iv) LF 6 1 7 6 1 7 0 0 0
Total 6 0 1 7 46 5 61 46 5 61 14 0 14

Table no. 33.8: UG detail Village:- Karvali
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 27 3 30 27 3 30 10 0 10
8 6 0 2 8
(iii) MF 11 3 14 11 3 14 5 0 5
(iv) LF 7 1 8 7 1 8 0 0 0
Total 6 0 2 8 45 7 52 45 7 52 15 0 15
Table no. 33.9: UG detail Village:- Regama

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 56 3 59 56 3 59 10 2 12
9 5 0 1 6
(iii) MF 16 2 18 16 2 18 7 0 7
(iv) LF 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 0
Total 5 0 1 6 77 5 82 77 5 82 17 2 19

Table no. 33.10: UG detail Village:- Fali
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 27 2 29 27 2 29 12 2 14
10 6 0 0 6
(iii) MF 9 1 10 9 1 10 6 0 6
(iv) LF 14 1 15 14 1 15 0 0 0
Total 6 0 0 6 50 4 54 50 4 54 18 2 20
Table no. 33.11: UG detail Village:- Kolsana

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 17 2 19 17 2 19 5 0 5
11 6 0 1 7
(iii) MF 15 1 16 15 1 16 3 0 3
(iv) LF 3 0 3 3 0 3 0 0 0
Total 6 0 1 7 35 3 38 35 3 38 8 0 8

Table no. 33.12: UG detail Village:- Kasal
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 30 3 33 30 3 33 15 2 17
12 6 0 1 7
(iii) MF 19 2 21 19 2 21 7 0 7
(iv) LF 12 2 14 12 2 14 0 0 0
Total 6 0 1 7 61 7 68 61 7 68 22 2 24
Table no. 33.13: UG detail Village:- Kalibel

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 34 1 35 34 1 35 3 0 3
13 5 0 1 6
(iii) MF 13 1 14 13 1 14 0 0 0
(iv) LF 7 0 7 7 0 7 0 0 0
Total 5 0 1 6 54 2 56 54 2 56 3 0 3

4.3.1 Entry point Activity (EPA):
EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important
works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding
the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 24.00 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The
villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which
revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of
activities.
Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Sr. Estimated cost
Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities planned
No. Unit (Nos) (lac)
Bore/Hand pump repairing 1 0.11
1 Kalmoi 0.29
Pipeline (mtr) 60 mtr 0.18
2 Khodamba 1.41 Well repairing 1 0.39
Checkdam Repairing 1 0.20
3 Patal 3.42 Pipeline (mtr) 650 mtr 1.94
Bore repairing 1 0.38
4 Uteva 3.02 Well Repairing 1 0.70
Checkdam Repairing 1 1.82
5 Titoi 2.01
Hawada 1 0.33
Well Repairing 4 0.28

6 Amba 2.74
Bore 5 2.00
7 Pardi 1.87 Well Repairing 1 0.66
Bore 1 0.40
8 Karvali 2.26 Well repairing 1 0.14
Community hall repairing 1 1.00
9 Regama 2.08
Hawada 2 0.80
10 Fali 1.97
Smasan Sagdi 2 0.60
Bore 1 0.20
11 Kolsana 0.69
12 Kasal 1.54 Well Repairing 1 0.40
School Fencing 1 0.60
13 Kalibel 0.70 Hawada 1 0.20
Total 24.00 24.00

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Identifying
Sr. Initiation of Hydro- Any other Estimated
Name of Capacity IEC Baseline technical
village level geological (please Cost (Rs. in
No. villages building activities survey support
institution survey specify) lakh)
agencies
1 Kalmoi 0.07 0.18 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.44
2 Khodamba 0.32 0.84 0.42 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.11 2.12
3 Patal 0.77 2.06 1.03 0.51 0.26 0.26 0.26 5.15
4 Uteva 0.68 1.81 0.91 0.45 0.23 0.23 0.23 4.54
5 Titoi 0.45 1.21 0.60 0.30 0.15 0.15 0.15 3.01
6 Amba 0.62 1.64 0.82 0.41 0.21 0.21 0.21 4.12
7 Pardi 0.42 1.12 0.56 0.28 0.14 0.14 0.14 2.80
8 Karvali 0.51 1.35 0.68 0.34 0.17 0.17 0.17 3.39
9 Regama 0.47 1.25 0.62 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.16 3.13
10 Fali 0.44 1.18 0.59 0.30 0.15 0.15 0.15 2.96
11 Kolsana 0.15 0.41 0.21 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.02
12 Kasal 0.35 0.92 0.46 0.23 0.12 0.12 0.12 2.32
13 Kalibel 0.16 0.42 0.21 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.00
Total 5.41 14.39 7.20 3.58 1.82 1.82 1.82 36.00
#One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started

Watershed Development Works:
Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the
Watershed and move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of The watershed.
Work is location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated. The aim is to Weave interventions into the
contours of nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.
Ridge Area Treatment Plans
In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning of the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher
reaches of the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed. Various
watershed managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation of forest with grasses in upper ridges.
1. Contour trench
2. Gabion
3. Grass seedling/plantatation
1. Contour Bunds/Trench
Contour bund/trenches are a simple, low-cost method of checking the velocity of runoff in the ridge area of any watershed. A contour trench
is a trench dug along a contour line. A contour line is an imaginary line that joins together points of the same elevation. Digging a trench along a line that is
at the same level increases the chances of containing runoff for a longer period of time within the trench. If bunds/trenches were not to follow a contour,
such digging could actually increase the possibility of soil erosion because there would be a rise in the velocity of runoff following upon an increase in the
slope of the land. In the ridge area of a watershed a contour bund/trench is a simple and inexpensive solution to slowing down surface runoff and reducing
soil erosion.
Objectives
1) Slowing down the velocity of runoff
2) Checking soil erosion
3) Improving local soil moisture profile

Contour bunds/trenches are constructed in the ridge area of a watershed. Rainwater, which falls in this area flow unchecked carrying with
it eroded soil into the flatter portion of the watershed - the "valley". This silt gets deposited into reservoirs and ponds, reducing their life. Thus, any water
harvesting work undertaken in the valley will become meaningless unless appropriate measures such as contour trenching are undertaken to control
runoff and soil erosion in the ridge. Contour trenches collect the rainwater that falls in the ridge area. This way the soil moisture profile in the area adjacent
to the trench is improved.
2. Gabions Structure
Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area of 50-500 ha. They are also constructed
to reinforce highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim of constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the
drainage line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, gabion structures help in -
1.Reduction in soil erosion
2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed.
3. Increasing recharge of groundwater and
4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created
downstream on the drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.
Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting:
The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or surface water
storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
(NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.
1. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams
1. Check dams
Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered
formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream course and the
height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff water cushions are provided
at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in
project villages.

2. Dugwell Recharge Structure
Ground water plays vital role in food production, drinking water supply, drought mitigation economic development etc beside environment
sustenance in country. Presently more than 85% or rural water supply 50% of urban water needs and 50% of water requirement for irrigation in the
country are met from ground water sources. As per the latest ground water resourse assessment carried out by Central Ground Water Board (CGWB). The
situation in 112 areas is a matter of series concern in Gujarat state. In all 31 areas are over exploited, 12 areas are critical and 69 areas are semi critical.
Artificial Recharge of ground water is one of the most efficient ground water management tools for ensuring sustainability of ground water
resources. Keeping in view the concen on problems of over exploitation of ground water resourses in the country as well as to ensure sustainable water
resources management and assured irrigation facilities in the affected areas, activity “Artificial Recharge to ground water through Dugwell” has been
prepared.
Name Of Work: Constructions of Dug Well Recharging Structure
Qty Unit Item Rate Per Total Amt.

13.136 Cm Item1: Excavation for Foundation in all sort of 69.60 Cm 914.27
Soil including sandy gravelly soil. Soft murmur
including depositing the excavated stuff as
directed incl. back filling the trenches with
suitable excavated stuff etc. comp. for lead up
to 50 and lift as under. (Manually without
dewatering ) (a) lift up to 1.5 meter SOR Pg.
No. 17-Sr. No.5(a)
0.644 Cm Item 2 : Filling in foundation with concrete of 2236.30 Cm 1440.18
cement, sand and metal (up to 5 Cm Size) in
following proportion including centering
,Shutering , Temping , Smootj Finishing curing
etc. for lead 50 mt. and lift 1.5 mt. (1) 1:4:8
SOR Pg. No 23-Sr. No 17(ii)
4.177 Cm Item 3: Providing and Laying burnt brick 2111.30 Cm 8818.48

(Conventional size ) Masonry for foundation in

ordinary Portland cement mortar 1:5 mm
depth curing etc. complete for all lead and lift
0.500 Cm Item 4: Providing and Laying plain / 3186.00 Cm. 1593.00
Reinforced cement concert of cement ,sand &
metal (20 mm to 25 mm size) in following
propos. Laid in situ incl. centering, shuttering,
temping , smooth finishing curing etc.
complete as directed for all leads & lifts.(iv)
1:2:4 SOR Pg. No 23-Sr. No .18(iv)
6.000 sm Item 5: Plastering cement plastering various 114.30 sm 4114.80
thickness plastering of cement & sand 1:3,13
mm and proportion incl. smooth finishing ,
curing , scaffolding. Comp. for all leads and
lifts as under (a) cement mortar 1:3
proportion. (i) 20 mm thick SOR Pg No. 26-Sr.
No. 35(a) (i)
1.95 Cm. Item 6 Providing filter sand of effective size 135.00 Cm 262.83
and uniformity coefficient and required F/S
and U/C SOR Pg. No. 56-Sr. No.3
0.97 Cm. Item 7 : Providing filter crust stone aggregate 425.00 Cm 827.42
of size with up to 20 mm with required F/S
and U/S SOR Pg. No.56-Sr. No.4(iii)
3.75 Cm Item 8: Providing and laying PVC standard 275.00 Mt 1031.25
size pipe 110 mm dia 6 kg / cm with all lead
lift as per req. by EIC as per side condition
SOR Pg. No .63 sr.no 170(7)
Total 19002.22

Measurement sheet
Item -1 Excavation for foundation in all sort of soil. Incl. Sandy gravelly soil, soft murrum incl. depositing … Etc. comp. For lead up to 50 mt. and lift as
under
Chamber 1 X 2.80 X 2.30 X 1.90 Av. 12.236 cm

Pipe 1 X 1.00 X 0.50 X 1.80 Av. 0.900 Cm
Total 13.136 Cm
Item -2 : Filling in foundation with concrete of cement, sand and metal (up to 5 Cm. Size) in following proportion(1:4:8) incl… smooth finishing etc. for lead
50 mt. And lift 1.5 mt.
Chamber 1 X 2.80 X 2.30 X 0.10 Av. 0.644 cm
Total 0.644 Cm
Item -3 : Providing and laying burnt brick (conventional size) masonry for foundation in ordinary Portland cement…etc.cop
Chamber 2 X 2.27+1.77 X 1.90 X 0.23 3.531 Cm
1 X 1.56 X 1.80 X 0.23 0.646 Cm
Total 4.177 cm
Item -4 : Filling in foundation with concrete of cement , sand and metal (up to 5 cm. Size ) in following proportion (1:2:4) incl.. Smooth finishing etc. for
lead 50 mt. And lift 1.5 mt.
Chamber 1 X 2.50 X 2.00 X 0.10 Av. 0.500 Cm
Total 0.500 cm

Item – 5 : Plastering cement plaster in various thickness of cement & sand 1:3 20 mm thick … etc comp.
O/S 2 X 2.50 X 2.00 10.00 Cm
2 X 2.00 X 2.00 8.00 Sm
I/S 2 X 2.50 X 2.00 10.00 Sm
2 X 2.00 x 2.00 8.00 Sm
Total 36.00 Sm
Item -6 : Providing , Filter sand of effective size and uniformity coefficient and required F/S and U/C etc. comp.
Chamber 1 X 1.56 X 1.04 X 1.20 1.947 Cm
Total 1.947 Cm
Item -7 : Providing , filter gravel of effective size and Uniformity Coefficient and required F/S and U/C ….etc. comp.
Chamber 1 X 1.56 X 1.04 X 0.60 0.973 Cm
Total 0.973 Cm
Item -8 : Providing supplying and fixing of slandered length of ISI mark Rigid Un-plasticized PVC pipe incl. cost of solvent cement and other material etc.
complete 6 kg/cm 2 no. of 110 mm dia. Pipe.
3no. X 1.25 3.75 Mt.

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing

Construction of new structures Total target
structures
Sr. Type of
Village name
No. structures Area to Area to
Area to be
Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No. irrigated No.
capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs)
(ha)
(ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 4 - 0.20 - 0.20
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 5 - - 2.00 - - 2.00

1 Kalmoi
Gabion Structure - - - - 4 - - 1.00 - - 1.00
Check Wall - - - - 1 - - 1.50 - - 1.50
Land levelling - - - - 5 - - 1.00 - - 1.00
Total 19 5.70 5.70

Proposed target

structures
Sr. Village
Type of structures
No. name Area to
Area to be Area to be
Storage Estimated Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No. irrigated No. irrigated
capacity cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha)
(ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 10 - 0.50 - 0.50
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 7 - - 2.80 - - 2.80

2 Khodamba
Check Wall - - - - 3 - - 4.50 - - 4.50
Land levelling - - - - 15 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Total 42 12.55 12.55

Proposed target

S. Village Type of structures
No. name structures
Area to be Area to be Area to be
Storage Estimated Storage Estimated Storage Estimated
No. irrigated No. irrigated irrigated
capacity cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 18 - 0.90 - 0.90
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 15 - - 6.00 - - 6.00

3 Patal
Check Wall - - - - 12 - - 17.50 - - 17.50
Land levelling - - - - 16 - - 3.20 - - 3.20
Total 76 31.35 31.35

Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of
S. Village existing structures
Type of structures
No. name Area to Area to Area to
be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No. No.
irrigated capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 17 - 0.8 5 - 0.85
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 12 - - 4.80 - - 4.80
4 Uteval Gabion Structure - - - - 14 - - 3.50 - - 3.50
Check Wall - - - - 8 - - 11.50 - - 11.50
Land levelling - - - - 15 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Staggered trench - - - - 1 - - 1.50 - - 1.50
Total 67 25.15 25.15

Proposed target

S. Village structures
Type of structures
No. name
Estimated Storage Estimated Storage Estimated
Storage capacity
cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 15 - 0.75 - 0.75
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 13 - - 5.20 - - 5.20

5 Titoi
Check Wall - - - - 4 - - 6.00 - - 6.00
Land levelling - - - - 14 - - 2.80 - - 2.80
Total 61 18.50 18.50

Proposed target

Sr. Village structures
Type of structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 10 - 0.50 - 0.50
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 15 - - 6.00 - - 6.00

6 Amba
Check Wall - - - - 6 - - 9.00 - - 9.00
Land levelling - - - - 14 - - 2.80 - - 2.80
Total 61 22.30 22.30

Proposed target

Type of structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 12 - 0.60 - 0.60
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 11 - - 4.40 - - 4.40

7 Pardi
Check Wall - - - - 4 - - 6.25 - - 6.25
Land levelling - - - - 20 - - 4.00 - - 4.00
Total 54 17.00 17.00

Table no.36.8 Activities related to Soil conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of
existing structures
Sr.
Village name Type of structures
No. Area to Area to Area to
be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No. No.
irrigated capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs) irrigated capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 9 - 0.45 - 0.45
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 10 - - 4.00 - - 4.00

8 Karvali
Check Wall - - - - 5 - - 7.00 - - 7.00
Land levelling - - - - 15 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Total 47 16.45 16.45

Table no.36.9: Activities related to Soil
conservation in the project areas (all financial
figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target

Type of structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 15 - 0.75 - 0.75
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 14 - - 5.60 - - 5.60

9 Regama
Check Wall - - - - 6 - - 9.00 - - 9.00
Land levelling - - - - 13 - - 2.60 - - 2.60
Total 61 21.20 21.20

Proposed target

Type of structures
No. name
Estimated Storage Estimated Storage Estimated
Storage capacity
cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs) capacity cost(Rs)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 8 - 0.40 - 0.40
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 16 - - 6.40 - - 6.40

10 Fali
Check Wall - - - - 6 - - 9.00 - - 9.00
Land levelling - - - - 10 - - 2.00 - - 2.00
Total 56 21.80 21.80

Proposed target

S. Village structures
Type of structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 6 - 0.30 - 0.30
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 4 - - 1.60 - - 1.60

11 Kolsana
Check Wall - - - - 1 - - 1.50 - - 1.50
Land levelling - - - - 15 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Total 31 7.65 7.65

Proposed target

Type of structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 10 - 0.50 - 0.50
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 11 - - 4.40 - - 4.40
12 Kasal Gabion Structure - - - - 7 - - 1.75 - - 1.75
Check Wall - - - - 2 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Land levelling - - - - 16 - - 3.20 - - 3.20
staggered trench - - - - 1 - - 1.50 - - 1.50
Total 47 14.35 14.35

Proposed target

Sr. Village Construction of new structures Total target
Type of structures structures
No. name
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Nala Plug up 5-10

- - - -
mtr - - 8 - 0.40 - 0.40
Pacca Nala Plug - - - - 6 - - 2.40 - - 2.40

13 Kalibel
Check Wall - - - - 1 - - 1.50 - - 1.50
Land levelling - - - - 15 - - 3.00 - - 3.00
Total 35 8.55 8.55

Table no.37.1: Activities related to water Conservation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target

structures
Sr.
Village Type of
No Storage
name structures Storage
. Area to be Area to be capacit Area to be Storage
capacity Estimate Estimate Estimate
No. irrigated No. irrigated y (in irrigated capacity(in
(in 1000 d cost d cost d cost
(ha) (ha) 1000 (ha) 1000 Cmt)
Cmt)
Cmt)
1 Kalmoi Dugwell recharge

- - - - 1 - - 0.20 0.20
Total 0 0 0 0 1 - - 0.20 0 0 0.20
Table no.37.2: Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
structures
Sr. Village Storage
Type of structures Area to Area to Area to
No. name Storage capacity Storage
be Estimated be Estimated be Estimated
No. capacity(in No. (in capacity(in
irrigated cost irrigated cost irrigated cost
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 1 5 40.00 3.00 5 40.00 3.00
2 Khodamba
Dugwell recharge - - - - 3 - - 0.60 0.60
Total 2 5 40.00 3.60 5 40.00 3.60

Proposed target

structures
Sr. Village Type of
No. name structures Area to Storage
Storage Area to be Area to be Storage
be Estimated capacity Estimated Estimated
No. capacity(in No. irrigated irrigated capacity(in
irrigated cost (in 1000 cost cost
1000 Cmt) (ha) (ha) 1000 Cmt)
(ha) Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 2 15 60.00 6.00 15 60.00 6.00

3 Patal
Total 7 15 60.00 7.00 15 60.00 7.00
Proposed target
structures
Sr. Village Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 2 20 60.00 6.00 20 60.00 6.00
4 Uteva
Total 5 20 60.00 6.60 20 60.00 6.60

Proposed target

structures
Sr. Village
Type of structures Storage
Storage capacity Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 1 12 40.00 3.00 12 40.00 3.00

5 Titoi
Total 4 12 40.00 3.60 12 40.00 3.60
Proposed target
structures
Sr. Village Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 2 20 60.00 6.00 20 60.00 6.00
6 Amba
Total 4 20 60.00 6.40 20 60.00 6.40

Proposed target

structures
Sr. Village
Type of structures Storage
Storage capacity Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 1 8 40.00 3.00 8 40.00 3.00

7 Pardi
Total 3 8 40.00 3.40 8 40.00 3.40
Table no.37.8 Activities related to water conversation in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
structures
Sr.
Village Storage
No Type of structures Storage Storage
name Area to be Area to be capacit Area to be
. capacity(i Estimate Estimate capacity(i Estimate
No. irrigated No. irrigated y (in irrigated
n 1000 d cost d cost n 1000 d cost
(ha) (ha) 1000 (ha)
Cmt) Cmt)
Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 2 18 60.00 6.00 18 60.00 6.00
8 Karvali
Total 4 18 60.00 6.40 18 60.00 6.40

Proposed target

structures
Sr.
Village
No Type of structures Storage
name Area to Storage Area to Area to Storage
. capacit
be capacity(i Estimate be Estimated be capacity(i Estimate
No. No. y (in
irrigate n 1000 d cost irrigate cost irrigated n 1000 d cost
1000
d (ha) Cmt) d (ha) (ha) Cmt)
Cmt)
9 Regama Dugwell recharge - - - - 2 - - 0.40 0.40
Total 2 - - 0.40 0.40
Proposed target
S. structures
Village
No Type of structures Storage Storage
name Area to be Storage Area to be Area to be
. Estimated capacity Estimated capacity(i Estimated
No. irrigated capacity(in No. irrigated irrigated
cost (in 1000 cost n 1000 cost
(ha) 1000 Cmt) (ha) (ha)
Cmt) Cmt)
10 Fali Dugwell recharge - - - - 3 - - 0.60 0.60
Total 3 - - 0.60 0.60

Proposed target

S. structures
Village
No Type of structures
name Storage Storage Area to Storage
. Area to be Area to be
capacity(i Estimate capacity Estimated be capacity(i Estimate
No. irrigated No. irrigated
n 1000 d cost (in 1000 cost irrigated n 1000 d cost
(ha) (ha)
Cmt) Cmt) (ha) Cmt)
Checkdam - - - - 1 9 40.00 3.00 9 40.00 3.00

11 Kolsana
Total 3 9 40.00 3.40 9 40.00 3.40
Proposed target
structures
Sr. Village Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
12 Kasal Dugwell recharge - - - - 2 - - 0.40 0.40
Total 2 0.40 0.40

Proposed target
structures
Sr. Village Storage
1000 Cmt) 1000 1000 Cmt)
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Cmt)
13 Kalibel Dugwell recharge - - - - 2 - - 0.40 0.40
Total 2 0.40 0.40
Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
Major activities of the SHGs
Names of
Sr. No. Average annual income from
Villages Name of activity No. of SHGs involved
activity per SHG
Animal Husbandry 1 0.48
Vermi compost 1 0.50
Baj dalia Machine 1 0.45
Washing Powder 1 0.72
1 Kalmoi
Crop demonstration 10 0.408
Drip irrigation 1 1.80
Horticulture 7 3.60
Pasture Development 6 0.36
2 Khodamba
Baj dalia Machine 1 0.45

Jari Udhyog 1 0.70
Horticulture 7 3.60
Baj dalia machine 1 0.45
Farm machinery 1 1.20
3 Patal Washing Powder 1 0.72
Horticulture 7 3.60
Mandap decoration 1 1.50
4 Uteva
Horticulture 7 3.60
Mandap Decoration 1 1.50
Nursery 1 1.20
5 Titoi
Bajdalia machine 1 0.45
Masala Udhyog 1 0.75
Gruh Udhyog 1 0.70

Horticulture 7 3.60
Nursery 1 1.20
6 Amba
Horticulture 7 3.60
Nursery 1 1.20
7 Pardi Jari Udhyog 1 0.70
Horticulture 7 3.60
Jari Udhyog 1 0.70
8 Karvali
Horticulture 7 3.60
9 Regama Animal Husbandry 1 0.48

catering set 1 1.20
Farm machinery 1 1.80
Horticulture 7 3.60
Nursery 1 1.20
10 Fali
Horticulture 7 3.60
11 Kolsana Crop demonstration 10 0.408
Horticulture 7 3.60
12 Kasal Mandap Decoration 1 1.20
Jari Udhyog 1 0.70
Nursery 1 1.20

Horticulture 7 3.60
Pasture development 6 0.36
13 Kalibel Crop demonstration 10 0.408
Horticulture 7 3.60
Pasture development 6 0.36

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target
Ridge area Drainage line Nursery Land Crop Pasture Total
S. Name of treatment treatment raising development demonstrations development Estimated
No. villages cost (Rs.
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a)Ha. (b) (a) (b) (a)Ha.. (b)
In lakhs)
1 Kalmoi - - 5 2.5 - - 11 3.20 10 0.20 6 0.06 5.96
2 Khodamba - 11 9.25 - - 17 3.30 25 0.50 25 6.77 19.82
3 Patal - - 27 15.75 - - 49 7.70 50 1.00 45 5.25 29.7
4 Uteva 1 1.50 22 18.50 - - 44 13.15 50 1.00 50 7.10 41.25
5 Titoi - - 19 11.25 1 2.00 41 12.45 35 0.70 45 1.92 28.32
6 Amba - - 23 40.50 1 2.00 39 13.50 50 1.00 45 3.77 60.77
7 Pardi - - 10 7.75 - - 43 15.00 25 0.50 20 3.225 26.475
8 Karvali - - 13 12.50 1 2.00 34 11.95 25 0.50 25 4.20 31.15
9 Regama - - 18 10.75 - - 42 12.85 30 0.60 45 4.85 29.05
10 Fali - - 21 11.50 - - 34 11.80 30 0.60 25 3.87 27.77
11 Kolsana - - 10 5.75 - - 14 3.90 10 0.20 5 1.38 11.23
12 Kasal 1 1.50 9 4.75 1 2.00 31 5.40 35 0.70 20 3.65 18.00
13 Kalibel - - 6 2.75 - - 22 6.80 30 0.60 20 1.62 11.77
Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs) Table no.

40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*
Executing
Type of treatment Type of land Target
agency
Estimated cost Expected
Villag No. of (Rs. in lakh) month &
Sr. Name of (i) (ii) (iii) (i) UG
e (iii) (i) (ii) units year of
No. structures Ridge Drainage Others (ii)SHG
name Land Pri- Commu (No./ completio
area line (pl. (iii) Others
dev. (L) vate nity cu.m./ M W O T n
(R) (D) specify) (pl. specify)
rmt) (mm/yyyy
)
Nala plug R D - P C - UG 4 - - - 0.20 may-2012
pacca nala plug - D - - C - UG 5 - - - 2.00 Jan-2012
Gabion structure - D - P C - UG 4 - - - 1.00 Apr.-2012
Check wall - D - P C - UG 1 - - - 1.50 Apr.-2012
1 Kalmoi
may-2011-
Land levelling - - L P - - UG 5(ha) - - - 1.00
15
Dugwell may-2011-
- - L P - - UG/SHG 1 - - - 0.20
Recharge 15
Total 5.90
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Table no.40.2: Details of engineering structures in watershed
works*
Type of treatment Executing

Type of land Target
agency
(i) UG
(iii) No. of (Rs. in lakh) month &
Sr. Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG
Name of structures (iii) (i) (ii) Others units year of
No. name Ridge Drainag (iii)
Land Pri- Commu (pl. (No./ completio
area e line Others
dev. (L) vate nity specify cu.m./ M W O T n
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyy
specify)
y)
Nala plug R D- - P C - UG 10 - - - 0.50 may-2012
Gabion structure - D - P - - UG 8 - - - 2.00 Apr.-2012
Check wall - D - P - - UG 3 - - - 4.50 Apr.-2012
2 Khodamba
may-
2011-13
Check Dem - - L - C - UG 1 - - - 3.00 Jun-2013
Dugwell Recharge - - L P - - UG/SHG 3 - - - 0.60 may-2011
16.1
Total
5

Table no.40.3: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*
Executing
agency
Villa (i) UG Estimated cost
(iii) No. of
S. ge Name of (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh) Expected
(iii) (i) (ii) Others units
No. nam structures Ridge Drainag (iii) month & year
Land Pri- Commu (pl. (No./
e area e line Others of completion
dev. (L) vate nity specify cu.m./ M W O T
(R) (D) (pl. (mm/yyyy)
) rmt)
specify)
Nala plug R D P C - UG 18 - - - 0.90 may-2012
pacca nala plug - D - C - UG 15 - - - 6.00 Jan-2012
3 Patal Check wall - D - P - - UG 13 - - - 19.00 Apr.-2012
Land levelling - - L P - - UG 16(ha) - - - 3.20 may-2011
Check Dem - - L - C - UG 2 - - - 6.00 Jun-2013
Total 38.35

Executing
agency
(i) UG Estimated cost
(iii) No. of Expected
S. Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)
Name of structures (iii) (i) (ii) Others units month &
No. name Ridge Drainage (iii)
Land Pri- Commun (pl. (No./ year of
area line Others
dev. (L) vate ity specify cu.m./ M W O T completion
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
Nala plug R D P C - UG 17 - - - 0.85 may-2012
pacca nala plug - D - C - UG 12 - - - 4.80 Jan-2012
4 Uteva
Staggered Trench R - - - C - UG 1 - - - 1.50 Dec-2013
Check Dam - - L - C - UG 2 - - - 6.00 Jun-2013
Total 31.75
M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Executing
agency
(i) UG
(iii) No. of Estimated cost Expected
S. Village Name of (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)
(iii) (i) (ii) Others units month &
No. name structures Ridge Drainag (iii)
Land Pri- Commu (pl. (No./ year of
area e line Others
dev. (L) vate nity specify cu.m./ M W O T completion
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
5 Titoi Check wall - D - P - - UG 6 - - - 9.00 Apr.-2012
22.1
Total
0

Executing
agency
Estimated cost Expecte
(i) UG (Rs. in lakh) d month
(iii) No. of
S. Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG & year
Name of structures (iii) (i) (ii) Others units
No. name Ridge Drainag (iii) of
Land Pri- Commu (pl. (No./
area e line Others complet
dev. (L) vate nity specify cu.m./ M W O T
(R) (D) (pl. ion
) rmt)
specify) (mm/yy
yy)
may-
Nala plug R D - P C - UG 10 - - - 0.50
2012
Apr.-
Gabion structure - D - P - - UG 20 - - - 5.00
2012
Apr.-
6 Amba Check wall - D - P - - UG 5 - - - 7.5
2012
may-
2011
may-
Dugwell Recharge - - L P - - UG/SHG 2 - - - 0.40
2011
28.7
Total
0

Executing
agency
(i) UG
S. Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy
specify)
)
7 Pardi Check wall - D - P - - UG 4 - - - 6.25 Apr.-2012
Total 19.80

Executing
agency
(i) UG
S. Village Name of (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
8 Karvali Check wall - D - P - - UG 4 - - - 5.50 Apr.-2012
22.8
Total
5

Executing
agency
(i) UG Estimated cost
(iii) No. of Expected
S. Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)
Name of structures (iii) (i) (ii) Others units month &
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
9 Regama
Total 21.60

Executing
agency
(i) UG
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy
specify)
)
10 Fali
Total 22.40

Name of Executing
structures agency
(i) UG
Village (i) (ii) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)
name Ridge Drainag (iii)
S. Land Pri- Commu (pl. (No./ year of
area e line Others
No. dev. (L) vate nity specify cu.m./ M W O T completion
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
11 Kolsana Check wall - D - P - - UG 2 - - - 3.00 Apr.-2012
11.0
Total
5

Executing
agency
(i) UG Estimated cost Expected
S. Village Name of (i) (ii) (ii)SHG
(iii) (i) (ii) Others units year of
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy
specify)
)
Nala plug R D L P C - UG 10 - - - 0.50 may-2012
pacca nala plug - D L - C - UG 11 - - - 4.40 Jan-2012
12 Kasal Check wall - D - P - - UG 3 - - - 4.50 Apr.-2012
Staggered Trench R - - - C - UG 1 - - - 1.50 Dec-2013
14.7
Total
5

Executing
agency
(i) UG Estimated cost Expected
area e line Others
(R) (D) (pl.
) rmt) (mm/yyyy
specify)
)
13 Kalibel
Total 895

Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
Executing
agency
(i) UG
Name Name of Expected
S. (i) (ii) (iii) (iii) (ii)SHG Estimated month &
of structure/
No. Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others Area No. of cost year of
village work
area line dev. Private Community (pl. (iii) (ha) plants completion
Others (Rs. in
(R) (D) (L) specify) lakh) (mm/
(pl. yyyy)
specify)
Farm
- - L P - UG,SHG 2000 0.06 march2012
1 Kalmoi forestry
Total 2000 0.06

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name of
S. Name of (i) (ii) (iii) (iii) (ii)SHG Estimated month &
structure/
No. village Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii) Area No. of cost year of
work
area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others (ha) plants (Rs. in completion
(R) (D) (L) specify) (pl. lakh) (mm/
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
wasteland - - L - C - UG,SHG 1 1.30
2012
plantation
Farm
2 Khodamba - - L P - UG,SHG 5000 0.15 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
Total 2 5000 1.475

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
No. Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii) Area No. of cost year of
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
3 Patal - - L P - UG,SHG 20000 0.60 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 2 0.05
development 2013
Total 4 20000 3.25

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
4 Uteva - - L -P - UG,SHG 15000 0.45 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 2 0.05
development 2013
Total 4 15000 3.10

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
- - L P - UG,SHG 20000 0.60 Feb-2011
forestry
5 Titoi
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
march-
Gramvatika - - L - C - UG,SHG - 1 2.00
2012
Total 3 20000 3.925

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
- - L P - - UG,SHG 15000 0.45 Feb-2011
forestry
6 Amba
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
march-
2012
Total 3 15000 3.775

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
7 Pardi - - L P - - UG,SHG 10000 0.30 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
Total 2 10000 1.625

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
- - L P - - UG,SHG 15000 0.45 Feb-2011
forestry
8 Karvali
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 2 0.05
development 2013
march-
2012
Total 4 15000 3.80

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
9 Regama - - L P - - UG,SHG 20000 0.60 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 2 0.05
development 2013
Total 4 20000 3. 25

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
10 Fali - - L P - - UG,SHG 5000 0.15 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
Total 2 5000 1.475

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
11 Kolsana - - L P - - UG,SHG 2000 0.06 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
Total 2 2000 1.385

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
- - L P _ - UG,SHG 10000 0.30 Feb-2011
forestry
12 Kasal
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 2 0.05
development 2013
march-
2012
Total 4 10000 3.65

Executing
agency
(i) UG Expected
Name Name of
of structure/
village work
specify) yyyy)
Common
march-
2012
plantation
Farm
13 Kalibel - - L P - - UG,SHG 15000 0.45 Feb-2011
forestry
Pasture march-
- - L - C - UG,SHG 1 0.025
development 2013
Total 2 15000 1.775

Table no.42.1: Details of allied / other activities
Executing
Type of land Target
agency
S. Name of (iii) Estimated Expected month
Name of activity (i) UG
No. village (i) (ii) Others cost & year of
(ii)SHG
Private Community (pl. (Rs. in completion
(iii) WC
specify) lakh) (mm/yyyy)
Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%)
Animal husbandry Private - - WC/WDT 0.80 Dec-2011-15
Vermi compost Private Community - WC/WDT 0.60 Dec-2011-15
Baj daliya Machine Private - - WC/WDT 0.10 Dec-2011-15
Washing Powder Private 0.25 Dec-2011-15
1 Kalmoi
Crop demonstration plot Privte 0.20 Dec-2011-15
Drip irrigation Private - - WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
Horticulture Private - - WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
Pasture Development Private Community - WC/WDT 0.15 Dec-2011-15
Total of Microenterprise and Production systems: 2.60 lakhs
Livelihood Activities for landless people. (10%)
Animal husbandry Private WC/WDT 1.50 Dec-2011
Goatry Unit Private - - WC/WDT 0.40 Dec-2012
1 Kalmoi Vocational Kit
Mistry/ Carpenter work Private - - WC/WDT 0.03 Jun-2011
Hand pump repairing kit Private WC/WDT 0.05 Dec-2012
Total Livelihood Activities for landless people: 1.98 lakhs

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
S. Name of (iii)
Name of activity (i) UG Estimated Expected month &
No. village (i) (ii) Others
(ii)SHG cost year of completion
Private Community (pl.
(iii) WC (Rs. in lakh) (mm/yyyy)
specify)
Washing Powder Private WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
Jari Udhyog Private WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
2 Khodamba
Crop demonstration WC/WDT
Private 0.50 Dec-2011-15
plot

Cycle Private - - WC/WDT 0.04 Dec-2012
Trolley Private - - WC/WDT 0.10 Jun-2011
Animal Husbandry Private - WC/WDT 4.20 Jan-2011
Goatry Unit Private - WC/WDT 0.40 Dec-2012
2 Khodamba Vocational Kit
Hand pump repairing Private WC/WDT
0.10 Dec-2012
kit
Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT 0.40 Jun-2011

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
S. Name of (iii) Estimated
Name of activity (i) UG month &
No. village (i) (ii) Others cost
(ii)SHG year of
Private Community (pl. (Rs. in
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Farm Machinery Private WC/WDT 2.00 Dec-2011-15
3 Patal Washing Powder Private WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
Crop demonstration plot Private WC/WDT 1.00 Dec-2011-15
Pasture Development Private Private - WC/WDT 1.12 Dec-2011-15
Tea Trolley Private - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2012
3 Patal Vocational Kit
Hair cutting Kit Private WC/WDT 0.25
Hand pump repairing kit Private WC/WDT 0.05 Dec-2012
Cycle repairing Private WC/WDT 0.40 Jun-2011

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
S. Name of (iii) Estimated Expected
No. village (i) (ii) Others cost month & year
(ii)SHG
Private Community (pl. (Rs. in of completion
(iii) WC
Mandap Decoration Private - - WC/WDT 0.80 Dec-2011-15
4 Uteva

4 Uteva Goatry Unit Private - WC/WDT 0.40 Dec-2012
Stitching Machine Private WC/WDT 0.10
Vocational Kit

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
(ii)SHG
(iii) WC
Mandap Decoration Private - - WC/WDT 0.80 Dec-2011-15
Nursery Raising Private - - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2011-15
Baj dalia Machine Private - - WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
Washing Powder Private - - WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
5 Titoi
Masala/ Papad Udhyog Private - - WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
Gruh Udhyog Private - - WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
Crop demonstration plot Private - - WC/WDT 0.70 Dec-2011-15

Cycle Private - - WC/WDT 0.05 Jun-2011
Trolley Private - WC/WDT 5.70 Jan-2011
Animal Husbandry Private - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2012
5 Titoi
Stitching Machine
Vocational Kit Private - - WC/WDT 0.09 Jun-2011
Mistry/ Carpenter work Private WC/WDT 0.25
Hair cutting Kit Private WC/WDT 0.15 Dec-2012

Hand pump repairing kit Private WC/WDT 0.20 Jun-2011
Beauty Parlour Kit Private - - WC/WDT 0.04 Dec-2012
Total Livelihood Activities for landless people 6.68 lakhs

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
(ii)SHG
(iii) WC
Nursery Raising Private WC/WDT 0.40 Dec-2011-15
6- Amba

6 Amba
Goatry Unit Private - WC/WDT 2.60 Dec-2012

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
(ii)SHG
(iii) WC
Mandap Decoration Private WC/WDT 1.20 Dec-2011-15
Nursery Raising Private WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2011-15
7 Pardi Jari Udhyog Private WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
Vocational Kit
7 Pardi
wiring kit Private WC/WDT 0.10 Dec-2012
Cycle Repairing Kit Private WC/WDT 0.40 Jun-2011

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
(ii)SHG year of
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Jari Udhyog Private WC/WDT 0.90 Dec-2011-15
8 Karvali
stiching machine Private - - WC/WDT 0.10 Jun-2011
8 Karvali Vocational Kit
Cycle Repairing Kit Private WC/WDT 0.40 Jun-2011

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
(ii)SHG year of
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Catering Private WC/WDT 0.50 Dec-2011-15
9 Regama Farm machinery Private WC/WDT 2.00 Dec-2011-15
Livelihood Activities for landles s people. (10%)
stitching machine Private - - WC/WDT 0.10 Jun-2011
Goatry Private - WC/WDT 0.80
Vocational Kit
9 Regama
Private WC/WDT Jun-2011
Cycle Repairing Kit 0.40
Handpump repairing Private WC/WDT 0.05

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
(ii)SHG
(iii) WC
Nursery Raising Private - - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2011-15
Baj dalia Private WC/WDT 0.30 Dec-2011-15
10 Fali
Drip irrigation Private - WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2011-15
Trolly Private - - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2012
Sugarcane juice machine Private - - WC/WDT 0.20 Jun-2011
10 Fali

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
(ii)SHG year of
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
11 Kolsana Crop demonstration plot Private WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2011-15
11 Kolsana
Vocational Kit
Fish ring net Private WC/WDT 0.03

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
(ii)SHG year of
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Animal husbandry Private - - WC/WDT 2.40 Jan-2011
Mandap decoration Private - - WC/WDT 0.40 Jan-2011
Vermi compost Private Community - WC/WDT 1.50 Dec-2012
Jari Udhyog Private - - WC/WDT 0.30 Jan-2011
12 Kasal
Crop demonstration plot Private WC/WDT 0.70 Jan-2011
Drip irrigation Private - - WC/WDT 0.25 Dec-2012
Horticulture Private - - WC/WDT 0.50 Dec-2012
Pasture Development Private Community - WC/WDT 0.50 Jun -2011
Vocational Kit

Executing
Type of land Target
agency
Expected
(ii)SHG year of
(iii) WC completion
specify) lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
13 Kalibel Crop demonstration plot Private WC/WDT 0.60 Dec-2011-15
Goatry Private - WC/WDT 0.20 Dec-2012
13 Kalibel
Sugarcane juice machine Private - WC/WDT 0.30 Jan-2011
Vocational Kit

Livelihood Intervention
Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect of empowerment. Although it is
extremely difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both
on-farm and off-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster of villages are motivated to
take part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.
Advantages of Agro-Based Activities:
While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages because of the following reasons:
1. Target groups are acquainted with most of the basic skills.
2. Easy access to inputs.
3. No problems of marketing, as most of the outputs are locally consumed as food.
4. As over 50-60 % of the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy
capital investment.
5. Risk of failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances of success
are high.
6. Infrastructure required for promotion of on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in
backward regions, which are deprived of regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap all
the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income generation
activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable interventions to
enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve post production management of the produce through grading,
storage, processing and marketing. Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list of micro-
enterprises taken up by various SHGs is presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, Khakhara making
units and food processing. However, over a period of time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supercede the trade as man y

Individuals participate in enhancing their production at the family level and try to organize themselves to market them collectively. Other
activities such as production of utility items, construction related activities, handicrafts and Moti work & Machi work for sarees (Hand work)
find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketing infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.
Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-enterprises
Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.
1. Motivation of the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers

2. Formation of Self Help Groups and their Federations
3. Gender sensitization
4. Training and capacity building
5. Micro-finance. Provision of credit facilities and linkage with banks
6. Development of infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing
7. Trade networking and establishment of market outlets
8. Village level Information Centre:
The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for development of various
enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination of technologies, procurement of inputs, Training of members and establishment
of linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the Entrepreneurs as and when needed. The selected
production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they should be:
(1)economically viable
(2)environmentally sustainable
(3)socially equitable
(4)energy efficient
(5)employment generation

Production System -1: Goatry Unit (Boer Unit)
The Boer goat is a large framed animal with mature weights between 260-380 lbs. for males and 210-265 lbs. for females. The
potential for growth is outstanding. Under intensive performance tested conditions, males averaged 80 lbs. at 3 months of age; 160 Lbs. at 8
months; 222 Lbs. at 12 months; 257 Lbs. at 18 months; and 313 Lbs. at 25 months. Females averaged 63 Lbs. at 3 months; 139 Lbs. at 12
months; 165 Lbs. at 18 months; 220 Lbs. at 24 months.
The Boer goat is capable of attaining an average daily gain of over 400 gr. or 0.88 Lbs. daily in feed lot situations. The Boers
average daily gain potential on pasture or rangeland is outstanding and offers great possibilities for selecting to improve growth rates.
The Boer goats dressing weight percentage is over 50%. Comparead to South African sheep, the Boer goat had the higher
dressing percentage with carcasses having more total tissue in the fore arm, neck and ventral trunk, and less tissue in the hind limb.
Boer goats seem to yield a carcass superior to Angora, dairy and over meat goats and that fat content and muscling of Boer goat
carcasses compared favourably with those of specialized mutton producing breeds.
Thus, it is not surprising that with their excellent growth and carcass qualities many well known goat specialists listed the Boer
goat as one breed that could make a major contribution to increasing productivity of meat goats worldwide.
A good meat goat should also be fecund and prolific. More kids born per doe will result in greater profit margins for the
producer. The ovulation rate for Boer goats ranges from 1 to 4 eggs per doe with a mean of 1.7 (plus or minus .9). A normal kidding rate of
200% is common for the Boer goat. This is higher than most other goat breeds, thus the Boer goat can be considered a prolific breed. This
conclusion was also reached in New Zealand and Australia, based on the number of super ovulated embryos (9) harvested from the Boer goat
donor program.
The Boer goat reaches puberty early, usually about 6 months of age for males and 10-12 months for first-mating females. The
Boer goat has an extended breeding season and it is possible to achieve 3 kidding every 2 years.

Boer goats give good milk, which enables them to successfully raise their multiple offspring with excellent weight gains and with
little pre-weaning mortality. A South African study indicated that lactation length was 120-140 days for Boer goats and their yield was about
half that of South African, which had a lactation length of 278 days. Boer goats had a higher butterfat (5.6%), total solids (15.7%), and lactose
(61) than any other goat breeds in South Africa. It has been postulated that for the Boer goat to attain its high pre-weaning average daily gain,
the doe must produce up to 5.5 Lbs./day. Actual milk production of Boer goat does under extensive management systems is actually less,
ranging from 3.3 to 5.5 Lbs./day, depending on age of doe and lactation number. These milk yields are not impressive by dairy goat standards
but for a goat that has not been selected for milk yield, it is considered excellent. This demonstrates the superior maternal capabilities and the
ability to rear multiple young of the Boer goat doe.
Production System - 2: Vermi composting unit for Project villages

Introduction:
The wide spread problems of soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the
project village large populations of domestic animals producing large amounts of organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste materials’,
can be transformed more quickly and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application. Nutrients within vermi-
composted material are readily available to plants, and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil structure and fertility or used as good
quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth media. The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise
spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and 0.3 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in
between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20
- 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the
matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.

Objectives
• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture.
• To promote production of vermi-castings as a viable small business venture
About The Worms
Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into
manure. The worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally
suited to locations / units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six
weeks lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the
multiplication of worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be
separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed.
Location
All villages of Vad project have lots of animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source of livelihood.
Vermicompost is very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit
area.
Market/Use
Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot
culture and in home gardens. Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost. Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other
manures and fertilizer so by the use of compost we can reduce the use of chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also
improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil.

Components of A Commercial Unit
Sheds
Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use of concrete pillars because this will act as a
source of income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting of beds due to rain on a windy day. While designing the
sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labour attending to fill and harvest the beds.
Vermi-beds
Scientific bed size proposed here is 10ft by 3 ft by 2.5 ft. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a
uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width should
not be more than 4.5 ft to allow easy access to the centre of the bed.
Land
About 500 square ft of land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one super structure
to cover the 10 beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for
compost production. Land can be taken from Gram panchayat on lease of at least 10-15 years.
Seed Stock
This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m 3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.
Fencing
The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on
the length of the periphery of the farm.
Water Supply System
We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of
conveying and applying the water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply
and saving on water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational

costs on hand watering and proves economical in the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of
water supply chosen.
Machinery
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to
the vermi-sheds, loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary
implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost.
Table: 42.iv Model of a Vermi-compost Unit (10 ft *3 ft *2.5 ft)
S. No Particulars Quantity Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Construction of bed 10 (Rs.)
6000 60000
2 Erection of shed
A Cost of Polls (8 ft * 5) +(10 ft* 5) =10 10 25 2250
B Cost of iron angle (16 ft * 5) + (40 ft *2) = 7 7 42 6720
C Nylon roof matting 1008 sqr ft 40 40320
D Labour charge + Transport - - 7000
3 Cow dung @ 275Kg per bed *10 bed 2750 0.35 960
4 Agri waste @ 70 kg per bed *10 bed 700 0.50 350
5 Worms 1.5 kg per bed *10 bed 15 300 4500
6 Tools - - 2000
7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) - - 2000
8 Miscellaneous - - 2000
9 Water canal on periphery - - 1420
10 Remaining cost for 1 year ( 8 cycle) - - 20480
Total cost 150000

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting
Benefits
1. Sale of vermin compost of 40 tones @ Rs.3500/- per ton 40*3500=1,40,000 Rs

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 300per kg 200*300=60,000 Rs
3.Total 2,00,000 Rs/-
Net benefit 50,000Rs/-
Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK which can be divided in to two categories and shown below.
A. Theoretical
• Introduction to Organic Farming
• Need and the importance of Organic farming
• Introduction to Composting methods
• Vermi-culture
• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection
• Vermi-castings
• Vermi-compost
• Marketing Avenues
• Application of vermicomposting
• Addresses of the suppliers of worms.

B. Practical
• Production Methods
• Raw Materials
• Site and the type of Infrastructure
• Tank
• Vermi-bed
• Harvest
• Quality Analysis
• Storage & Packaging
• Dos and Don’ts
Production System – 3 Washing Powder (Detergent) & Soap Making

Detergent powder and washing Soap are daily routine use things. Two materials for detergent powder is based on Acid Slurry
(Petrolium Product). The use of detergent powder is increased day to day. This enterprise can be started as Home made enterprise and there
is also a scope for large scale industry.
Market and market linkage:
The production can be achieved at block level and district level also. Any co-operatiive agency or Organisation does not sell this
Product so Market linkage is necessary for this product which will be created by manufacturer.

Predictions:
1) This enterprise can be installed at district head quarter. On this basis rental cost can be estimated.
2) Manufacturer can start this enterprise with 4 persons.
Manufacturing Process :
CMC, Acid Slurry, Sodium Silicate etc. can be used for the manufacturing of detergent washing Powder. Mixture of this material is changed in
soponification. After the process, the product can be cut in various in sizes and manufacturing stamp will be punched on the product.
Detergent Powder:
Different types of powder, colours, Slurry and powder is mixed and mixture is shaked well. After grading this powder, packing is done.
Production Capacity :
The daily production capacity of Detergent soap is 100 Kg and production capacity of detergent powder is 70 Kg.
Permission :
No need of any kind of permission.
Land/infrastructure:
About 300 to 400 Sq. Ft. room is needed for this enterprise.
Plant/machinery/instruments etc.

Sr. No. Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)
1 Foot operated machine for 1 10000
soap making
2 Soap Cutting machine 1 3000
3 Dies for soap making 4 5000
4 Iron Kadai-Capacity for 150 Kg 2 6000
5 100 Kg capacity weighing 1 Set 3000
Machine
6 Other instruments like bowl, 5000
tray etc.
7 Detergent powder machine 1 14000
8 Furnace cost for soap 4000
Total 50000

Sr. No. Particular Price (Rs.)
1 Plant/machinery/instruments etc. 50000
2 Office, furtniture etc.
Table, Chair, Cupboard, etc. 10000
So Total Capital Investment 60000
3 Operating Cost :
Raw material like Rajan, Costic Soda, Sodium Silicate, 40000

Acid Slurry, Washing Soda, Sodium Sulphate, Try
Sodium Phosphate, CMC, Sodium Diborate, Colours,
Smail & fuel etc.salary, power expenditure etc.
Total Cost 100000
Production Cost :
1 Row material 26000
2 Salary Cost(4 persons) 2500
3 Power Consumption Cost 300
4 Bank Installment with interest 2300

5 Packing Cost 700
6 Depreciation Cost 400
7 Repairs, Storage and useful thing cost 300
8 House rent 600
9 Other Cost 300
Total 33400
Total Selling (Monthly)

Detergent washing soap, 2500 Kg X Rs. 9 22500
Detergent Powder 1700 Gm X Rs. 8 13600
Total 36100
Cost Benefit Ratio
Total Selling 36100
Total Expenditure 33400
Total Benefit 2700

Production System – 4 Nursery Raising
For women and man to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and
market. The essence to empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new
opportunities for them to earn higher income in order ton improve their standard of living. This objective could be accomplished by
establishing enterprises that are based on the locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each
with 20 members, will be motivated and proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of
their own lives as well as the lives of those around them.
Production Capacity
B) Land/Infrastructure :
start his activity in his own land by using Approx. 900 Sq. Mt. carpet area.
Sr. Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)

No.
Nursery Raising
1 permanent protection cover with 40000.00
fencing
2 New Bed 40 5000.00
3 water facility/water tank/pipe line 85000.00
4 Other instruments 5000.00
Total : - 135000.00
Grand Total :- 135000.00

Production Cost (Years)
1 Begs purchasing (20 x 30) 16600.00
2 Soil and fertilizer 16800.00
3 Seeds 2600.00
4 Maintenance 15000.00
5 Soil and fertilizer back filling begs 10200.00
6 Cleaning to Beds 10000.00
7 Water and Electric facility 45000.00
8 Marketing/transporting 23800.00
Total : - 140000.00
Total Production (in Per year)
1. Yearly production 20000.00 nos. x 20.00 Rate / nos. 400000.00
Cost Benefit Ratio (Yearly)
Yearly income 400000.00
Production Cost 140000.00
Total yearly income will be Rs. 260000.00

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project
villages, and the scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by
the near by villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries.
Production system – 5 Sewing Machine & Stitching

For women and man to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and
market. The essence to empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new
opportunities for them to earn higher income in order to improve their standard of living. Demands for cotton textile and readymade
garments are on the rise in the state. Incentive Plan was envisaged to step up measures like charting upgraded designs, supplying looms and
ancillary inputs, building up centres complete with facilities conducive to the trade, assistance in advertisement and marketing etc.
To empower and create opportunities for empowerment in the project villages by creating a new skill, which mainly is a Sewing
machine to make a tailoring work. We have statutory organisation engaged in promoting and developed tailoring work to village’s womens in
the rural areas, thereby strengthening the rural economy of the district. If undertakes activities like skill improvement, transfer of technology,
research & development, marketing, etc., in the process of generating employment/self-employment opportunities in rural areas. Training will
be provided by our selected training organisation about 30 womens. This Project under women’s are making a pillow cover, Blanckets (Razai),
and embroidered dress, saries and other clothe veriaty etc.
This Project also make creative and designing clothes for childrens and ledies and this project to very usefully to village’s
women become a successful entrepreneur.
This objective could be accomplished by establishing enterprises that are based on the locally available resources and referably
indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 20-30 members, will be motivated and proper training will be provided for each
micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of their own lives as well as the lives of those around them.

Market
Field survey findings indicated that Clothes to Surat market and Mandvi market in many people purchese. It is a big market
centre for clothes. Training got after women’s making pillow cover, blanket, embroidered dress, saries and Clothes variety etc. sale to Market.
Production Capacity
Land/Infrastructure :
A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 300 Sq. Ft. carpet area.
Stitching Machinery and Embroidery /Instruments etc.
Sr. Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)

No.
A Machinery/Instruments etc.
1 Stiching Machinery and Embroidery 4 40000
2 Row material 50000
3 Marketing and sales activities etc. 6000
4 Room facility a nd electric facility 12000
5 Other instruments 1000
Total : - 109000

B Production cost (monthly)
1 Raw Material 4000.00
2 Electric charge 1200.00
3 Room Rent 800.00
4 Other instruments 100.00
Total : - 6100.00
C Training for 3 Monthes (Syllabus) 4800.00
Total : 10900.00
Total Production (Monthly)

Embroidery work 18000.00
Dress/sari stitching 3000.00
small bag and etc. 500.00
21500.00
Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)
Monthly income 21500.00
Production Cost 10900.00
Total monthly income will be Rs. 10600.00

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project
villages, and the scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by
the near by villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries.
Training Content
A. Theoretical
• Introduction to different types
• Tools and Equipments used in embroidery
• Market development.
• Addresses of the suppliers of raw materials,
B. Practical
• Raw materials for– the quality and variety.
• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.
• Dough making and the value addition in the form of flavours.
• Cost considerations and waste reduction.

Production system – 6 Mandap Decoration
Mandap Decoration is most important in this era for marriage function, Social Occasion or festival celebration like Navratri
Mahotsav. Mandaps are used in various size and various types on these occasions. Generally Mandap means a sitting arrangement of 100 to
1000 or more persons.
Market and Market Linkage :
This enterprise works full flage on marriage or festival celebration.
Asumptions :
One big room is required to keep accessories of mandap and no training is required for this enterprise.
Benefit Capacity :
Approx. monthly income of Rs. 10000 can be obtained from this enterprise.
Need for Persmission :
No permission is needed.
Static Capital Investment :
Land/Infrastructure :
Approx. 400 to 500 Sq. Ft. space is needed. Rs. 600 monthly rental is assumed for this purpose.

Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc. :
Sr No Particular Nos Price
1 Wooden Support(Sides) 100 4000
2 Wooden Suport(Poles) 400 8000
3 Colourful cloth for ceiling 48" 1000 Mt 20000
4 Kantan for flooring 1000Mt 8000
5 Matress, Pillowsetc. 50 Sets 25000
6 Chori Set(For marriage occasion) 1 set 5000
7 Chair Set 1 Set 3000
8 Folding Staircase 2 Nos. 1000
9 Hand cart of 2 wheels 1 Nos. 4000
10 Tube lights 40 and search Lights 40 7000

11 Decorative Lights and accessories 3000
12 Ceiling and Pedstal Fan 10 10000
Total 98000
Total cost Rs 98000.00
Production Cost
Sr Particular Price
no
1 Raw Material 400
2 Salary (Average Installation Cost) 2000
3 Power Cost 200
4 Bank installment with interest 2500
5 Packing Cost
6 Depreciation Cost 800
7 Repair, Storage and other 300
8 House Rent 800
Total cost 7000

Total Income(Monthly)
Total Average Income :10000
Cost Benefit Ratio
Total Selling 10000.00
Production cost 7000.00
Income 3000.00
Other Details:
1) No training is needed for this enterprise
2) As mandap service is a business of 8 months, total bank installment is calculated as 8 month basis.
Machinery/ Instruments/Dies-tools manufacturers/Distributions.

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
Target
Name(s)
Sr. CPR Activity Target area Estimated Expected no.
of the
No. particulars proposed under the expenditure of
villages
activity (ha) (Rs.) beneficiaries
- - - - -
1 Kalmoi
- - 0 0 -
Total for project
2 Khodamba Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 500
Pasture Silvi
1 0.025 1000
land Pasture
Total for project 2 1.325 1500
3 Patal Wasteland Plantation 2.60 1020
Pasture Silvi
0.05 800
land Pasture
Total for project 2.65 1820
4 Uteva Waste land Plantation 2 2.60 1345
Pasture Silvi
2 0.05 1200
land Pasture
5 Titoi Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 987
Pasture Silvi
1 0.025 776
land Pasture
Gram
Waste land 1 2.00 1243
Vatika
6 Amba Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 567
Pasture Silvi
1 0.025 454
land Pasture

Gram
Vatika
7 Pardi Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 534
Pasture Silvi
1 0.025 435
land Pasture
8 Karvali Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 1211
Pasture Silvi
2 0.05 1090
land Pasture
Gram
Vatika
9 Regama Waste land Plantation 2 2.60 1435
Pasture Silvi
2 0.05 1345
land Pasture
10 Fali Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 767
Pasture Silvi
1 0,025 567
land Pasture
11 Kolsana Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 145
Pasture Silvi
1 0,025 250
land Pasture

12 Kasal Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 1234
Pasture Silvi
2 0.05 1345
land Pasture
Gram
Vatika
13 Kalibel Waste land Plantation 1 1.30 532
Pasture Silvi
1 0,025 425
land Pasture
4.4 s Capacity building and Institutional collaboration

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration of a wide range of farmers’ organizations as well as
extension and research institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better
information flows and encourages mutual learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample
opportunities for members to share complementary expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to
produce, traders and consumers information, and education institutions to test their joint efforts to make a difference. Watersheds can be also
a good ground for learning and demonstration of expertise.
Scope of capacity building at Project Villages

Income Generation Activities
Stitching
Food Processing
Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management
Crop Information

Meteorological Information
Alternative Land Use Plan
Improved and Scientific agriculture practices
Scientific planning of Soil and Moisture conservation
Information dissemination on Audio/Video
Dairy Development and Management
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Full Address Trainings
Name of the
Sr. with contact no., Type of Area(s) of Accreditation No. of No. of
Training Reference
No. website & e- Institute specialization details trainings trainees to
Institute Year
mail assigned be trained
Agriculture/
Krishi Vigyan Training Horticulture/
1 Vyara GOG 2011-2014 3 70
Kendra,Vyara institute Animal
Husbandry
Agriculture/
Agriculturale
Horticulture/
2 university, Navsari University GOG 2010-2014 3 40
Animal
Navsari
Husbandry
Capacity
3 BAIF,Baroda Baroda NGO building & NGO 2011-13 4 50
livelihood
Training Capacity
4 SPIPA Ahmadabad GOG 2010-14 3 30
institution building
Space Remote
5 BISAG Ghandhinagar GOG 2010-15 3 9
application sensing
Forest Social Forestry Line
6 Agro Forestry GOG 2011-14 3 34
Department Division,Surat Department
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/
Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

Total No. of
S. Project No. of training
Project no. of persons to Estimated cost
No. Stakeholders programmes
persons be trained
PIA 12 12 4 72000
WDTs 9 9 4 54000
IWMP-3
UGs 836 145 2 72500
1 (Mandvi
SHGs 324 162 4 162000
block)
WCs 132 55 10 137500
GPs 20 10 1 2000
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

Estimated expenditure Outcome
S. No. Activity Executing agency
(Rs.)
1 Street plays Local drama group 0.55
2 Video shows PIA 0.55
Wall paintings/ Focussed PIA
3 0.55 Awareness generation and
Group discussion
PIA making beneficiaries accountable
4 Pamphlets and posters 1.00 for sustainable development
PIA
5 Banners and hoardings 1.00
Total: 3.65

CHAPTER-5
BUDGET

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project
Sr no Budget component Cost requirement (in lacks)
1 Administrative costs (10%) 60.00
2 Monitoring
(2%) 12.00
3 Evaluation
4 Entry Point activity (4%) 24.00
5 Institution and Capacity Building (5%) 30.00
6 Detailed Project Report (1%) 6.00
7 Watershed Development Works (50%) 300.00
8 Livelihood activities for asset less (10%) 60.00
9 Production systems and micro-enterprises (13%) 78.00
10 Consolidation phase (5%) 30.00
TOTAL 600.00

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP
Activity
Sr Village Institution Watershed Livelihood Production
no EPA and CB DPR development for asset system and Consolidation Total
(4%) (5%) (1%) Work less Microenterprises (5%) (88%)
(50%) (10%) (13%)
1 Kalmoi 0.29 3.66 0.73 0.95 0.37 6.00
2 Khodamba 1.41 17.58 3.52 4.57 1.76 28.84
3 Patal 3.38 42.36 8.47 11.01 4.24 69.46
4 Uteva 3.33 41.58 8.32 10.81 4.16 68.20
5 Titoi 2.01 25.14 5.03 6.54 2.51 41.23
6 Amba 2.74 34.20 6.84 8.89 3.42 56.09
7 Pardi 1.68 21.00 4.20 5.46 2.10 34.44
8 Karvali 2.06 25.80 5.16 6.71 2.58 42.31
9 Regama 2.08 26.04 5.20 6.77 2.60 42.69
10 Fali 1.97 24.60 4.92 6.40 2.46 40.35
11 Kolsana 0.69 8.58 1.72 2.23 0.86 14.08
12 Kasal 1.62 20.22 4.04 5.26 2.02 33.16
13 Kalibel 0.74 9.24 1.85 2.40 0.92 15.15
Total 24.00 30.00 6.00 300.00 60.00 78.00 30.00 528.00

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement
Sr Village Total cost requirement Total funds available Gap in funds
No under IWMP requirement
1 10.83 5.63 5.2
Kalmoi
2 32.76 27.07 5.69
Khodamba
3 69.94 66.07 3.87
Patal
4 62.22 58.21 4.01
Uteva
5 43.2 38.72 4.48
Titoi
6 56.14 52.67 3.47
Amba
7 39.62 36.04 3.58
Pardi
8 47.26 43.43 3.83
Karvali
9 43.62 40.01 3.61
Regama
10 42.78 37.88 4.9
Fali
11 19.94 13.21 6.73
Kolsana
12 33.92 29.66 4.26
Kasal
13 18.38 13.4 4.98
Kalibel
Total 520.61 462 58.61

Table no.50.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
Fund made Scheme with
Level at which
available to which Reference no. of
Activity to be decision for
S. No. Village IWMP due to convergence activity/ task/
carried out convergence
convergence took place structure in DPR
was taken
(Rs. in lakh)
Land levelling 1.00 MG NREGA Table no: 40.1 PIA Level
Check wall 1.10 MG NREGA Table no: 40.1 PIA Level
1 Dugwell Recharge 0.20 MG NREGA Table no: 40.1 PIA Level
Kalmoi Livelyhood 1.25 Table no;-42.1 PIA Level
Micro enterprice 1.65 Table no;-42.1 PIA Level
Total 5.20

Level at which
was taken
(Rs. in lakh)
Land levelling 2.05 MG NREGA Table no; 40.2 PIA Level
2 Khodamba Livelyhood 1.76 Table no;-42.2 PIA Level
Total 5.69

Level at which
was taken
(Rs. in lakh)
Land levelling 0.70 MG NREGA Table no;40.3 PIA Level
3 Patal Livelyhood 1.54 Table no;-42.3 PIA Level
Total 3.89

Level at which
was taken
(Rs. in lakh)
4 Uteva Livelyhood 1.49 Table no;-42.4 PIA Level
Total 4.01

Level at which
was taken
(Rs. in lakh)
5 Titoi Livelyhood 1.65 Table no;-42.5 PIA Level
Total 4.48

Fund made Scheme with which
Level at which
available to IWMP convergence took Reference no. of
S. No. Village due to place activity/ task/
carried out convergence was
convergence (Rs. structure in DPR
taken
in lakh)
6 Amba Livelyhood 1.85 Table no;-42.6 PIA Level
Total 3.47

Level at which
S. No. Village IWMP due to convergence took activity/ task/
convergence (Rs. place structure in DPR
taken
in lakh)
7 Pardi Livelyhood 1.59 Table no;-42.7 PIA Level
Total 3.59

Level at which
taken
in lakh)
8 Karvali Livelyhood 1.48 Table no;-42.8 PIA Level
Total 3.83

Fund made Scheme with which
Level at which
available to IWMP convergence took Reference no. of
S. No. Village due to place activity/ task/
convergence (Rs. structure in DPR
taken
in lakh)
9 Regama Livelyhood 1.46 Table no;-42.9 PIA Level
Total 3.60

Level at which
taken
in lakh)
10 Fali Livelyhood 1.58 Table no;-42.10 PIA Level
Total 4.89

Level at which
taken
in lakh)
Dugwell Recharge 0.40 MG NREGA Table no: 40.11 PIA Level
Crop Horticulture Dept PIA Level

11
demonstration 0.20 Table no: 42.11
Kolsana
Drip Irrigation 0.26 Horticulture Dept Table no: 42.11 PIA Level
Livelyhood 1.31 Table no;-42.11 PIA Level
Total 6.72

Level at which
taken
in lakh)
12 Kasal Livelyhood 1.58 Table no;-42.12 PIA Level
Total 4.26

Level at which
taken
in lakh)
13 Kalibel Livelyhood 1.26 Table no;-42.13 PIA Level
Total 4.98
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

Name of Type of agreement signed Financial contribution
S. Private Sector Partnership Expected
c) Any other Private Comments
No. Partner a)MoU b)Contract IWMP Interventions Outcomes
Agency (pl. specify) sector

Chapter -6
EXPECTED OUTCOMES

6.1 Expected Outcomes
6.1.1 Employment
This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the user communities. Employment opportunities
will be created to the people living in the watershed through different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self
employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal
husbandry and enterprise development.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:
Wage employment Self employment
S. Names of
No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
NO. Villages
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total
1 Kalmoi 0 214000 0 139100 214000 0 86 0 56 86 0 4 0 3 4
2 Khodamba 0 586000 0 380900 586000 0 746 0 485 746 0 37 0 24 37
3 Patal 4578 1023422 0 668200 1028000 7 1509 0 985 1516 0 75 0 49 76
4 Uteva 0 853000 0 554450 853000 0 1065 0 692 1065 0 53 0 35 53
5 Titoi 0 699000 0 454350 699000 0 544 0 354 544 0 27 0 18 27
6 Amba 0 840000 0 546000 840000 0 709 0 461 709 0 35 0 23 35
7 Pardi 0 690000 0 448500 690000 0 553 0 359 553 0 28 0 18 28
8 Karvali 4683 674317 0 441350 679000 5 648 0 424 653 0 32 0 21 33
9 Regama 3500 663500 0 433550 667000 4 768 0 502 772 0 38 0 25 39
10 Fali 0 646000 0 419900 646000 0 493 0 320 493 0 25 0 16 25
11 Kolsana 0 478000 0 310700 478000 0 99 0 64 99 0 5 0 3 5
12 Kasal 0 548000 0 356200 548000 0 1125 0 731 1125 0 56 0 37 56
13 Kalibel 0 436000 0 283400 436000 0 252 0 164 252 1 13 0 8 13
Total 12761 8351239 0 5436600 8364000 15 8595 0 5597 8613 1 428 0 280 431

6.1.2 Migration
WSD can open up new opportunities for households to both intensify and extensify production, for example through:
• Increasing the frequency of cultivation – new water harvesting structures often permits cultivation of a second crop, or ‘lifesaving’
irrigation of a main crop.
• Adopting new technologies, such as improved varieties of staple crops, higher levels of input use and higher yields; shifts to the
cultivation of higher value crops in the project areas expected.
• Expansion of cultivated areas – soil and water conservation interventions can bring new land into production.
All of the above tend to generate increased demands for labour. These may be provided initially from farm family sources and
subsequently by hired labour.
Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned below will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area
No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration
Sr. No. Names of villages
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 Kalmoi 20 5 120 30
2 Khodamba 10 3 90 30
3 Patal 19 5 120 30
4 Uteva 24 5 120 60
5 Titoi 30 10 60 30
6 Amba 16 5 90 30
7 Pardi 23 15 120 30
8 Karvali 20 5 120 60
9 Regama 10 3 60 30
10 Fali 12 3 90 30
11 Kolsana 14 3 60 30
12 Kasal 12 5 60 30
13 Kalibel 15 7 60 30
6.1.3 Ground water table

As demand for groundwater has gone up, rapid urbanization and land use changes have decreased drastically the already low
infiltration rates of rainfall into the soil and have diminished the natural recharging of aquifers. The ground water table thus has depleted over
the years. Substantial opportunities exist for groundwater recharge and water harvesting to supplement water supplies in the all village. In
order to improve the ground water situation it is necessary to artificially recharge the depleted ground water aquifers. The available

techniques are easy, cost-effective and sustainable in the long term. Many of these can be adopted by the individuals and village communities
with locally available materials and manpower. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks will be constructed to increase
ground water table from 10-12 mt to 7-8 mt in open well and 80-100mt to 65-75 mt in bore well in the post project period.
Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in Feet)
Expected Increase/decrease
S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level
(Post- Project)
17-18 ft 21-25ft
Kalmoi, Khodamba, Patal,
Uteva, Titoi, Amba, Pardi, Open wells
1
Karvali, Regama, Fali,
Kolsana, Kasal, Kalibel Bore wells 25-30 ft 30-40 ft

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water
Availability of drinking water
Quality of drinking water
Names of (no. of months in a year)
Comments
Villages Expected Post-
Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project
project
1 Kalmoi 9 12 Potable Potable -
2 Khodamba 9 12 Potable Potable -
3 Patal 10 12 Potable Potable -
4 Uteva 8 12 Potable Potable -
5 Titoi 8 12 Potable Potable -
6 Amba 9 12 Potable Potable -
7 Pardi 10 12 Potable Potable -
8 Karvali 9 12 Potable Potable -
9 Regama 8 12 Potable Potable -
10 Fali 10 12 Potable Potable -
11 Kolsana 10 12 Potable Potable -
12 Kasal 9 12 Potable Potable -
13 Kalibel 10 12 Potable Potable -
6.1. 5: Crops
Due to additional availability of water in new structures, farmers will be able to grow vegetable crops during non rainy seasons.
Even after taking rainy season and post rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also. Most
farmers with large families will prefer to grow vegetables, as the crops need timely availability of human labour to harvest and encash the
market potential. The planned earthen bunds would preserve some moisture in the soil. Also the proposed soil and water conservation
activities will bring more areas under cultivation. New agricultural practices, new technology, organic farming etc will be demonstrated in the
villages. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season
of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas
Sr No. Pre-project Expected Post-project
Name of
Name of crops Average Yield per ha
village Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha)
(qtl)
1 Kharif
Juvar 212.46 480.09 212.46 600
Tuver 225.86 88.68 225.86 150
Paddy 42 382.14 42 425

Kalmoi
Rabi
Juvar 11.6 725 11.6 800
Tuver 6 391.67 6 425
Groundnut 2.00 600 2.00 635
2 Kharif
Juvar 18.81 314.73 18.81 375
Tuver 14.77 124.92 14.77 225
Paddy 7.2 625.00 7.2 675

Khodamba
Rabi
Juvar 4.4 536.36 4.4 600
Tuver 3.8 381.58 3.8 415
Groundnut 5.40 494.44 5.40 525

3 Patal Kharif
Juvar 316.92 202.86 316.92 365
Tuver 128.08 136.24 128.08 200
Paddy 69.04 215.53 69.04 250
Rabi
Juvar 17.2 168.6 17.2 200
Tuver 4.8 350.00 4.8 400
Groundnut 58.92 217.58 58.92 275
4 Uteva Kharif
Juvar 109.26 283.91 109.26 300
Tuver 86.6 210.62 86.6 260
Paddy 113.4 506.04 113.4 550
Rabi
Juvar 8.8 587.5 8.8 630
Tuver 3.6 416.67 3.6 450
Groundnut 9.60 479.17 9.60 515
5 Titoi Kharif
Juvar 131.52 1543.99 131.52 1600
Tuver 116.51 1807.91 116.51 1830

Paddy 47.6 1196.11 47.6 1235
Rabi
Juvar 22.82 1064.42 22.82 1100
Tuver 1.6 531.25 1.6 580
Groundnut 1.80 1886.11 1.80 1915
6 Amba Kharif
Juvar 105.16 300.7 105.16 350
Tuver 85.18 416.47 85.18 460
Paddy 12.08 633.28 12.08 700
Rabi
Juvar 2.68 395.5 2.68 435
Tuver 4.8 1187.50 4.8 1200
Groundnut 9.60 590.63 9.60 630
7 Pardi Kharif
Juvar 65.76 146.29 65.76 200
Tuver 67.88 600.32 67.88 650
Paddy 36.8 187.77 36.8 215
Rabi
Juvar 6 260 6 300

Tuver 1.6 531.25 1.6 600
Groundnut 1.60 500 1.60 550
8 Kharif
Juvar 101.76 294.81 101.76 325
Tuver 109.26 100.77 109.26 150
Paddy 107.1 406.63 107.1 450

Karvali
Rabi
Juvar 15.6 892.31 15.6 915
Tuver 2.4 500.00 2.4 550
Groundnut 0.60 666.67 0.60 700
9 Kharif
Juvar 14.04 1403.13 14.04 1450
Tuver 250.5 492.61 250.5 545
Paddy 144.54 415.96 144.54 465

Regama
Rabi
Juvar 23.54 151.57 23.54 200
Tuver 1.6 581.25 1.6 600
Groundnut 0.80 875 0.80 900
10 Fali Kharif

Juvar 208.42 171.86 208.42 215
Tuver 211.65 627.45 211.65 700
Paddy 97.2 164.20 97.2 200
Rabi
Juvar 11 348.18 11 390
Tuver 6.2 1209.68 6.2 1260
Groundnut 8.40 314.29 8.40 375
11 Kolsana Kharif
Juvar 48.6 329.84 48.6 380
Tuver 27.72 146.65 27.72 200
Paddy 16 341.25 16 400
Rabi
Juvar 14 216.43 14 300
Tuver 8 256.25 8 300
Groundnut 14.80 270.27 14.80 315
12 Kharif
Juvar 82.49 2169.96 82.49 2200

Kasal
Tuver 38.66 549.41 38.66 600
Paddy 4.28 350.05 4.28 400

Rabi
Juvar 5.52 693.84 5.52 740
Tuver 8 937.50 8 1000
Groundnut 26.32 95 26.32 200
13 Kharif
Juvar 99.2 958.67 99.2 1000
Tuver 87.01 323.5 87.01 400
Paddy 80.16 181.64 80.16 240

Kalibel
Rabi
Juvar 10.24 295.9 10.24 350
Tuver 6 1166.67 6 1200
Groundnut 8.00 315 8.00 360

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture
Area under horticulture proposed to be
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha)
covered through IWMP
1 Kalmoi 0 23
2 Khodamba 0 8
3 Patal 3 8
4 Uteva 3 6
5 Titoi 0 15
6 Amba 5 1
7 Pardi 7 13
8 Karvali 5 13
9 Regama 1 3
10 Fali 0 4
11 Kolsana 0 5
12 Kasal 4 7
13 Kalibel 3 9

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed
1 Kalmoi 10 28
2 Khodamba 2 8
3 Patal 1 4
4 Uteva 3 10
5 Titoi 0 2
6 Amba 0 3
7 Pardi 1 4
8 Karvali 1 4
9 Regama 0 2
10 Fali 0 3
11 Kolsana 0 3
12 Kasal 0 2
13 Kalibel 0 4

6.1.8 Livestock
The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep. The interventions like
provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy
development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from
them.
Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project area

(For fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
Pre-Project Expected Post-project
Nam of
Sr. No. Type of Animal Yield Remarks
Village No. Yield (ltr) Income No. Income
(ltr)
Milch-animals -
Cow(Per animal/day) 13 4 18 25 4 20 -
1 Kalmoi Buffalo(Per animal/day) 16 3 27 35 5 30 -
Animals for other purpose -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 10 100 25 100 -
Milch-animals -
2 Khodamba Buffalo(Per animal/day) 236 3 27 265 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 275 100 300 100 -
Milch-animals -
3 Patal Buffalo(Per animal/day) 268 3 27 275 5 30 -
Animals for other purpose
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 10 100 25 100 -
Milch-animals -
4 Uteva Buffalo(Per animal/day) 327 3 27 390 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 7 100 55 100 -

Milch-animals -
5 Karvali Buffalo(Per animal/day) 1292 3 27 1330 4 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 4 100 35 100 -
Milch-animals -
6 Amba Buffalo(Per animal/day) 90 3 27 135 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 0 0 45 100 -
Milch-animals -
7 Pardi Buffalo(Per animal/day) 104 4 27 160 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 0 0 50 100 -
Milch-animals -
8 Karvali Buffalo(Per animal/day) 370 3 27 390 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 7 100 30 100 -
Milch-animals -
9 Regama Buffalo(Per animal/day) 229 4 27 260 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 139 100 200 100 -
Milch-animals -
10 Fali Buffalo(Per animal/day) 125 4 27 170 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 70 100 250 100 -
Milch-animals -
11 Kolsana Cow(Per animal/day) 12 3 18 60 5 20 -
Buffalo(Per animal/day) 48 4 27 80 5 30 -

Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 5 100 50 100 -
Milch-animals
12 Kasal Buffalo(Per animal/day) 235 4 27 290 5 30 -
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 227 100 300 100 -
Milch-animals
Buffalo(Per animal/day) 198 4 27 230 5 30 -
13 Kalibel
Goat (Meat;Rs/kg) 4 100 50 100 -
Linkages
The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to
deliver the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)
Backward linkages
Seed certification
Patal Seed supply system

1
Project Fertilizer supply system
Pesticide supply system
Credit institutions

Water supply
Extension services
Nurseries
Tools/machinery suppliers
Price Support system
Labour
Any other (please specify)
Forward linkages
Harvesting/threshing machinery
Storage (including cold storage)
Road network
Transport facilities
Markets / Mandis
Agro and other Industries
Milk and other collection centres
Labour
Any other (please specify)

Logical Framework Analysis
Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact

Village Institution  Formation of  One Watershed  Project can be
Formation Watershed Committee each implemented and  Unity and
Committee, User village managed in a prosperity in the
Group  Number of User group democratic and village
depending on the participatory way management.
coverage of particular ensuring equity.  People's
intervention Participation and
positive perception
Strengthening  Organise training  awareness camps to  Quality of towards the
Village Institutions and awareness be organized. management of programme
programme for common resources
Village institutions  trainings and improved.
exposure visits UGs
 Capacity building and WCs to be held  Quality of
workshops and distribution of
exposure visits User  Capacity building benefits between
Group and workshops to be people improved.
Watershed organised
Committee  Increased
 1 Federations of UGs awareness amongst
 Failitating and and WC to be formed women about
monitoring the village resources.
functioning of UGs
and WCs  Women
participation
 Strengthen linkages enhanced in
between UGs and decision-making of
WCs and Panchayat GVCs.

Institutions
 Involvement of
 Gender sensitisation youth and children
of UGs and WCs to in village
increase development
inclusiveness of increased.
samuh decision-
making.
 Sensitise village
communities to
involve children and
youth in
development.
Fund Management  Improve  UGs and WCs  Purpose, frequency

management and operating bank and volume of use
utilisation of UGs account and of the fund
and WCs. managing resources enhanced.
on their own
 Prepare  Volume of funds
communities to generated for UGs
explore other and WCs from
sources of income other sources of
for UGs and WCs. income increased.
Ecological  Protection,  Common and private  Fodder availability  Better Ecological

Restoration treatment and lands to be brought from common and order in the area
regeneration of under new private lands

common and private plantations and agro- increased
lands horti-forestry like
Neem, Adusa,  Accessibility to  Increase in the
 Protection, prosopis, Banyan and common and forest proportion of
treatment and Peepul lands increased households having
regeneration of with removal of more security of
forest lands  Forest lands to be encroachments and fodder
brought under new resolution of
plantations and conflicts
 Plantation of fruits protection  Reduction in
and forest species drudgery of fodder
 Trainings, exposure and fuel collection,
 Impart trainings, visits and meetings to especially women
conduct meetings be organised for
and organise communities, village
exposure visits for volunteers and staff
communities, village
volunteers and staff  Income generation
to effectively plan, intervention
execute and monitor promoted
activities
 Identification and
promotion of non-
timber forest
produce based
income generation
activities

CHAPTER - 7
QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.The system
would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows theentire state of Gujarat and all of
those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particularproject. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification,
inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-numberwise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be
accessed by the users of the system. This system is being usedfor pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available
online in the form of a database which willhelp the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area,
proposed areas for treatmentetc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project
inceptionstage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan correctivemeasures for the
project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of theproject.
Yet another component of the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff
alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the
project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT
equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitudelongitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then
transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment area is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT.
Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of
time.
Vigilance and Monitoring Committees
1. For every work sanctioned under the Scheme, there should be a local vigilance and monitoring committee, composed of members of the locality or village
where the work is undertaken, to monitor the progress and quality of work while it is in progress. The Gram Sabha will elect the members of this
committee and ensure that SC/STs and women are represented on it.
2. The Implementing Agency should apprise this committee of estimates regarding the work, time frame and quality parameters. The final report of the
committee should be attached along with the Completion Certificate of the work, and should also be placed at the next meeting of the Gram Sabha in the
Panchayat where work has been executed.
3. Local beneficiary committees may also be constituted for effective articulation of their entitlements and their access to them.
The PIA members will be responsible for ensuring that local monitoring committees/beneficiary committees are constituted.

Research support in watershed management
Watershed management requires the support of research. Watershed projects will be used as on-farm sites for research designed and
implemented with significant involvement of farmers and extension workers to produce site-specific technological solutions. This leads to problems in
adoption and up-scaling of research findings within specific watersheds. There is also the question of upscaling technologies and approaches beyond a
designated watershed. At the same time, researchers will be able to relate research activities to the real problems facing farmers or to capture the locally
developed or modified technologies. Yet there is a need to give technologies appropriate technical and scientific definition and to disseminate them widely.
Farmer organization and empowerment

The management of natural resources requires strong and effective farmer organizations. Such organizations empower farmers and create
a good foundation for the transfer, adoption and use of information on new technologies. They also help in negotiating for inputs at favorable prices.
Strong farmers’ organizations can be a conduit for services that meet felt needs. These needs include information to improve production
and marketing, credit, and demand driven approaches that ensure ownership and sustainability of interventions.
Farmers’ organization allows the use of participatory approaches that recognize local capacity and indigenous knowledge. It incorporates
the aspirations and perceptions that influence decision-making, while giving farmers an important role in planning and implementation of watershed
management activities. Such participation is important for the success, continuity and sustainability of the resource management programmes.
Often a successful watershed knits together many aspects of the people’s lives apart from purely technical issues. Many conservation and
basic group production initiatives have widened into a social movement dealing with matters such as weddings, funerals, care for the elderly and the
disadvantaged, and other issues in the community.
The initial natural resources focus also widens into a set of integrated activities such as the improvement of houses, provision of water and
electricity, acquisition of improved tools, seeds and livestock, all in the name of watershed management.
Empowerment of farmers therefore allows farmers to demand services and to ensure the continued role of the state in supporting
watershed development.
Use of traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge
Experience has shown that to effectively reach the farmers and to create viable watershed management options, it is important to respect
indigenous knowledge and combine it with the formal modern science and technology. Local traditional institutions should be part and parcel of the
process. For instance, there is a lot of under-used indigenous knowledge about climate, soils, biodiversity and other production conditions that confront
farmers. A lot of research findings are abstract to extension providers and farmers alike. Such findings need to be married with indigenous knowledge and
disseminated in a language that farmers and members of traditional institutions can understand.

7.2 Plans For Project management:
The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the
village level institutes in all villages, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of
assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper
link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post
implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

Such contributions will promote feeling of “ownership” of the programme among stakeholders. This will contribute to sustainable outcomes
in the long-term. The voluntary contributions are saved in the Watershed Development Fund (WDF) that is to be used for repair, maintenance and use of
assets created on common land. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:
Table No. 61. Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF)

Sr no Financial Details Percent Contribution
1 Natural Resource Management
For General -
For SC/ST 10%
2 For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry
For General
For SC/ST 15%
It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form of voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be diverted to the WDF.
7.4 User Charges:
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during
the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed comittee (WC)
shall maintain the records of the following.

CHAPTER-8
MAP
CHAPTER – 8

Base Line MAP

Other MAPS

Action Plan MAP


Mandvi DPR (Iwmp III)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mandvi DPR (Iwmp III)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 1

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 2

Table no. 18: Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 3

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 4

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 5

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 6

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 7

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 8

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 9

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 10

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 11

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 12

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 13

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 14

2 Khodamba 220070168200000 Khodamba 868.20 293

3 Patal 220070167930000 Patal 1111.90 715

4 Uteva 220070168340000 Uteva 993.40 630

5 Titoi 220070168350000 Titoi 647.40 419

6 Amba 220070168600000 Amba Surat 637.20 570

9 Regama 220070168190000 Regama 756.10 433

10 Fali 220070168320000 Fali 441.60 410

Total 7741.30 5000 600.00 -

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 16

cluster approach etc. The cumulative score is 96.

Table no.2: Weightage of the project

I ii Iii iv v Vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii Total

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 17

i Poverty index(% of poor to 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3)

ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20%(10) Low-less than 10% of

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 18

xi Contiguity to another 10 Contiguous to Contiguity within the Neither contiguous to

xii Cluster approach in the 15 Above 6 micro – 4 to 6 micro 2 to 4 micro watersheds

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 19

5C1A4a1g, 5C1A4a1f, 5C1A4a1e,

Other Projects / Scheme running in the project area:-

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 20

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 21

1 Khodamba 5C1A4a1g 200 10.200 7.30 71.57% 70%

2 Patal Patal 5C1A4a1f 200 10.200 7.15 70.10% 65%

Total 900 45.90 31.00 67.53% 68.75%

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 22

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 23

Social Forestry Division, Surat

The Organization and its Objectives:-

The Major functions of PIA:

a)To Prepare Detail Project Report.

c) To undertake community development activites.

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 24

e) To inspect and authenticate project account.

Development of the assets created during the project period.

SWOT Analysis of Social Forestry

Dedicated and experienced staff and Watershed Development Team.

Scientific plan in watershed project with the help of BISAG, Ghandhinagar.

District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee.

Well establishmed, PRIs for social audit.

Insufficient funds for complete watershed project per hectare.

IWMP-III PATAL PROJECT IN MANDVI BLOCK, SURAT 25

Project area is located for away from District head quarter.