Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Turap Baru
Turap Baru
15.00
14.00
13.00
12.00
11.00
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.25
3 0.60 0.75
4 0.70 3.00
5 1.00 3.00
6 1.60 0.75
7 3.35 0.25
8 3.35 0.00
9 0.00 0.00
1 0.00 0.50
2 0.60 0.50
1 0.60 0.00
2 3.35 0.00
1 0.00 0.00
2 0.60 0.00
Location :
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stressing of Reinforcement and Concrete
Name of Structure : Turap
Location : 0
Normal Condition Allowable compressive stress (s ca) = 60 kg/cm2
Allowable tensile stress (s sa) = 1850 kg/cm2
Allowable shearing stress (t a) = 5.5 kg/cm2
Young's modulus ratio = 24
Item Section A-A Section B-B Section C-C Section D-D
b (cm) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
A A
h (cm) 96.7 90.0 30.0 30.0
D C d1 (cm) 5.0 back 5.0 back 5.0 lower 5.0 upper
B B d2 (cm) 5.0 front 5.0 front 5.0 upper 5.0 lower
d (cm) 91.7 85.0 25.0 25.0
M (ton m) 3 3 1 2
S (ton) 3 3 3 1
D C
Bar size and spacing (mm)
Bar (As1) D 25 - 200 D 25 - 100 D 16 - 250 D 25 - 100
Section of Retaining wall Bar (As2) D 16 - 250 D 16 - 125 D 16 - 250 D 16 - 250
Stress sc 3 OK! 3 OK! 9 OK! 11 OK!
Stress ss 168 OK! 94 OK! 470 OK! 164 OK!
Stress t 0.38 OK! 0.41 OK! 1.11 OK! 0.60 OK!
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
STABILITY
S
: Turap
|e| = 0.09 m < B/6 = 0.56 m OK! |e| = 0.15 m < B/3 = 1.12 m OK!
q1 = 5.37 t/m2 < qa = 5.81 t/m2 OK! q1 = 5.79 t/m2 < qae = 5.81 t/m2 OK!
q2 = 4.47 t/m2 < qa = 5.81 t/m2 OK! q2 = 3.36 t/m2 < qae = 5.81 t/m2 OK!
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability6/35
1. Design Data
1.1 Dimensions q (t/m2)
b11 b12 b13
B = 3.35 m H = 3.00 m
L = 1.00 m (unit length)
h1 = 3.00 m h4 = 0.50 m
h31 = 0.25 m hw1 = 0.00 m hw1
h32 = 0.05 m hw2 = 0.00 m
h32 hw2
h4
1.2 Parameters h31
gw = 1.00 t/m3
Backfill soil Foundation soil Safety factor
gsoil = 1.60 t/m3 gs ' = 1.00 t/m3 (=gsat-gw) Overturning
gsat = 2.00 t/m 3 cB = 0.00 t/m 2
normal |e|<B/6=0.56m
c = 0.00 t/m2 fB = 20.00 o
seismic |e|<B/3=1.12m
f = 20.00 o
m = 0.50 (Friction coefficient) Sliding
Um = 1.00 (Uplift coefficient) normal fs > 1.50
b = 0.000 o
seismic fs > 1.25
a = 0.000 o
(for stability analysis) Reaction of foundation soil
= 12.529 o
(for structural analysis) normal qmax<qa
d = 0.000 o
(for stability analysis in normal condition, d = b) qa=qu/2
= 13.33 o
(for structural analysis in normal condition, d = 2/3 f) seismic qmax<qae
= 16.91 o
(for stability analysis in seismic condition, see Section 2.3) qae=qu/2
= 10.00 o
(for structural analysis in seismic condition, d = 1/2 f)
F = 10.204 o
( = Arc tan(Kh) ) Kh = 0.18
2. Stability Calculation
2.1 Case 1 (Normal condition, with vertical live load)
0.50
q = 0.50 t/m2 0.30
0.10
qa1
9
Pa1
Pa2 10 7
3.00 2.70
qa2 11
8
0.05
Pa3 6
0.00 12 4 5
Pw1 Pa4
0.50 0.00
1 2 3 Pp1 0.25 Pw2
Pu1
qw1 qa4 qa3 O qp1 qw2
qu2 Pu2
qu1
1.85 0.90 0.60
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability7/35
(1) Vertical Load
Cos2(f -a)
Ka =
Sin(f+d) x Sinf 2
Cos2a x Cos(a+d) x 1+
Cos(a+d) x Cosa
(for stability analysis)
a = 0.000 o
d = 0.000 o
Cos (f -a)
2
= 0.883 Sin(f+d) = 0.342
Cos2a = 1.000 Sinf = 0.342
Cos(a+d) = 1.000 Cosa = 1.000
Cos2(f+a)
Kp =
Sin(f+d) x Sinf 2
Cos2a x Cos(a -d) x 1-
Cos(a -d) x Cosa
a = 0.000 o
d = 0.000 o
Cos (f+a)
2
= 0.883 Sin(f+d) = 0.342
Cos2a = 1.000 Sinf = 0.342
Cos(a -d) = 1.000 Cosa = 1.000
Kp = 2.039
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability9/35
B 3.35
e = - X = - 1.624 = 0.051 m < B/6 = 0.558 m OK !
2 2
a) -2 With Uplift
B = 3.35 m
B 3.35
e = - X = - 1.624 = 0.051 m < B/6 = 0.558 m OK !
2 2
HR 8.247
Fs = = = 2.056 > 1.50 OK !
SH 4.011
b)-2 With Uplift
Sliding force : SH = 4.011 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 16.493 = 8.247 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.5 )
HR 8.247
Fs = = = 2.056 > 1.50 OK !
SH 4.011
16.493 6x 0.051
q1 = x (1 + ) = 5.373 t/m2 < qa = 5.811 t/m2 OK !
3.35 3.35
16.493 6x 0.051
q2 = x (1 - ) = 4.474 t/m2 < qa = 5.811 t/m2 OK !
3.35 3.35
Reaction of Foundation Soil in Case 1
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability10/35
5.373 t/m 2
- t/m 2
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability11/35
2.2 Case 2 (Normal condition, without vertical live load)
0.50
q = 0.50 t/m2 0.30
0.10
qa1
9
Pa1
Pa2 10 7
3.00 2.70
qa2 11
8
0.05
Pa3 6
0.00 12 5
Pw1 Pa4 4
0.50 0.00
1 2 3 Pp1 0.25 Pw2
Kp = 2.039
qa1 = Ka x q = 0.245 ton/m
qa2 = Ka x (h1- hw1) x gsoil = 2.353 ton/m
qa3 = qa1 + qa2 = 2.599 ton/m
qa4 = Ka x hw1 x (gsat - gw) = 0.000 ton/m
qw 1 = hw1 x gw = 0.000 ton/m
qw2 = hw2 x gw = 0.000 ton/m
qp1 = Kp x h4 x (gsat - gw) = 1.020 ton/m
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability12/35
Pw2 0.000 x 0.00 x 0.50 0.000 0.000 0.00
Pp1 -1.020 x 0.50 x 0.50 -0.255 0.167 -0.04
Total 4.011 4.59
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability13/35
(3) Stability Calculation
B 3.35
e = - X = - 1.582 = 0.093 m < B/6 = 0.558 m OK !
2 2
HR 7.659
Fs = = = 1.91 > 1.50 OK !
SH 4.011
b)-2 with Uplift Pressure
Sliding force : SH = 4.011 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 15.318 = 7.659 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.5 )
HR 7.659
Fs = = = 1.91 > 1.50 OK !
SH 4.011
SW 6xe
q1,2 = x (1 + )
B B
15.318 6x 0.093
q1 = x (1 + ) = 5.334 t/m2 < qa = 5.811 t/m2 OK !
3.35 3.35
15.318 6x 0.093
q2 = x (1 - ) = 3.811 t/m2 < qa = 5.811 t/m2 OK !
3.35 3.35
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability14/35
2.3 Case 3 (Seismic condition)
0.50
0.30
0.10
10 7
3.00 Pa1 2.70
qa1 11
8
0.05
6
Pa2
0.00 12 4 5
Pw1
Pa3 0.50 0.00
1 2 3 Pp1 0.25 Pw2
Pu1
qw1 qa3 qa2 O qp1 qw2
qu1 qu2 Pu2
1.85 0.90 0.60
Acting Load in Case 3
f = 20.00 o
a = 0.000 o
(for stability analysis) F = 10.204 o
b = 0.00 o
a = 12.529 o
(for structural analysis) (F = Arc tan(Kh) )
q = 0.00 t/m2 (for seismic condition) Kh = 0.18
Cos2(f-F-a)
Kae =
2
Sin(f+d) x Sin(f-b-F)
CosF x Cos2a x Cos(a+d+F) x 1+
Cos(a+d+F) x Cos(a-b)
a = 12.529 o
d = 10.00 o
Cos (f-F-a)=
2
0.998 Sin(f+d) = 0.500
CosF = 0.984 Sin(f-b-F) = 0.170
Cos a2
= 0.953 Cos(a-b) = 0.976
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability15/35
Cos(a+d+F)= 0.841
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability16/35
Kae = 0.724 (for structural analysis)
Cos2(f-F+a)
Kpe =
2
Sin(f-d) x Sin(f+b-F)
CosF x Cos2a x Cos(a+d-F) x 1-
Cos(a+d-F) x Cos(a-b)
a = 0.000 o
d = 16.91 o
Cos (f-F+a)=
2
0.971 Sin(f-d) = 0.054
CosF = 0.984 Sin(f+b-F) = 0.170
Cos2a = 1.000 Cos(a-b) = 1.000
Cos(a+d-F)= 0.993
Kpe = 1.216
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability17/35
b) Stability against sliding
b)-1 Without Uplift
Sliding force : SH = 5.412 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 15.318 = 7.659 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.50 )
HR 7.659
Fs = = = 1.42 > 1.25 OK !
SH 5.412
b)-2 With Uplift
Sliding force : SH = 5.412 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 15.318 = 7.659 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.50 )
HR 7.659
Fs = = = 1.42 > 1.25 OK !
SH 5.412
c) Reaction of foundation soil
2xSW
q1' = = = - t/m2 qae = - t/m2
3 x (B/2-|e|)
3.360 t/m2
- t/m2
- t/m2 - t/m2
in case, e < 0 and |e| < B/6 in case, e < 0 and B/6 < |e| < B/3
(not applicable) (not applicable)
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Stability18/35
2.4 Bearing Capacity of soil
(a x c x Nc) = 0.000
(gsoil x z x Nq) = 3.750
(b x gsoil x B x Ng) = 7.873
qu = 11.623 t/m2
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure19/35
3. Structure Calculation
3.1 Normal Condition
qa1
Pa1
2.70 Pa2
A A 0.9
qa2
0.00 Pw1 Pa4 Pw2 0.00
Pa3 B B
0.05 qw2
qw1 qa4 qa3
0.25 0.25
d = 13.33 o
a) Section A - A
h = 2.70 m
K
qa1 = ha x q = 0.241 ton/m
qa2 = Kha x h x gsoil = 2.082 ton/m
b) Section B - B
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure20/35
(2) Footing
Case 1 (with vertical live load) Case 2 (without vertical live load)
q = 0.50 t/m2 q = 0.50 t/m2
2.70 2.70
4 4
0.00 0.00
D C D C
0.05 0.05
0.25 0.25
3 1 3 1
D C D C
1.85 0.90 0.60 1.85 0.90 0.60
5
4 4
3 3 1
1
6 6
0.899 2 2
5.216 4.474 t/m2 3.811 t/m2
4.970 t/m2 4.652 t/m2
5.212 t/m2 5.061 t/m2
5.373 t/m 2
5.334 t/m2
2 2
6 6
a) Section C - C
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure21/35
b) Section D - D
Pa1 1 2 3
2.70
2.75
A A
qa1
Pa2
0.00 Pw1 Pa3 Pw2 0.00
B B
0.05 qw2
qw1 qa3 qa2
0.25 0.25
d = 10.00 o
a) Section A - A
h = 2.70 m
qa1 = Khae x h x gsoil = 2.889 t/m
No. Description Hae Y (from A-A) Hae x Y
1 0.500 x 2.700 x 0.500 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.292 0.900 0.262
2 2.700 x 0.300 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.350 1.350 0.472
3 0.500 x 2.700 x 0.100 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.058 0.900 0.052
Pa1 2.889 x 2.700 x 0.500 3.900 0.900 3.510
Total 4.600 4.297
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure22/35
(2) Footing
in case, e < B/6 in case, B/6 < e < B/3
2.70 2.70
4 4
0.00 0.00
D C D C
0.05 0.05
0.25 0.25
3 1 3 1
D C D C
1.85 0.90 0.60 1.85 0.90 0.60
4 4
3 1 3 1
in case, e > 0 ande < B/6 in case, e > 0 and B/6 < e < B/3
5 6
2 2
3.360 t/m 2
- t/m 2
4.699 t/m2
5.351 t/m2 - t/m2
5.785 t/m2 - t/m2
in case, e < 0 and |e| < B/6 in case, e < 0 and B/6 < |e| < B/3
2
2 6
6
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure23/35
a) Section C - C
b) Section D - D
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure (2)24/35
3. Structure Calculation
3.1 Normal Condition
qa1
Pa1
2.70 Pa2
A A 0.9
qa2
0.00 Pw1 Pa4 Pw2 0.00
Pa3 B B
0.05 qw2
qw1 qa4 qa3
0.25 0.25
d = 13.33 o
a) Section A - A
h = 2.70 m
K
qa1 = ha x q = 0.241 ton/m
qa2 = Kha x h x gsoil = 2.082 ton/m
b) Section B - B
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure (2)25/35
(2) Footing
Case 1 (with vertical live load) Case 2 (without vertical live load)
q = 0.50 t/m2 q = 0.50 t/m2
2.70 2.70
4 4
0.00 0.00
D C E D C
0.05 E 0.05
0.25 0.25
3 1 3 1
E D C E D C
1.85 0.90 0.60 1.85 0.90 0.60
5
4 4
3 3 1
1
6 6
0.899 2 2
5.216 4.474 t/m2 3.811 t/m2
4.970 t/m2 4.652 t/m2
4.722 5.212 t/m2 4.232 5.061 t/m2
5.373 t/m 2
5.334 t/m2
2 2
6 6
a) Section C - C
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure (2)26/35
c) Section E - E
Pa1 1 2 3
2.70
2.75
A A
qa1
Pa2
0.00 Pw1 Pa3 Pw2 0.00
B B
0.05 qw2
qw1 qa3 qa2
0.25 0.25
d = 10.00 o
a) Section A - A
h = 2.70 m
qa1 = Khae x h x gsoil = 2.889 t/m
No. Description Hae Y (from A-A) Hae x Y
1 0.500 x 2.700 x 0.500 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.292 0.900 0.262
2 2.700 x 0.300 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.350 1.350 0.472
3 0.500 x 2.700 x 0.100 x 2.400 x 0.180 0.058 0.900 0.052
Pa1 2.889 x 2.700 x 0.500 3.900 0.900 3.510
Total 4.600 4.297
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure (2)27/35
(2) Footing
in case, e < B/6 in case, B/6 < e < B/3
2.70 2.70
4 4
0.00 0.00
D C D C
0.05 0.05
0.25 0.25
3 1 3 1
D C D C
1.85 0.90 0.60 1.85 0.90 0.60
4 4
3 1 3 1
in case, e > 0 ande < B/6 in case, e > 0 and B/6 < e < B/3
5 6
2 2
3.360 t/m 2
- t/m 2
4.699 t/m2
4.030 5.351 t/m2 - t/m2
5.785 t/m2 - t/m2
in case, e < 0 and |e| < B/6 in case, e < 0 and B/6 < |e| < B/3
2
2 6
6
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Structure (2)28/35
a) Section C - C
b) Section E - E
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Re-bar 29/35
R-bar arrangement 25~200 16~250 25~100 16~125 16~250 16~250 25~100 16~250
Reinforcement As cm2 24.54 8.04 49.09 16.08 8.04 8.04 49.09 8.04
Perimeter of R-bar U cm 39.27 ok 78.54 ok 20.11 ok 78.54 ok
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Re-bar 30/35
R-bar arrangement 25~200 16~250 25~100 16~125 16~250 16~250 25~100 16~250
Reinforcement As cm2 24.54 8.04 49.09 16.08 8.04 8.04 49.09 8.04
Perimeter of R-bar U cm 39.27 78.54 20.11 78.54
Distribution bar (>As/6 and >Asmin) 16~250 16~250 16~125 16~250 16~200 16~200 16~200 16~200
Reinforcement As cm2 8.04 8.04 16.08 8.04 10.05 10.05 10.05 10.05
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Re-bar 31/35
131 67 22 212
Total 340 kg
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
Reinforcement Bar Arrangement
( Turap )
D25~200
D16~250
D16~250
3.00 D16~250
A A
D25~100 D16~125
D16~250
D16~125
D16~200 D16~200
D25~100 D C D16~250
B B 0.50
0.25
D16~250 D C
D16~200 D16~250 D16~200
3.35
concrete = 3 m3
reinforcement = 356 kg
cost estimate = 3,699,165
435558673.xls-09/02/2019
4. Wooden Pile (Not applicable for this Project)
qu = (40 x N x A) + (W x fi x li)
= ( 40 x 30.0 x 0.018 )+( 0.471 x 6.00 x 2.0 )
= 21.206 + 5.655 = 26.861 ton/pile
(safety factor : n = 3)
p x D4
I = = 2,485.0 cm4 (I : Moment of Inertia for a pile)
64
a = 0.20 E = 28 x N
Kh = a x E x D -3/4
4 Kh x D 4 22.041 x 15.0
b = = = 0.025 cm
4 EI 4 x 80,000 x 2,485.0
Kh x D 22.041 x 15.0
Ha = x d = x 1 = 13,020.22 kg
b 0.025
= 13.020 ton
(3) Allowable horizontal bearing capacity due to the stress of a pile itself
Ha = 2 x b x Ma
p x D3
W = = 331.34 cm3 ; (W : section modulus of a pile)
32
Ha = 2 x b x Ma
= 2 x 0.025 x 24,850.5 = 1,262.06 kg/pile = 1.262 ton/pile
Allowable horizontal bearing capacity acting on the pile top depend upon the allowable
stress of pile itself.
Ha 1.262
Spacing of pile = = = 0.84 m
Hr 1.503
qa 8.954
Spacing of pile = = = 0.54 m
V 16.493
qa 8.954
Spacing of pile = = = 8.11 m
Vp 1.104
Structure
Calculation formula in case of (B/6 < e < B/3) under seismic condition are corrected.
(distributed width of reaction of foundation soil)